Chapter 73 The imbalance of social resources will inevitably lead to the imbalance of social order

The imbalance of social resources refers to the state of overall imbalance caused by the interaction and influence of various social factors. The existence of this state is not conducive to the harmonious development of society. Some people say that the imbalance of social resources is a "disease" and a social "disease".The emergence of this "disease" will make a "healthy" social body quickly go from healthy to dead. Judging from the current situation, the uneven distribution of social resources (unequal wealth and poverty), uncoordinated regional development, uncoordinated economic growth and social development, and uncoordinated economic growth and resources and the environment can all lead to imbalances in social resources.

The imbalance of social resources is very harmful, and the resulting negative impact on a healthy social body is even more fatal. First of all, the imbalance of social resources can easily lead to the phenomenon of "those who drink soup are jealous of those who eat meat".Due to the difference in access to social resources, people's lives are "uneven in drought and flood", which in turn creates doubts about the "fairness" of social distribution, thus affecting the enthusiasm of workers. Secondly, the imbalance of social resources can easily lead to the disorderly allocation of production resources, and there will be a situation of "grabbing one by one" for driving and "grabbing one by one" for repairing cars.That is to say, the disorderly allocation of production resources will make it difficult for the organization of social production factors to "coordinate effectively", thus affecting the steady increase of productivity.

Third, the imbalance of social resources can easily lead to a serious "regulation failure" of the factors of production relations in the whole process of material production in the whole society. The "whole process" mentioned here refers to the "regulation failure" that occurs in the links of production, distribution, exchange, and consumption of social material production by production relations, which will lead to chaos and disorder in the entire social production, and further affect the process of social development. The main reasons for the imbalance of social resources are as follows:

The first is the deviation in the direction of regional development led by the government. We know that local governments mainly have the right to allocate social resources. Due to deviations in the thinking and concepts of regional development planning by local politicians, for example, some local politicians have changed their development ideas from economic construction to It has become centered on GDP. In this way, one's social role positioning will be limited to a mere "project manager", and the final development result will be "partial" and "partial".

The second type is the "natural" inequality in the demands of various social strata for their own social rights and interests. The imbalance of "interests" will inevitably lead to the imbalance of "rights", and the imbalance of rights will inevitably lead to the imbalance of dialogue rights. For example, in some local coal mines, the organizers of coal production and the dominators of the products or production results of the coal mines can only be coal bosses. For miners and coal bosses, one is a "boy" and the other is a "boss". This imbalance of power leads to unequal dialogue status, which can explain the problem.Because of the loss of the "dialogue status" between coal miners and coal bosses, the basic status of "dialogue" between coal miners and coal bosses will also be lost.That is to say, coal miners no longer have the "status" to "negotiate" with coal bosses, and they don't even have the "opportunity" to "negotiate" with coal bosses.

If the power imbalance develops in the end, it will inevitably lead to the re-division of the interests of all social classes, forming two major social groups, the rich and powerful group represented by the coal bosses and the disadvantaged group represented by the poor miners, which in turn will cause the whole society. Order imbalance", which leads to the "reasonable evolution" from a healthy and developing society to a deformed and sick society. We believe that in a healthy social system, state coercive power must be used to prevent the imbalance of rights, so as not to lead to an imbalance of social resources.The "national coercive power" mentioned here is to promote social management rationally, scientifically and pragmatically through the use of a legal framework that balances legal relations.

Of course, we have not emphasized the use of irrational and extreme behaviors such as "killing the rich and helping the poor" or "killing the rich and helping the poor". We believe that a society that protects the rights of the rich is a "fair" society.In this way, on the basis of the above "protection", a "high-level balance" between the two classes is formed. The "dynamic equilibrium" that can be achieved by the interests of all parties in society is the result of the game of multiple social forces. Without this game and without institutionalized guarantees for this game, it is impossible to achieve a balance of interests.