Chapter 2 Chapter 1.2

If you look at it from a Chinese perspective, you will inevitably think so—compared with Mao Zedong's armed seizure of power, Gandhi's peaceful struggle for independence is simply a "rightist" mistake.But the Indian people regard him as a leader, and relying on the charm of this leader, India's peaceful struggle for independence has succeeded.To put it in the words of the common people—for the common people to forgive the mistakes of the leaders is like forgiving the mistakes of "our own people".Whoever can really make the people feel that they are "one of our own" may rise from a politician to a leader.Otherwise, you're stuck at the level of a politician!There are many politicians in the world.One crop after another, like a singer.That's not how leaders are made.China needs a leader so much right now! ...

First of all, it is great enough to have great achievements in history, and secondly, it is an absolute commoner image, frugal, rejecting luxury, and always advocating clean government, plus the last point-it is sad to hear that ordinary people are suffering, really. Be sad instead of fake sad.There will be tears, real tears instead of fake tears, these aspects together constitute the God in the eyes of the Chinese people.At least people who are second only to God.At least it will be like this until people over the age of forty-five in China are not extinct—— A leader's heart - what the common people want is the simplest thing, and it is also a rare and precious thing in this era full of commercial atmosphere!

Authority and prestige are two very different concepts. The foundation of authority is power.Power can build a country, and naturally it also has the prestige of building a country.But once that foundation crumbles, its prestige vanishes. Take Stalin, for example, when he was alive, he was not intimidating, but when he was dead, he was only considered a party leader. Another example is Brezhnev, what happened? And what establishes prestige is universal admiration.It outlasts authority much more. During the "Cultural Revolution", Jiang Qing said something about how literary and art workers should "correctly" reflect real life.She said - we don't deny that socialism also has some dark sides.If you really see it and feel it, then you can capitalize on the light more consciously and passionately.According to the logic of this "standard-bearer", light inspires people, and people will no longer pay attention to darkness. Isn't darkness the same as non-existence?

For a period of time, certain people who were qualified to represent the people understood and avoided the word corruption.It seems that if you talk about it, you are not a sincere reformer.In fact, I am afraid that if I talk too much, I will be deprived of the qualification to represent the people. The later stage of the "Cultural Revolution" became more and more corrupt.It is a concentrated manifestation of the political corruption of the Chinese Communists.Its characteristic is that the whole party and the people of the whole country tell lies, and use lies to deceive Mao Zedong until his death. There were only two truths in the ten years of the "Cultural Revolution" that are worthy of special mention by historians.Once, a few veterans came up against the case and told the truth, against political corruption within the party.The result was dubbed "February Countercurrent".Another time, the "April 5 Incident" in Tiananmen Square, which was triggered by commemorating Premier Zhou, was beaten down with a big stick and designated as a "counter-revolutionary incident"...

Of course, we cannot deny the positive, important, and huge role played by the "National People's Congress" and "CPPCC" on the current situation and future of the country.But it should be admitted that the voices calling for the punishment of corruption came first from those respectable people in the press.No matter how much the common people have been complaining about the same malpractices in the press for a long time. The phrase "power-for-money transaction" first and foremost undisputedly came from the folks.Afterwards, the articles were gradually denounced.So today it is possible to become an open topic.Otherwise, it will only be the angry words of the common people forever...

I once read an article written by a lady who is good at bridge and played from abroad to China and then to Zhongnanhai. It is said that she is quite charming.The main content is to criticize our domestic news media and expose too many dark sides.From her point of view, it also seemed to be a bad thing.And she advocated that more articles about the daily life of some of our authoritative old people should be published.Let our people know what lovely people they actually are. I think this is also an interesting proposition.Newspapers also need such healthy lace embellishments.It's better than making up some sensational pseudo-documentary pornographic cases.But I don't agree with her criticism of our domestic news media for exposing too much of the dark side.Although I fully believe that she has good intentions.First of all, I am not sure whether the "dark side" she mentioned includes the corruption that we need to further expose today.I thought corruption was the most sinister dark side of our country right now.If it is also included in the "dark side" mentioned by the lady, then I would like to say that fortunately, some of our journalists who still have a sense of responsibility to the country and the common people have not all given up the courage and conscience to expose.Otherwise, on the one hand, there will be widespread corruption, and on the other hand, there will be peace through singing and dancing. Wouldn't it be tantamount to advocating that even the conscience is corrupt?

As far as I know, my country's comprehensive development level ranks in the 70th place in the world, its per capita GDP ranks in the 90th place in the world, and its overall quality of life indicators rank very low in the world. There are so many illiterates, and so many people who have not fundamentally solved the problem of food and clothing.It is understandable that the living standards of party and state leaders and their children are higher than that of ordinary people.This is also in line with the theory that some people get rich first.No matter which part it is, they are all part of the more than 1.25 billion Chinese people.But a teenage girl wearing such a precious gold chain does not show the strength of the country.It can only make the children of ordinary people who cannot marry a daughter-in-law feel unbalanced.And make it impossible for those who want to explain it.Of course, you can also say that the children of ordinary people deserve their psychological imbalance. It is because of their jealousy and their own psychological tolerance.So leaving this level aside, as far as our Chinese tradition of educating the next generation is concerned, it will not play a good and positive guiding role, right?Even if our teenage girls in China can wear gold chains around their necks and chests, we still need someone's children to set an example of rejecting luxury?Why do common people miss the older generation of proletarian revolutionaries so much?Because most of them have the quality of rejecting luxury and never sticking to it.And the same is true of their requirements and education for their children.In the letters and poems they wrote to their children, almost all of them left evidence of this requirement and education.This is of course a blessing for developing China and the Chinese people whose living standards are very low.And of course their own virtues.Today, for the Chinese Communists, is it really unnecessary to keep such virtues?For the family education tradition of the Chinese Communists, is it also a matter of the passing of time and has no meaning?

As far as I know, even some royal families in the world pay great attention to teaching their children and descendants to avoid luxury when they are still children.A child is a child, wouldn't wearing gold and silver make you look like a child? ... Clearly, it is increasingly difficult for Beijingers to find a common language with people across the country.Beijingers despise Guangzhou people, just like those old western empires despise the Japanese as economic animals.Beijingers look down on Shanghainese, thinking that Shanghainese are too shrewd, too slippery, too self-interested, too gambler in dealing with others.People from Beijing and people from Tianjin can't get along very well, and I feel that people from Tianjin seem to be born with a "secondary school" energy.Beijingers seem to favor people from the Northeast.From the population of Beijing, you can often hear good things about the honesty and loyalty of the people in the Northeast.But in the past one or two years, I have often heard complaints from Northeast people about Beijingers—that Beijingers have also begun to become rascals, slippery, less friends, and too selfish in everything. , becoming more and more annoying from the heart.In the past, people from the Northeast had a lot of respect for Beijingers, feeling that they generally had "political consciousness".Later I felt that their "political awareness" was not very high, but they still generally had "political minds".Later, I felt that it was not really a "political mind", but a "political complex" or "political sense".Now I finally feel that what I can ask Beijingers for advice is nothing more than bits and pieces of "political information."And only a very small number of people who still have to continue to eat "political food" in the commercial age are interested.It is not so respectful to Beijingers as before.

The "transformation" of the minds of Beijingers shows that our country's "transition" period has undergone a rapid transition.When politics is more a matter between politicians, the long-term stability of a country is expected. But the problem is that except for less than one percent of the Chinese who got rich first, the vast majority of Chinese people are very confused and bewildered in the days ahead.They really need a close goal, a short-term goal that can be reached by running a few steps and stretching their arms, and they need a trustworthy person to tell them responsibly—what will happen next year?What will happen next year?What will happen in three to five years?Will factories continue to close?Is the fate waiting for them to pay 76 to 15 percent of their wages or simply lose their jobs?Will I definitely get social security and medical bills if I lose my job?How much would that be? ...

But no one can answer their questions in such a very specific and close-radius life content, and no one dares to guarantee or promise them anything.Their fate seems to be determined by the people who control their fate, but it seems that no one dares to say to them responsibly - believe me, I am fully capable of this.What is especially frustrating to them is that they themselves clearly cannot determine their own destiny. Then I remembered a friend's advice to me—be more confused about big things, and be clear about small things. I remember saying at the time: "I am not unfamiliar with this statement. It was Lin Biao who said it, but you said it backwards—he said that big things are clear, and small things are muddy."

The friend said: "I didn't say against it, it was Lin Biao who said it against. So he thinks he is a sensible person, but he is not a sensible person." I asked him what he said? He persuasively and persuasively enlightened me—the major events in this world are originally changing with the passage of time and changing frequently.A lot of things that seemed to be absolutely correct back then, and would never change the conclusion, were not one by one negated with the evolution of the times?The so-called ten years in the east and ten years in the west of the river are viewed horizontally as ridges and peaks on the side.However, many small principles have been followed by common people since ancient times.For example, if you borrow money from others, you should always pay it back, right?You owe others love, and you should always remember it, right?When you cross the road, you must obey the traffic rules, right?If you violate the traffic rules and get hit by a car, the responsibility lies first with yourself, right? ... I remember the first time I read an article in the newspaper about some big money feasting for tens of thousands of yuan, walking around angrily alone at home, thinking why the Chinese are so hopeless?Once you get rich suddenly, you don't know how much you are, or what your last name is?Eat one less meal and donate the money saved to the out-of-school children in poor areas. It is not a little bit of warmth among compatriots to the society. It shows that the Chinese who got rich first are still in poverty. Is there sympathy for the living Chinese? But even for a person like me who is prone to emotions, when you read such articles in the newspapers for the tenth time, do you still have those emotions when you first read them?Would you still walk around the house alone angrily?Do you still sing about something? So, even when I read in the newspaper that the big money in the south ate the "golden banquet" worth a million yuan, I even thought it was an interesting thing, a fun thing. I think, for ordinary Chinese people, some things that were originally deafening and socially alert are probably like this, but in the end they have no choice but to become leisurely articles just like the lace content in newspapers for people to read and know. right? If you say you have no feelings, you are not seeking truth from facts.After all, there are still some feelings.For example, the relationship between some big money and money, as far as I think, is very similar to the relationship between a man with abnormal sexual psychology and a woman who is absolutely possessed by him.You may wish to imagine that he longed to possess a woman for a long time, then once he possessed her, he ravaged her, raped her legally, and the pleasure compared with normal men must be more than ten times greater. The extravagance and extravagance of some wealthy rich people want to squander money. I can say with certainty that it is not just for the sake of showing off and showing off, as some articles put it in a nutshell.But it is, even fundamentally—a symptom of a sickly psychosexuality.For these men, money and women are the same thing.Even something sexier than a woman.Raping a woman is illegal.Even for wives, wanton ravages and sexual abuse, if the wife is not willing to do so, it is inevitable that she will have to resort to the law.Rape, rape, and abuse, in their view, are as sexy as women, even if they are not more sexy than women, but they absolutely don't have to have the slightest scruples.For money does not accuse its possessor.Compared with women, money, as long as a person owns it, it is absolutely obedient.Moreover, rape money, for some wealthy rich people, must have a special sexual experience as if they have raped all the women in the world.Undoubtedly, in their view, money is not only the same thing as women, but also means that it is almost the master of all women.He even raped the ruler of all women, is there any woman in the world that he can't rape?This is like some wealthy clients in old China. When they went to the end of the prostitution and said that they had enough of one prostitution, their sexual desires turned to the old man's body in an unbelievable way.To them, that seemed to mean a final one-time total rape.Often, after that, they also become impotent. In the era of commodities, in an era that is heading towards extreme commodification, some women, especially some women who are naturally pretty, no matter whether they are willing or unwilling, or they are willing to pretend to be coy on the surface, in some rich and In the eyes of men with poor quality, everything is inevitably just a commodity without a price tag.is a consumer product. One of them suddenly asked me - "What do you think of the 'groupies' among today's teenagers?" I said: "That is a common sexual psychological phenomenon that has been grouped." My words made people look at each other. At that moment, I really felt very uncomfortable and awkward all of a sudden. Maybe I'm a person who seems too lacking in "accommodation"?Are my words too blunt and too sharp?Do they think I'm too mean for contemporary teenagers? "But you also chased after the 'star' back then. Chairman Mao was also a 'star', a 'great savior', how do you explain that?" I said, "That is a universal religious psychological phenomenon that has been universalized." "So you were born out of faith back then, but today's 'groupies' are driven by sex?" I said: "My words do not imply praise or derogation. The generation of that year was generally malnourished, which led to too late physical maturity. Compared with today's teenagers, it is generally two or three years later, or even three or four years. The generation of that year , the general excess of 'thought nutrition'. 'Thought nutrition' is the heat energy provided to the spirit. The heat energy of the spirit can only promote the behavior of the spirit. It is different from the material male or female hormone absorbed from food nutrition, so the year's On the surface of the same phenomenon, the first generation and the current generation have the essential difference between the sexual psychological phenomenon and the religious psychological phenomenon.” Why are there more girls than boys in "Groupies"?And why are there more pretty girls than less pretty girls?And why did she quit that "clan" automatically when she was twenty-two or three-year-old?Why do you force her to chase her when she is twenty-five or six years old? ... The reason is so simple - the initial awakening of a teenager's sexual psychology must first be induced by the girl next door or a certain female classmate in the same class.The result is that he either represses himself, masturbates, or simply picks or molests her.Between a "star" of the opposite sex and a girl next door or female classmate, a man's seemingly intimidating and realistic way of thinking must convince him why he should look far away.Especially when it comes to sex, men are generally more aggressive than women. "Invading" a female singer, especially a female singer who is traveling to Hong Kong and Taiwan, even a teenager's mind will tell him that it is tantamount to whimsical.He could dream about her, but when he woke up, he would still stare at the girl next door or the female classmate when he opened his eyes.They also pretended to be very "star-chasing", and showed very "star-chasing" behavior, which was really for the girls of that family to see.Maybe the girl next door or the female classmate he has a crush on is among them.Girls are not.Girls who are not so beautiful are certainly not enough to attract the attention of boys of the same age.What they desire is probably nothing more than a kiss, and a kiss is the best way for them to poetize their desire.And most of them prefer to obtain the satisfaction of their desires at the level of waiting.No further fantasies are made.They are especially afraid of seeing the naked nature of a phenomenon.Especially when they themselves constitute a phenomenon.If they can't even get the satisfaction of a kiss, they will wait for the opportunity to kiss others because of their desire to be kissed.This process of psychological transformation includes subconscious revenge for the status quo that I have been too ignored.When they were crying, shouting, screaming, crying, waiting outside a certain big hotel, it seemed that they only wanted to see a certain singer, the obvious fact was that the real and common saying "worship" It has nothing to do with it, it is really a miserable situation where they are tormented by their own sexual desire (there are some stage differences from sexual hunger).And when the brave and lucky one among them rushed to the stage like a mad cat, hugged the head of any male singer and kissed it, it was really equivalent to a ejaculation of teenagers.The difference is more psychological.Then, they may say with excitement when they meet someone—"I kissed so-and-so", or write this sentence in their diary.And the original correct meaning of this sentence should actually be read as "So-and-so kissed me!" - so their psychological sexual behavior seemed to be practiced and satisfied... As for those beautiful girls, their existence in reality may be in the state of being "chased".This is enough for them.Even enough to bore them.Although they are not "stars".They also participate in the "clan" of "chasing stars", perhaps more "following the fashion" and "chasing" vanity.A kiss is easy for them, easy as pie.As long as they are happy to get or give.They are more aware than anyone else that they have the strength in this area, and the opportunities are multifaceted and numerous. "Fashion" and vanity will make them stronger, and in their opinion, being more and more is good.So it has become the first need and desire... Indeed, if someone in the middle class is carefree and carefree, and the "living method" is relaxed and happy, and someone in the common people is unwilling to be mediocre, struggling endlessly, and determined to climb up to the middle class and even bourgeois Among the "ambitious ways of living", it is difficult for anyone to analyze the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, good and bad.Another example is between Lin Yutang and Lu Xun. They are both literati. It seems difficult for you to say whether Lin Yutang's "scholar-bureaucrat"-style "living method" is more in line with Chinese standards, or Lu Xun's "time fighter". "The "living method" is more in line.It can only be easy because of people.Lu Xun once denounced the "bracketing method" of the "scholar-bureaucrat" style of the old Chinese literati, which is a "living method" that "dedicates to turning gossip into nonsensical articles because of qualifications and capital connections."Lin Yutang, also by name, commented on Lu Xun in this way—"It is better to call it a fighter than a fighter. Once a fighter loses the target he is fighting for, throwing a stone at a dog will hit him quickly." Mature versus superficial kitsch, thinking versus trendy kitsch, cultural character versus philistine philosophical kitsch, cultural responsibility and mission versus the "theoretical" kitsch of cynical street ruffians, in a word, the overall cultural mentality of cultural people is strikingly different. The shy and kitsch posture is "hanging upside down" with the muddled world that does not distinguish between good and evil, beauty and ugliness.And from the current point of view, it seems that I am afraid that I will not be able to hang up, and it seems that I am afraid that I will not be able to hang up tightly.Therefore, a series of books that teach people how to become tactful and smooth in social life, and then become cunning and cunning, and become "thick and dark" occupy the cultural garden majestically. A young critic once wrote an article specifically researching and discussing the images of women in the works of a group of male educated youth writers, and found that the young women they (of course including me) poured their emotions into portraying, although there are thousands of differences, they are generally gentle and quiet women. .I think this is a cultural phenomenon and tendency manifested in the bleak love history of a generation.Cheerful and lively personality, for young women, it was too easy to become the target of accusation and criticism.In the confrontation with the times, they are probably the ones who finally compromise. The article further demonstrates that looking at the lingering women described by most male writers seems to be enough to draw a conclusion-in terms of love, a generation of educated youth is lost. I think this conclusion is roughly correct. It seems that none of us will take the initiative to approach each other.I exist only to embolden her, like a vigilant wild dog—just to embolden her.It seems that someone is secretly monitoring our every move, so that we can't approach it, and we dare not approach it rashly.But it was this unnatural situation, mainly caused by the restraint of both of us, that on the contrary led us to secretly have an initial fondness for each other.Because that kind of restraint is the specific psychology of a generation in a specific era.A behavior regulated by an absurd moral principle.If I act too proactively towards her, she is likely to suspect that I have "bad intentions".If she was too aggressive towards me, I was more likely to see her as a flirtatious girl.We all want to be close, to talk, to get to know each other. Things in the world are often right and wrong.There is good and evil in the inclination of the human heart.There is a distinction between good and evil, and there is love and hate in the heart.To human beings, the distinction between love and hate is actually the most magnanimous, the most unrestrained, and the most natural character. Distinguishing between likes and dislikes is really not a high-level standard of our human behavior and ideas.It's just a low-level minimum standard.But isn't all nobility, including all so-called justice, built on the first cornerstone of our human virtue and character?Otherwise, there will be no sincerity in each of us.There will be no "respect" in our dictionary. Some of our contemporary people seem to have completely forgotten the "testament" of their ancestors that "the way is different, and there is no conspiracy".It seems that the minimum and almost the last character boundary of "things of a feather flock together and people are divided into groups" based on self-love has been wiped away, and only the "middle way" has been adhered to.And superficially transformed the "middle way" into a group of harmony.As a result, there are more and more people of the mean.And through them, they promote their own moderation as a fashion, as if they have initiated some new life movement and created some new civilization.Therefore, it is not difficult for us to see such a situation—rogues, ruffians, insidious villains, treacherous people, and all those who behave badly and have bad morals and malicious intentions should be isolated by the normal pattern of "dividing people into groups". They are able to come and go swaggeringly in our lives, corrupting and poisoning our lives to the point where they can do whatever they want.Wherever he goes, there will be a group of moderate people who will take advantage of the fun to deal with him, play tricks on the spot, shake hands and pat shoulders, and be in harmony with him. What's even more sad is that once people with clear love and hate show clear love and hate, the moderate people will put on a moderate face to reconcile.We lack the courage to be upright and dare to love and hate at the same time, but we are very good at acting like a child at this time. Compete with the hateful by daring to hate, defend the cuteness by daring to love, suppress the hateful phenomenon by competing with the hateful, defend the cuteness with the courage to love the cuteness, and carry forward in our lives.Let there be more truth, kindness and beauty in our lives!Let us be a shield within the scope of each of our lives to resist the invasion of ourselves and our lives by false ugliness.At the same time as a spear. Let us experience the first magnanimity, the first chic, and the first nature of being a human being with a clear distinction between love and hate! After that, it is the question of whether we can appreciate more of the nobleness and beauty of the human heart... Don't we always swear by "today"? Sometimes we take oaths as strict rules for our tomorrow and the day after tomorrow.Sometimes we openly swear at others and hope for oversight. Many things have been done just this way. Many hearts have become better in this way. Many wishes have been fulfilled in this way. The warmth of life has been lost, which is as worrying as the erosion of water and soil in nature.If we ourselves have never put warmth into life, then what right do we have to complain that life is too indifferent? Stealing actually means stealing.Common people call the same behavior stealing, while literati say it is stealing.Picking the lock by slipping through the door is called robbery, and picking something out of another person's pocket is called pickpocketing, and it is called stealing when literati and scholars do these things.For example, stealing other people's articles or ideas is called "plagiarism".For example, cheating is often written as "stealing jade" in the articles of literati and refined scholars.I often think that this is our little cunning, in order to emphasize the difference between stealing and stealing by using the word "stealing" when being criticized... Earning other people's money turns out to be such a joyful thing. To earn other people's money by deception, you even feel that the other party is worthy of your secret ridicule.I remembered that I bought three catties of water chestnut powder in this market not long ago. I felt that the stickiness was suspicious after eating. I asked a friend to find a unit to test it, but it was just starch soaked in bone glue powder.I think the pleasure of the person who sells it not only has the pleasure of deceiving someone successfully, but also has the element of revenge for someone. People who live near good people will probably have this kind of momentary kindness in their hearts, and they can't always restrain this impulse of self-expression.It shows that self-confidence is still based on the side of good people, and it is a kind of comfort.And the sense of peace and satisfaction in the heart that proves something-I am a person who has such a desire for self-expression from time to time! Once the dignity of the human heart is close to instinct, we can only be in awe of it.I think my act of giving alms is really insignificant to that old woman... Literature is a river that flows from the day it existed to the present.All literary phenomena that have been produced are inevitable, and all literary phenomena that have disappeared are also inevitable.It is constantly produced, and it is constantly lost.However, the flow of human literature will never dry up, it depends on the spiritual life of human beings to nourish it, and it in turn nourishes us spiritually.If there is any unchanging law of literature, then I think it is that it is always connected with the spiritual universe of human beings. Perhaps no one in this world can exert a lifelong influence on us, and no one can take long-term responsibility for us, not even our most responsible parents.Just as we cannot be parents to our own children, so if there ever existed a Mr. and a Mrs. and a Mrs. who could bear lasting responsibility for the formation and life-long influence of our spiritual and personal qualities, then he or she She will never be someone else.Certainly, it is ourselves. We start educating ourselves when we are children.It's just that the doctrine is different... Each of us is born with a majestic "pointer".It is a shame that is part of our human nature.It distinguishes us from all beasts and birds.Only by relying on it can we effectively educate ourselves in terms of mind and personality.Everyone's soul is a courtyard.In the days to come, there are many people who will teach us many skills of making a living and dealing with people.But few will be the gardeners of our souls. If the outcome of World War II had been reversed, I think it would be difficult for Japan to become the economic power it is today.Colonial rule over a country with a large population would exhaust Japan and overwhelm itself.In the end, the donkeys are poor, the colonial rule has no tricks, and the local development has no achievements. Sympathy is as annoying as hypocrisy and rhetoric if it is mistaken in its basic inclination. As a nation, Japan has many strengths that we Chinese can learn from.But history is history, and crime is crime.When we talked about the crime of Japan’s aggression against China, on my part, I thought about it as part of the crime of human aggression.As a Chinese, I hope that Japan will reflect and repent, but I hope that one part of mankind will have a minimum of reflection and humiliation on the suffering caused by the war of aggression and the other part of mankind.A nation without the initiative of self-reflection and Yu Cheng's sense of humiliation will be vigilant by all countries in the world.I hope that Japan will dispel the vigilance of other countries in the world with practical actions on this point.Otherwise, it will most likely be a country that has no true friends in international relations! Humans are not birds and have no wings.After running in the air for a long time, my heart is always not so at ease.Even if it is a desert, I would like to land first, to rest assured. A woman, if she can give her "6,000 yuan saved with great difficulty" to a man who has only known each other for a few days and has no understanding at all, then he will put her on the bed, that is, It's a matter of course and by the way. In my opinion, "Sino-Japanese relations" are actually "Sino-Japanese economic relations" for many middle-aged Japanese.Furthermore, it is a kind of "international relations" that can profoundly affect Japan's economic status in Asia and even in the world. For many middle-aged Americans, "Sino-U.S. relations" is probably more about "Sino-U.S. political relations."Furthermore, it is a kind of "international relations" that can profoundly affect the political status of the United States in Asia and even in the world. The Yankees have proved themselves to be a world power by relying on their international political strength in the world.Its international political wing and national economic wing are both full-fledged and flying together. Japan relied on its economic strength in the world to prove itself as a world power.Although its national economic wing is comparable to that of the United States, its international political wing has degenerated to an extremely small size.This strange bird was able to soar above the sky of the world only by the constant flapping of its single wing. Japan cares so much about its share of China, a huge "market" with unlimited potential. The Yankees seem to be quite indifferent, even if they value it in their hearts, they have to pretend to be disdainful on the surface. Americans look around the world, as if they are always thinking - which country is still the main enemy of the United States? The Japanese look around the world, as if they are always thinking - which country can be opened up as Japan's economic market now? Architecture is a city's "fixed art"; women are its "moving art".The reason why Paris is famous in the world is also because of the elegance of its women. In every city on this earth, no matter how big or small, as long as a man pays attention, he will always find a few beautiful women.This is the case in cities everywhere. A few beautiful women can't prove the quality of a city.What is meaningful is the general landscape of women.That kind of ordinary and natural scenery of women who are ironed with the life forms of the general public.Just like Paris is not really full of beauties, there are so many beauties. What surprised me the most was the "tranquility" and "clearness" on the face of the youngest Japanese woman.That kind of "tranquility", as if there is nothing worth worrying about in my heart, and there is nothing to ponder over; that kind of "clearness", like "a clear sky" and "cloudless" in the world of desire of.It seems that there is nothing in the outside world that will stir their thoughts and arouse their grievances. I asked the translator, how could a Japanese woman's face "cultivate" such a demeanor? The translator is a young man who graduated from the Chinese Department of Shanghai University. He has settled in Japan for many years and is employed by a large company as a temporary translator. My question startled him.After pondering for a long time, I said smoothly, "Japanese women are different from most of us Chinese women. There is not so much life pollution on their faces, and they are not so complicated. I also felt this when I first arrived in Japan." Japan is one of the most typical "male center" dominating countries on our planet.Of course, so far, there is no such thing as a "feminist center" country on earth.几乎所有的国家无一不是“男权中心”主宰国家。 我说日本“最典型”乃是想指出，从传统上看，日本妇女在“男权中心”主宰的悠久历史阴影下，几乎处于一种类乎姆女的地位。从家庭到社会，从劳役义务到性义务，都类乎婶女。或者进一步地，更准确地说，在漫长的日本社会的历史过程中，日本男人渐渐将他们的女人“调教”得类乎他们的婶女了。而她们并不，也许从来不觉得，从家庭到社会对她们的要求和定位，有什么不妥有什么不好。甚至早已一代代地习惯了，反而认为是天经地义的了。 拜伦对于女人曾说过这样的“名言”——“晚她们进来！于是她们出现为我服务(当然包括性服务)；让她们出去！于是她们悄悄从我面前消失……” 我想，拜伦也许说了绝大多数男人想说而不好意思坦率说出口的话。绝大多数日本男人未见得知道拜伦曾说过那样的话。但他们是凭着男人潜意识里的本能，那样“调教”他们的女人。而且可以说达到了目的。 日本的色情文化，日本的色情业，正在潜移默化地消弭着日本女人的羞耻感。正在使她们习惯于接受一种观念——性是微不足道的，性是有利可图的。对于一心想赚钱的男人们是这样的，对于一心想赚钱的女人们也是这样。 女人消弭着性羞耻感，要么接近天使，要么，的确的接近“二百五”和“十三点”。女人接近天使，脸上必是“宁静”的和“澄净”的。接近“二百五”和“十三点”，也往往会是那样子。 日本女人是日本的温而顺的婢女。 如果说生育是女人的第一天职，那么害羞便是女人的第一本能。 生活中不限量的东西，便不再是人们贪婪没够儿的东西了。 我顿有所悟——为什么日本青年男女中“发烧友”多，“追星族”多。当色情文化裹携在大众文化之中，泛滥地包剿着他们和她们，而他们和她们又厌倦了，腻歪了，相比而言，做“发烧友”和“追星族”，倒意昧着是心理“卫生”、心理健康的选择了。否则，他们和她们又用什么去充填精神呢？希望他们和她们，大众文化的消费主体，都变成所谓“精英文化”和“学者文化”的追随者鉴赏家，不是有点儿过于浪漫了吗？ 我在国内时，曾听到有同胞说：“一个中国男人，最好是拥有美国的绿卡和房产，拥有日本的汽车和老婆。拿这个国家任何一国的工资，但是一定要在中国上班。” 美国“绿卡”身价高，美国住房宽敞有花园，而且买房优惠条件多；日本汽车便宜实用，日本老婆温而顺对丈夫睁一只眼闭一只眼，往往采取无为而治的夫人政策；美元和日元都是坚挺的硬通货；而在中国上班最可以做一天和尚撞一天钟，吊儿郎当…… “二战”的结束，对于意大利，有点儿“自己解放自己”的意味儿；对于德国，有点儿被从法西斯统治之下“解放”的意味儿；对于日本，却是彻底的无条件的投降。仅仅意昧着是投降，再什么都不意味。 一方面，日本是“二战”的祸首国之一；另一方面，又是地球上惟一的原子弹受害国。二十余万日本人死于顷刻！ 侵略战争，使日本遭到的灾难，比它带给别国，首先是中国的灾难，似乎更具有恐怖性。 而且，半个世纪以来，任何一个国家，都找不出一条哪怕是相对成立的理由对日本表示较由衷的同情。 日本只能长久以来暗暗怜悯自己。 日本和美国的关系，很像金庸武侠小说中最常见的关系——剑侠或刀客，剪除了他的心恩人物，却同时扮演了对方儿子的“监护人”角色，类似“义父”式的“监护人”角色。他似乎忘了那小孩儿终究是要长大的，那小孩儿必然地也就长大了。轻功硬功内功外功都具备了，甚至足以和他“过招”了，眼见着一天天不再是他能控制得了的了，这时他的“监护人”角色便有些尴尬起来。 日本人对美国的心理，必是十分矛盾的。一方面，他们视美国为“义父”。另一方面，他们又怎甘永远处于“义子”的地位？何尝不愿摆脱美国的“监护”？ 也许，中国，和我们自己，都在不知不觉之中开始习惯的太多了。也许，过不了多久，也就再没有什么事情和事件，值得我们稍微的震惊了。而居然仍保持着震惊本能的人，则理所当然地显得少见多怪，显得滑稽可笑，甚至愚不可及。 这真是一种令人沮丧的现实——当代之中国女性，一旦知识化了，很多一部分，也便同时“准贵族化”了，变成了些个“包法利夫人”式的女人。 “知识女性”和女“知识分子”，显然是极不相同的两个概念。 每年都从全国的大学里派生出前者们，却只能从众多的前者们之中派生出极少的后者们。 前者们往往更加对一切与女性的时髦相关的事物发生浓厚兴趣。因为她们往往自以为有了“知识”，便拥有了尤其要享受时髦的特权。 看来仅仅“知识化”未必就会使女性在精神品格上自立自强；正如仅仅富起来未必就会使男人成为文明人。 中国当代并不缺少男文化人和女文化人，并不缺少“知识女性”或“知识男性”，起码不像缺少起码的社会良知、社会道义、社会责任感和使命感那么紧迫地缺少。但却十分紧迫非常紧迫地缺少真正意义上的“知识分子”，尤其缺少真正意义上的女“知识分子”。至于形形色色的所谓“知识女性”，从来都只不过是时代的闪烁发光的边角料，正如玻璃厂里的玻璃渣子也闪烁发光一样…… 刘晓庆是名气大大的女演员，但非是演技最高的女演员。名气高于演技，乃中外演艺界寻常现象，因素往往在“戏”外。 爱是文学艺术中老得不能再老的主题。却永远的老而不死。真真是一个“老不死的东西。”我想这大撅由于读者们总是一代一代老得很快，总是一代一代相继死去的原因吧？ 大多数当代人既不愿执勤地生活在传统观念中，其实也不愿非常激进地生活在种种时代的“先锋”观念中。往往习惯于生活在传统与“先锋”之间的“过渡带”。 当代人不但要读关于爱的故事，更要读当代人创作的，尤其要该当代人反映当代人的。 老故事和畅销书之间的关系，其实正意昧着当代人和爱、和性、和家庭观念之间的尴尬——不求全新，亦不甘守旧。全新太耗精力，守旧太委屈自己。 近年，情形似乎有了很大变化。物质生活水准提高了，五十多岁的男人不再各个都像小老头儿了。四十多岁的女人也普遍都非常在意地减肥、健美，想方设法使自己年轻化了。事实上，她们也真比五六十年代的女人们年轻得多。人既年轻，心也就俏少。半老不老的女人们的内心里，其实是和少女们一样喜欢读爱情小说的，只不过不喜欢读爱情一方主角是少女的小说罢了。 半老不老的女人们和半老不老的男人们内心里所幻想的。直接的就是婚外恋。 对于婚外浪漫恋情的幻想，一个只有小学三四年级文化程度的女人，绝不比一个受过大学高等教育的女人或女硕士女博士什么的稍逊，甚至有过之而无不及。初级教育教给人幻想的能力，高等教育教给人思想的能力。婚外恋幻想是中产阶层妇女传统的意识游戏之一。 ，它在每段赤裸裸的情欲和性的描写之后，总是“有诗为证”。而那些“诗”，几乎全部的拙劣到了极点，后来就干脆不厌其烦地重复出现。同样的字、词、句，一而再，再丽三地使用，好比今天看电视连续剧，不时插入同一条广告。 笑笑生毫无疑问是一个有间接淫癖的男人。他从他的写作中也获得着间接性心理的和性生理的快感。可以想象，那一种快感，于笑笑生显然的形同手淫。后人将“批判”和“谴责”的桂冠戴在他的头上，实在意昧着一种暖昧。 性爱在中国当代小说中，几乎只剩下了官能的壳。这壳里也几乎只剩下了人欲的流动。 没有温情的爱情是根本不可能的，正如没有氧的空气根本不是空气一样。 爱着的男女之间的温情都是有几分“肉麻”的，只不过“肉麻”的程度不同罢了。这一点一切爱过的男女——痴爱也罢，逢场作戏也罢，都是心中有数的。而且都是有切身体会的。 读过许多关于爱情的小说之后，我已经变得不大容易被爱情故事所感动了。 最感动当代人的爱情故事，必是发生在当代的爱情故事。 哪怕极平庸的当代爱情故事，也会至少吸引当代人中的一部分。 这种感动就像嫉妒一样。当代人不会嫉妒古人，不会嫉妒神话中的人和传说中的人。但一定要深深地嫉妒他或她周围的人。 一切的爱情小说，包括神话中的爱情故事和民间的爱情故事，都是有“性别”的。有的可归为“男性”类，有的可归为“女性”类，有的可归为“中性类”。《白蛇传》，则是“男性”类的爱情故事。这故事通过许仙这男人，去感受千年蛇精的自娘子。这故事明显不是为女人们讲述的，而是为男人们讲述的。尽管它赚取了女人们的眼泪，但是真正深入的是男人们的心。哪一个男人不曾幻想和一条白娘子那样的大蛇精发生一段恋情呢？可是许仙却不会进人多少女人们的梦里，由于他对真爱的不信任。白娘子却世世代代满足着一切中国男人们的爱情幻想。 在西方人的爱情观念中，性则往往是摆在第一位的。性生活的美满，才是幸福夫妻关系的大前提。我们不知道安娜·卡列尼娜决心要与她的丈夫离婚而不惜做花花公子渥伦斯基的情妇，除了对方风流倜傥的外表，是否也有着她的丈夫性疲软的因素。 饥渴之人，一旦有机会“暴食狂饮”，可算是一种上帝赐予的补偿。 康司丹斯在她所处的那个时代的勇敢选择，具有女性个体的积极意义。弗朗西丝卡的选择，则顺应了社会的暗示。前者将被女人所叹服，后者将被社会所叹服。前者征服女人，后者征服男人。不乏深刻，但毫无感人之处。《廊桥遗梦》毫无深刻，但不乏感人之处。它感动我们的，不是十四年前的男女婚外恋，而是罗伯特的格守诺言。以及他对弗朗西丝卡那种“曾经沧海难为水，除却巫山不是云”的专情。这一种专情，确乎足以使当代男人们无地自容。也确乎足以令任何一个当代女人打算涌泉相报…… 我认为，《廊桥遗梦》好比是一个气象气球。它飘到中国上空，使我们经由它的出现，足以观测到我们自己所处的“社会气象”。“气象”二宇所指，当然是爱情观念和家庭观念。如若劳伦斯依然活着，他将会震惊地看到，使他当年痛心疾首斥以厉言的那类青年，七十年后在中国竟比比皆是。 如若罗伯特·沃勒到中国来与他们和她们坦率交谈，将会震惊地明白——他的《廊桥遗梦》却是在与他的愿望相反的方面感动中国的“新生代”，以及新生的中产阶层男亥们。 中国人所面临的家庭和爱情的矛盾，将在下一个世纪像地球上的能源污染一般空前严重。 对美的女性的裸体之欣赏，或对女性的裸体美的欣赏，应是人类最起码具有的、最由衷的、最自然的、最愉悦的欣赏意识。这一种欣赏意识，应与我们对大自然中的美景的欣赏互有最直接的共鸣。 皆云“钱财乃身外之物”，怎么的一来，从哪一天开始，中国人仿佛都活到了另一种境界？一种“钱财之外本无物”的境界？ 我所由衷赞美的是进化之后的人体之美。是那些健康的、年轻的、充满生命活力的人体之美。我尤其毫不害羞地由衷地赞美这样一些女人的人体之美。这世界上再没有其他任何事物，竟能与她们的人体之美相提并论。一只孔雀无疑也是美的，可是若将它们的漂亮焙目的羽毛技光了，它们顿时会变得多么丑陋啊！一匹骏马，一只豹，一头鹿或羚羊，无疑也是美的。可它们如果站立起来，那样子又将是多么可笑啊！面一个健康的，年轻的，充满生命活力的，体态优美的女人，无论她穿上什么衣服，都是美的。衣服的款式与色彩不同，她身上焕发出的美感也便不同。而她什么都不穿的时候，赤裸地，安详地站着、坐着或卧着的时候，那么她的美更加无与伦比倘一群又一群裸体的男人进入我的视野，我也将确不知会对我的心理造成什么感受。因为据我想来、男人还是容衣服更体面一些。不穿衣服的男人连所谓气质都谈不大上了。以前我每星期都在公共浴室洗一次澡。我承认那种地方其实是我最讨厌去的地方之一。 当我们谈论人体美的时候，其实主要是指女性人体而言。虽都是人，一裸，男人和女人的结果，则就不能用同一“语言体系”去说了。雕塑大师米开朗其罗的“大卫”，与断臂的维纳斯相比，简直就算不上是什么艺术品了。罗丹的“思想者”，据我看来，罩上一袭亚里士多德穿的那种长袍，同样是坐在那儿做冥思冕想之状，艺术效果反而要好得多。男人的肌肉感其实不具有怎么高的审美价值。有的生命形体需要皮和羽毛的“包装”，去掉这一种“包装”使不值得欣赏。有的生命形体“包装”与不“包装”都是美的。优美的女人形体就是这样。这是造物主决定的。一个亘古不变的自然法则。 人体是最美的。人脸乃最美中之美。人眼乃最美中之至美精美的。 我常觉人眼美得不可思议。大不抵一瓣桔，色不外蓝黑褐．不发声而善表达，不遣词而语汇丰富，乃至于连文字都甘拜下风。一睁则与灵性相通，一闭则与梦境同游。远眺则山川江河，尽收眼底。近观则纤尘之微，也看得个一清二楚。喜怒哀乐优，仁义礼志信，一双眼睛，统统的都包括了去。美目流盼中是美人眼。视死如归是志士眼。无所畏惧是猛士的眼。天真烂漫是儿童的眼。纯洁无理是少女的眼。睿智深邃是哲人的眼。谈然视之是隐士的眼。善良祥和是君子的眼。所以老百姓有一句话道是“画脸容易圆眼难”。文词中有一句话道是“画龙点睛”之笔。一张报的关键版块叫“报眼文章”。一首诗的藏妙处叫“诗眼”。政治家大商人的高明举措被形容为“独具慧眼”…… 我常常为许多小小年纪就戴上了近视眼镜的少男少女们的眼睛而难过。 一上中学，分数这条疯狂的猎狗，就将他们和她们追逐得像些可怜的小野兔似的无处逃命。从初一到高三，从十二三岁到十七八岁，整整六年里，他们和她们成了这个国家这个民族心理最紧张的人。为了分数首先牺牲的是欢乐，接着的代价是眼睛。某重点中学的高二班中，三分之一学生是近视眼。另外三分之一视力明显下降。最后三分之一也都不同程度地感到视力不佳…… 我为许多年轻女郎们的眼睛而难过。她们本都有一双好看的眼睛，可是却步要用一些乱七八糟的所谓化妆品污染在自己的眼睛周围。使她们看去像熊猫，像火鸡。她们这样做往往是为了引起男人们的注意，吸引男人们的目光。可是却似乎不懂，男人们欣赏的，最是女人们未被污染过的眼睛。 我也常为许多男人们的眼睛而难过。我发现许多男人们的眼睛，观看猥亵的、邪狞的、丑恶的、残忍的情形的欲望，是远远强大于观看美好的、优雅的、艺术化了的事物的。“赏心悦目”这个词的含意，对他们的眼睛而言，恰拾反了过来。看书一定要看“黄”的，看电影一定要看“黄”的，看录像更要看“黄”的。“色情”二字已不过瘾，要看床上的“一招一式”的真功夫的操练。当然，最好再佐以血腥的恐怖之刺激…… 男婚女嫁，关乎一辈子。质量的前提，首先该是“性”和“情”。 好丈夫是各式各样的。除了吸烟我没有别的坏毛病。我非是“登徒子”式的男人。也从不“拈花惹草”、“招蜂惹蝶”。In fact.在男女情感关系中我很虚伪。如果我不想，既或与女性经年相处，同行十万八千里，她们也是难以判断我究竟喜爱不喜爱她们的。我自认为，我在这一方面常显得冷漠无情。并且，我不认为这多么好。虚伪怎么会反而好呢？其实我内心里对女性是充满温爱的。一个女性如果认为我的友爱对她在某一时期某种情况之下极为重要，我今后将不再虚伪。 最重要的，我的妻子赞同我对友爱与情爱的理解。在这一前提中，我才能学作一个坦荡男人。 我对妻子坦坦荡荡毫无隐私。我想这正是她爱我的主要之点。我对她的坦荡理应获得她对我的婚外情感的尊重。实际上她也做到了。她对我“无为而治”，而我从她的“家庭政策”中领悟到了一个已婚男人怎样自重和自爱…… 我给未婚男人们的忠告是——如果你选择妻子，最适合你的那一个，才是和你最有“缘”的那一个。好的并不都适合。适合的大抵便是对你最好的了…… 在吃这一方面，中国人的嘴其实是很丢中国人的脸的。 中国人的嘴之第二个不争的方面，是说假话。 遗憾的是，有些假话只许帮着去说，不许一语戳穿。有些假话，仍被铁幕罩着，暂且还分辨不出究竟是真是假。有些假话是人人都乐意说的。正应了林彪那句“名言”——“不说假话办不成大事”。 比如北京市那位畏罪自杀了的副市长王宝森，倘不是一朝马脚败露，被揭发了出来，恐怕至今仍是个言必爱党、爱国、爱民、爱社会主义的好干部呐！ 中国人的嘴之第三个不争的方面，用老百姓的话讲，甚至是“缺德”的方面，便是惯善贬低别人，打击别人，抬高自己，美化自己，自以为得计，自以为得意。 中国人的嘴，又是这世界上最凶恶的嘴。 我总在想，什么时候，中国人的嘴不那么喜宴贪吃，不那么一张嘴便一套套的假话，不总在打击和贬低别人，不总在抬高和美化自己，什么时候，中国人学得不将“口福”当成一种幸福去追求，学得少说多做．以说假话为大耻，以制造和参与流言蜚语为丑恶，什么时候——那时候，中国才真的有些什么希望可言！ 爱憎分明于一个人是多么重要的品质。 与我的中学时代相比，现在的中学生，似乎太被学业所压迫了。我的中学时代，是苦于无书可读。买书是买不起的，尽管那时书价比现在便宜得多。几个同学凑了七八分钱，到小人书铺去看小人书，就是永远值得回忆的往事了。现在的中学生们，可看的太多了，却又陷入选择的迷惘，并且失去了本该拥有的时间。生活也真是太苛刻了。 我挺怜悯现在的中学生的。 我真同情我的中学生朋友们。 贫困是人类最大的丑恶现象。 如果我们已知人类有百种丑恶，那么三分之二盖源于贫困，三分之一盖源于贪婪…… 贫困是可以消灭的。穷人却是永远都存在的。 “心理贫穷症”将是商品时代的一种“绝症”。