Chapter 82 My recently criticized articles

My articles have always been gentle and honest. Although I am often ridiculed as vulgar and boring, I rarely receive political criticism, so I am very annoyed by those fake liberal heroes. They hate why I don’t go to prison.Anyone who does not go to prison means that he is a running dog of the government and a slave of the autocracy.In order to prove that I am not very "safe", I have to declare that I am often unlucky, and I have to actually be unlucky.Alas, it is difficult to be a human being. Below is an article I recently published.Then I will post a critique of me by a certain authority.Fortunately, the times have changed after all, otherwise this criticism would be enough for me to go to jail.

lackeys of imperialism Kong Qingdong Recently, I encountered a very strange incident. When several of my articles were published in newspapers, the sentences containing the word "imperialism" were all deleted by coincidence.There was an article called "multiple submissions for one draft", which was published successively in two newspapers separated by thousands of miles. "imperialism".Holding the sample newspaper, I couldn't help but feel a lot of emotion. It is common for editors to delete and revise the author's articles, and it is also the editor's job responsibility.Because my articles are often not in the taste of a gentleman, I have been trimmed and polished by the editor, which has almost become a practice that I don't bother to mention.Besides, most of the editors who asked for manuscripts were my friends. They didn't dare to despise my language skills, but resolutely took the knife with the mood of "this is also for your own good", so that we can avoid troubles for each other.Therefore, I can generally understand the kindness of editors and not settle accounts with them.We can't just talk for ourselves, and ruin the jobs of our editor friends, can't we?

This time, however, I feel compelled to say a few words.Because of such a tacit act of castration, it has gone beyond the relationship between the editor and the author.In other words, this is no longer the editor's personal behavior, but behind it, there is a powerful invisible hand, with the help of the editor's pen, he deleted the "imperialism" that he hated so much.So whose hand is this? I don't think this hand will be a political hand.I don't think there will be any government department or official organization ordering all media editors: the words "imperialism" are not allowed to appear on the printed materials of our People's Republic of China.I think not only China does not, but other developed and underdeveloped countries do not. Even the big brother of imperialism, the United States, has articles of justice or false justice criticizing "imperialism" every day.What is strange is that in China, where we have socialism with Chinese characteristics, there is a ban on "imperialism".

So I couldn't help thinking about who the newspapers that published my articles were for, and who were their parents.It is said that today's overwhelming urban newspapers are mainly for "white-collar workers".Who is the core force leading white-collar workers?It is said that there are tens of thousands of "successful people", or more concisely, they are called "rich people".The so-called rich are precisely the "hegemonic clan" who have inextricably ambiguous relations with "imperialism".If you go to ask, why was "imperialism" deleted?They will not and dare not answer directly.They will say that this word is too old, or too exciting, or too revolutionary. To put it bluntly, it is too out of line with international standards, too out of globalization, too out of WTO, too out of anti-terrorism... ...It turns out that this is the big invisible hand that opened behind our newspaper. This is the hand of Zhao Botao, who has turned clouds and rain in Mao Dunzhong, and this is the hand of Uncle Jin Ba, who has never appeared in Cao Yuzhong.This hand can spend money to buy an entire newspaper page, this hand can appear in the guest seats of every lively program on CCTV, and this hand can even get an authentic doctoral degree from Peking University and Tsinghua University overnight. Gently delete one of Kong Qingdong's "imperialism" by hand, what's the fuss about?Even if they wanted to delete me, Kong Qingdong, from this earth, it would be no more troublesome than eating a ten-thousand-dollar morning tea.

When I figured it out, I was relieved.I have been deleted from criticizing leaders, Peking University, celebrities, and big money, but unexpectedly, China, which overthrew the five-star red flag of the three mountains decades ago, was deleted today. The words of imperialism.Is this what imperialism ordered them to do?I think there is no such mentally retarded imperialism.Although imperialism has a barbaric and disgusting side, being good at absorbing criticism, at least putting on a democratic posture of "freedom of speech" is probably one of the skills that imperialism can develop and grow.As for those heroes in China who did not rely on free competition to climb to the status of the rich, I am afraid that they are too low-grade to serve as lackeys of imperialism.Moreover, these thieves of state-owned assets will never admit that they are lackeys of imperialism, just as Mr. Liang Shiqiu swore to the death that he was a lackey of capitalists.According to Liang Shiqiu's logic, if there is no formal admission procedure, no fixed annual salary, no clear reward and punishment system, and no clear master, then it cannot be called a running dog.It forced Lu Xun to invent a new word and call him "a lackey".As a result, Lu Xun was forever accused of "swearing" by China's rich and powerful.Rich people never swear, they are always civilized and hygienic, and they also help others to delete uncivilized and unhygienic swearing words, so as to make this world more stable and orderly, more joyful and peaceful, and more murderous. Voice.But I just don't want to appreciate their teachings, because I am confident that I have already seen through that they are a group of fake rich people.They feel that they are invincible, and that they are only three or two steps away from imperialism.But just like a line in Lao She: Imperialism stretches out a little finger and knocks them down.They have made a lot of love for imperialism, but they have only acted as lackeys of imperialism.Besides, he offended me, Kong Qingdong, and the public relations on the two roads of heaven and hell were messed up.Therefore, after I relieved myself, I was really worried about these rich brothers.