Chapter 8 The United States is not a paper tiger, but an "old cucumber with green paint"

Ideal education without "big goals" cannot be mixed In the autumn of 2008, I went to Harbin Engineering University. There were not many people on the streets of Harbin at 9:00 p.m. Many, but they still feel quite satisfied and happy.I went to some of their key laboratories to have a look. Indeed, some projects are doing very well, and the project leaders are very young. They really dare to think and do it.In fact, in today's marketization, the Northeast is the most outdated.I went to the most prosperous Central Avenue in Harbin to see that several large commercial cities were being built there. I asked the local people where the investors came from, and they said they were all from Dalian.In fact, most of the wealthy people in Northeast China are concentrated in Dalian, and Harbin, a heavy industrial city that used to be so good, seems to have fallen behind in the economic tide. What should we do now?Fortunately, there are schools like Harbin Engineering University and Harbin Institute of Technology.Aren't these schools built in preparation for the war?As soon as the Korean War ended, the Soviet Union gave us 156 projects, most of which were in the military industry, and the Northeast became popular.Later, in 1964, it broke up with the Soviet Union, and played the "big third front", and established a large number of military enterprises centered on Sichuan.These military industries were later regarded by many people as a waste of resources and without benefits.But why don't they think about it, if infantry weapons from these industries had not been continuously transported to North Vietnam through the Chengdu-Kunming Railway, and hundreds of thousands of American troops were held there, how would there be a chance for China and the United States to ease later?I remember that in 1995, Song Yichang said something like this in the "Strategy and Management" magazine: One railway dragged down two superpowers.Justin Yifu Lin seemed to be there when he said this. He was pursuing "comparative advantage" at that time, and he believed that China should use cheap labor and market resources to start over from processing trade.I think he didn't understand the benefits of strategic industries that Song Yichang talked about at that time. This is a question of the structure of one's heart, a question of whether there is a "big goal".I remember that Wang Xiaodong also asked Lin Yifu whether the economic model of "comparative advantage" considered the issue of national security. At that time, Lin Yifu did not answer directly.

We should be grateful to history, and we should be gratified that there is such a national legend as Harbin Engineering University.Today these industries are what China can desperately use at the most critical moment.At this point, we would like to thank a few people, including Lee Teng-hui and Chen Shui-bian, without them for promoting "Taiwan independence", these old foundations of China might really be smashed by others.Later, why did the United States suppress Chen Shui-bian and play the role of detente on the cross-strait issue? Wasn't it just using the Taiwan issue to test China's public opinion?

Before the 2008 Taiwan general election, I went to the front line in Fujian. I was really worried when I went there, but at the same time, I was relieved that the mental state of the soldiers there was not bad.Because after all, it is rarely influenced by the market economy.Some troops are stationed in ravines. Although the commanders and fighters always complain when talking about economic life, they are still very excited when talking about fighting.In fact, they knew very well in their hearts that people would only value their social status after the war.But the time should not be too long. If it takes too long, the hearts of the people will be scattered, and the talents will be lost slowly.

In fact, this makes many patriotic young people very anxious. Some people criticize the military for corruption on the Internet. In fact, thinking about it the other way around, their unhappiness is also a kind of unhappiness that hates iron but not steel. Perhaps a country's "big goal" was gradually formed in a "war crisis", and to put it bluntly, it was forced out.Although some people follow the West and clamor for "China Threat Theory", and we ourselves call it "Peaceful Rise" and so on, at least how to avoid and contain war is also a factor that cannot be ignored.Numerous facts have proved that the heirlooms of "doing business with swords" formed in the West for hundreds of years will not be discarded. ,is it possible?This is actually opportunism!

The 2006 Shanghai Jiaotong University Hanxin gang that was exposed by the media, and a certain type of armed helicopter of ours, all happened when we wanted to do things.In fact, the same issue applies to poisoned milk. If the matter of poisoned milk is pursued in depth, is it because someone wished to stipulate that our milk standards should be formulated in accordance with EU standards?According to that standard, do we have good pastures with high protein content as in the EU?The standard is high, there is no raw material, so we have to fake it.At the beginning, how many media were advocating that "integration with international standards" was a sign of China's rise, but now that melamine is out, they criticize it with a high profile of "social conscience".To put it bluntly, the source of many things is opportunism, not thinking clearly about how China will go in the future and what kind of big goals it has.Chips and helicopters are the same. Your industry is to produce vests and pants, and you want to ask for good things in high-tech products. Is that possible?

The country has been aware of this problem since 2002, and the slogan of industrial upgrading and independent innovation came out. However, after more than 20 years of "literary and artistic accent" and opportunism, the situation is so forced that there is no way out, and it has to be supported by investment in the short term. People, so they put together a patchwork report to report that they innovated. Later, the leaders thought it was good, but the leaders didn’t know, so let’s mass-produce it. Once mass-produced, the bottom line came out. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is the Eight-Power Allied Forces. Something spelled out.

... There are many such things, and young people will slowly replay the original chess step by step like a new chess player, and find out the mistakes step by step. In the end, they will definitely find that the real problem lies in: there is no "" big goals". For such a large country, it should at least fight a commercial war, and a commercial war must be backed by military equipment, and military equipment must have an industrial foundation.Such a simple logic, can't young people see it?Therefore, if there is no "big goal", the so-called ideal education for young people cannot be mixed.

Beware of being thrown into the dungeon forever by others After you have a "big goal", you can go back and examine your own essence little by little, and find out your relative position in the world. In August 2008, regarding the conflict between Georgia and Russia, I did a program on Phoenix TV called "Threesomes".Before the show, Dou Wentao was putting on makeup there, and asked what we should say, and I said that old cucumbers were painted with green paint, and that too professional military technology was meaningless.He was very curious and asked what was going on.I said: From a military point of view, Russia is an old cucumber without green paint, and the Americans are old cucumbers with green paint. In fact, they are both old cucumbers in essence.After finishing the program, the buddies from the Academy of Military Sciences immediately sent me a text message saying: You Song Xiaojun finally said what we dare not say!

Why?Because after the Cold War, although the Soviet Union collapsed, the United States is actually half disabled and cannot afford to spend so much military expenditure to continue playing. The United States and the Soviet Union signed an anti-missile agreement in 1972. At that time, after the high-growth economic prosperity in the 1960s, the West finally experienced an economic recession.It's you raking in money, I raking in money, and in the end both of them can't rake in.As a result, the two big bosses who were fighting for hegemony sat together and talked about such an anti-missile treaty, that is, the two sides can only build two ballistic missile defense systems near the capital.At that time, China and the United States and the Soviet Union were both at odds, so in 1964 Mao Zedong decided to do it himself, called "640 Project".Later, in 1978, the "640 Project" was discontinued, and now many young military fans still feel very sorry when they talk about the "640 Project".Although they didn't know that the country was indeed in difficulties at that time, they could feel the momentum when China had "big goals".On the other hand, right now we seem to be too soft, lacking the boldness that a newborn calf is not afraid of a tiger.

At the end of 2001, Bush Jr. tore up the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and played with the global ballistic missile defense system.Although most of this system uses "off-the-shelf goods", it is chip technology-using IT technology that was blown up during the Clinton era.But after all, Russia has been a big country and had big goals. Putin immediately realized that this problem is very serious. This is a way to put the Russian nation into a dungeon forever.In other words, once the United States engages in "anti-missile defense", it will greatly limit Russia's last trump card - nuclear weapons.So Russia tried every means to contain the "anti-missile" thing even if it took Georgia as a knife.

The Americans didn't do very well in Vietnam, hundreds of thousands of people and a lot of money got stuck there.At that time, Americans needed "detente" more than anyone else. Nixon had no choice but to go to China to carry Zhou Enlai's coat.They found that the conflict between China and the Soviet Union was severe in 1969, and they realized that pulling China to deal with the Soviet Union would definitely work, because the Soviet Union was on the rise at that time.In fact, if you look at the rise and fall of the British Empire, this technique is often used. The 1972 event can be said to be a practice after the United States obtained the British "truth".Originally, if the Soviet Union had quit Afghanistan in 1979 and developed slowly, the Americans would not have turned the plate of the Vietnam War so quickly.Later, the Americans pulled China, and the Soviet Union fell into Afghanistan and completely collapsed.After these rounds of tossing, the United States after the Cold War couldn't bear it anymore. It fought Iraq, dismembered Yugoslavia, and finally got stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan.Therefore, the United States and Russia are old cucumbers in terms of national strength.From a military point of view, the United States can only adopt a method of painting green paint. This kind of green paint is an excessive exaggeration of information warfare. Information warfare is everywhere. In fact, it is an extension of IT technology in the Clinton era. This is not the same as the economic IT bubble It is obviously a bubble, but the United States keeps advocating military affairs, and its real purpose is to obtain a strategic buffer.They do this firstly to cover up their old cucumber faces, and secondly to induce countries like ours that have not yet completed industrialization to follow suit. The most interesting thing is that a lieutenant general sat next to me in a meeting. He said that he had seen military exercises in so many countries. Only the big screen in the Chinese military exercise command post was the most advanced. What else is he doing? Battlefield Internet cafes, these things are also full of military TV dramas. Before the mechanization is completed, it is completely an information war, which is a bit too much.I was very touched when I heard it. After all, he was a company commander who served in the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, so I can tell the truth. Russia knows best that the United States is an old cucumber with green paint, because they have always been rivals. Russia’s attitude is like this: I know you are an old cucumber. If you paint some green paint, you will not dare to ram in front of my house. If you are far away, let’s find I may not be able to practice you in a central place, because you have one more layer of green paint than me, but you are definitely useless if you are close.This is not the case in China. After the 1990s, I learned from others, and then began to use overwhelming information warfare. I bought countless computers. Watching the exercise screens are all information warfare. You have not yet completed mechanization. "Information first" is a bit early, right?Playing information warfare is no substitute for mechanization.Information warfare only amplifies the energy of mechanization, and cannot determine the outcome of a war. But now you go to the counter of military books in bookstores, and most of them are about information warfare.If you are misled by the United States and follow the "green paint of the new cucumber", you can do nothing.In terms of industry, you can just make vests and pants, and you don’t need to mechanize. You can win the war in Internet cafes?This way of thinking has had a profound impact on China, not only at the military level, but also at the industrial and economic level. Now that the economic crisis has come, everyone has come to their senses. On the day of the Olympic opening ceremony, Russia beat Georgia, and everyone was dumbfounded, because Georgia’s information warfare equipment was equipped by the United States, including the Humvee convoy, satellite communication encryption system, and identification friend or foe system.The U.S. assistance is mainly to add information warfare to old equipment, such as using anti-aircraft missiles bought from Ukraine, modifying the identification friend or foe system, and shooting down the Russian Tu-22 bomber.However, Russian tanks don’t even have GPS, and Russia only has 17 global positioning satellites. They can’t afford to launch satellites without money, and they can’t locate them. They don’t know where the tanks are going.However, the Russian army used a particularly traditional method of warfare to rush over and surround the city of Gori, Georgia, and surrounded Tskhinvali, the capital of South Ossetia, and Georgia surrendered.Just such a division and siege, and won, everyone has nothing to say.As for trendy words such as information warfare, people in the general staff can think about it. They are all idealistic, but military operations consider pragmatism and focus on winning. Regardless of idealism, why not fight?The "dissuasion strategy" of the United States scares those who dare not fight. Some of our scholars keep saying that China is not good, that China is too far behind, so it cannot confront the Americans now.I would like to ask a question: Since it cannot confront, what should Taiwan do if it really becomes "independent"?If the U.S. intervenes in accordance with their "Taiwan Relations Act" and protects Taiwan clearly, will we just watch Taiwan become "independent"?In fact, this is impossible, because once Taiwan becomes "independent", the legitimacy of the regime will be gone.Under such circumstances, the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China finally said "information warfare based on mechanization", which is forcing you.The report of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has a special chapter on national defense construction, which talks about the "compound development of mechanization and informatization", but the original popular view seems that information warfare represents everything.At the same time, it can also be noticed that during Taiwan's "general election" in 2008, many young people on the Internet said that if Taiwan became independent, it would be resolved by means of war. This is also a deterrent.Public opinion deterrence is a brewing process, and the key is to break the American lie that "information warfare is invincible".The military strength of a country is not just weapons and equipment. In the case of limited weapons and equipment capabilities, it is also important to have the courage to fight a protracted war. The "big goal" after the error correction strategy After having a "big goal", a country will carefully examine its own capabilities and current situation, and know how to take each step, so it will be steadfast. At the same time, it will be able to work hard to explore the situation of its opponents.Many young people in China give advice to the military on the Internet, and slowly they will find out where the crux of the problem lies.Looking at modern history, Japan has fought a military war and a commercial war in less than 100 years. How could the Japanese dare to think about it, but the Chinese would not dare to think about it with so little land, resources and population?After the British Industrial Revolution, Japan was the first country in Asia to complete industrialization. Of course, they transferred their warlike bushido spirit to commercial warfare, and now they have become the second largest country in the world in terms of economic output.It is impossible for us to become like Japan. Our agricultural society is too developed and comfortable, but we have been bullied after industrialization. If we want to change the unfair world order, we must have the mentality of a real big country.Now it seems that the mention of "the rise of great powers" depends on the economy, but look at what kind of economy China is. This financial crisis can be seen clearly. People don't want our things, and we have a wave of migrant workers returning home, shouting "" In line with international standards", in fact, it is a processing factory for others.Now seeing the coffin, did you shed tears?Are you still messing around like this?I think young people don't want to just mess around like this.In addition to some domestic real problems, changes in the external environment are the biggest stimulus to young people, and eventually they will find out what makes them really unhappy.Late-developing countries count as one, just look at Iran and Venezuela.It is impossible to modernize without mobilizing young people and addressing what upsets them.If you don't fix it, sooner or later they will figure it out on their own. Young people will one day understand that China is a gherkin in terms of industrialization.Looking at the larger historical trajectory, although China is an old cucumber from the perspective of feudal society, from the perspective of industrialization, the Germans, Russians, and Japanese are moving faster than us. They are middle-aged, and we are still young and energetic. vigorous.As long as we grow steadily, there will always be a day when we will succeed.For example, when the "Shenzhen VII" went to the sky, the Americans hoped that the Chinese spacecraft would one day transport them in space, because after 2010, the American space shuttle would not be able to fly, and their spacecraft had not yet been produced.During the Cold War, the United States was in its prime, but the United States was too aggressive and spent a lot of money. The space shuttle is a good thing, but it can’t last.Of course, time is really tight now, especially with the outbreak of the financial crisis, the economic "trial and error" of the Americans has shocked the world. China originally wanted to walk on the shoulders of others, but now the shoulders have collapsed. What should I do?The most important thing is that they have experienced two capitalist economic crises and know that the crises may lead to war, so the United States has never forgotten to build the sword in its hand, which is the heirloom of the British Empire-doing business with a sword.Bombing Yugoslavia and attacking Iraq are all "doing business with a sword."And the ballistic missile defense system is like this, because you have nuclear weapons in your hands, which is equivalent to having a desperate gas tank. The missile defense system they develop will eventually make your gas tank unable to light.At that time, if you challenge others with a gas tank, they will ignore you.The reason is very simple. Many young people who like the military can see that they are just anxious, so they are not happy when encountering these things. The history of this kind of unhappiness is not long. In the first 30 years, we were quite optimistic for a long period of time.In the first 30 years, I felt that it was not possible. The development model had to be changed, and the goal had changed. It was called open introduction (large-scale chemical projects have been introduced since the early 1970s).The introduction of material culture must be attached to spiritual culture.We envy other people's material culture first, then we will naturally worship other people's spiritual culture.There is nothing wrong with the introduction of material culture along with spiritual culture.But why did the Japanese, Germans, and even the Soviets import a lot of Western chemical, mining machinery, and automobile technology (including military technology) during the Western economic crisis in 1929? Why did their culture not change?It was because I had a big goal at that time—I introduced your technology to surpass you in the future, so the culture did not change with you, the culture was still Russian culture, and I only introduced material culture.Although the Soviet Union disintegrated later, this "history of a powerful country" is worth pondering.But we didn't have this gate at that time, and it was all good for others when we introduced it. In the early 1980s, things like toad mirrors and bell-bottom pants were a cultural introduction. It is impossible not to sing "Turandot" if you have put on toad mirror and bell-bottom pants.It's too late to worship, and the goal of catching up with others has long been forgotten.Now with the increase of processing trade, I found that most of the profits are taken away by others. My son’s father and mother in a foreign company are very happy, but they don’t know that the child is being wronged by foreigners.There is a backlog of such grievances, and everyone will naturally think of big goals.This situation was more obvious in the 1920s and 1930s, because it was close to the Opium War and the Sino-Japanese War, especially after the September 18th Incident in 1931 and the Japanese occupation of Beijing and Shanghai in 1937. Things just popped up.Otherwise, how could young men and women who could have lived a good life as white-collar workers go to Yan'an?Those young people from Tsinghua University and Peking University who went to Yan'an, through personal experience, later became the main force of the new China's heavy chemical industry and military industry in the early days of liberation. The "big goal" they worked hard for was forced out of reality. They are present in the current "two bombs and one satellite".Now we say that the "big goals" at that time led to the later "Left" aggressiveness and made people's lives too miserable, but this cannot be a reason for not setting "big goals". In 2008, after a series of events happened, as time went by, it was probably the beginning of the gradual formation of the "big goal" that had been corrected. No scaremongering: The worst outcome of a financial crisis is war Postmodern capitalism is a very standard model played by the West. I have already mentioned the means by which it suppresses other countries.And in this case, I think China's role is double, it is not only the place where the West's industries are transferred, that is, the place where the low-end manufacturing industry is transferred, but also a goal for the West to destroy your independent industries and military industry.The reason why the West has not been destroyed immediately is because it is not sure, and if it is not sure, it will continue to test.In the past 60 years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, the situation has been exactly half-and-half. It turned out that the first 30 years were desperately preparing to directly confront the West. According to Liu Liqun's words, it was "struggling for strength in military warfare." heavy industry.This part is precisely the part that the West will destroy in the future, but we have actually destroyed a lot of this part ourselves, but we still have some roots, including the recent "Shenzhen VII", nuclear weapons and so on.The transfer of industries from the West to China is in line with the operating laws of the entire post-modern Western model. They hope to transfer some low-end industries to you, and take advantage of your cheap labor, cheap land, and cheap resources and environment.At the same time, on this basis, let you start to accept their financial tools again, for example, through financial tools such as the stock market and various funds, one is to suck away China's manufacturing profits, and the other is to crush China's independent industrial sector. Under such circumstances, China has become an uncertain factor, that is, industrial transfer and financial instruments. China seems to be doing well, but the West wants to destroy part of it.Since the Taiwan Strait crisis in 1995, the part of us that the West wanted to destroy has been forced to be strengthened.From the perspective of interests, this has become a game between two things within the Chinese people, that is, whether to be independent or dependent.Of course, on the surface, no one dares to say the latter. After all, this is what countless Chinese martyrs have pursued with their lives and blood since 1840. However, in reality, the various forces are competing fiercely.For example, after the Wenchuan Earthquake, people discovered that China's economy has been developing rapidly for so many years, and its achievements have been brilliant. Why can't it even develop and produce helicopters by itself?The few military helicopters that were left were flying very carefully.Premier Wen said that seeing the rented helicopters “stings my heart”—from a technical point of view, the flying skills of those helicopters for maritime rescue are far superior to those used by the military. This is because we do not have helicopters, not personnel quality issues.Otherwise, how could our fighter pilots adapt in such a short time during the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea?The most important point is that more people and young people have seen that it is not feasible for a big country to follow a path of dependent industrialization.Now the opportunity has come, the financial crisis broke out, first of all Russia's attitude has changed.Now Russia may sell us the military industry technology that they spared no expense to build back then, and some industries in the West, especially in Europe, are almost unable to support it, including CNC machine tools, engines and other technologies.But look now, how many experts thought of these things when they said "buy the bottom"?They also discuss in the media every day whether they should buy US bonds.As a big country with unfinished industrialization, a big country that claims to rise and change the unjust and unreasonable political and economic order of the world, how come no elites have thought of such a great opportunity?But looking at what young people are discussing on the forum, I can't wait to make a list of technology "buying the bottom".Young people have a new knowledge structure, but it is the Western culture of "the strong prey on the weak" and the maximization of the interests of the market economy let them understand the truth that "this is a cruelly competitive world".They have also begun to judge the recent financial crisis based on their historical knowledge. It is impossible for them not to think of war, because the essential characteristics of capitalism, or the crisis under the premise of the existence of nation-states, is likely to lead to war. It turns out that the United States and the West hope to shape China into the state they want to see in accordance with the model of maintaining their eternal strength.Now that the financial crisis has broken out, the financial instrument has been exposed, and young people are seeing it more and more clearly.This forces China to ask itself several questions: What do others want us to be?What kind of China do we want?How big a gap is there in the middle? Of course, you may not have sorted out this gap clearly, and you may still be in the process of understanding it.Old comrades have the ideas of old comrades, young people have the ideas of young people, and intellectuals also have different ideas. What will China be like in the future?It is obviously not enough to just talk about the rise of China and the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. How to outline this thing?Just like you said that you will build a house in the future, what will this house look like, how to decorate the first and second floors, wood or reinforced concrete?According to the old saying, this is "with confidence"!I think after experiencing many major events in 2008, this outline has become more and more clear.Contrary to the official ambiguous description, the clearing process of this kind of outline is gradually completed in the midst of many "unhappy" young people.With such a clear picture, it may take two generations, three generations or even several generations to perfect it and finally realize it.Looking at history, if there were no warships and merchant ships blocking China's doorstep in 1840, would people like Sun Yat-sen have drawn a picture of China's future modernization?Therefore, when discussing the formation of China's "big goal", one cannot but wonder: Will this financial crisis lead to a war involving China? In 2008, I made a program about Russia on many occasions. Although these reasons were all related to the military, there was a longer-term thinking behind it.That is, will China be cornered like Russia? Looking at the history, from 1949 to 1979, we tried to take the road of "military war for strength", and we also got the treatment of the so-called "China-US-Soviet Triangle". After 1979, we changed our strategy and took the road of "commercial war for strength". Today, whether you admit it or not, with China's population, market and energy demand, in the eyes of the West, China is on the way A road of "business war hegemony".Look at the current "encirclement and suppression" of Chinese goods, their pressure on the appreciation of the renminbi, and their fear of China's energy demand for "realizing a comprehensive well-off society". In the end, they will use their best military means to seek "commercial war hegemony" China is cornered?Once such a day comes, how can we carry out the "jedi counterattack"?Did Russia have the opportunity to raise oil prices during the Iraq War?Will history give China such an opportunity? As the economic crisis spreads all over the world, the voices of using war to eliminate the crisis gradually increased in private.First of all, after people calmed down, they began to rethink the problem from the perspective of historical experience.I once had dinner with several people to discuss this issue. It was like being in an information maze. Everyone has different information. It can even be said that everyone is willing to absorb information according to their own expectations and wishes.So I started from the beginning of the maze.After human beings entered the industrialized society, especially in the development process led by capitalism, the ultimate means to eliminate excess production capacity and population is war, and then the industrial machines can work again for the things they destroyed.Especially after the two world wars, a large amount of funds invested in the wars achieved a technological leap in military technology and was transformed into civilian technology, which made the post-war economy prosper for a long time.But after the 1980s, Western countries entered the post-industrialization era after completing industrialization. The stock of technology was basically exhausted, and the excess capital could no longer find new technology investment, so they had to play with financial derivatives. During this process, industrial transfers and financial tools created a very interesting social stratification in China.After some of the top elites in the big cities have integrated with the post-industrialization of the West, they impulsively became the trendsetters in the financial field. This kind of impulse, but there are too few people like him, and the voice is too loud.Another group of people are in the middle class, that is, in the manufacturing industry. According to my observation, this group of people actually have a little inferiority complex, thinking that they invested in the wrong business and did not engage in finance.People in the third level are in the countryside. Under the situation of extreme information asymmetry, children can only study hard to enter the second or even the first level.In other words, China has three cultural stratifications: agricultural, industrial and post-industrial.After the financial crisis, many people did not believe that the post-industrial society, which represented the direction of human civilization, was screwed up.Many intellectuals believe that this is just an inevitable "trial and error" in the post-industrial era, and a self-correcting mechanism will naturally emerge later, but no one has demonstrated whether the final emergence of this self-correcting mechanism will be like the industrial society. Pay the price of war.Some people say that the United States wants to fight Iran, but is it to drink poison to quench thirst or to create a self-correcting mechanism?Is the proportion of drinking poison to quench thirst higher?So is war the next step? During this period, Israel launched the largest war against Palestine since 1967. Why did the United States and Britain behind Israel, together with Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which are still in the traditional military and religious regimes, use the pretext of maintaining the Middle East peace process against Hama? How about a devastating blow to this democratically elected government in Sri Lanka?There is a great paradox in this, that is, the interests of democracy and the West have conflicted in the Middle East. Does this prove from another aspect that the West has a problem in the post-industrial era?When something goes wrong, go back and use violence to destroy what you once advocated?This also includes Russia, which has already implemented democracy, and is still facing potential military conflicts with the West, at least conflicts that require the use of military force to balance the relationship between the two sides.Therefore, in this sense, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that post-industrialized countries in the West will resort to war if they fail to go on, or to create a self-correction mechanism for "error correction".