Chapter 51 Chapter 47 Jelly World - Part 1: The End of Matter

Me: "Hello." In fact, this kind of greeting is already a habit of mine, and the following sequence is: habitual smile → sit down → open the notebook → take out the recording pen → press → take out the pen → unscrew the pen cap → look at the other person → Observe each other → wait to begin. But in front of her, she didn't look at me. This patient is about 30 years old, and the greenness of a little girl on her face has not completely faded away, but she already has the charm and sex appeal of a mature woman—and without makeup.It must be admitted that she was attractive--not pretty, but attractive.I dare not say that I have seen many beautiful women, but I have also seen many.If she is a charming type, if you look directly at her, every man counts as one, and they will all be "electricized" half dead.Of course, as for whether to show it, it depends on personal quality.Like me, for example, I'm the one who shows it—the eyes twinkle.

In front of her, she was sitting cross-legged on a chair, looking at the front with confused eyes.Although I was right in front of her, I'm sure she didn't look at me, but looked at the front so blankly.That is to say: No matter what is in front of her, she will always look at it so straight. For patients in this "meditative" state, I know what to do - etc.There is no other way but to wait. After about tens of minutes, I saw her slowly come back to her senses. Me: "Hello." Her: "Huh? When did you come?" Me: "It's been a while." Her: "Oh, why are you here?"

Me: "Didn't I say that on the phone before?" Her: "I forgot." Me: "Now tell me: I want to know about your world—if you will." She looked at me and reacted for a while: "Aren't you a doctor?" I'm not." She: "So that's how it is... Then you plan to be my follower?" Me: "Huh? I have to think about this question." She: "Well, I can understand, after all, I haven't said anything yet. But after I finish speaking, you may become my follower." I smiled: "Okay, let's try it." She: "Sit tight, I will tell you what the world is like, what it all is, including all the weird things, the unexplainable things, I will tell you. Listen carefully, and you will unravel the truth." All doubtful."

Me: "@#$%&!!!" This is not what I said, but what I thought in my heart, because she hit my nail right away.For a long time, I have been questioning all this, always feel as if there is something wrong, but can't find anything wrong.There are always some things that I can't figure out why, but I never give up that questioning attitude.In other words, it's stuck to the bone.Once this dead spot is hit, even if I'm about to pee my pants, I will never move a step. I will keep listening until I have my own judgment. But I can be sure that my expression has not changed a bit: "Okay, tell me."

Her: "Are you religious?" Her words knocked me from a burning point to a freezing point in an instant-it was boring.If she was going to say some kind of cult-like teachings or make up some religious ideas, I decided to leave immediately. But I still didn't show any expression: "No." She: "Well... that's a little troublesome." Me: "It's okay. Although I don't have religious beliefs, I know a lot. I read a lot because I was interested in it when I was young. You can talk about religion as much as you want, and I can basically follow it."

She: "Oh? That's good, I'll just say it directly. Buddhism says: there is a world of bliss; God or Christianity, no matter how they are divided, will recognize the existence of heaven; Islam is also an extremist sect or a moderate sect, and it also recognizes: There is heaven or the holy place of worry-free. After Taoism evolved from the original philosophical thought to a religion, although it does not praise the existence of heaven very much, there is also the saying of becoming immortal and entering the fairyland. Do you understand? No matter what religion, there is always I will tell you that there is such a wonderful place. Even those cults are the same, and those cults have no innovations, they are all modified or simply copied from the orthodox religion. Or those rubbish leaders claim that they are from an orthodox religion God, or Buddha. Anyway, they are all the same: liars. The question is: why do those religions emphasize the existence of such a place? No matter what you call that place. Paradise, paradise, holy land, fairyland. The name is not important, what is important is that everyone will say that place is very good and powerful, why?"

Me: "I have thought about this. I think it is an ideological realm, or just an attitude. For that ideological realm, no matter what religion is, it is a goal. That is to say, many roads lead to one place, and many This is how I explain it. Just like Plato's "perfect world" philosophical view, it is just an ideological embodiment of a philosophical theory, rather than really having such a place." She smiled triumphantly: "Okay, the explanation is very good. But now you remember what I said and what you just said, let's put this aside, talk about other things first, and finally come back to this."

I'm OK." It seems that I was frightened by those cult people just now and wrongly blamed her. She: "Let's talk about something more interesting. Do you know the so-called telepathy?" I know." She: "If something like telepathy happens to two people, it will be strange, but it's nothing new. But, if something like telepathy happens to two particles, can you still understand it?" Me: "Hey?! Quantum physics again? Are you talking about unconditional electric transport?" She: "Don't be nervous, I don't want to talk about physics, and I don't understand those things, but I know some things. That's what one of my students never understood. He is a physics expert. He told me this. "

Me: "Wait, the physics expert is your student?" Her: "One of my followers." Me: "What is following you? Thought or theory or talent?" She: "You will understand, now go back to the topic just now from gossip?" Me: "Oh, sorry." She: "The physics expert once told me that two completely unrelated particles will interfere with each other. For example, particle X and particle Z. They plan to launch particle X, the target is particle Z, and the purpose is to interfere with particle Z .However, before launching particle X, particle Z has already been disturbed. Moreover, that phenomenon turned out to be the same as the interference after launch. That is to say, particle Z felt the disturbance from particle X in advance.”

Me: "I know this, the unconditional correlation characteristic of particles, there are many such experiments. Also, if the kinetic energy of particle A is changed, particle B will also change inexplicably, and so on. There are too many, but no one knows why." Her: "I know." me?" Her: "Don't make that noise, it's nothing to be surprised about. I'll tell you what's going on." I still couldn't help being excited, it doesn't matter whether she really knew or pretended to know, a person who can say such a thing is at least worth letting me get in touch with.Because I'm tired of hearing those gods, the cosmic beings are controlling, and there are other nonsense that have boundless magic power.None of them have any theoretical basis, and they just copy the content of religion and legends without any innovative spirit. I am really tired of hearing it.

She: "Let's do a fun experiment. You know the blue screen technology commonly used in movies and TV?" Me: "Know that." She: "We use that to do it. First find a snake. Then paint the middle part blue except for the head and tail of the snake. Then put the snake on a floor of the same blue color, and then use a video camera to take pictures and put them on Look, what you'll see." Me: "I can only see the snake's head and tail moving, but not the snake's body... Ah! I understand!" She was a little impatient: "I told you not to make that startled sound." Me: "Sorry, you continue." She: "That's what you just understood. Between the snake's head and tail, there is a body painted in blue that is connected, but it can't be seen on the screen after shooting. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it actually is. Exist. Those two seemingly unrelated particles are actually just a part—the part that we can see. We can’t see the ones that interact with each other. Or in other words: we can’t detect it with our existing instruments.” Me: "That's right, but there is a fatal problem with your statement: you are still postulating an explanation. The same hypothesis can also be hypothesized using parallel universe theory and superstring theory." Her: "Parallel universes? Superstrings? What's that?" Me: "You don't know?" Her: "I don't know, you know? Tell me." It took me about 40 minutes to explain briefly and irresponsibly the most basic points of those two theories. She: "I probably understand what it means. But the two theories also have a big problem, and it is very important." Me: "What's the problem?" She: "That kind of explanation is only limited to a certain physical level. It can't explain everything, or I haven't thought about explaining those. I just assumed an explanation for a certain phenomenon. But in other aspects, new problems will arise, or Can't be applied and proven at all. And on some points, I don't conflict with them." Me: "All ears." She: "In fact, time and space are defined by ourselves. It seems that they are two different things, but they are not. They are both the same thing." Me: "Excuse me. The concept of 'space-time unity' has actually been proposed in the theory of relativity." She: "Oh? Then I don't know. But the word time and space is still a state of merger. Because we can't span time yet, it is very difficult to understand this structural concept. I don't think time and space can be separated. Moreover, I feel a little funny about the multiverse theory. Why use this universe or that universe as a distinction? There are many universes? There is a problem with this quantitative unit itself. The so-called multiverse does not exist, I would rather use 'this universe' to illustrate. Your past, your future, your present, or a trillion years from now, and a trillion years ago, are the same and have always existed .” Me: "Huh? Can you explain in more detail?" She: "Let's take the multi-universe theory. That view is correct. It says that there are many universes, some are from the Tang Dynasty, some are primitive people, and some are very similar to now, and you are dead long ago. Yes. Is that so?" Me: "Well, that's right." She: "But the problem with multiverses is that the idea is that many universes exist and are parallel. That kind of thinking is still divided by time. Let me say it again: In fact, time and space are not two different things. They are one. We artificially dismantled the concept. Why did we dismantle it? Because our concept of space and time is only because we exist in a certain place and can only exist in a certain period of time, so we use this to divide One part: now. That is why we will always use the concept of causality to judge things. There is a cause and there is an effect. But now due to the development of science and technology, we have discovered a major loophole in the causality problem-the strange connection of particles. Then I just can’t figure it out, why is that? The multiverse thinks that other universes are affecting it; the superstring theory thinks that it’s just the effect of the tremor of one particle, not two particles. As far as I know, there’s another holographic projection theory Right? For those, I just think it's funny, but I'm not interested. It's like when you see a child playing with mud, you think it's funny, but you're not interested in participating. The two points you told me, still The holographic universe theory I heard is actually a very one-sided view. Think about it carefully, whether these explanations or academic views are based on the fact that time is different from space. There is no escape from that This is a kind of cognitive shackles. Multiverse or superstring theory is still an explanation for a phenomenon, not an attempt to explain all of them. Because of this, these things are one-sided and cannot explain everything.” Me: "It seems like this..." She: "It's okay, you don't have to agree with it, but I dare to conclude one thing now: because those academic views or theories still rely on the existing cognition of time and space, then these theories will definitely do great things. Correction or complete collapse. Because the concept of continuation of cause and effect is a narrow positioning attitude, it will collapse sooner or later, so these theories based on it will definitely be as I assert. Of course you don’t have to believe it, but I can make a note now. You'll see the day, and it's not far." What she said was indeed shocking to me, but her expression was extremely calm.I know the root of that peace—confidence. Me: "There is no need to establish written evidence, I would like to know your opinion." She: "All of this, the past, the past branches; the present, the present branches; the future, the future branches, are all together. There is no past, present, and future, and we don't need to divide them according to our concept of time. Understand this Words are the most important." Me: "If you understand it, you understand it. Just like the concept of up, down, left, and right, it is only determined according to the gravitational force we feel, and there is no up, down, left, or right. But all the things you said are mixed together...I can't imagine .” She: "Correct it: it's not a messy mix, but it's always together, inseparable. That's why our concept of cause and effect is created. In fact, if you abandon the view that separates time and space, you will I found that many things are not complicated or mysterious, and they are easy to explain. The problem of why particles are related can be solved, because they are one in themselves; the problem of how two people have telepathy can also be solved, because they are one in themselves; sometimes When encountering some problems that can happen, they can be solved; ghosts, aliens, flying saucers, supernatural, and even non-linear dynamic relationships can be explained clearly. Why can it be explained? Because we only see part of it, we can’t see it The ones above are the ones painted in blue. In fact, this concept of seeing is limited to itself. What’s more, all of these things are composed of the most basic kind of matter, so whether these things are called particles or energy It doesn’t matter, or use very basic quarks, all of these, without exception. That is to say, it can be concluded that the so-called matter is actually the same. You have the matter of your ancestors in your body, and the matter of other people’s ancestors, It also includes the matter of your future descendants, the matter of the dinosaur trilobite, the matter of the sun, and the matter of other galaxies, all of which are the same, and there is no difference. Furthermore, looking at it in reverse, all those explanations Unclear things are all confirming that what I said is true, not like those superstrings and parallel universes, where a certain problem cannot be explained.” Me: "Why do I feel a little bit of denying the material world?" She: "On the contrary dear, on the contrary, I am affirming this material world. I am definitely affirming this material world. However, I think that matter has an end. We are now desperately exploring the edge of the universe, in fact What you are exploring is not the edge of the universe, but the edge of matter. When you find the edge of the universe, you have found the end of matter. This kind of universe is like this. Besides, if you have to use quantitative units, Then, all the universes, all the causes and effects, all the up and down, all the left and right, all the you and me, all of them are all together, just like a big piece of jelly, without any difference." Me: "Is it fatalism? It means that the individual is unable to change something, and it is doomed long ago?" She: "Have you forgotten? I'm not just talking about a past, present and future together, but also countless past, present and future. You can change or have new choices, but it must be in this big piece of jelly — still in matter.” Me: "What about the change? How did you make the change?" She: "That's what we said at the beginning. Let's use the jelly analogy: there are many, many tiny air bubbles in the big piece of jelly. Those air bubbles don't belong to matter, what do they belong to?" Me: "What does it belong to?" She stretched her waist: "I'm so tired. I don't tell others about this easily. I'm afraid of causing trouble, but it still causes trouble—the two doctors and psychiatrists are already my followers. So , Now those people restrict my activities, except for going to work, I can only stay at home and not let me go anywhere.” Me: "Those people? Who?" She: "Those people in the hospital said I was dangerous." Me: "... Well, you are indeed dangerous. What about your parents? Do you believe this?" She didn't answer directly: "My dad wrote part of the letter, and my mom thought I was crazy; are you free the day after tomorrow?" Me: "Hey? Still bring the second episode? Tell me now. What's going on with the bubbles and the end of matter?" She emphasized calmly: "I'm tired. I have time the afternoon after tomorrow. I don't want to talk about it now." The next day, I did nothing and frantically searched for information—all the information I could find. I tried to find problems to overturn or question her point of view.But I found that, as she said, all things that cannot be explained can be explained clearly with her point of view.Or it was all proving she was right.This broke me down, because I'm still not sure that's the truth I'm looking for, but if it's true, I must have enough confidence to confirm it, otherwise I will still be fidgeting and tossing and turning. I'm looking forward to that day after tomorrow.Or, am I looking forward to knowing the end of matter?What the hell is not in the world of that hunk of jelly?