Chapter 21 Letters from readers-2

Professor Long: I think everyone deeply loves this place where they live or grow up, but they may use various ways, but I think as long as the starting point is a sincere love for this place, even if If you can't agree with his behavior, you should also treat it with an understanding eye. From my standpoint as a serving soldier, this is a relatively taboo thing, but I think people have the right to know and the right to demand reform.Your book and China Times have already been "banned" in our unit.Although I don't agree with this approach, the formation of the army must know how to obey orders.

This is a document issued by the political and warfare department, which is classified as "secret", which means that it violates the regulations if it is circulated to the outside world, so I don't want people to know who I am, because there is no certainty about the result. Size, anyway, self-protection is. The China Times was banned because of the article, I quite agree with your statement, I even recommend it to my friends, it is very interesting that after I worked hard to get others to accept it, I announced that everyone should not own this book, what would they think I don't know, but I think people should have the ability to judge for themselves.

The purpose of my writing this letter is to let you know such a thing. On the other hand, I hope that it will not affect your usual rational and persistent attitude. Things always need to be constantly reviewed to make progress. The truth should be the more you say It becomes more and more obvious that everyone in this society observes this society from a different standpoint. The older generation has gone through a lot of struggle to maintain the current situation. It is no wonder that they maintain a relatively conservative position in their mentality. Although it sometimes constitutes resistance to progress, it is also an indispensable force to maintain this situation.

I very much support your efforts, it takes courage, and I hope that while you "tolerate" this matter, you can continue to let this society still have the voice of "strive for improvement". The cheering voice in our society is enough Too much, I want to dare to point out the missing side is what we need more; everyone has the right to ask for the progress of this society, and has the right to ask you to do your best to contribute to the society as a citizen Of course, we include women selling oyster omelets, busy office workers and many soldiers who stick to their posts. January 28, 1986

Mr. Long: Since enlisting in the army, I seldom pick up a pen impulsively to write letters in the middle of the night.But today I saw your defense of the informer, which aroused the grievances that have been pent up in my heart for a long time.It is exciting to know that you have such an outspoken pastor on campus, and it is even more fortunate that our newspapers can publish articles that are as outspoken as you.I once read your article to the brothers in my company. After reading it, there was a burst of applause. I said, "That was not written by the platoon leader. I should thank Zhongshi for having the generosity to publish such a candid article." You know, more than 70% of my soldiers are below junior high school level, and there were not many college soldiers present at that time.Usually, they are only allowed to read a few party newspapers, and I can only use the newspaper reading (three times a day) or classroom time to read some non-stereotyped things to them, otherwise, I will feel that their life is too empty and monotonous.

I don't know when I made "excessive remarks".The only pre-officer in the division was me, who was dismissed as the company and platoon leader (of course I did not join the party), and I was often criticized by the superiors, especially those who were in charge of political warfare, so I was listed as one of the key assessment personnel in the camp.For this small report, I don't know how many times I have been shot.However, I did not give up the job God gave me.I still ask my soldiers in various ways, and I enlighten them from time to time, hoping that they will be useful people after they leave the army.My goal is not far from the requirements above, but the means are not agreed with them.The education I have received does not allow me to lead subordinates in an authoritative leadership style.I would rather believe that their nature is kind and they want to make themselves better.This assumption is not acceptable to officers of professional background.

I often feel that after serving as a soldier, I will never owe Taiwan any more.Because she rejected the care and hugs of too many people.Compared with other people, this small setback of mine is really nothing, but it is also really disheartened.I am not the kind of opinion leader who leads a club. At best, I just debate with teachers and classmates in seminars. However, some issues are very sensitive. The guidance of teachers is often not to draw conclusions, but to clarify the essence of the problem.It's just a collection of some feasible solutions.If I was put on the list just because of this, I would really be unwilling to do so!

Maybe, I'm not a good officer.However, my sense of responsibility for connecting with my brothers has not been eliminated because of my own personal experience.I am by no means a talented person, and I can only contribute a little strength to my family, friends, and limited people around me.I care about my soldiers not because of my uniform or class, but because they are a lovely bunch of brethren.If one day I return to China after studying, it will not be to answer some call, but I think I have the ability to do more service for more people. I met Mr. Wang Jinping once; I also met Mr. Chen Guying in the conference hall.I feel sad for their situation today; my own teacher has never been promoted to director of the institute because of party membership.These encounters are commonplace for a conscientious intellectual.I fervently hope that your soldiers will be able to stand out from the blue, and I also hope that you will not be too Don Quixote sometimes.Windmills are sometimes the embodiment of the devil.

Ms. Long, Professor Yingtai: What is "yes" and "no", can you tell me?What is "right" and "wrong", can you really tell the difference?What is "good" and "bad", are you sure? I don't speak for anyone, I only know that I am Chinese, I am a small unit of the Chinese nation, I hate Western culture, I don't believe that they are better than us, why do I have to keep a low profile in everything and take them as the center Yes, are we wrong?Just imagine, who caused Taiwan to be so "backward" (the backwardness in their eyes) so far?Who gave us herpes and AIDS?Who Invented Pornography and Movies to Harm Us Teenagers?Is it the bastard people who dance some shitty dances and then say, "It's going to cause your hair to fall out and your muscles to strain"?I hate that I am not the Bruce Lee in the movie, I hate that I don't have martial arts to fight more foreign devils, I hate...

Is the political system of foreigners good?How long have they been able to do it? There are a lot of problems that make them struggle; we have 5,000 years of history and culture, should we learn from them?What's more, the background, habits, and customs are completely different from their deserted countries, what do you think?Why do we take them as "yes" and we all "no"? !joke! Do you think that Confucius and Mencius are just farting, just a stumbling block to the so-called "progress" and "modernization"?The Chinese are Chinese, and we should have our own way. When we all become "foreign slaves" (like some girls, they are willing to be played by foreign devils, just for a card, fuck it, disgusting!) and we are all eaten by foreign devils When it is clean, I can assure you that no one can find a way back. China, the Chinese nation, is finished. Would you like to see it? !Professor!

I may be taught by you, I dare to write, it is influenced by you, thank you, so that I am not afraid of being "cut" by you, professor, please don't be disappointed, I can't read English-ever! !what!what!what!Go to your barbaric text, rampant text, ha!what!what!Long live the spirit of the Chinese nation Student Cai ○○ on P.S. All the bullshit notebooks have foreign languages, go fuck it! Professor Long: After a night of wind and rain, I quickly finished reading the masterpiece.Most of the arguments in the book are extremely earnest, and they criticize this society full of diseases. The precious moral courage and sense of rights are indeed touching and highly appreciated!If these concepts can be spread in society as soon as possible, then the disadvantages will be reduced, and the poor people in Shengdou should be able to live a happier and more honorable life. However, there are some places in the masterpiece that are too high-profile, and I personally feel that it is necessary to discuss them; 1. There was a time when newspaper articles angrily accused the killing of tigers as a barbaric act, and shouted to protect the rights and lives of tigers. The words were fierce and the momentum was formidable.However, I feel that this is just a silly act of a poet and wine scholar who pretends to be noble, which is really ridiculous. I have also studied for several years. Although I failed in my studies, I have acquired a lot of sentimental scholarly habits. Every time I walk through the chicken coops in the market, or look at the pigs raised by the villagers, I always feel sorry for their lives. Endless!However, I know I can't say anything, after all, I can't stop eating meat, and the vast majority of people can't stop eating meat!Moreover, chickens and pigs are not slaughtered when they grow up, so who has the energy to raise them?And why are there so many feeds?And what I am puzzled is: These literati can keep silent about Taiwan, where thousands of cattle, sheep, chickens, and pigs are slaughtered every day, and they drink and eat meat, but they yell at the fate of a few tigers. Is the life higher than that of chickens and pigs?The life of a tiger needs to be protected, why not the life of a chicken and a pig?Why do we have to kill chickens and pigs every day to feed tigers?And from Taiwan's ecological point of view, are tigers more important than chickens, pigs or frogs?Do not kill tigers, but buy tigers from foreign countries and put them in the mountains, will it help ecological restoration?With Taiwan's dense population, can tigers be released into the mountains?Tigers are not allowed to be released into the mountains, and they are not allowed to be killed, so who will feed them?Tigers are not allowed to be killed and no money is given to feed them. In order to satisfy the noble mentality of poetry, wine and literature, they insist on being raised by others until they die. Today, I saw that you opposed the killing of tigers on the grounds of "rare animals", "humaneness", and "ecology". What I want to ask is: You advocate the prohibition of killing tigers, but you have also prepared funds for buying tigers and raising them?Is it against the concept of rights to ask ordinary people to bear the obligation of raising tigers to death out of thin air? ! 2. You wrote on page 93: A taxi driver drove his car into a big pothole in the road; he was shocked and cursed "fuck the Kuomintang", you said "this driver is completely wrong", "his curse is completely unfair".However, I smiled knowingly at his scolding.I think if you are willing to understand Taiwan’s party-government relationship more objectively, understand the structural factors behind every appearance, and understand the long-term oppression of a good citizen by the party, government, military, police, and tax bureaucrats, you will also smile knowingly. Or you will be emotionally silent.Because this is not just cursing at all, is there any right to walk without pitfalls!But under the long-term oppression of unconstitutional violence, under the exploitation of countless heavy taxes, countless bridges, tolls, parking fees, and administrative fees, this is the most helpless and pathetic way to vent hatred!It is said that he is helpless because there is no way to argue unreasonably, let alone whether there is any way or no way!And the reason why it is pitiful is that in Taiwan, we are only allowed to speak irony, not to tell the truth. When you are beaten, you have to say that it doesn’t hurt, and when you are imprisoned, you have to say that you are grateful for the benevolent government.Otherwise, just like a taxi driver last year—a veteran Yu Xinmin, he confided to his passengers that he was dissatisfied with the government and missed his relatives in the mainland. Singing sadly! Let me ask: Although ordinary people know that individuals have at least those rights, but seeing "legal" force unscrupulously intrude into the scope of individual rights and private property, occupying land as king, individuals are unable to defend themselves, and the law is on the side of the powerful, what do you say? What if the driver didn't scold him like that? 3. Forgive me for being abusive. In the article "Ashamed of "Silence"——Applause for the Elegant Citizens", I think you seem to write too quickly!You said: "Of course Su Nancheng knows why he was appointed as the mayor of Kaohsiung: he has the courage and courage to target the pustules with the knife." I think this is a bit contradictory, that is: if he "knows" why he was appointed "Appointed" as the mayor of Kaohsiung, and he is a person with courage and courage, then he will never be the mayor of Kaohsiung; if he takes office, he is not a person with courage and courage.Because according to the constitution, he can only be elected and cannot be "sent".According to the Central Regulations and Standards Act, his appointment is not legal, but can only be said to be orderly.May I ask a person who recites the Three People's Principles and uses law and power to coerce the people, but he can ignore the "premier's legacy" for the sake of promotion and fortune, disregarding the law and being unreasonable, can he be called "courageous" and "courageous"? ? In this article, you compared street vendors to "pustules" and "bad guys", and applauded Kaohsiung citizens (or informants).I know that you are in the upper class, you can study abroad, you can own a car or a bungalow, you don’t have to go to the wind and rain to make a living, you don’t have to run away from the police, and you can run around on the streets... However, as an upper class As a member, I hope you will face up to the dignity of life and the right to exist of poor people. Do you know how the ordinary people survive in Taiwan, an island with severed diplomatic relations, weak foreign trade, small land and many people, and underdeveloped industry and commerce?Do you know how farmers survive when the countryside goes bankrupt, agricultural products are under pressure, farmers work hard for years, and their income is not equal to that of a factory worker?Do you know that the government only collects taxes, regardless of unemployment benefits, and the labor laws are incomplete and enforced with one eye closed? Workers are injured, fired, and unable to find a job. How do you solve the seven problems of opening the door every day?Do you know that the mine workers died and became vegetative, the government and labor insurance benefits are a drop in the bucket, half of the private donations are kept by the Taipei County Government, how do the children of the miners live? ... The existence of prostitutes, beggars, and street vendors in Taipei, Kaohsiung, and other cities and towns is mostly not because these people are born lowly, shameless, and willing to eat dust and dust on the streets, but because there are many reasons that force them to do nothing. This is not the best course of action.Let me ask: the human heart is fleshy, and everyone knows to pursue wealth, comfort and honor. If it is not a last resort, who would like to live in a dark corner like this, facing a humble and miserable life? "Rich wine and meat stinks, and there are frozen bones on the road." If intellectuals can ignore the current facts of the smell of wine and meat, and only blame the eyes of the frozen bones, this is almost inhumane! Of course, the city should be modernized, it should be tidy, and the street vendors should have a proper management.However, if you have read modern Western theories, you should know that urban modernization cannot be viewed in isolation, and you cannot just criticize street vendors when you demand a clean city.Why don't you ask the Beigao Second Municipal Government, after collecting astronomical amounts of taxes, fees and fines, how much money is spent on projects that benefit the citizens?The "Social Welfare Service Center" in the 16th District of Taipei City only has personnel and administrative fees, but no activity and service fees. The city government ignores social services, but can design projects randomly. Needless to say, many projects have been dug and dug, how much money and blood of the people have been wasted?Among the plethora of city government regulations, most of them only know prohibition, prohibition, fines, detention, confiscation, and compulsory expropriation (40% to 50% of the market price). In the eyes of this group of greedy bureaucrats, politics is management. Laws are regulations, but few people know that taking responsibility for people's lives and social development is the positive purpose of politics and laws! Think about it: It is hard to find a job in the society, and it is hard to find a branch. What can the ordinary people do besides supporting their families with the most primitive business behavior?Do you want them to steal and rob?The city government has money, power, and people, but it does not take on the responsibility of supporting the people, and messes around in the municipal administration. Intellectuals dare not criticize it, so how can they turn around and blame the street vendors? To be honest, Taiwan's literati are particularly self-proclaimed, but also very humble, lacking the spirit of common people and things, let alone what is meant by "knowledge and conscience"?What is "love and respect"?He is fully ignorant of the difficulties of Jiarong, but Goethe shows his shame but is afraid of future generations."Wise and great", "grateful to the benevolent government", and "freedom and stability" in the newspapers are their mindless mantras.Pleading for the life of the tiger, pleading for the life of the wall and the Japanese shrine, is their most heroic deed!However, many ordinary people were illegally detained and died violently after a few days of detention. Human rights and lives were trampled on in the most lawless way (if you don't believe me, I can provide evidence).But I have never seen these literati, using their words of pleading for the life of a tiger, to care for the poor compatriots who died!Could it be that the so-called literati's conscience means "only ask about animals, not common people"?The so-called literati morality means that the life of a tiger is more important than human life, and the power of a tiger is more important than human rights? You—Professor Long, are not only a university professor, but also an intellectual. You not only have knowledge, but also love. You don’t want to be locked in an ivory tower, singing modern crooked poems, but caring for our society with valuable insights. It is the reason why I admire you so much and am willing to write this letter to you.But I also hope you, don't be framed by paper materials, don't be blinded by self-prejudice, and don't follow these vulgar literati.Get out of the campus gates and go everywhere to see what is behind the people's livelihood, progress and prosperity.I hope that after being tempered by reality, you will make greater contributions to the people of this land! Sincerely, readers February 22 Miss Long: I really can't understand how the newspaper run by the Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China would allow you to set wild fires there?Especially this election eve?You are not playing some "lead the snake out of the hole" trick, are you? If you are "playing for real", I think you academic characters (I'm just a "runner", the so-called Philistines in the Pacific) are really cute and naive.People say that we don't have a crisis of confidence, and you are so angry, it's really ridiculous.Haven't you heard of Huineng's Zen Koan? "The poor monk has no faith, and the donor is also nonsensical. He has no confidence, so why is there a crisis?" Nonsense!We certainly don't have a crisis of confidence. I don't doubt your IQ, but I'm just worried that if you are so naive (if you are real), you will soon be ashamed. First of all, have you seen clearly, among the so-called "people with a heart who silently sow and cultivate", among those "idealists" and investors who want to publish "Human World", are there any daughters-in-law and babes of high-ranking officials? Angry female writer?Are there apologists and whitewashers who pretend to be "rational and fair"?Is there anyone who was ordered by the imperial court to sing a bad face as a foil?How many are real, conscientious, social workers?Can your investors stand the scare? Second, have you figured out the nature of power?Have you figured out who you are?Did you know that "Qing Jun's side" is actually on "Qing Jun"? (Dong Lin'er is a group of idiots who still believe in the long live of the emperor's sanctity even when they are decapitated. There are only two kinds of believers for Confucianism-masochistic believers and make-believers!) Do you know that anything that raises social awareness—from grassroots social movements to sophisticated literary and artistic activities—is not conducive to a Confucian-style regime that relies on ignorance to maintain its rule. (You only need to look at the huge superstitious forces in this society and the shameful TV programs to understand that the accusation of "fooling the people" is by no means a false accusation) Can you figure out the true nature and root of some problems? For example, you can understand your friend who "rides the motorcycle to work every day" "blood boils" can't wait to go...his skull cracked...", and those "crazy crowds" and the "hardly inserted The psychological background of the owner of the "locomotive" in front of me? Do you think it is just a traffic problem, or a national moral problem? Can you understand the pressure on the peddler who yelled at you "Ruan is a killer"? You Ever heard of the term "fascist social psychology"? You can understand those as axioms.Is the person opposed by the righteous, progressive, conscientious, and loving people unbearable to be the enemy of the evil, indifferent, and cruel? (Pahlavi was defeated because of this.) Do you understand that the traditional Chinese Confucian way of controlling bureaucrats is basically the coercion method used by gangster gangs? (That's why Zhuangzi said that saints never die, but thieves abound.) I am definitely not the kind of people who "remain neutral in the face of serious moral crisis" as Dante said (the hottest places in hell are reserved for them).I am indeed happy to see that we have social movements, but if the social movements are only rippling, symbolic, and misunderstood the goals (such as promoting national morality, such as Haishan love donations, etc.), it is only in vain to create some fake progress for this society. It's just like that, it doesn't help to solve the basic problem.In the long run, our society will completely lose its vitality. Finally, I also want to ask "whose home is Taiwan?".To be honest, I am also confused.The novel articles I read in the newspapers either talked about the New World or the Old World.Whose home is this?Or who is in charge?Should be pretty clear. May the wildfire burn forever Dear readers, 1985, 10, 28 P． S．I also saw what you said "...the lack of motivation of the people themselves..." You should know that in Taiwan, the total capital of state-owned enterprises (party-run is also counted as private) accounts for more than 35% of Taiwan's total capital .If you add it to the public and educational personnel, military police, party camps, power-waiting enterprises, hawkers, and businessmen who have to evade taxes, the whole of Taiwan will eat without looking at the faces of the rulers, and those who dare to cause trouble (like you) will be left How many?Those in power (since you say) don't like social consciousness movements.Those who eat by looking at their faces are not full, so how dare they openly support various sports?For the rest of the people (like me), sorry, it’s too late to find food and clothing, so it’s time to be free and elegant.There is also the example you gave, asking people to notify the police station when they see trucks stealing sand.This is probably lettered reasoning (or formalized).Do you think the police are willing to live on just a salary?If the result is "invalid", it means that your ancestors are virtuous. Miss Yingtai: Hello. After reading the "previous generation" section of "Wildfire Phenomena", I feel a little inappropriate. I am one of the people you refer to more, and I also have the same identity as those who are considered "spreading rebellion" in your example, but it is just a low-level one. A person who lives on a retirement pension in an ear-satisfying age faces society with the belief that more things are worse than less things. When I read the first edition of Wildfire Collection, I raised my hand many times in my heart.Drinking many times is enough for self-entertainment, so why bother to add something to the cake and praise it!There may be quite a few people who have the same idea as me. Besides, those of my generation who don’t read enough and are not good at writing, may be able to find out the roadblocks by reading an article (of course it’s not your ability to criticize novels), but, If you want to write an article or something, there are flaws everywhere, so you have formed a large group as you mentioned. It’s not that the older generation doesn’t pray for a higher level of blessing, let alone want democracy, freedom, and human rights. After experience, it is difficult to understand deeply. Can you imagine an old tenant farmer, with all his hard work (not the current mechanical farming), to create a well-off situation, and then sell all he has to invest in a computer company?They are not against you, but they are afraid that you will overturn such a boat, because they are all poor and afraid! !Why don't you use more convincing articles to convince people? !wish Genan April 25, 1986 Professor Long Yingtai Qingjian: Since your masterpieces were published one after another in the China Times "Human World" last year, they are indeed inspiring and acclaimed. It is gratifying that you can spare no effort to select carefully for readers and guide intellectuals (writing and reading) to the right path with a brave attitude. valuable.However, after reading the article "Wildfire Phenomenon" in the China Times recently, I really felt a lot. Let's avoid talking about democracy, freedom and human rights mentioned in the big article, because this issue is too big and we can't talk about it without power.The source of power (from ancient times, China and foreign countries) is hereditary and the other is blood and sweat, and talking about this issue may be mislabeled by interested people (it has also been mentioned in the masterpiece).I just want to express my thoughts on the "previous generation" and "this generation" that you wrote (because I'm afraid I won't see the next generation mature, so I won't talk about it), what you said is all right, but you It seems to be too "flattering" to this generation of young people, and you seem to be advocating that they violate the family, betray their parents, and move towards a life of selfishness, abandoning family relationships and disregarding (sorry, maybe I said it a little bit more).I will now give an example to prove that some of them have already done so (please don’t ask me for evidence, that’s the right to privacy, right), I have a friend and his wife who are nearly 60 years old and in poor health, and only have one son , he developed freely to study abroad and obtained a Ph.D. After returning to Taiwan, he worked in a university.Because of the wasted years of academic marriage, I married a girl who graduated from Fu Jen Catholic University (the couple said that the material and mental pressure and torture their son suffered during his studies are as intelligent as you can imagine).Due to the different living environments of the two families and the difference in family education, coupled with the free nature of the young people, it can be said that the old man treats his daughter-in-law with patience in every possible way than he treats himself a thousand times better.But they still don't understand it, and they often glared at each other, abandoning their elders and forcing them to return to their old nests to spend their lonely lives. Of course, everyone has freedom and independence.But has this generation thought about the so-called "rights" and "obligations" for the previous generation? Although some people say that "husband and wife are in debt to their children", even if they leave "gratitude and repayment" aside, the issue of survival should always be taken care of, right? .Is it true that young people can abandon their lonely parents because they care about their freedom, not to mention that the current "generation" is the future "previous generation".Maybe they will say "don't wait until then, we won't ask for it", but that is their freedom, but why don't they settle what the previous generation asked for? It has not reached the level of Europe and the United States, otherwise the elderly would be willing to bear the humiliation and torture like this generation to support them. Maybe you will say that this is a "special case" or even "there is nothing wrong with it".good!But the question is why don't young people share a little bit of their play time and energy with their relatives, and some go so far as to use "compassionate" swarms (forgive me for saying this, just like they buy your book, it's just a fad , You know exactly how much it will affect them, right?) Encouraging unhealthy trends and gaining power by opportunistic opportunism.And people who really need help are lonely and helpless, we don't say grace, just "righteousness", young people should have it.Let me give another example of young people's inappropriate freedom, if you go to some amusement places (including restaurants) during the holidays.Most of the people crowded there are young people. There is nothing wrong with that. The problem is that most of them are not producers. This is called "fairness". Of course, according to the logic of some young scholars, "their parents are happy and you don't care about it", yes, but have you ever thought about what to do if some parents are not happy!In fact, the children in most families are already their masters, especially those who you said are "self-righteous from the blue", arrogant and ignorant, and rebellious as progress, some have reached the point of forcible plunder, and the family structure and ethics have reached the edge of breaking Here, please allow me to take my immature view of the family. I will look at "family" (including the old, middle and young) in terms of "home". Old-Middle-Eppemiancy is inseparable from the past and the future) I have heard and seen too many cases of perverted young people, please stop burning down families and destroying ethics by "winding the fire and taking advantage of the wind" (I know you don't have these meaning, but I am afraid that those who have lost their minds, do not distinguish between good and evil, and have not yet opened their minds will mess around).Therefore, I think you should use your talents to exert the conscience and ability of scholars, as well as the influence of the "dragon responding to typhoon" to subtly and emotionally persuade those young people who are not open-minded, lazy, eager for quick success and quick profit, and strive for freedom and authority with the previous generation. , do less unrighteous things (even if you fight, you must be fair, right?), you may not know that there are many families where parents are angry with their daughter-in-law and have nowhere to complain (you may say "you deserve it ").But people will grow old one day, and they can't be compared with beasts, right!You must have studied abroad for a long time and have seen a lot of knowledge. How are their young people free to spend money and enjoy themselves at home?Of course, we should not measure it in a "generalized" way. You have to advocate the struggle for freedom from power, democracy and human rights. This is the trend of the times and no one can stop it, let alone "twist his arm", but What you mean in the big article is to argue with your parents (the previous generation), I am afraid that "this generation" will suffer the consequences in the future.And it will also lose the unique style of the descendants of the Yellow Emperor (truly go to the whole world, but I am afraid that others will not agree) There are enough tragedies and too many helplessness of the times. Some people say that cleverness is different from wisdom. You are a wise man. If you want to do what you like (young people) and want to gain both "fame and fortune" (as shown in your big article), you have already got it. Please try to be kind when you write again. Do your best to make some young people not blindly oppose the family (the previous generation). Of course, I don't mean to ask you to go against what you said and re-enter the "frame", "independent thinking" or even contradict your parents (say It’s okay to argue), but please don’t encourage the trend of opposing parents and opposing the family.You say "yelling" and I am begging, please don't regard this family as the "shackle", the family of the "shackle" has broken the truth after the May Fourth Movement.I want to say too much to you, and I agree with you that you should not go to extremes, that water and fire are incompatible, and that you are asking the power to let go rather than letting the innocent suffer.Mr. Professor once again expresses to you that because I am dizzy and slow-minded, there are many words that are inadvertent and messy. If there is something unintentional and you find it offensive, please forgive me congratulations teach security A respectful pen Under the lights on April 24, 1986 Miss Long: After get off work today, I took the time to go to Gengxin at 6:45PM, and the place was already full of people, and several seats were covered by books. If it was before, I would have thrown the books aside. Standing in the back row, people are getting more and more crowded, and when I turned from standing upright to sideways, I began to wonder if it was necessary to wait another 50 minutes?So I focused on the faces around me, trying to find out their motivations for coming to listen to your speech from their eyes, but the more I looked, the more confused I became, because I thought I was at a concert. PM: 7:08 I decided to give up, because this anxious environment is simply not suitable for listening.Unexpectedly, getting out of the gate from the last row was also a struggle, because I had to keep pushing away the crowd who were trying to squeeze in.At a close distance of 15 to 20 centimeters, the faces and eyes are changing drastically, almost leaving the venue in a feeling of disgust. On the way home, can't think of what you'll find amidst rapturous applause?From the photos, you look quite handsome. Do those young people who are wandering outside the stadium regard you as an idol?Does this kind of photography make your posture reproduce a kind of "confidence" charm, causing those young people who yearn for and be infatuated with you to yearn for it?Because I heard people say words like "I'm so fascinated by her" at the venue. Especially for the topic you want to talk about, will there really be so many phenomena that you are interested in?Or have your articles been satisfying the fun of "troubling and rebelling" in their minds? Between minority and majority, almost three years ago, I affirmed the categories of masses and non-masses.The development of modern society and psychology has further confirmed this kind of bias difference in personality and interest. Therefore, I think it is unusual for this speech to be such a sensation?And the recent popularity of literary speeches.Is it an abnormal phenomenon?Especially for a very serious literary criticism speech like today, how can there be so many audiences? In fact, I have always suspected that these phenomena are the response of some superficial emotions, related to Taiwan's economic situation, and they are all a pattern of sudden ups and downs.Or the humanistic atmosphere of the island, which lacks a stable personality to calmly face the changes of things, and is often inexplicably involved in the frenzy of swarms. In the past, for a while, I relied on the above methods to adjust my mood.Because Chinese people have lived for thousands of years, it is inevitable that they have accumulated too many tail diseases that have been passed down from generation to generation.College students are nothing more than human beings, and there are still so many similarities in science in the past, and there are only a few people who can be counted in history, so how can we ask for it today?In the end, I just asked myself the question of where to stand. After a long time, there is no way to accumulate so much responsibility, morality and courage.All I can guess is one in 18 million or two or three.Scolding the masses, after a long time, so what, the campus beauties are still selected.The emotion of buying and selling is not the same, it is just a one-time payment or installment payment (or a small purchase). There is nothing to be proud of, and nothing to be ashamed of.If you want dignity, you have to sacrifice your life and interests.Isn't Tennessee William also in the "Glass Bead Animal Circle", outlining the shortcomings of modern human nature? In an environment like Taiwan; how much more can we do?My own experience has gone around in a circle, and I have retreated into the vast ocean of existentialism. Too many views are swinging between the extremes of the radical reform activists and the side-viewing party that looks on coldly. I believe you also have moments of coldness.Jiao Xiongping went from hot to cold, and became negative for a while. 我只看经验和意志，一个是现象，一个是理想，人最后的表现，就是这二个，前面一个看得见，后面一个说得出。而我只是想最后呢？ 当我在上历史哲学时，一下克罗齐、一下黑格尔，我想写却是史记与司马迁，可是我们的历史课本把人简化成伟人，这一个空洞的概念，连司马迁都接不着。而今，以台湾的现实环境，该怎么做，你也很清楚，是否要像司马迁赔进去，去证明一件事，我想司马迁的自叙已提到了。 一度你在骂人时，我以为我站在你那边，后来想想又好像不是，不晓得你是否感受到另外一群人的存在，在过去，在现在他们却不曾被提到，但是他们一生很清楚地活着。有一天，我发觉到我是属于那一群，渐渐我也感染到他们的生活态度——在可为与不可为之间等待着。 你的演讲，就现实而言，算是成功，也算是一种希望，只是观众本身似乎真的自觉到"什么"那就很难说。 最后，我想说，是有机会时，别忘了留一些刺痛给观众，尤其是面对面。有点伤痕或是疤痕，人才会记住一些事情也才会去想些"为什么？"因为现场的观众，很容易被"新论""新释"的过滤冲昏了头。这是今天会场的印象之后的想法。 至于台湾的远景，就要问自己是否有足够能力无比的冷静，与坚强的理智来应对，什么时候挺身接棒？什么时候退身交棒？这些都是现阶段试着去要求自己或责问朋友的地方。提供你作再接再励的慰勉。 bless you 一九八五年九月四日