Chapter 81 Criticism of my above article

World Magazine: What should the world see about China? Recently, I got 12 issues of "The World" magazine. It is printed in full color and is very beautiful. The content involves major events and figures at home and abroad. National Esperanto Society.So, the author read carefully.After reading this, I was surprised. I felt that many articles published in this magazine ran counter to the current situation of implementing the scientific concept of development and building a harmonious society in our country. They attacked the Communist Party and the socialist system in a disguised form, and advocated the so-called democracy and freedom of the West. And there are many articles criticizing all aspects of modern China.It makes readers feel the darkness of today's society.Just to name a few:

Who is "the lackey of imperialism" Among the 12 issues of the magazine, there was an essay titled "Imperialism's Lacking Dogs", written by Kong Qingdong. Apart from being unclear in logic, this article was biased in its arguments, and mistakes in viewpoints were commonplace. Because the editors deleted the word "imperialism" from the manuscript, it was determined that the editor's "superior" was instigated by the editors, and the editors' "superior" was the "hegemony" who had an ambiguous relationship with "imperialism". family" are lackeys of imperialism.

In an article of less than 2,000 words, the author commented on imperialism in this way: "It is true that imperialism has a barbaric and disgusting side, but it is good at absorbing criticism. At least it has put on a democratic posture of 'freedom of speech'. One of the techniques by which imperialism can grow and prosper." What is the subtext of the author's statement, that is, our society is not as good as imperialism, and we can't even put on a "posture" of "freedom of speech", which is probably not the case right! First of all, the development of capitalism and imperialism should be studied with scientific methods. Secondly, the opinions that imperialism is good at absorbing are only beneficial to its current policies, not to society and all mankind. The United States firmly disagrees with the Kyoto Protocol, and stops Japanese officials from paying homage to the Yasukuni Shrine. The Japanese Prime Minister and leadership have also been stubbornly doing their own thing.As for the freedom of "speech", I am afraid that even the United States, which flaunts "freedom and democracy", will not tolerate speech that is harmful to society or threatens the regime!

In Kong Qingdong's article, the word "rich people" appeared many times. He believed that it was these rich people who made the editors delete the word "imperialism" he wrote.And these "rich people" are probably too low-level to serve as lackeys of imperialism." These rich people "have made the world more joyful and peaceful, and murderers are more silent than grass." Who are these rich people?Kong Qingdong made it clear: it is a powerful invisible hand behind the editors.Although the author said that "this hand will not be a political hand", in essence it still points to the leading department of the press and publishing for research and publishing policies.

It is very strange that this manuscript full of loopholes, unclear thinking, wrong ideas, and improper writing style was selected by the editor of the magazine and published in a grandiose manner.Is it just a matter of level? ………… At present, under the leadership of the Party Central Committee, the people of the whole country are united to create a harmonious society. However, the 12th issue of the magazine in 2005 showed a serious deviation in the direction of public opinion, which deviated from the central propaganda policy.It is hoped that the organizers of the magazine will be responsible as guards and stick to the position of socialist public opinion.Make due contributions to China's reform and opening up, to accelerate economic development, and to realize the great cause of a strong country and a prosperous people as soon as possible.