Chapter 71 70. Controversy over the national system

Yang Du entrusted Xia Shoutian to forward a masterpiece "On the Salvation of the Nation by the Constitution of the Monarch" to Yuan. After reading it, Yuan praised it very much, and praised it as a truly outstanding talent!This "On the Salvation of the Nation by the Constitution of the Monarch" is indeed a good article in terms of writing, but the argument is not correct.The original text is too long, so the excerpts are as follows: "A guest asked Mr. Hu: "The Republic of China was established, and it has been four years since the founding of the Republic of China. It has been 10 or 20 years since the establishment of the Republic of China. Is it possible for China to become rich and strong, and stand side by side with the great powers in the world? Mr. Hu said: "No, no, no! From the present way, if you don't think about it, change the course and change it. If you want to be a strong country, there is no hope. If you want to be a rich country There is no hope, and there is no hope to establish a constitutional country, and it will end in subjugation! The guest said: Why? The Duke of Tiger said: This is the disadvantage of the republic! The Chinese people have a good name but are not practical. Republic, China has no way to save the country from now on!

The guest said: What does it mean that there is no hope of establishing a constitutional country?Mr. Hu said: Republican politics requires the majority of the people to have common sense of common morality, so the people are the main body, and the so-called presidential administrator is the organ entrusted by the people to manage public affairs. Nothing is impossible, the policy of governing the country is changed, and the issue of safety, danger, and chaos does not matter.How can China say this?The majority of the people do not know what a republic is, nor do they know the so-called law, or what freedom and equality mean. Those who are arrogant think that everyone can be the president, that is, I should also enjoy this right, and if elections are not available, they will raise their troops to fight for the ear, which is the proof of the second revolution.In addition to the sudden departure of the monarch, the prestige of the central government is far less than before, and the sand is scattered everywhere, which is out of control.No matter who is the head of state, if he wants to unify the administration and maintain domestic security, there is no other way than to use autocracy.Therefore, at the beginning of the Republic, all those who advocated constitutionalism in the past advocated autocracy instead.Now that the presidential system is in effect, although there are "Convention Laws" and various conference organs, it seems that it is close to a constitution. However, the form of the constitution and the spirit of the dictator.The protesters may be ill because they cannot fully establish a constitution. I don’t know that in the past four years, if the non-government adopts an autocratic spirit, China’s desire for a day of peace is impossible.Therefore, it can be summed up in one sentence: the republic of China cannot be governed without autocracy.To put it differently, it is said: The republic of China cannot be governed by a constitution.Because a constitution is not enough to govern a republic, a republic cannot be established as a constitution. For a constitution to be established, the country's century-old plan, the development of education, industry, military and other things, does not go beyond this.However, its effect cannot be expected hastily.The fastest time will take ten to twenty years. The longer it is done, the more effective it will be. The strength of all European countries is based on this.However, looking at today's China, the people of the whole country, everyone knows that chaos is coming, and they dare not think about the future. Follow the rules, do not seek meritorious service, but seek no faults; those who are greedy and cunning will steal from dogs and rats to enrich their own pockets, and the plan is a plan for avoiding the chaotic concessions in the future.Literati and politicians occasionally make high-level remarks and slander the current situation, but their hearts are connected with those of their generation, and they have nothing to gain, so they have a heart of seeking, and they are not true scholars; the head of state, the term of office is only a few years, and the term is long. But re-election, the longest is life, who will be the future successor?By what method did he obtain this position?How many people are competing with him, can he be content with his position?Its policy towards the country is different from mine, but can it continue unchanged?Nothing can be predicted.With such a current situation, even if the head of state is a world-class talent, who wants to establish a century-old plan for the country and determine constitutional politics, but if he looks down at the present, he will be vented, who will praise him?Looking back to the future, it is very slim, who will continue?The so-called one-hundred-year plan, is Wu Cong established?Therefore, we have no choice but to retreat and seek the law of maintaining the status quo, employing people to administer, and everything is done according to this purpose, but so that internal chaos does not occur, and external affairs do not cause death, he has become a wise and great president of China.Even those who are obsessed with constitutionalism, in their position, may have the same mentality, and with this method, there is no way to go further.Therefore, the constitutionalists of the past are all silent today, not demanding constitutional government; Gai also knows that saving the republic with a constitution is not a fundamental solution, and there is no way to do it.When there is a virtuous president, the whole country is full of peace of mind, that is, if the head of the yen is not a virtuous person, it is impossible to maintain the status quo, and it is impossible to preserve one's own position. The achievements of the dismal management were wiped out in one fell swoop, and it ended up in the end of the country's subjugation. What's the point of a century-old plan?Therefore, it is said: There is no hope of becoming a constitutional country.

The guest said: As the Master said, there is no hope for a strong country, no hope for a rich country, and no hope for a constitutional country. Honestly, there is no other way but to subjugate the country!But is there no way to save the nation?Mr. Hu said: To put it plainly, there is no hope of prosperity and a constitution, all because of the republic;If you want to save the nation now, go to the Republic first!Why?If one seeks prosperity and strength, one seeks constitutionalism first, and one desires constitutionalism first seeks the monarchy. The guest said: What does it mean to seek prosperity and strength first by establishing a constitution?Hu Gong said: The rich and powerful are the purpose of the country; the constitution is the method to achieve this purpose.Do not use constitutional methods to seek prosperity and strength. The ancient British masters also had them, such as Han Wu and Tang Tai's concubines.However, if people survive, the government will act, and if people die, the government will cease.In the thousands of years in China, has there been no sage Emperor Ming Wang, but his achievements in martial arts, how is it today?In the ancient history of various countries, is there no outstanding hero who became a great cause for a while?However, how many people are there who are not suddenly destroyed!However, the disadvantages of some people's demise of the government cannot make a rich never become poor, and a strong cannot become weak. Therefore, from the moment of discussion, although there is a small ups and downs, but from the beginning of the establishment of the country, it will never make progress.European countries have been established for a long time, although they are not as long as China, but they have been established for thousands or hundreds of years. Why have you never heard of many powerful countries in the West?At that time, there was no constitution, and it could not continue to be strong.Japan has been our neighbor for thousands of years, and I have never heard of such a powerful one before?At that time, there was no constitution yet, and it could not continue to be strong.Only in recent years, there has been a sudden invention of constitutional government, which was practiced by European countries, and the countries prospered, and Japan practiced it, and Japan prospered.It is not strange that all the countries that China has encountered and lost are all rich and powerful countries, and all of them are constitutional countries!However, it is not surprising that it is impossible to achieve wealth and strength without a constitution, and it is impossible to achieve a country that is neither rich nor strong with a constitution.Although this statement is strange, it is true.The most painful and dangerous thing for the country is that people keep government and people die and government rests. Only when constitutional government is established, people keep government and people die and government is also promoted. There is progress and no retreat. And the richer, there is no one who turns rich against poverty; there are those who turn weak to strong, and strong to stronger, and there is no way to turn strong against weak.When people die and government continues, the effect must be this.Today's Kaiser is not William No. 1, and the Prime Minister is not Bischmack.And virtue does not end because of the death of people, it is against the prosperity of the sun, and constitutionalism is the same.Today's Emperor of Japan is not Emperor Meiji, and Prime Minister of Japan is not Hirobumi Ito or Katsura Katsura, but Japan does not cease government because of the death of people, but it is against the prosperity of Japan, and constitutional government is for it.From this point of view, it is clear that the function of constitutional government is strange and great.For constitutionalism, the country has a certain legal system. Neither the head of state nor the people of the country can act outside the law. Personnel change, but the legal system remains unchanged; the wise cannot do good beyond the law, and the unworthy cannot do evil beyond the law. If the country has this certain legal system as its main body, then the government will always have good governance and no bad governance. The sick people will be less and less, and the people who benefit the people will be more and more. All businesses in the country will naturally develop and progress year by year. , Follow this to infinity, if you want a country that is neither rich nor strong, can you get it?All the old people envy wealth and strength, but in a constitutional country, it is easy to become rich and powerful.Although it is easy to become rich and strong, it is very difficult to establish a constitution.When the constitution was first established, the bureaucrats were stuck in the old ways, and the scholars and the people were afraid of changes. There was a lot of resistance, and the process was extremely difficult. For example, if a train is placed outside the track, if you want to move it, you will use a lot of force, it will take a long time, or it will still be ineffective; And fortunately, when it is pushed into the track, the wheel turns, and it travels thousands of miles in an instant.Chinese people don't worry about the difficulty of being rich and powerful, but only worry about the difficulty of establishing a constitution.After the constitution is established, it will naturally be prosperous and strong, so it is said: If you want to be prosperous and strong, you must first seek the constitution.

The guest said: What do you mean if you want to establish a constitution, you must first seek the monarch?Hu Gong said: Law and the United States are both republics, and they both practice constitutional government. Then, under the Chinese republic, constitutional government will be implemented. Who can't do it?But it must be said that changing to a monarch can establish a constitution. Is it true that there is nothing wrong with this?However, let me ask the law, do the American people raise their troops to fight for the president?Everyone knows nothing about it.And why is there nothing but me?This is a clear proof that the level of the people is not as good as law and beauty.Only because of this, it is not like today's autocratic republic, and there is no way to fix chaos.A constitutional government is a tool for seeking governance. It is China's future competition for the president of the war. I don't know when it will be?What happened later, I was afraid of thinking about it, and I was prepared for chaos, but how could it lead to governance?Therefore, unless the disadvantages of competing for the head of state are eliminated first, the country will never have a peaceful day.It is only considered that President Yi Da is the monarch, so that the head of state of a country can stand in an absolutely uncontested position, which is almost enough to stop the chaos.Mencius said to determine the chaos of the Warring States: "fixed in one", and Yu said to fix the chaos in China: "fixed in one", what he calls one, all countries are unified; what he calls one, the head of state has a certain person.If the head of state has a certain number of people, there will be no room for competition in the country. Once the foundation of the country is established, people's hearts will be safe.After ordering the chaos, the first words lead to governance, and then the constitution can be said.There must be doubts in the world that after the monarchy is changed, the constitution may not be established;In the world of the republic, everyone is full of peace.Knowing that the establishment of a constitution will not prevent future chaos, so we will let it go and not plan it; after being changed to a monarch, the people of the whole country will want to rule again, and the voice of demanding a constitution will surely rise. The head of state is the same, and his throne is not derived from the monarchy, but from the change of the republic. If he does not implement constitutional government, he first thinks it is a tool to calm people's hearts, and he cannot respond to the requirements of the people.And since the monarch is the foundation of the country, the whole country must think about the laws of the country, and there is no other way except constitutional law.The one who is above is a plan for the descendants of thousands of years, and must try to make it safe. If you use people to administer the administration, you will still rely on dictatorship, and the royal family will easily become a resentment house, and its way is in danger; To constitutionalism.Therefore, speaking from this aspect, constitutional government cannot take place without a monarch; speaking from another aspect, it is also impossible to maintain a monarchy without constitutional government.If it is called a constitutional system, the monarch is irresponsible, and the monarch must not be willing to create it. If it is, there will be no hope of constitutionalism.I don't know that every British lord must have far-sighted vision and great courage. He knows that he is an autocratic lord and cultivates merits for the people. Those who carry out government affairs, people die and government is also promoted, and the creation of the country is relatively large. ...

The guest said: Zi said that saving the country with a constitutional monarchy, and the interests of the monarchy have been explained in detail, but when it comes to constitutionalism, there are many issues that should be studied.From the end of the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China, constitutional government was not practiced in the country, but there were many disadvantages, which were criticized by later generations. What is the reason?Mr. Hu said: In the former Qing Dynasty, the power to establish a constitution was exercised by the Qing Dynasty. However, the so-called constitutionalism of the Qing Dynasty was not a constitution.In the Guangxu period of the former Qing Dynasty, the royal family was in crisis, and the words of the revolution filled the whole country, and the rise of the constitutional party, to promote doctrine, to carry out in practice, suitable for the president to take charge of the military, and to know how to save oneself, there is no one who is more than a constitutionalist. That is to say, it is the biggest goal of this, and it is obviously the leader of the national constitutional party, and it is implemented with perseverance.At the beginning, the power of the Constitutional Party was far inferior to that of the Revolutionary Party, and with the prospect of constitutionalism, the hearts of the people began to yearn for peace and hoped that this matter would be established.As a result, the power of the revolutionary party plummeted.If the Qing Dynasty can really establish a constitution, then the revolution of 1911 can be judged as inevitable; if the constitution is established, the royal family politics will not happen spontaneously. After that, the Constitutional Party lost its core of leadership, and the royal family politics, which was extremely opposed to the constitutional government, survived. On the one hand, it hung the pseudonym of constitutionalism, which was a passive countermeasure; .The royal family plays tricks and bribes the public. Everything they do is contrary to constitutionalism. The people ask for the opening of the National Assembly, which is invalid, and the people ask for the abolition of the royal cabinet, which is invalid.The policy of the Constitutional Party was not good, and the dishonesty was used throughout the country, so the Revolutionary Party rose in its place and carried on without hindrance.Those who knew it at that time already knew that the Constitutional Party went from prosperity to decline, and the Revolutionary Party went from decline to prosperity, that is, the survival and death of the Qing imperial family.As a result, Wuchang called out, and the whole country responded, with the army as the main force, and the members of the provincial advisory councils, among them, the Constitutional Party was the majority, and so far they had no choice but to support the revolution!It was too late for the Qing Dynasty to go to the royal cabinet and promulgate the "Nineteen Creeds" until this time!Therefore, at the end of the Qing Dynasty, there was no constitution, let alone the advantages and disadvantages of constitutionalism. Only the Advisory Bureau of the Zizhengyuan was established as the basis, but what the royal family did was no different from the appointment of the revolutionary organ.There is a saying in Western Confucianism: "A false constitution will surely lead to a real revolution." The Qing Dynasty wants to deceive the people with a false constitution.The President was right at the time, that is, he said, "If there is no constitution, there will be revolution, and the two must be one of the two."To this day, those who are stubborn, or those who once sympathized with the royal family, say that the former Qing Dynasty died, and those who died in the constitutional law wanted to impose the crimes of the royal family on the constitutional party, and the constitutional party would not accept it.Therefore, it is reasonable to say that the royal family is unwilling to establish a constitution, which will cause the disaster of the revolution; if it is said that the establishment of a constitution is not convenient for the royal family, which will cause the disaster of the revolution, what is the rationale for it?Therefore, I said that the so-called constitutionalism in the Qing Dynasty was not constitutionalism, but it was just a false name for constitutionalism and a real disaster for calling for revolution.

The guest said: The matter of cleaning up the house is the same. In the first and second years of the Republic of China, there was a "Convention Law", a cabinet, and a parliament. It seemed that constitutional government was also implemented. However, the power of the parliament is omnipotent, and the government's actions are all illegal. There is clamor and disturbance, and the whole country is in an uproar. However, if this kind of constitutional government is established for a long time, how can the country not perish?Today, I still talk about constitutional government. The people of the country have already heard this term and become afraid. Is it okay?Mr. Hu said: The opportunity for the establishment of a constitution in the Republic of China lies with the Democratic Party. The so-called constitutionalism of the Democratic Party is not constitutional, but it is only a means of achieving the goal of revolution by means of constitutionalism.In the first and second years of the Republic of China, whenever I met revolutionaries and discussed politics with them, I often said that those who could not be unified by autocracy, knew that extreme civil rights could never be exercised at the level of China. On the contrary, it is knowing it and then disobeying it, so what is the reason?And even in terms of the first "Convention Law", it is still reasonable to implement it in the era of the Nanjing government, because the Senate will move to the north, and it will temporarily join the cabinet system and various government restrictions.Later, the Congress bound all the actions of the government based on this, so why?Do you really want to be drunk with the republic and want to implement a very high degree of constitutionalism?No, but they want to use this to reduce the power of the government so that it cannot unify the country, as a preparation for their revolution.Looking at the front and back, from the day when the Nanking government was abolished to the day when the Hukou uprising, all actions were for this purpose.Those who don't know say this is the purpose of their constitutions, and those who know say this is their revolutionary method.People do not want to establish a constitution, but they only want to revolutionize, and I slander it with the constitution, and use it to slander constitutionalism, it is not wrong!Although Ruoyun is a revolutionary technique in it, it is still a constitutional purpose on the surface. After all, it cannot but be called a constitution, and it cannot but be said that a constitution is enough to cause chaos; I don’t know that this is not the fault of the constitution, but the fault of the republic!If it is not a republic, how can such a "covenant" be established under the pretext of civil rights; and how can a country's "covenant" be made by the Democratic Party at will?What's more, how can we use the "Contract Law" to prepare for the revolution and become a place to compete for the presidency?Proposalists do not blame the fundamental republic, but blame the branches and leaves of constitutionalism, which is a theory that does not know the root.I have said that the republic of China must be autocratic. From this point of view, how can the constitution and the law suffice?Those who commented on the first "Yuefa" did not know this meaning, but they knew it so they were their ears.Therefore, I say that the so-called constitutionalism of the Democratic Party is not constitutionalism. It is just a method of constitutionalism to achieve the purpose of revolution. The party itself is preparing to revolutionize others.

The guest said: But the so-called constitutionalism of Zizi is not the same as that of the former Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China?Hu Gong said: Yes!There are two essential meanings for establishing a constitution for the monarchy of the future: one is righteous, so the disadvantages of the Republic of China are corrected; the other is honesty, so the disadvantages of the former Qing Dynasty are corrected. ... The guest said: Righteousness leads to national security, honesty leads to people's trust, and the disadvantages of the former Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China can all be swept away.It is a blessing for China to implement a constitutional monarchy in this way. Although I am a fool, I dare not follow the teachings.So when Mr. Hu's words came to fruition, the guest withdrew happily. "

At that time, Wang Fengying had a letter titled "A Letter to Chou'anhui and Yang Du on the National Style".Seven of them are not allowed. The original text is too long, so it is deleted. "I read in the newspaper that I launched a preparatory meeting. The declaration was based on the fact that the European and American republics are prone to disturbance and the Chinese people's lack of self-government ability. The sages and sages of the middle school will jointly plan the long-term peace and stability of the country, and then study whether the imperial system is applicable to our country today, whether it is beneficial and not harmful. It is admirable to have great plans and foresight, excellence and perseverance. However, let’s talk about the current situation Therefore, it is absolutely impossible to make changes in the national system in order to shake the national veins. President, all the clauses in the old "Convention Law" that are enough to restrain the president and make the administration inflexible should be eliminated without leaving any room for conflict. This is the word "Republic" in China today. Let’s use the example of enlightened autocracy. Those who say that a republic is not suitable for China are talking about the form of government. In today’s new "Convention Law", the president has a vast and boundless right to rule. Isn’t it suspected of overcorrecting? Since the implementation of this system, the prestige of the central government has become stronger, the political progress has been more favorable, the finances have gradually become unified, and all provinces are extremely obedient. I am sorry. As a result of the discussion at the meeting, will the enlightened autocracy of the new "Convention Law" still be adopted? Now the president has implemented it, and there is no criticism in the world. Why do you need a monarch? If you think that the president has too much power, you want to set up a new cabinet. Is it possible to make the head of state irresponsible to the Congress? There is a precedent in France, so why is there a monarch? However, today’s advocacy of a constitutional monarchy, and the danger of a republic, is only a question of succession. Gu Xin’s "Convention Law" has been established The term of the president is ten years, and he can be re-elected. There is no doubt that the current president will be the lifelong president. You must choose talents wisely, and you can look forward to them; if you hide a name in Shishi, you will be overwhelmed and do nothing. If you publish temporarily, you will not be able to move. In the election of the National Assembly, only these three people are limited, and those who have no hope outside the bureau will die. Fa Liang Italy and the United States, the head of the republic changes frequently, and the disadvantages of electoral disturbances have been swept away. How dangerous is it? If you still worry about the easy competition of these three people, it is not as good as the status of the world. Know it Whether there is competition or not is a relationship between morality and lawlessness. If there is no morality, how can the legal system be left alone? Fearing family competition is more harmful than elections. However, the public loves the current president very much, a gentleman. To love others is to be virtuous, but not to be heard is to appease; today, at the beginning of his appointment, the President took an oath to abide by the contract, and repeatedly declared that he would never revive the monarchy. All have been seen and heard by all. In the past, Lao was proclaiming the theory of Sheng Sheng and advocating restoration. The world was in an uproar, and a group of people rose up to restore it, thinking it was a serious crime of treason against the Republic of China. Today, the President has reinstated the ban, and then there will be discussions on the monarchy. There is no pardon for the crime! Sincerely, the current President is the head of the Republic of China, loves the entrustment of the people, and vows to preserve the state system for the Republic of China forever. Courtesy is also righteous. The declaration of the noble association, but the study of the state system, does not discuss the name of the leader. Genus, Gai originally intended to seek succession, so he would not be surprised by the dagger, but he didn't know that the disaster of the theory was sometimes worse than the flood!At the end of the Qing Dynasty, foolish people advocated the theory of racial revolution, and it became popular all over the world.In the 1911 Wuchang disaster, there was no such thing as success or strength, and the world was falling apart, so the views of race and the theory of revolution were deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.And the establishment of the Republic of China government, the revolution has been successful, but those who use this to create chaos, still rise up again and again, die without regret, and the lingering flames of the poison have not subsided to this day.Now the foundation of the country has been established, people's hearts are rough and at ease, and the public is under a democratic government, suddenly advocating the dissent of a constitutional monarchy, and today's president has expressed that he will never be the emperor.The name of Tianze has not yet been determined, which has gradually stained the hearts of the people. Not only the socialists, but those who are lucky and will not succeed. Who pretends to be a talisman and confuses the crowd?Specialized generals, are there no one who waits and sees, waiting for the time to move?Calling chaos and quick disaster, who will be the most serious?The so-called danger in the heart, dare not not tell!I am not a fool, thinking that the new "Convention Law" creates a special case of the president's enlightened autocracy, and it is most appropriate to govern China today.The Constitution of the Republic of China says that it is appropriate to follow the previous regulations, and nothing is easier.If the public must say that the monarch is the same, it can avoid the fierce competition of undivided kings and covets, then please take Ganbao to divide the history of Jin Dynasty and discuss the history of the Six Dynasties and Five Dynasties, and study it in detail!Words of worry and danger, I don't know what to choose, thank you for your forgiveness! "

At that time, people often said that Liang Qichao's writing could kill people like a sharp knife. Liang's political stance was questionable in history, but his articles were indeed soul-stirring, and people never tired of reading them. The "Problemist" article dealt a blow to the Chou'an Society and Yuan Chengdi, no less than the battle to protect the country led by Cai E. The original text is too long, so the excerpt is as follows: "Qiu Shuang's stomach ailment, lying down for a period of ten days, thinking about things and thinking about others, all thoughts are exhausted, and there is a lot of clamor outside the house, and then he hears about the problems of the state. I am tired of talking about politics like a scumbag, so why do I have to discuss it? Although , I am alone in this matter, and I can't allow myself to say anything, so I wrote this article.

Before I start writing, I have two meanings for the readers: first, you should know that I am not a newcomer to the republic, so I have no preference for the republic, and I have no preference for other countries. Second, you should know that I am not like the elder Mo Shoujia who is fighting for the dynasty, Shouyang Fernweed, Lulian Donghai, this person has their own reasons. There is a way to find one's own position based on status. If you look at the reasons for the country's honor and danger, then there is no choice between the rise and fall of a surname. Covered but close to Zhenghu.

In the past, I used to make a statement to the public, saying that the political commentators of the constitutional party only asked about the political system, not the national system. Those who heard it suddenly might use this as a trick. I don’t know that this is the principle that political commentators abide by. Passover also.It is not something that political commentators should ask, especially not what political commentators should ask. There is no absolute good in the Husband State System, but the fact that it has already been established is the root of its existence. If you want to rely on academic principles as your master and slave, and make artificial choices in between, is it not a matter of absolute ignorance in the world?Mere ignorance is not enough to be a deep disease; but if you have a view of love and hate in the country, and artificially create facts in order to match your love and hate, then the country will be plagued by disasters, and there will be no end!Therefore, my humble opinion is that no matter what kind of state system is, it is not opposed to it. However, under the current state system, if you want to use speech to advocate another state system, you will oppose it at any time! Today, the respite is uncertain, and the second proposal to change the state system has resumed.What is the truth behind this discussion?I dare not know.On the surface, it originated from the conversation of Dr. Goodnow, an American doctor.Has Gu Shi ever made such a claim, and what is the meaning of his claim?It's not something I dare to know (Gu Shi told a reporter from an English newspaper that he didn't have any claims).For those who are confused, if the main points in Gu's theory are abstract comparisons of the gains and losses of a republican monarch, if the state system must be suitable for the national conditions, and if the failures of Central America, South America, Mexico, and Portugal are cited, all of these All meanings are very common in nature, not profound and subtle. Why is it that politicians in the country are like forests, and scholars are like crucian carp. For a few years, they have not realized this superficial theory and fact, and so far they have suddenly borrowed it from a foreigner. Presumptuous?I am really confused!If it is said that this meaning is not invented by foreign doctors?Regardless of other things, even though I have little knowledge, I can't catch Dr. Gu, but Dr. Gu's great work today can be said to be inadvertently the same as my ten-year-old theory. I am one-tenth one-hundredth of an ear! Who can say that the interests of the republic should not be discussed?However, there is a time for discussion.When the Revolution of 1911 first started, it was the most suitable time for discussion, but after this, it is almost no time for discussion. (When the chaos in Hukou continued, the official president did not take office, and the countries did not recognize the republic, there may still be room for discussion, but that is all).At that time, where are the public and others?At that time, when scholars in the world compared the theories of the gains and losses of the national system, there was no work that could be used as a reference?At that time, will the countries of the United States and Mexico be enjoying peace and feasting, and there will be no tragedy, so as a lesson?At that time, a clumsy, foolish and foolish person like a humble person, who was imprisoned overseas, worried about the discomfort of the republic, wrote and talked about books, with tears and blood (I don’t keep the manuscripts of my life, and I don’t have any evidence. At that time, important people, Whoever gets my book should know it by himself. I had a poem at that time: It is easy to get the report of Chu Zhi, but it is afraid to save Wu's plans. It is also said: It is easy to touch it, but it is difficult to restore it. It is also said: Let the emperor live in it Therefore, the ancient precepts can be discussed. The rest are published in group newspapers on number theory).And the hero who understands the current affairs is doing his job day by day to promote the republic, saying that the republic is the extreme track of public security, and that the republic is inherent in Chinese history.Alas!The most important thing in the world can be static but not moving. How can it be repeated and tried, discarded like a game of chess, saying that I will bury myself for the time being, and predict that I will do it myself?If the republic is sincere enough to subjugate the country, you must know that the day when the public is happy to promote the republic and promote the republic, it will be the time when China will never be restored. There is a proverb: "Since we have today, why bother at the beginning"?How many times in one's life do one commit a great sin and feel that it is not enough, and forbearance can benefit from it?How long ago was the establishment of the Husband's Republic?Those who seek to overthrow the republic take the initiative of the heroes of the republic, and those who are ignorant of current affairs and still have a little nostalgia for the republic are those who opposed the republic in the past.There is nothing more strange than true in the world, and nothing more sad than true in the world! Today's commentators say: "Instead of a republic and autocracy, which one is like a monarch and a constitution." 'Constitutional and non-constitutional are the nouns for the regime; republican and non-republican are the nouns for the state.We have always argued that we only ask about the form of government, not about the state, so we think that if the form of government can be constitutional, no matter whether the state is a monarchy or a republic, there is no one. and also.The state system and the government system are diametrically opposed to each other. It is said that if you want to change the government system, you must use the method of changing the state system. The world would rather have this theory!If Erze merged with other constitutional countries in the world, the changes in the state system may be endless!The previous commentators said that a monarch can never establish a constitution, but only a republic can establish a constitution; (when I was in a debate with the revolutionary party, the other party held this view).Today's commentators also say that a republic can never establish a constitution, but only a monarch can establish a constitution. I really don't know what theory it is based on to complete its argument!I would like to ask the commentators first to determine the definition of constitutionalism, and then to check whether the thesis can be established.Doesn't the so-called constitutionalist necessarily have a supervisory organ and an executive organ confronting each other, and the exercise of political power is often subject to certain restrictions?Doesn’t the so-called constitutional monarchy regard the monarch’s lack of responsibility as the greatest principle and the establishment of a responsible cabinet as a necessary condition?To confirm this simple constitutional definition, one more fact must be assumed as the basis for the debate: I want to ask the commentator who is the ideal monarch in the future?To put it more seriously, is he the current president?Suppressed beyond today's president, and don't fumigate the alchemy point to get it? (Nowadays, the president refuses to rule on his own. Since he has repeatedly made resolute declarations, today he is only presuming to use it to argue his ears. I am willing to accept the crime of disrespect). If you don't want to find someone else, where will you put the current president?The President has devoted himself to the affairs of the country for a long time, and he is willing to take care of himself. Wouldn't he want to quickly release this burden and take care of Lin Quan?How can the people of our country allow the president to relax?But will the president be under the false monarch, and the responsible cabinet will be organized?Now that the president puts the country first and is willing to give in to each other, but with the whole country entrusted to him, what is the danger?That's why, apart from today's great president, don't seek a monarch, and say that a constitutional monarchy can be realized, but it can't be true.For example, today's President is a monarch, but my President refuses to admit it at first, but for the sake of the country's century-old plan, the current President is willing to sacrifice everything in order to favor the popularity of the people, and what our people demand is from the President. How can you expect him to be an irresponsible monarch?The irresponsible monarch is often compared to the fat ears of the Europeans and the United States, the ears of beautiful and noble ornaments!Given the urgent situation in China today, is it appropriate for such an important person to invest in such an idle place?It is still a question of whether the responsible cabinet can be established and whether it can be applied.It doesn't mean that the great president can't allow the responsible cabinet to survive under him. Now that the country wants someone with this ability and qualifications, who can take this responsibility on behalf of the head of state, I have never seen it.Gai is facing all kinds of difficulties today, and it is not my president who bears the brunt of it. Who can care about it?Appointing one person to take charge of the President's behalf is insignificant, but Wei Jin can't do it himself.In the past, the change from the cabinet system to the presidential system is a good medicine that adapts to the requirements of the current situation and can be abolished. How can the current situation in the next one or two years be so different from the previous one? Can it be changed accordingly?It's not the deceitful words of heroes, it's the scholar's pedantic arguments!Therefore, it is assumed that the current president is willing to be a monarch, and that a constitutional monarchy can be realized, and the theory cannot be established. However, today's standard constitutionalism is regarded as the talisman of the theory of state system, unless there is another explanation for the word constitutionalism, I dare not speak.Before the end of the Qing Dynasty, it was said that it was constitutional. Can the commentators admit it?And I would like to ask the commentators what kind of contract they dare to guarantee that after the change of the state system, constitutionalism can be implemented without hindrance?Otherwise, it is still a pure monarchy, not a constitutional monarchy.It goes without saying that it is not a constitutional monarchy, but it is an absolute monarchy.Can't bear the weakness of the republic, but want to replace it with an autocratic monarchy. It is said that it is a good plan, but it is not understood.Now under the republic system, there are various unavoidable reasons for the temporary dictatorship, and it can still be forgiven by the world if it offends the public. Conditions to make it come true, then at the beginning of the reform of the state system, the people must be declared to be constitutional. If you practice autocracy, I fear that people in the world will no longer be the head of state!Husbands outside Mongolia in the name of constitutionalism but experts in non-constitutional reality, the reason why the Qing Dynasty collapsed before!The poem said: "The Yin Jian is not far away, in the post-Xia world." Those who comment on it will think about it! I have exhausted my words, but there is one more thing that should be advised to the public: the public advocates the monarchy, and the future monarch in their hearts must be challenged by the public. If you want to be different from the current president yeah?Now that the president has just stepped down, the Chinese nation will soon be in the twilight. In the light of fairness, how can it be seen that this is not the case?Seeing this and still making such a conspiracy, rather than having a deep hatred for the country, he must kill his life and start quickly. These 400 million people should be punished together!If you want to ask the current presidents?Today, the words of the President's oath on the ascension of the throne are used to tell the emperor and the queen, and the bottom is to express the love of Chinese and foreign students. It is true that everyone has heard of it!In the past few years, the floating debate has become more and more popular, and the president has occasionally heard it, and his righteousness is expressed in color, saying that no matter how much he presses, he will never win his ambition. It is vivid in my ears; and Admiral Feng Huafu explained to me the decree he received, saying that he has prepared a number of rafters in England, and if the people do not see the homes, they will use that land as their home.From this to talk.Now the president's determination can be seen by all, how can the public know nothing about it?It is an unreasonable discussion of this extraordinary move. In case the situation is oppressive, the President of our country will angrily follow his preface. I don’t know how the public and others can handle the future?But if it is not the case, the public must use the belly of a villain to save the heart of a gentleman. Privately speaking, what the president said in his daily life is not his original intention, but it is just like Confucius said, "If you give up what you want, you must do it." Ci', my aunt once tried it, but I knew it would not be my fault; if I believe it, then what will the public think of my president as a human being?If you break your promise and get fat, everyone is cheap!With this in mind, how can the crime of insulting the personality of the President be counted?This is also suitable for 400 million people to be punished together. Again, have you ever read the "Yuefa"?Have you ever read "Interim Criminal Law"?Have you ever read the Associations and Assemblies Act?Have you ever read "Reporting the Law"?Have you ever read the president's orders in the past year on corporal punishment for chaos in the country?Did the public ever know that citizens should have the obligation to abide by the constitution and laws?It is openly under the chariot, calling on the disciples to instigate revolution (anyone who seeks to change the state system is called a revolution, this is the general meaning of political science), and the law enforcers are afraid of being expensive and close, and they will not change anyone, and equality is beneficial.白昼横行，无复忌惮，公等所筹将来之治安如何，吾不敢知，而目前之纪纲，则既被公等破坏尽矣！如曰无纪纲而可以为国也，吾复何言？如其否也，则请公等有以语我来！且吾更有愿为公等进一解者：公等之倡此议，其不愿徒托诸空言甚明也，其必且希望所主张者能实见施行，更申言之，则希望其所理想之君主国体，一度建设，则基业永固，传诸无穷也。夫此基业，果遵何道，始能永固以传诸无穷？其必自国家机关令出惟行，朝野上下守法如命。今当开国承家伊始，而首假途于犯法之举动以为资，譬诸欲娶妇者，横挑人家闺闼，以遂苟合，曰但求事成，而节操可勿沾沾也，则其既为吾妇之后，又有何词以责其不贞者？今在共和国体之下，而曰可以明目张胆集会结社，以图推翻共和，则他日在君主国体之下，又易为不可以明目张胆集会结社，以图推翻君主，使其时复有其他之博士提示别种学说，有其他之团体希图别种活动，不知何以待之？诗曰：'毋教揉升木，如涂涂附。 '谋人家国而出于此，其不智不亦甚耶！孟子曰：'君子创业垂统，为可继也'。以不可继者诏示将来，其不祥不亦甚耶！昔干今升作《晋纪总论》，推原司马氏丧乱之由，而叹其创基植本，异于三代。陶渊明之诗亦曰：'本不植高原，今日复何悔？ '呜呼！吾观今兹之事，而隐忧乃无极也！ （附言）吾作此文既成后，得所谓筹安会者寄示杨度氏所著《君宪救国论》，偶一翻阅，见其中有数语云：'盖立宪者，国家有一定之法制，自元首以及国人，皆不能为法律外之行动，贤者不能逾汉律而为善，不肖者亦不能逾法律而为恶。 '深叹其于立宪精义，能一语道破，惟吾欲问杨氏所长之筹安会，为法律内之行动耶？抑法律外之行动耶？杨氏贤者也，或能自信非逾法律以为恶，然得勿已逾法律以为善耶！Alas!以昌言君宪之人，而行动若此，其所谓君宪者从可想耳！而君宪之前途，亦从可想耳！ "