Chapter 29 Lin Daiyu made a mistake when talking about poetry

When Jia Baoyu met Lin Daiyu for the first time, Baoyu smashed that jade madly The Chinese characters are all the same in different versions, and they are actually errors, which have never been discovered.For example, in Chapter 48, when Xiangling studied poetry with Daiyu, Daiyu told her: Ping Sheng to Zi Sheng.False to real, real to imaginary.If there is a strange sentence, it will be flat and false, and it will make it. It seems good, but it is very wrong.If you really do verses, if you match the virtual characters with the real characters, and the real characters with the virtual characters, don’t you want to make a mess?Could it be that Lin Daiyu taught Xiangling this way and the author taught us this way?This is a continuation of the above "flat tone versus oblique tone", and the syntax follows, which leads to mistakes.Forgive me for speaking bluntly, I am afraid that it is not the copyer's mistake, but the author's clerical error.There is a saying: "A wise man must have a thousand worries and one loss." This is almost one of the ten thousand worries.

I have always disapproved of "changing words with meaning", but it is a different matter when encountering some situations.Obvious mistakes like this should be corrected.Because the mistakes found here can be clearly seen not only from the actual writing of poems, but also from the text of this book. Flat tones, of course, to flat tones.The imaginary versus the real, of course the real versus the imaginary.Needless to say, every sentence is enough.Let’s try to compare flat to flat. There is only one sentence in this book: Ping Sheng to Zi Sheng. This is not bad.But the opposite of reality is two sentences:

False to real, real to imaginary. Why?Isn't one sentence enough?The following is called "Ping Zhe Xu Shi" in parallel. The use of different syntax here does not mean that the situation is a bit different.Flat to Zhe, Zhe to Flat (forgive me for saying so sloppily), but the truth is not true, and the truth is not true, so one sentence of flat and two sentences of false and true, the author occasionally makes a clerical error and forgets to correct it. It is absurd, and there is no redundancy, and it does not hurt the light of the sun and the moon.It was originally read as: False to virtual, real to real.

There is no doubt about it.From the point of view of grammar and grammar, this is the case, so this kind of modification is neither hard to buckle with the method of poetry, nor is it to change the word with meaning, but to change it from time to time.Moreover, if mistakes of this nature are not corrected, I will be sorry for the readers. This example is certainly the most recent; however, it is more worthy of our attention because it is often missed.