Chapter 16 Chapter 6.2

Also, men always put more emphasis on official career than women, and there are especially many Chinese men who wish to step into the gate of an institution. Since you are in the "organ", many years have passed, whether you are promoted or not, it is not only related to the honor and disgrace of the "organ" personnel, but also most closely related to the vital interests and psychological conditions of the "organ" personnel.The reasons for being promoted or not promoted are often complex, changeable, and sometimes unfair. "Organ" people are treated unfairly, and "organ" people often dare not express their dissatisfaction too much.There are a lot of complaints, and maybe even the chance of the next promotion will be ruined in advance...

Therefore, people in China's "organs" all have some common characteristics.That commonality has long been known by the Chinese people, so I don't praise it here. Therefore, people in China's "organs" have always had the most interpersonal scratches and scars among Chinese people. Therefore, among people in China's "organs", "background", "background", "backer", "flirtatious", "following others", "forming cliques", "upper line", "leadership relationship" and so on. , It is also the most talked behind the scenes.Not all that bad though.

This makes the "government" where the people are located is not a "government", but also seems to be a "government". There are many who believe that the needs of the human spirit seem to be infinite. This is an incorrect conclusion. Many people believe that a person with very low material needs must have unlimited spiritual needs; a person with too greedy material needs must have pitifully little spiritual needs. This is also an incorrect conclusion. In fact, people with very low material needs often have limited spiritual needs.Professors are generally easier to satisfy in terms of material needs, and their spiritual needs are nothing more than reading, music, travel and other things that ordinary people like...

In fact, people who are too greedy for material needs will also have correspondingly inflated spiritual needs. According to statistics, the world currently provides people with at least 400 kinds of content to meet spiritual needs. Normal people don't yearn for their own spirit to go through those contents and enjoy them several times. And people who are not satisfied with material desires often show greed in their spiritual needs. It is said that the "Cultural Revolution" was a "crazy movement", and Chinese people have been saying this for more than 20 years. A person's madness is often a lifetime thing.Ten years is short.It's lucky that I'm not crazy after ten years.

But how can a whole nation go crazy for ten years? In the early years of "reform and opening up", there were indeed "left" and "right" attitudes regarding whether to reform and open up. Twenty years have now passed. With regard to things in China, if anyone still talks about "Left" and "Right" at every turn, isn't he pretending to be stupid? With this kind of person who pretends to be stupid, what else can you do other than ignore him? In the final analysis, the driving force behind the "Left" is the self-promotion that spares no effort, what they want to achieve is personal goals, and what they want to achieve is personal utilitarianism.

Looking at the problem this way, we can see the lies of the "Left" no matter from those who supported the "Great Leap Forward" back then or those who self-proclaimed themselves "reformists" today. In recent years, I have watched too many performances—from some self-proclaimed so-called "reformists". Regardless of the early Eastern culture or the early Western culture, human beings' imagination of their ancestors is actually very similar.The similarity of thinking means that the desires are relatively consistent—the relationship between the first man and the first woman in the world was originally brother and sister or almost equal to brother and sister.Human beings are the offspring of such a man and a woman.

From this relatively consistent desire, we seem to be able to analyze the general agreement of early humans on "equality between men and women". I think, in the subconscious of human beings, there has always been an instinctive, ancient consciousness of worshiping women, inherited from generation to generation, right?This is similar to the "Oedipus complex" summarized by Freud, but also has differences.The "Oedipus complex" summarized by Freund is mainly a male "complex" and is closely related to sexual consciousness.The ancient human consciousness of worshiping women basically has nothing to do with sex, or has little to do with it.It is mainly reflected in the worship of women's thoughts and virtues.That is, the worship of "partner".Regardless of gender, this kind of worship is close to instinct.It's like a sea turtle crawling towards the beach as soon as it hatches, it's innate.

Thinking about it this way, isn't "partner" Eryu the greatest word in our human lexicon? A man can have everything, but not a partner.If there is no one in his life, and he is not a man dedicated to religion, then even the king is actually an unfortunate man. A woman can want anything, but she wants this and that, and even if she gets a lot, what she definitely wants in the end is a man, a partner. A boy becomes a youth, and he learns to approach women as a man.If the image of a beautiful woman was deeply imprinted in his heart when he was a teenager, then he would definitely use her as the standard to appreciate the beauty of other women or discover the shortcomings of other women...

This young man later naturally became a middle-aged man. If you ask him which generation of women he loves, he is often confused and unable to answer; but if you ask him which type of women he loves, then almost every middle-aged man can speak freely.As a result, those who ask him will definitely hear that the beauty of the women he loves is almost always derived from the impressions in his memory, and more of them have the charm of a certain type of women in the past tense... In the final analysis, the Hai people that a man admires, more or less, will inevitably have the beauty of the woman he was close to when he was young.

Therefore, what kind of women are attracted to men when they are young, and when they grow up, they will look for similar women all over the world.If a teenager often gets close to women in a luxurious environment, then he will often go to such places to meet women when he grows up, and often mistakenly think that of course the most worthy women should be in such places. I know that there are some teenagers who, because of the sudden wealth of their families and the poor quality of their parents, do often visit places where the feasting, the feasting, the greenery, the paper and the money are glamorous.

I feel sorry for these teenagers... If my memory is correct (I know, it is getting worse every day), then this sentence should have been said by Chekhov-a man of integrity, under the gaze of a dog, his heart is always will feel shy. "His eyes told me" or "her eyes said" are probably becoming less and less reliable among human beings.Especially unreliable in China.Complicated, unreliable, and untrustworthy eyes are as many as fake and inferior products."Eye contact" between people has become absurd and ridiculous.Trustworthy "eye contact" is almost only possible with dogs. The dog's loyalty and stupid loyalty, as well as the dog's sense of responsibility and the principles of being a dog, determine that the dog is an animal with too much "human world".Dogs live a tiring life because they are really affected by the "world" of people. "One center, two basic points", there is a new folk interpretation-say: "Take health as the center, live a little more chicly, and think a little more openly." Our dislike of mice is actually due to its tail.After all, a fluffy tail looks more comfortable than a bare one.The tail, which is simply bare and hairless, is nothing more than that.Rattail is neither.Rats have very sparse hair on their tails.The fur on the tail is also earthy gray.Usually lighter than the earthy gray of the body hair.It is so sparse that if anyone wants to count, he can count them in a short time after catching a mouse.Much less hair than a caterpillar.Afterwards, the true color is the same as that of a mummy. Therefore, I believe that the development of human "culture" has not only contributed to the progress of society, but also concealed the truth of many facts.Just as the mouse's ugly coat color and its ugly tail affect the objectivity of our perception of the mouse's eyes.We needn't be uneasy about being this way only about mice—but we tend to feel the same way about people and certain events in the world. Therefore, the history left to us by our predecessors, and the history we will leave to future generations, contains all kinds of ambiguity and various subjective misunderstandings. Therefore, today, the independence of human thought should be especially encouraged, advocated, supported and loved... Aren't Chinese men nowadays all vigorously criticizing and even attacking each other for "impetuousness"? "Impetuous" is indeed an indisputable fact.I also often have a few. What should I do if I become "impetuous"?Get drunk?outing?fishing?Pick up girls?Take sedatives?Where do you go to a place where pornography is consumed? ...I admit that this is all a way to restrain "impetuousness".But after that? "Irritability" is the "skin disease" of the soul, and it is often committed! My own way to overcome my slight "impetuousness" is to thank guests behind closed doors, turn off the phone, and read a book quietly at home.And, of course, lie down and watch. If I feel like I've contracted a severe case of "impetuousness," I go to the zoo. We even killed a cow, it was a cruel scene.Fasten the middle bolt to the stake first.At first, I didn't know what people would do to it, so I was tied up obediently.They are used to being chained and don't think there is anything wrong.Wait until you see something is wrong from people's expressions, it's too late.So Niu had a premonition that he would not survive, and a string of tears fell from Niu's eyes.The cow is not struggling at the moment, it is just sad.The man raised the eight-pound ten-pound sledgehammer and swung it round, aiming at the cow's forehead and heart with a blow.So the cow let out a sad cry of "beer".With one hammer, the cow's body shakes; with two hammers, the cow's body shakes again.After five or six blows, the cow's two front legs knelt down.It no longer barked, only weeping silently.Some male educated youths, in order to show their courage, competed for the hammer and smashed Chaozhong's forehead and heart.Then someone brought a samarium knife head, that is, a scythe head more than two feet long, like sawing a piece of wood, "sawed" from the cow's neck upwards, and blood gushed out like a fountain... I have always wondered why a person who is not a professional butcher would show such excitement, interest, and pleasure in personally participating in the bloody slaughter?We humans have had the profession of butchers since ancient times, isn't it just for most people to avoid bloody stimulation?Although there is no full-time butcher in the company, how abnormal is it that there are some educated youths scrambling for the first place and everyone is eager to try?If you think about it carefully, what a terrible aspect of young people's psychology is that?This terrifying aspect is clearly directly related to the atrocities committed by the Red Guards during the "Cultural Revolution"... Regrettably, it is precisely between human beings, between some human beings and another part of human beings, that one side drives the other to a desperate situation, and the same phenomenon is much more common than humans treating animals, and animals treating animals.Ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, too numerous to enumerate.And there are all kinds of conspiracies, all kinds of sinister, all kinds of viciousness, and all kinds of ugly things that gloat on the sidelines for entertainment... Therefore, human beings will always need a kind of self-education, that is - the self-education of human nature from generation to generation... We have discovered the characteristic of our human consciousness—that is, human beings are especially accustomed to regard might as the qualification of "King". Those who are feared by ordinary people will be awed and subdued, and they will be regarded as "kings". The word "king" is different from "leader" and "head". "Leaders" and "heads" are admired for their charisma and performance.But this is not the case with "king". The status of "king" is the result of conquest.Anyone who is a "king" must first dominate one side.Therefore, in China in the past, the bandit leader who roared in the mountains and forests was also called the "King of the Mountain". Emperors or kings, if they are not hereditary, but "struggled", all of them are kings first, and then "emperors" and "kings". A person with a childlike innocence, even if he has all kinds of shortcomings, in my opinion, he must be able to make friends. However, in the world, there are fewer and fewer people who are truly childlike.Especially in cities.In the city, people have become "units" and "industries", fighting openly and secretly for their own interests.It's like being locked in a big cage, it's difficult to get close to each other, and you can't hide and hide, and the city is deep in people's hearts.Just in terms of personal hobbies, there may be childlike performances.In dealing with his own kind, he is tactful.There seem to be fewer and fewer Chinese who worship heroes, and more and more people worship the theory of traitorous heroes.When everyone becomes a doctor or expert in "Thick Black Studies", then it's not that Xiong wants to play with others, but people have to go to the deep mountains and old forests to find Xiong as a friend... During the "Cultural Revolution", some men openly and unscrupulously "played others like monkeys", showing their ability to humiliate others.Because the "Cultural Revolution" was an unprecedented opportunity, the conditions were not only "ripe", but the "reasons" were in line with the "revolution". During the "Cultural Revolution", the "procedure" for people to "play" with others was simpler than the procedures for everything today. First, in the name of "revolution", some people were declared "heterogeneous", so some people became "ghosts" and "snakes". God", so it seems to be inferior to monkeys.Not only can you "play", you can play tricks, you can also fight... Really, I don't like men who are particularly fond of monkeys. However, in my opinion, there are quite a lot of Chinese men who are monkey-like in mentality, or Chinese men who are like monkey-players... It is muddled logic to regard the rich as heroes in general, and to prohibit and oppose to ask questions, and even publicly declares that those who dare to ask are guilty, and that it is reasonable not to ask questions.It is also a logic that runs counter to the interests of the country and the people. At the same time, I also hereby solemnly tell Mou Zhong that I have publicly apologized in the newspaper and in my book about the incident of Zhang Guan Li Dai in my book.If you still feel that you are not dissatisfied enough, then you can hold another press conference, or buy out the space of some newspaper or magazine, or buy out the time slot of the radio and TV station. I will definitely go there and apologize publicly again.Just another public apology and nothing else.Even, the words and sentences of the apology can be drawn up by yourself, and I will continue to write the draft loudly.And bow three times after reading... However, if you use your set of business practices as the leading voice of "reform and opening up" to criticize my book and my views, then you have to think twice!At the very least, you need to find some people with a relatively good level, who can really pick out my own remarks from my book, instead of making them out of nothing rather than taking them out of context. Criticize, not just criticize with the low-level, low-level position and low-level interest attitude of one of the businessmen themselves or a company.The criticism is well-founded, and I openly express to learn from your correct thinking-if I still sell some nonsense critical "articles" at the same level as before, I will not only never accept it, but I must refute it. Although my cervical spine is seriously ill now, writing has become a chore, but to refute the dubious "articles" of people like Wu Yuenong-to say it immodestly, I can deal with a group of people by myself. In my opinion, those who advertise for others, as long as they don't call the bad ones excellent, the mediocre ones wonderful, as long as they don't flatter others, then what they do is a great benefit.Not only beneficial, but also harmless. I despise those who are hired for a small amount of money to take revenge for others by writing articles.At least, it's despised right now.This shows my pedantry.My thinking neither conforms to the economic laws of reality, nor can it transcend reality, but conforms to the embarrassment of idealism.Because if based on reality, one thousand words, one thousand yuan, or ten thousand yuan is contracted by one person to work on a small piece of paper and a large piece of paper on a sustainable basis. I have to admit that it is easier to earn money.The money that is easier to earn is certainly the money that is worth earning.And if it is based on the great realm of true idealism, then its pure eyes should not have discovered this kind of trick at all.Ugly things should not be seen in the eyes of ideals.Since they are not human eyes, how can we talk about contempt? The word "literary ruffian" can be understood as a "hybrid" in which literati and ruffian "copulate". "Hybrid" does not refer to offspring in terms of species, but refers to the synthesis of the personality characteristics of literati and ruffians.Every "literary ruffian" has not only the opportunistic literati's rudder, taking advantage of the fire, but also the innate cunning and rascality of a ruffian.It's just that its "ruffian" was packaged by "literature", and it was "synthesized" into a kind of evil and inferior prudence the day after tomorrow. Examining the history and history of Chinese official and unofficial literature, there are few typical literati who are very ruffian.Literati have various disadvantages, but most literati refuse to be contaminated by ruffianism.The main psychological component of ruffians is not just cynicism.Because most cynics just use cynicism as a psychological shield, and disrespect as a totemic declaration written on the shield to defend themselves.But ruffian is not like that.The main psychological component of the disease is the dark viciousness bundled up layer by layer.The more common psychological whisper of ruffians is this sentence - "all x fuck!" This is a typical ruffian's psychology of looking at society.It is also a typical literary ruffian's psychology of looking at the literary world.The difference is that ruffians don't need to use the packaging of the text to cover up this kind of psychology, while ruffians must make the most of the packaging of the text. The likes of Zhang Chunqiao, Yao Wenyuan and their minions received the ugly name of "literary ruffians" because of their dark and vicious political psychology. "Down with all" and "fuck all x" are the same mentality.But they are not using ruffian techniques to cover up this kind of psychology.Instead, it relies on political power and tyranny.Therefore, I have always believed that they are not typical "literary ruffians", but "bastards" where literati and reactionary politicians have sex.Their personality traits are the synthesis of the disadvantages of literati and reactionary politicians. The behavior of literary ruffians is a phenomenon in which literary ruffians openly masturbate in the name of literature.The purpose is to draw public attention.Literary ruffians are derivatives of the relationship between literature and "market economy".The relationship between literature and "market economy" sometimes cooperates hand in hand and each gets what it wants; sometimes they both see each other and part ways.This is because, after all, literature has its individuality, while the market has only the generality of economic laws.Individuality is not swayed by commonality, and individuality must be sacrificed. But literary ruffians have no personality. The credo of Wenpi's existence is - "If you have milk, you are a mother." Money itself is naturally not something dirty and evil.Even under a microscope, a banknote does not contain any more bacteria than a newspaper that has been read in public; it is merely a substitute for an exchange commodity.In ancient times, people also used shells, animal teeth, and beautiful pebbles as "coins"-it can be seen that money itself has no different attributes from those things. My ideal—the person who wants to destroy banknotes actually wants to change the various irrational phenomena in the current distribution of money in human society.There is nothing wrong with the idea itself.Unreasonable phenomena do exist.But this is not a realistic idea, because "destroying banknotes" cannot eradicate the irrationality of material possession. It should be noted that all human beings have been making efforts to rationalize the distribution of money for centuries, including "revolutionary" methods.And, in many countries, initial results have already been achieved. The "revolutionary" approach has generally been denied.Because the human system has progressed, it will find a better way than "revolution".Of course, rationality is also relative. The development of human beings will no longer take eliminating the rich as the measure of social moral balance, and will be committed to eradicating poverty and supporting the poor.In the end, almost everyone can enjoy the fruits of material civilization.If we don't seek uniformity, but complete average, this goal can be achieved. China is developing economically.In a period of chaotic business planning, there were nouveau riche and a disparity between the rich and the poor.This phenomenon was watched by the students, so they felt aggrieved.This is completely understandable and should not be blamed. A mature business society is like this - it is not easy for someone to earn a lot of money, but it is not that difficult for most people to earn enough money to spend.This is an ideal stage for human beings. In a mature commercial society, it is impossible for the money of the rich not to flow into the commercial activities of the society and become public ownership in disguise.For example, Hong Kong tycoons Li Ka-shing and Huo Yingdong.The money they have has already exceeded their personal consumption and has played a positive role in the whole society of Hong Kong. There are many great entrepreneurs in the world whose personal lives are frugal.The money they have plays a positive role in all aspects of society, and they enjoy it themselves but are not extravagant.They are respectable and contemporary heroes. It's just that some nouveau riche in China want extravagance once they break out.This is ugly.It will take time to see them become civilized bourgeois! In my opinion - spending time and drinking is actually very meaningless.Just imagine, a person can live like that for a week, but what about living for a year?So what about living ten years?How about living ten years in the best years?Is that really happiness?Is it really worth spending one's life in such a life? Thinking about it this way, we have our own principled attitude towards money: 1.When we watch other people spend their days and drinks, we will be disgusted. 2.When we ourselves are poor, we cherish every penny we earn, because of our instinctive aversion to excess and excess.Because of the money we earn ourselves, and because we resist extravagance and depravity, we not only maintain a good state of mind in life, but also gradually save a little. 3.We have a lot of savings, which are used to improve our lives to a limited extent, to support the elderly and children, so that money can reflect the best value in us. 4.Last but not least, understand that we only need money to make our lives carefree.Don't be too greedy, too envious. If a Chinese with ample food and clothing and a carefree life still pursues money so relentlessly, he is a money worshiper! ... There are a lot of new words nowadays, and a "series" will pop up after a while. The word "running official" belongs to a small "series".Correspondingly, there are the words "bright words" and "hidden songs".The term "running an official" refers to a phenomenon. "Running for an official" means asking friends around, looking for connections, exploring the back door, taking advantage of power, and taking shortcuts to become an official for oneself.Or some people's own experience summary?In short, it has become a word that everyone understands. The word "pao" in "paoguan" is also used well, vividly expressing the rush, busyness and hard work.Times have moved on after all.There is competition everywhere. If you don't "run" in time, others will "run" ahead and get there first. Wouldn't it be too late to regret it! When the chief of the section raised his "opinions" to the chief of the department, or the chief of the chief to the chief of the bureau, he suddenly stood up, his face turned pale, and he said loudly: "I'm not afraid of wearing small shoes! I'm not afraid of retaliation! This opinion has been in my heart for a long, long time! Today In front of everyone, I have to mention it!... My superior, you...how can you ignore your own body for the sake of work!..." This is an example of "hidden award".It seems that it has been used as a "burden" in cross talk.It is also a necessary skill for "running officials". Tired people don't want to be unrestrained, it's not that they don't want to be unrestrained, but they don't have the minimum prerequisites to be unrestrained. Then there is only fatigue. A few days ago, I sang a popular song. "Can't bear it" means "too soft-hearted". "Too soft-hearted" often has to pay a price.The heaviest price is to take his own life.One situation is unexpected, and the other situation is to sacrifice one's life for righteousness. Reminiscing back, speaking from China, from the "Cultural Revolution" to the present, the same logic is still being muttered endlessly by some villains, villains, and political thugs in the "Cultural Revolution"-big political background How could I disobey then?My crimes, in fact, none of them are my faults, they are all the faults of the "Cultural Revolution" itself... There were too many cruel and cruel things during the "Cultural Revolution". The "unbearable" heart of the "unbearable" people is too little... Let’s think about it more recently, and say now——everyone knows that in China today, there are quite a few people who are willing to be killers.Employment wages vary widely.It ranges from tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, two hundred thousand to several thousand and hundreds of dollars.Moreover, "subcontracting" is fashionable.Each turn and turn, the middle man peels the skin layer by layer.Even if the ultimate murderer only gets a few hundred yuan, he still won't kill people, or even kill a few people, or kill people all over his family. They have no sense of "unbearable". And I really hope—in real life, there will be more comedy, or even more slapstick.If the human heart cannot tolerate the existence of the word "unbearable" in a solemn situation, how wonderful it is to have the miracle of "too soft heart" appear in the occurrence of comedy and farce! Like all countries in the world with a long history of feudal emperors' rule, China is also a country with a profound and long-lasting influence of the "official standard".Today, although its influence has shrunk, it still strongly influences the fate of many Chinese people, including many intellectuals big and small.Therefore, Chinese people, as well as Chinese intellectuals of all sizes, have repeatedly bred the buds of cynicism in their minds, and cynically regard the way of cynicism as a kind of maturity, a kind of great wisdom in life, and a kind of chic way of life. Indeed, it is also understandable and should even be sympathetic.Under the huge projection of the "official standard", from the officials who are dedicated to the official system, to the large and small intellectuals who depend on the official system, to the common people who are governed by the official system, anyone who wants to stand upright has no choice. is easy.On the contrary, don't stand up straight, it is really a manifestation of self-knowledge.Moreover, as long as you get used to it, it doesn't feel so bad.Sometimes even get a better, better feeling.You'll get a better feeling than trying to stand up straight. Under the huge projection of kingship, no matter who wants to stand up straight, he must pay the price. The reason why democracy is a good thing for the people after all is that after it completely dispels the huge projection of royal power, it makes it possible for everyone to be liberated psychologically. None, without having to pretend at all.On the contrary, people with power often put on a show in front of the people in order to gain the favor of the people.Because the people are almost always qualified to say in the name of democracy: "Your power was given to us, and if we want to take it back and give it to others, we can do so!" For the contemporary college students in China, for many years, I have always had a misunderstanding in my mind.Before this misunderstanding was realized by myself, it confused me very much.Not sure if the problem is with me or just with the college students. And indeed, to tell the truth, how amazed I have been at their shallowness! Contemporary college students in China—they are such a group of people; even, it can be said that they are such children—higher IQ, shallower thinking; Too "ego", but their "ego" is often shattered at the first encounter of specific social obstacles... In the final analysis, I think that what our adult society should convey to them is this kind of awareness-students should still focus on learning.Don't get distracted and study hard.As for who should be more responsible for the country, the conclusion is clear, and that is the middle-aged people.Responsibility, including the accompanying misunderstanding and heaviness... After the "Cultural Revolution" carried out an unprecedented and almost complete sweep of culture, what happened in the spiritual space of the Chinese people? First of all, Jiang Qing himself, the "standard bearer" of the "Cultural Revolution", couldn't bear the unprecedented loneliness of an era without culture. Jiang Qing himself wanted to watch American movies back then.Like Grim Heart, like, like.In a very secret place, the copy was bought from Hong Kong with US dollars. The cultural and cultural phenomena of the "Cultural Revolution" illustrate several social facts that are close to the truth. For example—in any era, the enjoyment of culture is equally graded.In the age of politics it is political privilege, in the age of business it is money. For example—culture and art cannot be swept away at all.Those who want to implement the "Three Lights Policy" are doomed to be more impatient with the loneliness of the cultural and artistic space than ordinary people. For example - ordinary people have a natural instinct, that is, they can be very creative to satisfy their own entertainment.Without conditions, even politics itself, which suppresses their entertainment rights, can be treated as entertainment by them. For example—once politics is entertained, politics begins to slip into vulgarity.And slipping into vulgar politics, its authority begins to disintegrate... Cao Xueqin wrote only one book in his life, and he almost completed the masterpiece handed down from generation to generation under the circumstances of being poor and ill, and eating frozen sorghum rice balls all day long. In my opinion, this is very sympathetic.I have always believed that if Xueqin's fate was better, for example, if he had the conditions to pay attention to diet and nutrition, then he might live ten years longer.Then maybe besides, he will leave some more cultural heritage for future generations... All the excellent literature and art related to suffering in the world, first of all, is not born of suffering, but faithfully records the suffering of the times. The suffering of cultural people and artists has never been what culture and art must require of them.And like all human misery, it is above all part of human misery. If the "Silk Road" is a commercial route, then the road "towards the United States" is obviously also a commercial route—the Chinese people who are "towards the United States" are no longer selling silk, but first of all they are themselves.That sounds navigable, but it's close to the truth. The Chinese who walked on the ancient "Silk Road" suffered hardships (and often faced dangers along the way) while walking; today's Chinese people who "go to the United States" mainly suffer hardships after they have arrived. Chinese characters are too rich.Some words can almost only be understood and cannot be expressed in words.For example, "Yi" Yu.I always think it is a fairy-like Yu.Yes, it doesn't mean that it is easy to remind people of gods, but it means that it is easy to remind people of immortals.So, what is the difference between gods and immortals?I don't quite understand either.Maybe it's just the difference in temperament?When a mortal encounters a god, no matter whether it is a great god or a small god, he will feel awe in his heart, right?But immortals are generally not strict.Immortals are kind.For example, any one of the Eight Immortals, just from the appearance, seems to be willing to make friends with good people.Immortals generally don't deliberately put on airs of gods.Therefore, goddesses and fairies seem to have always been two different types of women in legends.Goddesses often appear in the world in a dignified image.Fairies are different. Fairies seem to be approachable. Regardless of any nation, regardless of its historical stage or era, it will never fall into such a misunderstanding-judging beautiful things as unbeautiful or even ugly; or conversely, judging ugly things as unbeautiful Ugly, even beautiful. In some indigenous tribes, women are generally not painted face.Girls especially don't paint their faces.Juveniles who are considered underage are generally not smeared.Face paint is almost always reserved for grown men.And almost always on the eve of going into battle.Once a teenager starts painting his face, he is considered a warrior from then on.Once adults start to paint their faces, it means that he is bound to be born and die again at a severe moment.Tumian is not born from the love of beauty, but a signal of war, a symbol of a soldier's identity, and a transmission of the will to fight to the death with responsibility and obligation.Of course, when special celebrations are held, women, even girls, often paint their faces and revel in the same way as men.But that has nothing to do with the love of beauty, it only reflects the sincerity of a certain ritual.Just as men and women in civilized societies wear black veils and white flowers to funerals not for the sake of beauty.As for wearing a silver ring around the neck, it is actually a way of shining wealth. For men, women are the ideal carriers of wealth.Bean Guruzi.The length of the neck, which leads to morbid deformities, is really the price of glory, not the result of the pursuit of beauty, or it is not mainly the result of the pursuit of beauty.This is not the same as the contemporary women in civilized society who cut their double eyelids and unfortunately suffer from inflammation and scarring of pupils, or who suffer from silicon poisoning due to breast augmentation. But why is it that in China, an ancient civilization, among human beings who account for a fraction of the world's population, in the long history of nearly a thousand years, collectively, they have been sunk in the confusion of women's beauty?So that in the Qing Dynasty, Liang Qichao and Dong Zunxian, the inspectors, jointly issued an announcement to dissuade them in the place where they worked; Starting from the distress of the country, the country, and the country, it is impossible to issue an edict to persuade the ban; so that Yuan Shikai, the governor of Zhili, personally wrote the "Persuasion against Footbinding" to no avail; so that in the period of the Republic of China, it was necessary to rely on fines. It has spread -- and the silver mouth is eight or nine million taels, and the year is thirty million taels.It shows that in the minds of the Chinese people - money can be fined, but women's feet must be bound. Beauty is definitely not the beauty in the eyes of a certain man.Usually she must be the beauty in the eyes of almost all men.The derogatory comments of others cannot make her unbeautiful.But her own inner flaws, such as jealousy, vanity, ignorance, and greed, are enough to make her external, objective beauty that everyone recognizes at a discount. Beauty is the smile on a big face.So eyes are needed in order to see it; emotions are needed in order to feel it. 在某时代和某社会阶段，体制弊端多多，腐败现象严重，贫富差距天上地下，社会财富的配置极不公正，一类知识分子看在眼里，心中明白，了解得特别清楚，于是发出批评乃至批判的声音，那是多么正当又正常的呢？倒是缄默显得很不正常了。Is it not?有责任感的知识分子本身并不可笑。倒是诱导知识分子改变这一角色的言论，无论多么的时髦，本质上是动机可疑的，有时甚至意味着是一种乔装了的反动。知识分子(当然指你所说的那一类)不需要那一种言论的诱导。 知识分子无非这么几类：一类由于长期的职业特点，几乎与世隔绝，埋头致力于专业，对社会丑恶现象知之甚少，也根本不想多知道；一类其实知道的并不少，亲历亲见的也很多，但吸取经验教训，明哲保身，避而不谈，保持大智若愚的沉默；一类看到了，知道了，相当清楚地了解了，于是就要说。别人认为自说，自己也还是要说，非说不可。有时甚至会拍案面起，大声发出呵斥…… 这三类知识分子，所以这样，所以那样，乃是由于不同的成长背景、不同的个人经历，甚至不同的性情所决定的，都有各自的理由，那就随各自的意愿去做为好。 “文如其人”——此话于散文，更有普遍性。于小说，可能恰恰反过来。小说描摩外部世界，散文则如心泉流淌。想丝毫也不汇人其人的本色，须高超的文的技巧。我绘自己定的原则是——文章不妨泼辣，不妨激烈，不妨棱角鲜明，这汲什么不可，也不算大的毛病。但为人则须温良敦厚，宽忍谦和一些，这也不是“人格分裂”。即或是，这种“分裂”于人于已于社会，也不构成危害。但若反过来“分裂”，那就太可怕了…… 一个自私、倔狭，特别嫉妒、虚伪面又心理阴险之人，他理智地活着，对别人是很可怕的事。他率性地活着，对别人也是危害极大的事。 第一，眼前的生活，尤其我们中国人眼前的生活，在我看来并不怎么诗意化。第二，真和美，可作判别自然物及一切人的身外之物的标准。但二者之间加进了一个“善”字，则就主要是评说人心的标准了。依我看来，人心中缺少“善”，则人言行必虚妄，则美人，也不美矣，对人类的心史而言，无善便无美。人类诸美德，皆是“善”这株万年大树上的果子。第三，生活对人的教训也往往非是你说的那样。往往好东西并不平均分配，往往坏东西太相对地集中在某些不幸的人身上了。比如贫穷则失学，则健康没有保障，则不能成为知识者，则就业机遇少，则承担不起意外灾祸……所以人类一直在干预生活，使人类的社会变得对更其广大的人都有幸福可盲…… 美女有能力使自己的心灵也美。但一个心灵很美好的人，却无法使自己的外表也变得漂亮。有句歌词唱的好：“虽然我不美，但是我很温柔”。古人也有句话说的好——“桃花面，蛇蝎心”。外表和内心，都统一于美，固然好。不能统一，心灵自觉向美的方面完善，也好。 生命的含义，对绝大多数人而言，本就包含着责任。对父母，对儿女，对友情，对爱情，对工作……林林总总的责任使生命充实，有本能的活力。完全没有责任内容的人还算生命吗？凭什么别人对你尽了责任，而你幻想逃避一切责任。我不认为责任是生命的苦役。但生命有时是相当脆弱的，一己的能力也往往是徽不足道的。种种的责任集于一身，心有余而力不足，那样的生命就太可悲了。 我怀疑现存的有关人类起源的教科书内容。 我确信人类的最终归宿是地球毁灭。 我认为科学在造福我们人类现时利益的同时，肯定也在加剧着地球的严重祸患。 很久以来，我总有一个疑问——我们人类在物质生活的水平和质量方面，要求是否越来越病态，越来越背离人性，越来越走向着反面了呢？ ... 外国科学家做过这样的实验——将蚂蚁放人杯中，哪一只往外爬，以烟头烫哪一只。三百次以后，皆不复爬也。而有的蚂蚁，其实并不曾往外爬过，故也不曾被烫。但别的蚂蚁的体伤似乎使它们明白——选择某一方向是不可取的，不明智的。外国科学家们断言——它们的下一代，也将不同程度地接受这种变聪明了的遗传。这在动物学界叫作本能退化。人是何等聪明的动物！人不需要三百次之多的教训。再愚矗的人都不需要这么多次的教训才能总结经验，人只需要几次教训就足够了。 中国当代知识分子中的思想者，依然缺乏针对当代进行思想的勇气。或者，准确地说，依然在采取这样的方式迂回曲折地表达思想——即求助于对历史的澄清、分析、反思、再认识，间接地、缩头藏尾地体现对当代的思想认识。这使当代的思想者们的思想、技巧性远远高于实际上的思想价值。有时甚至将普遍的人们早巳达到了的思想认识，反复地靠技巧包装了不厌其烦地诉诸于世。故往往将思想淹没于技巧了。 我认为，在一切民主国家中，不再能产生所谓政治思想家了。民主使人类的全部政治思想画上了休止符。在目前还没有实行民主的国家中，也不再能产生什么政治思想家了。因为如果他拒绝之，他岂配妄称思想家？若表示接受，那么又将发现，许许多多的人比他更欢迎之。故他们能做的，仅仅是在没有民主的地方传播民主罢了。 民主不但结晶了人类几乎一切的政治思想成果，也解决了人类大部分的人文思想之探究。所剩的思想空间已相当有限。这也是近当代全世界都难以产生思想家的原因。科技依然在迅速发展，人类的思想却似乎处于半休眠状态。这并不意味着人类思想的萎缩，更不意味着傲情。恰铬相反，而意味着一种难以再超越的成熟。 人类在教育制度方面，似乎目前还没想出比考试更公平的方式。考试的制度，显然有其自身存在的弊端，但恐怕我们不得不承认，它乃弊端最少的方式。 中国乃世界上人口最多的国家。中国历年的初中生高中生，因而也是世界上最多的。但中国却并不相应地是世界上大学最多的国家。这是一个残酷的前提。此前提决定了，每百名中国儿女中，仅二三名高中生最终能进人大学校门。主要不是他们和她们的智力问题，而是现有的大学最多只能吸纳百分之二三。 中国目前出高考题之首要的、最终的目的，捅破窗纸说亮话——乃为大面积地、有效地杀伤百分之九十七八的中国儿女升学的可能性。排除许多省份的穷困地区教育质量确实普遍低下的因素，高考题所要杀伤的人数，估计仍在百分之七八十以上。杀伤率每年不能低于这个比例。倘低于这个比例，则必出现有许多学生的考分虽过了高考分数线，但全国各大学人满为患的局面。