Chapter 14 Section 12 Chen Shui-bian will be like this!

Li Ao On March 12th, the "Legislative Yuan" questioned the administration of the "Executive Yuan". Chen Shui-bian, a legislator from the Democratic Progressive Party, took a share of the "National" for six years in protest against the "Executive President" Hao Baicun of the Kuomintang for delaying the construction of the Beiyi Expressway. The draft plan, with the word "refund" written on it, stepped off the podium, walked to the chief seat of the "Executive Yuan", tore up the "National Construction Plan" in front of Hao Baicun and threw it before the case, angrily accusing Hao Baicun of "breaking trust in the civil".Hao Bocun asked him: "How can you infringe on my seat!" Chen Shui-bian replied with "What about your seat?"Some legislators saw that the dignity of Haobo Village was damaged, and immediately stepped forward to pull Chen Shui-bian away. Chen Shui-bian still used the gap to throw the shredded paper at Haobo Village.The newspaper said: "The members of the 'Legislative Yuan' chamber and the citizens in the auditorium were all astonished by Chen Shui-bian's extremely abrupt and abnormal actions. The scene broadcast on TV also shocked the public. Chen Shui-bian Such a bad attitude in discussing affairs and discussing politics is not only a shameful performance of Chen Shui-bian as a "member of Congress", but also makes the public deeply saddened and helpless by the rebellion of the DPP as an opposition party in the "Legislative Yuan"!"

The newspaper also said: The ruling party legislators deeply disapproved of the actions of DPP legislator Chen Shui-bian in the court meeting yesterday. Liang Surong, president of the "Legislative Yuan", said on the spot that such actions violated the rules of procedure. Hand over punishment", Li Shengfeng, deputy secretary-general of the party department of the "Legislative Yuan", also asked the DPP group to reflect, "Should the behavior of Commissioner Chen be handed over for punishment!" Legislator Zhao Shaokang also said: "Violence is violence, such behavior It’s just wrong.” Rao Yingqi, Secretary of the Party Department of the Legislative Yuan, also directly called such behavior inappropriate.Xie Shenshan, a member of the Standing Committee of the ruling party, was quite "surprised" by Chen Shuibian's actions. He believed that such actions in the past were mostly done by Wang Congsong and Wu Yongxiong. He didn't understand why Chen Shuibian would do such actions.Think "How could Chen Shui-bian do this"?

In my opinion, Chen Shui-bian will be like this! Why?Because it violates the democratic parliamentary norms, it is simply a way that the DPP prefers.They went astray from the very beginning, but in the end they clashed with each other, imitated each other, acted in an unconventional way, which was not a good idea. In the end, Chen Shui-bian, how could he be an exception? Originally, under the rule of the Kuomintang, Taiwan's democratic politics was a fake democratic politics, because it was very far away from the Anglo-American democratic politics from the very beginning. The so-called Anglo-American democracy refers to an out-and-out Anglo-American democracy, not an Anglo-American democracy that sells dog meat. In Through the Looking Class, Humpty Dumpty says to little Alice: "When I use a word, it just means I want It means - neither more nor less." (When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean.neither more nor less.) Alice protested: "The problem is, you can't Take the words as one or the other." Humpett Templet answered simply, he said: "The problem is, who has the final say." Although some people say that China is also practicing Anglo-American democracy. Politics, but what is practiced is actually Hampton-Dumpter-style, just the democratic words he has the final say on, and this kind of words are just the democratic ramifications of the group dictatorship he wants to express.

The biggest feature of British and American democratic politics is that they regard democracy as a way of life, a kind of education, and a kind of style. These excellent qualities form the so-called democratic demeanor.Butler (NM Butler), president of Columbia University, said: "One of the difficulties of being a gentleman is that you are not allowed to assert your rights rudely." (One of the embarrassments of being a gentleman is that you are not permitted to be violent in asserting your rights.) Anglo-American democratic politics, whether in parliament or in protests, are not fashionable and rude.Although the political stance is firm, but to express this stance, it is "a gentleman who strives for it."

In Taiwan, after forty years of wasted time, a good opportunity to build a showcase of democracy has been lost.As soon as the DPP made its debut, it attacked the Kuomintang as undemocratic. I agree with it. But where is the democracy of the DPP? It is also worrying.Let's not talk about how undemocratic the DPP's internal structure is; the brutality of its external performance is obvious to all.Whether discussing politics in parliament or protesting and marching on the street, they are all brutal, which is too substandard. Wang Jingwei once brazenly said to the Youth Party: The Kuomintang's world was brought by itself. If you are not satisfied, go to the revolution.If the DPP is very violent, it is better to go to the revolution. It does not need to use the name of democracy to develop many bad habits of non-democracy. It is so ridiculous that it did not bring down the Kuomintang, but it brought down democracy first.Zhang Hongxue criticized Zhu Gaozheng, saying: "You don't have the grace to talk about democracy; you don't dare to engage in revolution."The greatest tragedy of the DPP is that it had the opportunity to build a showcase of democracy, but it went astray from the very beginning. Everything was messed up, but it was still ignorant and self-satisfied.

The so-called democratic demeanor does not depend on written norms in everything, on the contrary, it follows many unwritten norms.Chen Shui-bian is an excellent legal scholar, of course he knows that many norms in the world are nothing to worry about, and legal scholars do not advocate the "Theory of Enumerated Powers" (Theory of Enumerated Powers) for certain laws, but advocate the "Theory of Implied Powers" (Theory of Implied Powers), they believe that many non-legal items, including customs, practices, maxims or precepts, and other social constraints, are actually implicit in the legal spirit.Therefore, it is not necessary to use express laws to stipulate everything.In other words, the maintenance of the spirit of the law lies in what Xunzi called "conventional conventions", and norms that everyone knows are nothing to worry about.

Of course Chen Shui-bian is clear about the norms that should exist in a democratic parliament, but his unconventional and unmannered behavior is of course learned from bad examples. There are too many bad examples, but it is obvious that Zhu Gaozheng, Lin Zhengjie and his like set up figurines to destroy the parliamentary regulations under the pretext of not having established regulations.Two years ago, before Lin Zhengjie was elected as a legislator, he went to the "Legislative Yuan" to do this.Lin Zhengjie led the crowd to the "Legislative Yuan" to observe, but everyone wore "protest clothes" and made a big noise at the venue.At the same time, Zhu Gao of the Democratic Progressive Party was cheering on the sidelines, thinking: "It is their freedom of expression for the observers to enter the meeting wearing clothes with slogans on them." Come in and call Zhu Gaozheng's note, will the guards let him in? Of course not, so I hope I can reflect on some things." Sadly, the DPP, like the KMT, is negligent in self-reflection.With the agitation of a persecutor, Lin Zhengjie yelled that the "Legislative Yuan" meeting audit rules do not stipulate that you cannot enter the venue with stickers on your body, why can't you put stickers on your body?However, we can't help but ask, there is no rule in the auditorium rules that you can't urinate in public. Is it possible to urinate in the auditorium according to the logic of the DPP? ——The norms that everyone knows are nothing to worry about. Is it the work of reasonable people to enumerate and include regulations in everything like this?

Xu Daolin, a professor at Tunghai University, told a joke.He said: "One time when I visited a certain administrative agency, I saw the '××× Toilet Use Rules' hanging on the wall of the toilet. . ' They asked me for my opinion.I said, this rule seems to be able to add one more thing, which is 'if there are any unfinished matters in this rule, it has to be modified'. "The concept of rules has spread so far, which is the structure of the brains of the DPP officials. I really don't know how Lin Zhengjie learned political science at Tunghai University. Chen Shui-bian could have been a calm and sharp "legislator" with his profound knowledge of law, but his shortcomings were that he was more than sharp but not calm enough, and his attitude towards politics was tense and serious. It is a pity that Zhu Gaozheng's actions below.I hope that he will make amends after he learns his mistakes, and give people the impression that Taiwanese are still democratic, and let people know that not all Taiwanese are uneducated. That's good.

March 13, 1991