Chapter 25 Qin Keqing dies and is named Dragon Forbidden Captain

This book narrates the details of Qin Keqing's death, see "A Study of a Dream of Red Mansions".Here is a version issue.The thirteenth chapter "Qin Keqing's Death and Seal of Dragon Banwei", according to Zhi Yanzhai's review, the original work "Qin Keqing's Lascivious Funeral in Tianxianglou", was later deleted and revised, and even the table of contents was changed, which seems inappropriate. I once said so Guo: "Qin Keqing's husband donated to Long Jinwei, it seems that Qin Keqing should not be said to have died as Long Jinwei." Let's not talk about the problems in the writing.

First of all, I want to say that Long Jinwei did not have such an official name in the Manchu Qing Dynasty, and he probably alluded to the guards of the Qianqing Gate.Although some officials can donate, but for the lack of "guards", the emperor's close guards are not allowed to donate as a rule.It is not true that the book donates an official, and it is said that the Long Banwei is dead, and it is really sealed, and there is nothing strange about it.It's so stubborn that it doesn't seem to be closed.Let's look at the text of this chapter: Because Jia Zhen thought that Jia Rong was just a door supervisor, the list of Lingfan scriptures was not good-looking, and there were not many deacons, so she felt very uncomfortable. ...Dai Quan said: "... Now the three hundred dragons are short of two members... Since our children want to donate, write your resume quickly."

He clearly said that he would donate the Dragon Forbidden Captain.Just how big is the Dragon Forbidden Captain?There is also a clear text below its grade: Get a ticket for Wupinlong Banwei, and give him a license. Is Wupinlong Forbidden Captain really that big and wide?This is nonsense.Later, it was indeed written on the Lingfan Sutra list.There are three places in the 13th and 14th chapters, from the Jiachen manuscript of Qianlong, the Qi preface edition of the Zhengshu Bureau, the first typesetting edition of Cheng Weiyuan, and various workshop editions. Most of them are written in this way; hereby quote the earlier Jiachen edition:

The deacons and other things used before the spirit are all in accordance with the five-rank duty regulations.All the tablets on the Lingpai said that the heavenly imperial edict bestowed Jiamen and the Qin family with a pleasant spiritual position. On the altar between monks and Taoists, the great book on the list is hereditary to the grandson of Ning Guogong's tomb, protecting the inner court imperial guard Long Jinwei, Jiamen Qin's pleasant funeral. (thirteen times) Inscribed on the front is a large letter entrusting the first-class grandson of Ning Guogong's tomb to protect the forbidden road in the inner court, the imperial guard Long Jinwei, and the coffin of the pleasant Qin family of Jiamen who enjoy a strong life. (fourteen chapters)

No matter what, there is nothing wrong with this, everyone knows that the fifth grade seal is pleasant.But looking at the Qianlong Jimao edition and the Gengchen edition of Zhiyanzhai, the "pleasant" in these three places are all referred to as "respectful".If there are obvious clerical errors and copying errors, it’s okay to make mistakes in three places in a row. If the author can’t even figure out the three grades of respectful people and five grades of pleasant people, what else would he write.What's more, Zhiben's thirteen chapters "Lingpai Shushang" and so on are also based on the "five-rank job regulations".Did he forget immediately?

This is a special pen of the Ming Dynasty, a special pen in Qin Keqing's book.Since Gong Ren is a third-rank seal, who is the third rank?This book has a clear text, which is the resume mentioned above: It reads: "Jia Rong, the supervisor of Jiangning County, Yingtian Prefecture, Jiangnan, is 20 years old. The great-grandfather was originally the envoy of the Beijing Camp, Jia Daihua, a hereditary first-class general of power. Jia Jing, a Jinshi of Zu Bingchen. His father inherited the third rank of Juewei. General Lie Jia Zhen." (Jiachen version) It turned out that these three grades belonged to Jia Zhen's grade, but they were moved to Qin Keqing's spirit tablet, scripture list and Mingjing for no reason.This way of writing is ruthless and "forced", and the author's intention is profound and clear to the extreme.He seems to want us to believe that he donates to this official because he wants to show off, look good, and save face, but it's not the same thing at all.It doesn't matter whether it's a fifth-rank Captain Long or a third-rank General Wei Lie, is this how they should behave?As mentioned above, Long Jinwei can't donate at all, donating an official is already a lie; donating an official for the sake of ostentation is even more a lie and a lie.Therefore, even if the grade is written correctly, it is not really correct; if it is wrong, it does not matter.The author borrowed this to deliberately show us a flaw.In other words, although the author deleted the words "Xiangsang Tianxianglou", he used a different style of writing to write this book.The people in the various school magazines didn’t understand this, and judging by the common sense of the official system, simply changing it to pleasant is naturally not bad at all. The superficial loopholes and contradictions have been eliminated, and the author’s intention has thus disappeared.And I can't help but misunderstand the original meaning. It seems that I can be so rich by donating Long Jinwei. If I forget to write it like this, it won't make sense.That is to say, what the author used in the Long Jinwei, Sanpinfeng, Wupinfeng, etc. was originally a false pen. Although it is self-contradictory and contrary to common sense, it doesn't matter much;Once the real pen is used, there is a real contradiction with the whole article.We all want to ask, why is a Yiren with a fifth-grade seal so rich?It can also be said that although mistakes are not mistakes, and mistakes are not mistakes, but it takes more detours to understand.

Reading a book, reality and absurdity intertwine each other. Talking about reality is extremely realistic, and talking about absurdity is extremely absurd. If you use the method of "glue engraving" to verify it, you will encounter obstacles everywhere.Here is just an example.The author writes about Qin's funeral with many negative words and irony, and this is not the only point, but this "one-character difference" is the finishing touch.