Chapter 64 The final solution can only temporarily protect the property and quality of life of the citizens

On the issue of pensions, we need to actively do one thing, that is, we should come up with a final solution to the existing problems of pensions.So far, they can only compromise with each other in some places. With the current manpower, it may be impossible to re-investigate who has paid pensions or who has not paid pensions.In order to restore the lost records in the database, it is necessary to edit some "symbols". It would be great if the citizens themselves could remember their own number, for example, "My number should be..." after entering the database, "My pension should be like this...".

Moreover, although there are 50 million "lost pension registration records", there are still 800 million data records that have not been lost, so it is necessary to study this part of the data as carefully as bees gather honey, and then conduct a sample survey on the registration records , In this way, many problems found can be identified, which is the so-called opening of Pandora's box. Doing this, what is the final result? I think we should emulate Sweden's practice, that is, "implement the same system for all citizens, and those who have a clear registration will be paid pensions according to the registration situation, while those who are not registered have to ask them to make a compromise." did.

The "compromise" mentioned here means that an alternative choice must be made. One is to receive living security money every month, because a certain amount of security money is issued every month, so it can also be understood as living allowances.The implementation of the living security fund system is aimed first at the people at the bottom of society. "I'm really sorry, but your pension registration records can't be restored anyway." The state solemnly apologized to the person concerned.When the parties cannot produce any evidence and the state is not clear about the investigation, they can only adopt a one-time payment of pensions.For example, a one-time payment of 3 million yen is paid to the person concerned, and then monthly living security payments are made.It can only be done in this way, and it can be called a pension, but it is actually a concept with the living security fund.

Why do you want to do this? This is because Article 25, Paragraph 1 of the Japanese Constitution stipulates the right to life of Japanese citizens, specifically "all citizens have the right to maintain a healthy and civilized minimum standard of living."And based on this provision, the Japanese government also promulgated the "Life Security Law" in 1950.Therefore, according to the Constitution, it is also possible to directly refer to it as a "pension", and the state just gives an explanation to the victims of missing pension registration in this way. These are the only two solutions I can think of.

However, such a specific proposal has not been discussed by the government. Under the public opinion that "we must pay in full no matter what", the government's approach is to continue to promise the public that all lost records will be retrieved very clearly.