Chapter 85 The Attempt to Revaluate All Values ​​The Will to Power Section XVII

the will to power attempt to revaluate all values Section 17 <948> Concept of honor: based on belief in "good society", cardinal qualities of chivalry, ongoing duty.The fundamental point is that one should not take one's own life too seriously; one should not appear too familiar, nor too docile; Nor should you be overly modest, unless you are an equal; people have to show their faces. <208> The New Testament contains struggles against the noble and the strong, as described in the Fox Rhinecker, and in the same way: always with missionary sweet-talk and righteous refusal. , so that people will know its power.

① In 1794, Goethe published the collection of hexameter rhymes "Fox Rhynnack", which refers to Mr. Fox in the fairy tale. - translator <30> We have existed for almost two thousand years for Christianity, so the time has come when we will have to pay the price, we will lose the gravity of our false ego—we have not known where to go for a long time.We suddenly break into the opposite valuation, using the same energy standard, thus causing people to have an extremely excessive valuation of themselves. Now, everything is phony, "out of line," weak, or overwrought:

a) people try to find earthly solutions, but in the same sense, in the ultimate triumphant sense of truth, love, justice (socialism: "equality of men"); b) likewise, people adhere to moral ideals (with non-egoism, self-denial, will-denial as their tenets); c) people even try to hold on to the "beyond": even though it is nothing but the illogical unknown X; nevertheless, it is immediately explained that an old-fashioned metaphysical consolation can be drawn from this unknown; d) People try the old-fashioned divine guidance, and realize the rewarding, punitive, educational, and good order of things from the phenomenon;

e) people continue to believe in good and evil, so that people make it their duty to triumph over good and to perish evil (--this is British: the typical example is John Stuart Mill, a fool); f) Contempt for "naturalness", longing, ego: even attempts to understand the highest spirituality and art as the result of impersonal and indifferent life; g) The Church is also allowed to intervene for a long time in all major events and major entanglements of private life, with the aim of making this serious and different.Because, we are always inseparable from "Christian country" and "Christian marriage"——

<793> My "future": - an intense multi-skill training.Military service: so that, generally speaking, the first man from a superior family becomes an officer, whoever he is. <56> The staging of European nihilism. During the uncertain period, all kinds of explorations, the old ones entered Tibet, and the new ones were not released.Clear period: Everyone understands that the old and the new are opposites.That is to say, the old values ​​are born of the descending life, and the new values ​​are born of the ascending life—see, all old ideals are hostile to life (from decadence, and determine decadence, regardless of the Sabbath how bewilderingly embellished with morality).We know the old, and we are far from being strong enough to reach the new.

Three Passion Periods: Contempt, Compassion, Destruction. Time of Calamity: Arose a doctrine designed to sieve men...which made the weak and the strong resolve— <904> Wisdom lacking "free spirit": to make the strong nature stronger and capable of great deeds; Doubt - Open-mindedness - Experimentation - Self-reliance. <524> The role of "consciousness". ——The role of "consciousness" cannot be ignored, this is a fundamental matter.Because this is our connection with the "outside" where our consciousness is developed.Conversely, management, or protection, and care related to the synergistic effects of bodily functions do not enter our consciousness; neither does entry as spirit.Because this requires the establishment of a supreme auditing authority.Needless to say, there is to be a leadership council there so that the different major desires can exercise their votes and powers. "Pleasure" and "pain" are hints in this respect, as are acts of will.Concepts, too.

To sum up: the causal relationship that we do not grasp always influences the phenomenon of consciousness—the hierarchical sequence of thoughts, feelings, and concepts in consciousness does not at all indicate that this result is the result of cause and effect.But, superficially, in the extreme, that is what consciousness is.Starting from this superficial phenomenon, we establish a whole set of concepts of spirit, rationality, logic, etc. (—not all-inclusive, because this synthesis and unity are fictitious), and the above concepts will be projected into things and things. later! Consciousness itself is generally considered to be the whole organ of the senses and the supreme court; therefore, it is only the instrument of intelligibility.Because it is developed in communication, and it is related to the interests of communication... The "communication" mentioned here can also be understood as the role of the outside world and the corresponding response that must appear on our side; the same is true for our role in the external world .It is not the guide, but the organ that guides.

<921> means by which to maintain a strong kind. Prove yourself entitled to exercise special actions; use this as an attempt at self-overcoming and freedom. Enter a state where non-barbarians are not allowed. Achieving willpower dominance and certainty in oneself through asceticism. Don't confide in your heart; be silent; beware of refinement.Be good at obedience, method: test self-preservation.The deceit that embellishes the glorious past. Don't conclude that "people have the same desires", but the opposite! Revenge can be repaid, this is the privilege of doing things, and it is a commendation.

Do not covet the virtues of others. <936> said the aristocracy.The herd ideal - has now reached its pinnacle and has become the highest value setting for "herd living".For an attempt should be made to ascribe a cosmic, i.e. metaphysical, value to herds. —In opposition to herds, I advocate the theory of aristocracy. A group that retains a concern for and sensitivity to freedom in its heart must have a sense of specialness and should have the power to determine itself. Power will make the group show a clear outline, but rights and groups are hostile, so the group cannot Pay attention to power.

The more power I give up, the more I subdue myself, and the more I strive for equality, the deeper I sink into the dominion of mediocrity, and ultimately of the mob.An aristocratic society, in order to maintain a high degree of freedom among its members, presupposes an extreme tension arising from the diametrically opposed desire of all its members, namely, the will to rule... If you really want to do away with the apparent antagonisms and class differences, you will also lose your strong love, your high beliefs, your feelings for yourself. On the real psychology of free and equal herds. - What will decrease?

The will to take responsibility for itself is the symbol of the downfall of self-government; the capacity to defend and attack, even the most spiritual; the power to command; Great mission. Tragic, happy day. <80> On criticism of big talk. —I am full of malice and suspicion about what people usually call "ideal things".For my ideal pessimism is that I see "higher emotion" as a source of ominousness, a source of smallness and devaluation. If one expects some kind of "progress" from an ideal, one is fooled every time.The ideal victory is a reciprocating motion every time. Christianity, revolution, slave rebellion, equal rights, charity, love of peace, justice, truth, all these big words have value only in the struggle, as a banner, but not reality, but dazzling words, ulterior motives Doesn't mean wine (clearly stated, it's the opposite of these words!) <559> "Things that originally had qualities"—that's a dogmatic idea, and people have to categorically abandon it. <782> "Institutions of ever-increasing individual autonomy": Parisian philosophers like Foyer have spoken of the above.These folks should take a look at the Herd Race, because they are.You, future sociologists, open your eyes!The individual grows strong under the opposite conditions, and your man languishes, because that is your purpose, and for this you need the whole trickery of the old ideal!You will do so, so you think that ideals are what your herds really need! ① Alfred Foyer (1838-1912) - French philosopher, advocated Plato as the starting point of evolutionary idealism. - translator There is no honesty in psychology! <341> ideal origin.Let us examine the soil from which ideals arise. A. Starting from the "aesthetic" state, here the world appears richer, more complete, and more perfect——.The pagan ideal: where self-affirmation prevails (people will give up—).Highest type: the classical ideal—it represents the successful man with all his main instincts.At the same time, it expresses the highest style, the great style.That is, the "will to power" itself.People's fearful instinct dares to correct itself. B. Our starting point is those states that make the world emptier, paler, and impoverished, where "spiritualization" and insensibility occupy the ranks of the perfect; where cruelty, directness, and Animality and indirect animality (—because people can sum up and choose—). "Wise man", "angel", missionary = virgin = ignorance, this is the psychological characteristics of idealists - anemic ideals.This was probably the ideal of the man who first articulated the pagan ideal (hence Goethe calling Spinoza his "saint"). C. Some situations make us feel that the world is more absurd, worse, poorer, and more gullible than the ideal world we imagined or hoped for. This is our starting point (——people want to deny, people want to eliminate——) .The projection of the ideal onto what is anti-natural, anti-factual, anti-logic; the state of man who makes such judgments (—the "impoverishment" of the world is the result of suffering. For, though one takes it, one does not give it— —), which is an anti-natural ideal. (The Christian ideal stands between the second and the third, being an intermediate product, sometimes emphasizing the first and sometimes the second.) Three ideals: A, either the intensification of life (pagan), or, B, the impoverishment of life (--anemic), or, C, the denial of life (--unnatural). The feeling of "divinity": being in a high degree of filling - in a very delicate choice - in the contempt and destruction of life. <24> Nihilism not only examines "futility," but also believes that everything of value is destroyed.Because people have moved their hands, so they want to destroy... This is illogical, if it can be said that way.However, nihilists do not believe in the necessity of logic...this is the state of the strong and the strong willed.Because, for such people, it is not acceptable to keep them in the stage of negating "judgment". —Negative behavior, which is determined by their nature.The "nullification" caused by judgments helps the nihilization caused by hands. <926> Refutation of John Stuart Mill. —I categorically deny that this man is mean if he utters such maxims as "All desire alike" and "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; but because he insists on effective reciprocity As the basis of all interactions, so that all actions become our amortization of the benefits we receive.Here, the premise is the lowest meanness.Because, here, between me and you, the equivalence of behavior becomes the premise; here, it is equivalent to canceling the personality value of the behavior (and the personality value cannot be repaid and offset at all—), "reciprocity" is Despicableness; because what I do is something that others are not allowed to do and cannot do, which cannot be offset (—except within the scope of carefully arranged "equal status"—).More precisely, one must never repay anything, because people are one-offs and do one-offs—a basic belief that contains the reason why aristocracy draws a line from the mediocrity, because the mediocrity To believe in "equality" is to believe in repayment and "reciprocity". <16> If we become "disappointed," it is not because we have not opened our eyes to life, but because we are only interested in seeing various desirability.We stare at that so-called "ideal" with contemptuous resentment.Because the reason why we look down on ourselves is that we cannot always suppress that absurd impulse, which is called "idealism".Appeasement is better than the complaint of the disappointed. <332> "People should be people" sounds as dull to us as "trees should be trees". <882> The superiority of the Greeks and Renaissance men is admitted—but, in spite of their aspirations, the causes and conditions of their origin are not considered. <244> The culmination of human psychological deception is that someone believes that he is the original and "comfortable" according to the self-righteous prejudice of goodness, intelligence, strength, and dignity.Because, here, all causality is not considered at all, and any good, any wisdom, any power exists because of this, and thus acquires value.In short, the ultimate and hierarchical factor of birth must not be regarded as having been present, but as the "freedom" of the assumption, and even as the cause of all formation processes... If we start from experience, from the fact that one person greatly surpasses all If we start from the standard situation of human nature, then we will see that any higher power itself contains freedom beyond good and evil, that is, beyond "true" and "false", and this freedom does not allow consideration of the goals that good itself wants to achieve.For, once again, we take the good for wisdom in all its degrees—in which the good is discarded, as are "truth," "justice," virtue, and other popular valuations.Finally, all degrees of goodness themselves are abandoned.Because goodness already presupposes short-sightedness and roughness of the spirit. Isn't this obvious?In the same way, it is not possible to distinguish between true and false, profit and harm over a long distance. Isn't this also based on this premise?The high power of the highest good can also have catastrophic consequences ("removal of evil"), why is it so secretive? ——Actually, please see what requirements the "God of love" puts forward for his believers; they are required to destroy human beings in order to accommodate "goodness". —In fact, this is the same God who becomes myopic, possessed, and impotent before the true character of the world, because, finally, one asks: How much is his conception worth! Indeed, knowledge and wisdom are inherently worthless; goodness is likewise worthless.Because people must first have a purpose, starting from this, these characteristics will get value, or non-value. —Perhaps there is indeed a purpose from which extreme knowledge becomes a high non-value (as if extreme deception were one of the preconditions for the enhancement of life; like a weak spring)... If our human life becomes what life is, all "truth", "goodness", "sacredness", and Christian "divinity" so far will become a great danger. ——At present, people are in danger. If they violate the ideal of life, they will be in danger of catastrophe. <474> Some people think that there is some proper relationship between subject and object; that the object is the subject of Vipassana is a well-meaning construction.I think it must have had a comfortable life.The criterion of our awareness of things depends entirely on the crude utility of the functions that become consciousness: how does this bias of consciousness warrant us to account for "subject" and "object" in relation to actuality! <651> One cannot derive the lowest and most primitive activity of the nucleus from the consciousness of self-preservation, because the nucleus in a mysterious way takes up more matter than is required for preservation.It is worth noting that it fails to "keep itself" in this way, but disintegrates... The desire that plays a leading role here can just be used to explain the will not to preserve the self, because "hunger" is what is necessary for these Explanation of a biologically complex creature (--hunger is a specialized and late form of desire, an expression of the division of labor, in the service of a superior, higher desire). <309> There are people who are looking for moral origin.If such a person argues, "It's not right," then they think people should stop doing it, or do something else instead.On the contrary, as long as I haven't figured out the immorality of things, I can't sleep or eat.If I get this amoral out of the way, then I regain my balance. <390> Theorem I derived: the value of real people is much higher than that of all ideal and "desirable" people in the past.For all "desirability" in relation to man is an absurd and dangerous indulgence by which particular species of man seeks to make the conditions of his own growth and preservation the laws governing mankind; The dominant "desirability" devalues ​​the value, power and certainty of the future of man; this poor and one-sided ideal of man is exposed, even today, if he wants to; Capabilities and levels are too low to correspond to the actual value of man (not merely "desirability"); hitherto ideals have been a slander of the world and of man's power, a miasma surrounding reality, The great temptation of man leading to nothingness... <477> I also identified the phenomenality of the inner world.Because everything we are aware of is cobbled together, simplified, modeled, and explained. — The actual process of internal "perception," the causal unity between thought, feeling, craving, between subject and object, etc., is, in our opinion, a lie -- perhaps pure fantasy.All the formalities and procedures for dealing with this "apparent, inner world" are the same as for the "outer" world.We don't stumble across "facts" at all, since pleasure and pain are later derived intellectual phenomena... "Cause" ah!We blurt out, as logic does, to suppose that there is an indirect causal link between thoughts—an observation that yields extremely superficial results.Between the two thoughts, every possible desire will play its role.But because the speed of movement is so fast, we will deny the existence of desire... Thinking of the kind envisioned by the epistemologists does not occur at all, since it is all a free-wheeling fiction by emphasizing one element of the process and depressing the rest in favor of unmistakable artificiality... "Spirit" is something that thinks.If possible, "the spirit should be absolute, clean, pure" - this assumption is the second result of the false derivation of self-observation caused by the belief in "thinking".First, there is an imaginary behavior here, that is, "thinking" that never happens; second, a subjective basis is invented, on which any behavior of this kind of thinking (otherwise it is nothing) can find its origin, that is, , behaviors and actors are fictitious. <543> In a world that is inherently false, authenticity may be an anti-natural tendency.For this truth only makes sense if it serves as a means of attaining a special, higher false potential.In order to be able to invent a real, existing world, real people must first be created (including the case where there is a kind of person who claims to be "real"). Simple, straightforward, non-contradictory, persistent, unchanged, no creases, no detours, no curtains, no forms.This kind of person will design the world of existence according to his own image, and regard it as "God". For authenticity to be possible, the whole sphere of man should be very clean, very small, and very striking.Because, in any case, this range is an excuse to back up authenticity. ——Lies, tricks, distortions of the truth will definitely cause resentment... <668> "Willing" does not mean "desire", desire, or requirement.For the desire to give orders is clearly different from the will.There is no such thing as "will" in the world, only concrete will.For, one should not induce purpose from state—as epistemologists do.The "will" they have in mind is as difficult to appear as "thought" because it is purely fictional. Giving orders to something is a will (-of course, this does not mean that the will will be "executed"). The general state of tension in which forces seek to function—this is not "will." <598> Things are different for philosophers recuperating.In other words; for example, he can recuperate in nihilism.It is a nihilistic belief that there is no such thing as truth in the world.This belief is a full-body exercise for the champion of knowledge, the fighter of unremitting struggle against truth that is so ugly, because truth is ugly. <704> How did the fundamentals of psychology suddenly become infuriatingly distorted and falsified?For example, "man pursues happiness"—how can this be true?In order to find out what is "life" and what kind of pursuit and tension is life, then the above formula must be applicable to trees, plants, and animals as well. "What do plants seek?"—but then we have invented a false unity that does not exist.For, if we put before us a poor unity—the plant, this is tantamount to ignoring and denying the fact of a tremendous growth by its own and semi-self originality.I think that the last and smallest "individuals" are incomprehensible in the sense of "metaphysical individuality" and atomism, and I think that the range of their forces is continuously shifting-this is obvious.But any one of them, if it changes like this, is it also pursuing happiness? —However, all self-extension, assimilation, multiplication are struggles against opposites; movement is, in essence, a phenomenon connected with pain: for if the motive force here harbors such a hope and constantly seeks pain , then what it expresses should be another kind of will. ——Why do the trees in the primeval forest fight with each other?For happiness?For power! ... Man, master of the forces of nature, master of his own wildness and indulgence (desire, learned to follow and be used by man)—man, compared with prehistoric man, is an incomparably great power—not "Happiness" this advantage!How can it be said that people pursue happiness? <222> The superior man is distinguished from the inferior man in his fearlessness and in his defiance of misfortune, because, if the values ​​of the theory of happiness come into effect, these manifestations are symptoms of decline (--physiological weariness, impoverishment of will-power ——).Christianity, because of its "blissful" vision, is a typical way of thinking for people who suffer and live in poverty.But the full force is bent on creating, suffering and perishing.Because, in the eyes of this force, the false salvation theory advocated by Christianity is a cliché, a face of hierarchy, and disgusting. <302> I think that one day people will subtly return the value of human beings to the corner where only it fits.Because it is a declining value.Many species of animals have disappeared; if man disappeared too, the world might lack nothing.In order to be indifferent to everything, one must have the temperament to be a philosopher (-nothing is alarmed). <790> If people figure out the "why" of their life, then it is not difficult to abandon the "way" of life.This is tantamount to a non-faithful criterion of cause, purpose, and meaning, a lack of will, if the values ​​of pleasure and pain come to the fore, and if there is a market for the doctrine of hedonism-pessimism; resignation, resignation, virtue, "Objectivity", etc., is at least a sign of forgetting one's origins. <12> The decline of cosmological value. A． Nihilism as a state of mind is bound to emerge.First, if we look for the "meaning" of all phenomena, we will not find it.Because the seeker always loses his courage in the end.Nihilism, then, is the consciousness of prolonged, wasted energy, of "vain" suffering, of insecurity, of lack of opportunity to recuperate, to console oneself—ashamed of oneself, as one deceives one's self for too long... It may have made sense in the past, to apply the highest moral standard and moral world order to all phenomena; or, to increase love and harmony among people in intercourse; or, to move closer to a state of universal happiness; or, even to a state of universal nothingness - the goal It still makes sense anyway.What all these concepts have in common is that a goal is achieved through the process itself. —However, it is now understood that nothing can be achieved, no goal can be achieved through becoming... Thus, disappointment with the supposed purpose of becoming becomes the cause of nihilism.In a word, this is true of particular ends; it is also true of all hitherto hypotheses of ends, since the hypothesis is concerned with "development" as a whole (—man is no longer a cooperator, much less a center of becoming). Secondly, as soon as one establishes all phenomena and their totality, systematization and even organization, nihilism appears as a psychological state, so that the soul that longs for favor is immersed in the whole idea of ​​​​supreme domination and form of management. (—if that is the soul of a logician, absolute logic and real dialectics are willing to come to terms with everyone...).This is the form of unity that is all "monism".As a result of this belief, man is deeply involved in the feeling that he is connected with and dependent on a whole above him, which is the standard of divinity. ... "universal happiness requires the sacrifice of individual happiness" ... But look!There is no such universal thing at all!Man fundamentally loses faith in his own worth, were it not for this infinitely precious whole that works through man.For man conceives this whole in order to be able to believe in his own value. Nihilism as a psychological state does not yet possess the third and final form.The above two points of understanding tell people that no purpose can be achieved by becoming, and all becoming has no broad unity that can allow individuals to hide, just like the situation in the highest value.So all that remains is to condemn the whole world as false, and to conceive a world beyond this world as a stand-in for the real one, however, once one understands that the fictional world is only for psychological needs, one understands The final form of nihilism is formed when one should not do so at all.This form itself contains non-belief in the metaphysical world—it renounces belief in the real world.If one takes this standpoint, it is admitted that this reality of becoming is the only reality.One does not endure this world, though one does not wish to deny it, having rejected all secret access to the inner world and false divinity. ——what happened?When people understand that neither the concept of "purpose", nor the concepts of "unity" and "truth" should be used to explain the general characteristics of life, a sense of worthlessness arises.For nothing can be achieved, no desire can be realized by using the above-mentioned concepts; there are many phenomena, but there is no broad unity.Because, the character of life is not "real" but "false"... There is no reason at all to believe in the "real" world... In short: the categories we use to assign value to the world, such as "purpose", "unity" ", "existence", etc., are now thrown out again through our hands—therefore, the world takes on the appearance of worthlessness... b. Suppose we realize why the above three categories should not be used to explain the world. If, according to this recognition, the world begins to strike us as worthless, then we have to ask: Where does our belief in the above three categories come from? Come,—shall we try to find the possibility of breaking them from faith!If we devalue the three categories, their demonstration of the futility of the universe is no reason to devalue the universe. —Conclusion: belief in the categories of reason is the cause of nihilism. —The categories by which I measure the value of the world are connected with purely fictional worlds. —Consequence of corollary: all the values ​​we have hitherto tried to rely upon to enable us to begin to value the world and ultimately to depreciate it, when they appear inapplicable—to use the language of psychology—in order to preserve and enhance human The result of the utilitarian view that the product of domination is the end.Because these values ​​are only superficially projected onto the essence of things.To set oneself up as the standard of meaning and value of things: this is always the expression of the sheer naivety of man. <7> Man should live to serve the highest values, especially when these values ​​govern him with great difficulty and cost. ——People have these social values ​​in order to create a momentum of values, as if these values ​​are really God's will, really are the "reality", the "true" world, the hope and the future world that reign over all living beings.Now, when the ins and outs of value have been clarified, the universe has lost its value in our eyes and has become "meaningless"-but this is only a transitional state. <36> Philosophical nihilists firmly believe that all phenomena are meaningless and futile; yet meaningless and futile should not exist.Where did it come from?How do people know this "meaning" and standard?Nihilism essentially holds that a dull and unhelpful prospect of existence will make philosophers disgusted, bored, and hopeless.This view contradicts our philosopher's sensibility.This is due to that ridiculous valuation.For the character of life must please the philosopher, if it has the right to exist... It is not difficult to understand that happiness and pain can only have the meaning of means within the phenomenon.For what remains is whether we can really see "meaning" and "purpose," whether the question of meaninglessness or its opposite is incomprehensible to us. —— <675> Everything depreciated in value. ——My request is that since people have canceled the actor of the behavior conceptually, and thereby emptied the behavior, then the actor must be brought back to the behavior.I demand that since people have removed purpose from behavior and thereby emptied behavior, it is necessary to bring back "purpose", that is, the "intention" to do something. All "purposes," "goals," and "meanings" are nothing but manifestations and perversions of the will that occurs simultaneously with all phenomena, that is, the manifestations and perversions of the will to power.To have a purpose, an aim, a purpose, the will to have it all, is almost the same as the will to be strong, the will to grow—and, besides, the will to acquire the means. Therefore all instincts, most general and lowest, in action and in will, are always the least known and most hidden, for we are the maxim... All valuations are but the result and narrower vision in the service of this will.For valuation itself is this will to power. It is absurd and misunderstanding to criticize existence from any of these values.If there is a process of decline in this respect, the process is still in the service of this will. Please judge existence itself!Still, judgment itself is such a being! —Because we deny, we are always pretending to be who we are. People should recognize the absurdity of this life-and-death verdict; then, try to figure out the result.This is very representative. <1065> The emperor kept blaming himself for the perishability of things, in order not to take himself too seriously, and to take things with equanimity.But it seems to me that everything has infinite value, so that things pass by in a hurry.For, I seek eternity for every phenomenon.Will the most costly ointment and wine be poured into the sea? — I take comfort in the fact that all things past are eternal — because the sea will wash them back. <134a> I want to reclaim all the beauty and sublime we lend to things real and imaginary, for this is man's wealth and product: man's most beautiful vindication.Man is poet, thinker, God, love, power.what!Talk about regal generosity in man!It is with this kind of generosity that people give things to others, but they themselves are poor and feel poor!迄今为止，人最大的非我性就是他赞赏过、祟拜过自己，并且知道怎样隐蔽自己，而他就是那个创造了崇拜物的人。 —— 〈９３０〉 人牺牲了多少好处，人又是多么无"私"啊！人的一切欲望和激情都想拥有自己的权利——欲望离明智地利用自私还相当遥远！ 人们不想拥有自身的"幸福"；为了能够相信人总是为自身着想，人必须成为英国人。我们的渴望由于激动的时间过久，是不会闹事的——。他们聚积起来的力要寻求对手。