Chapter 42 Act 40 Trial of Bush Sr.

The scene is the same as Act 1. God Lee: (Stands up, hits the gavel) Now announce the opening of the 40th court of the "Last Judgment" (sit down).The defendant is the 41st President of the United States, George Bush. (Bush Sr. stands up) God Lee: You are George Bush, born in 1924, the 41st President of the United States.To distinguish you from your son Bush Jr., people call you Bush Sr. Bush Sr.: (laughs) As long as you call him Bush, you can be old or young. God Lee: Do you remember the English sentence below? Poor George, he can't help it—he was born with a silver foot in his mouth. (Poor Bush, born with a silver foot in his mouth)

Bush Sr.: This is what Ann Willis Richards said to me during the 1988 election. God Lee: What does this sentence mean? Bush Sr.: Did you say so?Said I was rich. God Lee: Your family has been rich since your great-great-grandfather was one of the 49 California Gold Rush tycoons, wasn't he? Bush Sr.: (nods his head) Yes. God Li: In fact, you are better at panning for gold than your ancestors, because you can "pan" for oil.One of your nicknames is "Silver-Spoon George," right? Bush Sr.: Yes. God Li: When President Reagan was interrogated in the last court, he talked about the disparity between the rich and the poor in the United States and the disparity between the rich and the poor in the world that you caused. In contrast, you have been rich for several generations. How do you feel?According to a survey of eight rich countries conducted by the London School of Economics in 2005, the United States has the most serious social inequality.The population poverty rate in the United States is the highest among the developed countries in the world, more than double that of other industrialized countries.This was also proved in the "Newsweek" on September 19, 2005.On average, 1 in 8 Americans lives in poverty.How do you feel about being a rich man?

Bush Sr.: I think this is a matter of history.As early as 70 years ago, President Roosevelt said that he saw one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished.What makes me wonder is that so many percentages of poor people in the United States are not responsible for it themselves? God Lee: You are good at dodging.But the key is not the percentage of the poor, but the mentality of these people.I'll read you a quote from Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five (takes out a piece of paper): America is the richest country in the world, but many of its people are poor, and poor Americans, stimulated by the outside world, hate their own poverty.For Americans, poverty is a sin...Many countries in the world have their traditional stories, describing a person who is poor, but has noble ambitions and talents, and is greater than those who have gold and power ; but, in the United States, such stories are never seen.The poor in the United States will from time to time laugh at their own poverty, and praise those who are richer than them.When the poor eat poor food in the house, there always seems to be a sign on the wall next to it, cruelly saying: "If you are really smart, how did you end up in such a poor state?"

When Americans have no money, they will constantly blame themselves for being incompetent and bad... This kind of self-blame just creates a good excuse for those who have money and power, because whether they talk in public or in private, they can be right. Others said: "It's the poor who caused it themselves, and we don't have to be responsible for them." You hear me, Bush Sr. These few paragraphs of literature are written just for you. Bush Sr.: (Nodding his head) I admit that what he wrote is really accurate. The mentality of Americans is indeed like this. Americans regard rich people as saints and supermen. Americans only value money. Americans are snobbish and use money as a measure Unit snobs.This is indeed a problem in the United States.

God Lee: What about places outside China?You are the ones who created the ever-widening divide between the haves and have-nots of the planet.According to World Bank statistics, in the past 50 years, global wealth has increased sixfold, but the gap between the rich and the poor is widening.The rich, who account for 20% of the world's population, own 75% of the world's wealth; the poor, who account for 20% of the world's population, earn less than $1 a day on average.The gap between the rich and the poor is more clearly displayed in children.According to UNICEF, poverty and hunger kill 40,000 people in developing countries every day, 70% of whom are children under the age of 5.Facing this miserable world, the right to survive is the only right. Who says the right to survive is not a basic human right?Don't sing high-profile things, children under the age of 5 starve to death one by one, why is the right to life not a human right?

Bush Sr.: Oh. God Lee: You know what?With a global population of 7 billion, two-fifths are malnourished, one-fifth is chronically hungry, and 10,000 people starve to death every day.Using the analogy of 10 children at the dining table, 3 of the 10 children can't finish eating at best, and throw food to the dogs. Just enough for 2 kids out of 10. Of the other 5 out of 10, 3 were deficient in nutrition and only ate bread or rice, nothing else; the other 2 didn't even have to eat bread or rice, and died of starvation.And you in America spend more money on dogs than on saving lives.The food that is thrown into the trash can every day, that is, the food that is wasted, can save the empty stomachs of the world, but what are you Americans willing to do?What you are doing is making flames everywhere, just wanting human life, not saving human life.Children are starving to death, and the right to life is naturally a human right.

Bush Sr.: If the right to life is a human right, then dogs have to live, which is also a dog's right. God Li: Don't sing high-profile, right?Dogs under the age of 5 in the United States will not starve to death!Especially in the White House, isn't it?The picture of the White House raising a dog fully tells the world that in the eyes of the President of the United States, people are indeed inferior to dogs. Bush Sr.: God Lee, which country doesn't have its problems?Without its skeleton in the closet?The family scandal of the United States is that 1% of Americans control one-third of the wealth in the United States, and about 0.5% of Americans, that is, the small group of people who make up the super rich, control the common wealth of this country. 200 companies use more than 80% of the country's resources.Don't look at how rich my Bush family is, we are just little brothers squeezed among them, skeleton yin the closet, we can't finish digging.

God Lee: Speaking of skeletons, are you a member of the secret society "Skull and Bones"? Bush Sr.: (embarrassed) Since God asked, I'll admit it.That was really the hardest group at Yale to join. God Lee: When you joined the club, did you do mud wrestling?Did you do a mock murder?Ever kissed a skull?Are you "Magoy"? Bush Sr.: God Lee is very knowledgeable, and the question is sharp and bloody. It is a bit strange: since you know it, why do you ask? God Lee: You are the defendant, you can’t ask me back with questions, the “Last Judgment” questioned knowingly, in order to make the transcript complete, ask again, are you “Magog”?

Bush Sr.: I'm not proud of my sexual experience, but President Taft here is "Magog."Other God Li asked, my answer is yes. Taft: (waking up from a nap) Who's calling my name? Bush Sr.: (Adding from behind) I report you as "Magog" in "Skull and Bones". Taft: (Heads sideways and glaring) Don't make fun of fat people, only those who have rich sexual experience are qualified to be "Magog". I am so fat, how can I enrich the Fa? Bush Sr.: You are just a question of how much posture you have, not how much experience you have. (Laughter.) Taft: Why does God Lee ask this?

Bush Sr.: It means that he knows the details of the defendants, that he not only knows the bright side of our American president, but also fully grasps our dark side. Taft: Will God Lee divide the two sides like you do?In his eyes, is there a bright side to the President of the United States? (Laughter.) God Li: (Tap the hammer three times) You only need to worry about whether you have a bright side, don't worry about having it but not knowing it, you know it and I will know it. Bush Sr.: We know God Lee must know, but is there a bright side?We know we don't know. (Laughter.)

God Lee: You are the only president of the United States who has served as a spy chief. From 1976 to 1977, you served as the director of the CIA and controlled the CIA in one hand. Bush Sr.: Yes. God Li: Do you know how many things your CIA has done to subvert China in the Chinese territory of Tibet? Bush Sr.: I have heard a little about it. God Lee: Taking Tibet as an example, you, the United States, have been violating international law and the principle of inter-country, to give China little shoes to wear.Tibet is obviously a part of Chinese territory, how can you support Tibetan rebels against the central government through the CIA?And under the guise of religious issues. Bush Sr.: Isn't that a religious issue? God Lee: If so, why is there no mention in James Lilley's Memoir, the memoir of your CIA special agent Li Jieming, all that is mentioned is your support for the "Tibetan anti-riot guerrillas in the early 1960s" and what they provided to you The "twenty-nine volumes of "Work Newsletter"" are all "we are linked with the Tibetan anti-communist organization" and "the cooperation is even closer".Finally, he added: "Based on their loyalty to the Dalai Lama in exile, Tibetan guerrillas embarked on a high-stakes mission to gather information about the People's Liberation Army. To improve, the CIA has drastically reduced its support for Tibetan guerrilla groups." How do you feel about these black and white words?Can you still rely on the United States?Li Jieming is your friend, right? Bush Sr.: (Nods.) God Lee: His brother was also a member of the "Skull and Bones", and later committed suicide.He struggled inside, couldn't pass the test, and died.It seems that if you don't lose your conscience, you can't do your CIA career. Bush Sr.: In one's life, one does sometimes do wrong things. God Lee: You, the United States, have been working on Tibetan independence, do you know that? Bush Sr.: Is there any evidence that the United States is pursuing Tibetan independence? God Lee: My evidence is your evidence.Take a look at your new book in 2007. Your author Tim Weiner published "Legacy of Ashes", which revealed that the CIA not only trained Tibetan guerrillas in the Colorado camp, but also The monthly payment to the Dalai Lama was US$15,000 for 20 years and did not stop until 1974.The CIA's Tibet program reached its peak in 1959, with as many as 1,800 Tibetan guerrillas trained by the CIA, and the situation is getting bigger and bigger.It's so big that President Eisenhower has opinions.He said to CIA Director Allen W. Dulles: "If we do this, won't the CCP retaliate against Tibetans more severely?" The work in Tibet was terminated.It can be seen that the United States is pursuing Tibetan independence, and the evidence has long been conclusive. Bush Jr.: Tibet's independence was achieved by the Dalai Lama themselves. God Li: But your United States is supporting you openly and secretly. Your American president met him in the White House, or met him unexpectedly, and pretended that he was just a religious leader. Is his identity so simple?Don't lie.Let me show you some more evidence.After China won the right to host the 2008 Olympic Games, the Dalai clique proposed a "decisive battle for the Olympics" in an attempt to speed up Tibet's independence activities by interfering with the Olympics. On February 27, 2008, the "93 Movement" of the Dalai clique also urgently applied for funds from the "National Endowment for Democracy" as "funds for activists to deal with dangerous times."According to the data released by the foundation itself, from 2002 to 2006, they provided the Dalai clique with special financial assistance of 135.77 million US dollars.It can be seen that you, the United States, are still providing funds!You said that the Dalai Lama and the others created Tibet's independence. Now that the evidence is as above, do you still dare to say that? Bush Jr.: Let's meet with Dalai Lama in half-light. In fact, this is not only the United States, but also other countries. Isn't that the case with the German female chancellor? Shen Li: If the issue is purely "universal value of human rights", it is another matter.In fact, it is: 1. You have ulterior motives to use human rights to wear China's little shoes; 2. You have used the most unbearable entry point, which is the last remaining model of theocracy in the world today. joke.The female chancellor who was a submissive citizen under the rule of the East German Communist Party, if she knew about the "universal value of human rights", why didn't she make some records in East Germany first?I understand what you mean by "not only the United States, but also other countries". Many white-faced people in the West are jealous of China's unification of Tibet.But they don't send money and weapons like you, build training bases, support a human rights abuser to win the Nobel Peace Prize, and openly say that "the United States will consider recognizing Tibet's independence." Do you still have China in your eyes? Bush Sr.: Did someone openly say that "the United States will consider recognizing Tibet's independence"? God Lee: Of course there is, as your Secretary of State said, in December 1950, when President Truman took office. Bush Sr.: Oh, that's a little too much. God Lee: Come back to the CIA.Let me introduce a person to you. He is Gyalo Thondup, the second elder brother of the Dalai Lama.He was born in 1928 and went to Lhasa with his young fourth brother Dalai and his family in 1939. In 1944, he went to Nanjing and studied politics and history at the Kuomintang Central Political School for five years, and married his classmate Zhu Dan from Suzhou. In 1951, he went to see Chiang Kai-shek, and Chiang Kai-shek gave him $50,000.In the same year, he reached a secret agreement with the CIA of the United States, and he was responsible for "arranging to collect intelligence on Tibet." In 1952, he returned to Tibet via India. In 1956, with the support of the CIA, he planned a guerrilla war in Tibet, and successively selected Tibetans to train in Taiwan and Saipan. In 1959, he assisted the Dalai Lama in exile in India. In 1979, he began to serve in the cabinet of the Tibetan government-in-exile and visited Beijing in a private capacity.Since then, he has visited Beijing many times. In July 2002, he visited Tibet for the first time after leaving Tibet for 51 years.The second brother of the Dalai Lama has spent his whole life in Beijing, Taiwan, the United States, and India. He has made no secret of his relationship with the Americans, especially relying on the support and training of the CIA in the United States.He is the Dalai Lama's blood relative and representative, and he is the "Dalai Lama in a suit". Do you think his actions are personal actions?Of course it belonged to the Dalai Lama. Dalai Lama clearly colluded with the United States and failed to resort to force and rebellion against the central government. That’s why he turned himself into a man of peace and human rights. Now he is only narrowed down to a religious leader and beautified as a Nobel Peace Prize winner. , it would be too small to underestimate this friend of the American CIA who used knives and guns.Relying on the power of your media, you insist on dressing up human rights murderers like the Dalai Lama as human rights fighters, and portraying the guy who failed to use knives and guns as a pacifist. This is really too much. Bush Sr.: But, God Lee, doesn't Tibet have his particularity? God Lee: Specificity?Yes, it's a pity that it's a shameful side, right?Tibetan religion is a branch of Buddhism, which tends to be demonized. You only need to look at the so-called Tibetan art to understand. Those horrible thangkas, statues, magic tools, skulls, demon pestles, etc. are all inferior. The trick of demonizing religion, what can this inferior religion enlighten civilized people?It’s just starting from you American ignorant show stars who took the lead in changing tricks, engaging in publicity stunts, and hyping up the Tibet show, thinking that an empty life can be comforted from Tibet, which is the roof of the world. It’s nonsense. What can the inferior religion of Tibet teach civilized people?Therefore, to believe in religion, to believe in the religion of Tibetans, and to play the Tibetan card in religion is fundamentally ignorant and foolish.As for playing the Tibet card politically, it has a long history.Because no one among the world powers wants to see China complete and strong, they have been trying to split China into seven or eight pieces. Outer Mongolia's independence from China is a masterpiece of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom, and Tibet is the same.The problem is that Tibet has been a Chinese territory for thousands of years. Even when the Dalai Lama confirmed the agreement on the peaceful settlement of Tibet in 1951, he openly recognized Tibet as Chinese territory.How can we let him go?Will Britain let Scotland secede?Will the US let Hawaii secede?Therefore, there is no problem that is not Chinese territory at all.Now, even the Dalai Lama doesn't talk about the issue of Tibetan independence, he only talks about the issue of human rights. Bush Sr.: At least the Dalai Lama talked about human rights issues. You can't say he was wrong, right? God Lee: It is right to talk about human rights issues, but can the Dalai Lama talk about it?Check the records.Check out the record of the Dalai Lama's rule in Tibet.In the archives, there is someone who recites scriptures to celebrate the Dalai Lama’s birthday. Two bloods, all kinds of blood, and a whole piece of human skin” bloody request, such a Dalai Lama, actually won the Nobel Peace Prize, the Nobel Committee has a paragraph of praise, which says: “…Dalai Lama in his struggle for the liberation of Tibet consistently has opposed the use of violence. He has instead advocated peaceful solutions based upon tolerance and mutual respect in order to preserve the historical and cultural heritage of his people." He has always opposed the use of violence, and he advocated the use of peaceful solutions based on tolerance and mutual respect in order to preserve the historical and cultural heritage of the Tibetan people) I think that the Nobel Prize review committee probably did not see that piece of human skin Bar? Bush Sr.: In this way, the subject of human rights is too complicated. God Li: In the history of mankind, the rule of theocracy has evolved from the rule of the monarchy to the rule of the monarchy, and then to the rule of the people. However, Tibet is the most theocratic region left in the world. In fact, the Dalai Lama is the most outdated, the darkest, and the most superstitious theocracy The representative of the rule, the so-called "history and heritage of the Tibetan people", is actually the talisman of this ugly rule.Say "liberate Tibet" and fight for freedom for Tibet?The first thing to do is to break this most outdated, darkest, and most superstitious theocracy, which is the top priority.However, from the Tubo regime in the 7th century to the Dalai regime in the 20th century, the Tibetan people were completely shrouded in the rule of slavery and spiritual slavery. How did they come to freedom and liberation?What about human rights?In fact, the subject of human rights is not complicated, but when it comes to the Dalai Lama, it becomes complicated because it is completely screwed up. Bush Sr.: I am very helpless. I want to raise a procedural issue with God Lee. God Lee: What procedural question? Bush Sr.: Everyone has a share in the issue of the Dalai Lama. Why is it that I am being interrogated in this court? I am only one of the presidents of the United States. God Lee: (smiling) But you were the director of the CIA. Bush Sr.: I am also the only US president who has served as an ambassador to China. Please don't ignore my friendly side to China. God Li: You are visiting China as the President of the United States. Fang Lizhi, who was on the list of state banquets and invited guests who the host and guest do not want to meet, was blocked by the Chinese government.You, the United States, promote that China does not give people freedom.However, I wonder how the US interpreted the events of 1979. In February 1979, during Deng Xiaoping’s big banquet in Washington, China invited Robert Williams (Robert Williams), an activist who advocated black civil rights. .When he went to the dinner with an invitation card, the U.S. Secret Service (Secret Service) blocked him and said: "You can't come in." (You can't come in.) The above two things are too similar, but one happened In Beijing, one thing happened in Washington, I wonder why you Americans only remember that China does not give people freedom?But forget that you don't give people freedom?You Americans are clearly outraged at "an invitation to an individual unacceptable to the American side".But you will also be angry with the Chinese. Can you not admit that this is also a human feeling?If you don't want to talk nonsense, let me recite the words of the old Jewish Shylock (Shylock) in Shakespeare: If you pick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? (If you stab us, can we not bleed? If you tickle us, can we not laugh? If you poison us, can we not die? If you bully us, can we not take revenge?) Bush Sr.: The God Lee analogy goes too far.I am indeed friendly to China. God Lee: Then at 64, why did you connive at the United States to intervene and create the "Fang Li Incident"? Bush Sr.: We didn't make it, it was Fang Lizhi's own personal behavior. God Li: Even your State Council has named important people, and you still say you didn't intervene? Bush Sr.: You can't say this out of thin air, you have to have a basis for it. God Lee: According to?Of course, this is not just out of thin air, you are the ambassador to China from the CIA. Bush Sr.: Li Jieming again? God Lee: If not him, who else? Bush Sr.: Where did he say that? God Lee: Said in the memoir.Let me read that paragraph to you (takes out a piece of paper): "It's like the plot of a spy novel. Fang Lizhi, his wife, and their son came to the embassy and were first advised to leave. After they left, the State Department in Washington heard that I ordered them to be brought back quickly. At around 11:00 p.m., McKinney Russell, head of the news culture team, and Ray Burghardt, acting deputy director, slipped into the gate of the Jianguo Hotel and found an American journalist who was temporarily hiding There were three members of the Fang family in the room. Russell and Bo Ruiguang, two professional diplomats, who looked like James Bond, the 007 agent, sneaked into the room where Fang Lizhi lived. Fang Lizhi answered the door, and they spoke Chinese Professor Xiang Fang said: "Let's go!" When a group of people passed through the gate of the hotel, they bent over and dodged until the three of Fang's family got into the American van. Mr. Fang decided to leave the embassy at the end of June, and it was another secret Take action, smuggle him out, and send him back to Fang’s apartment in Beijing.” You see, it was clearly your American 007-style diplomat who asked Fang Lizhi to transport him to your embassy in your van, and you said that the U.S. official Didn't intervene?Wasn't you the President of the United States at that time?Fang Lizhi is a Chinese. I think it is reasonable for him to have any dissatisfaction and fight for human rights against his own government, but I cannot accept that you foreigners stir up trouble, fan the flames, and... Bush Sr.: I admit that we intervened in 64, but the soldiers shot and killed the people. God Li: Soldiers kill the people, the reason needs to be investigated, the problem is that the people kill the soldiers first, if you are in the United States, what should you do? Bush Sr.: If the people do it first, it's no wonder the soldiers.We in the United States do not allow people to kill soldiers with their own hands. God Li: At 64 o'clock in China, the soldiers were killed first. Bush Sr.: What evidence do you have?My intelligence is that soldiers kill first. God Lee: There is something wrong with your intelligence.Your ambassador to China, Li Jieming, said in his memoirs that you did not see his telegram on May 26, 1989.Li Jieming wrote: "I, an American ambassador who is reputed to have a good relationship with the White House, can't deliver the report to the president's desk at a critical moment related to the most important event of the 20th century. Speaking of it, it's really frustrating." Bush Sr.: Oh. God Lee: Let me read a memory of your ambassador: "This military vehicle stopped at the main intersection in front of the Great Hall of the People. It was isolated on the asphalt road, unable to move, like a fish stranded on the beach. The crowd could stop it The armored personnel carrier also seemed to be taken aback. It was silent for a while, as if thinking about what to do next. Then, a large amount of wood fell on the military vehicle like rain. Some people tore down chairs, and some broke branches. A pile of wood surrounded the military vehicle. Then, someone lit a fire. A CNN cameraman beside Jim Huskey captured the movement of the crowd. The following images were broadcast all over the world through fluorescent screens. Under the lens, A PLA soldier jumped out from the back of an armored personnel carrier, no doubt trying to escape for his life to avoid being burned alive. The people were already furious at this time, and beat him to death in front of He Shikai." If you the Central Committee of the United States Will you sit and watch this scene of people killing soldiers in the square in front of the government? Bush Sr.: Are we Americans sitting idly by? Didn't President Hoover order the shooting in 1932? Hoover: (stands up) I'm sorry, I'm going to protest, to the accused President Bush.First, this matter has already been tried, why do you keep bringing it up?Second, I respect the human rights of the United States, unlike your intelligence chief (sit down). Bush Sr.: What human rights do you respect? In 1932, you took action in the capital of the United States and recorded more than 100 casualties, including babies who died at the scene. At least no babies died in China. What American human rights do you respect? God Lee: Well, stop listening to you Americans talking about your red-faced subjects. Bush Sr.: There are some of us who don’t blush. For example, during my presidency, the communist countries in Eastern Europe collapsed and the Soviet Union disintegrated.There is a new peace in the world. God Lee: Peaceful situation?Take a look at the records.Since the collapse of the communist regimes in Eastern Europe, you have virtually continued military operations: the invasion of Panama in 1989, the Gulf War in 1990-1991, the military intervention in Somalia in 1992-1993, and the military intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1995 , the 1998-1999 airstrikes in the Gulf region, the 1999 airstrikes on Kosovo and Yugoslavia, the 2001 war in Afghanistan, and then the invasion of Iraq in 2003, is it peaceful?What a peace.From the disintegration of the communist countries in Eastern Europe to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, you did not lay down or lighten your arms. You fought against the enemy all the way. Is this what you call peace?American peace?Are you too belligerent?Too militaristic, right? Bush Sr.: Maybe the Soviet Union collapsed, and we haven't adjusted well to the new world.Just in general, according to our scholar and federal government adviser Francis Fukuyama (Francis Fukuyama)'s point of view, the settlement of the Cold War issue without bloodshed symbolizes an "end of history", when the world All countries in the world are united in Western freedom, democracy, and capitalism. God Li: Is it really such a good scene?I don't think so.Thousands of you scholars and experts have been following the Soviet Union closely for 40 years, and it is strange that no one can predict that the Soviet Union will "disintegrate" in the late 1980s.It is inaccurate to use "disintegration" to describe this phenomenon.When the Communist Party no longer opens the door to "export revolution" and closes the door to become a "capitalist roader", in fact, they will soon learn the shortcut to earn your money, and use the money they earn to choke you.The so-called "disintegration" may mean that he wants to lose weight, not to be puffy, at least not to be so fat.In the era of puffiness, the raw material consumption of the Soviet Union was 1.6 times that of the United States, energy consumption was 2.1 times that of the United States, and the amount of chemical fertilizers was 7.6 times that of the United States. It was a mistake to fight recklessly with the United States.Take it back now, so what if there are fewer federations?Just my nuclear weapons in Russia and one state can kill you and the United States. We don’t need to use the quota of killing you 200 times to kill the enemy. We only need to let you die once.As for communism, so what if it "disintegrated"?For the Soviet Union, start from now on. Don't think that Western freedom, democracy, and capitalism are patented. We old men can also "take your pot and face your face", and we are winning you.See, "disintegration"? "Disintegration" is a liberated body, "disintegration"?Look at Putin, maybe he's snickering. Bush Sr.: Compared to the past, Russia is too small. God Lee: But it's small enough to have a weapon to kill you once, you can only die once, not 200 times.Don't forget the "David's Law of War". Even terrorists in your eyes may use nuclear weapons, let alone Russia?As long as Russia has that kind of strength, you have to fear it and guard against it, of course it will not be as reckless as terrorists in your eyes.After the "disintegration" of the Soviet Union, you are still calling, what are you doing?Think you America can eat the world?It seems that as long as there are "terrorists" in your eyes, your fights will be in vain. Bush Sr.: We are very good at fighting. God Lee: But why not your enemies? In 2001 for the so-called "Operation Enduring Freedom" (Operation Enduring Freedom) in Afghanistan, you the United States only spent 61 days and only 16 people died, and none of them were killed in frontal combat. regime.This example warns people that if you want to fight the United States from the "symmetrical battle", you will lose the shit if you fight the United States with a dignified formation and a flag of righteousness. .On that kind of battlefield, there is almost no problem of fleeing retreat, because fleeing or retreating must first "turn around", and there must be steps of "turning heels" and "returning". However, it is too late, because you have already died.Under this kind of "symmetrical combat", who would be so stupid to fight head-on with you?Who still believes face to face?It seems that face to face is only used on the sports field and on the bed.Everyone is going to use the "David's method" against you.isn't it?The "911" that your son Bush encountered is a classic of "David's Way of War".Moreover, after "911", the "frightened bird" price you have to pay is the prolongation of the war.Would you like to hear the price? After 9/11, airport security is the first priority. According to estimates, there are more than 2 billion international passengers every year. If everyone arrives at the airport an hour in advance to undergo security checks, and the opportunity cost per hour is 10 dollars, then The world will pay an annual tax cost of US$20 billion for this.Adding in the salary cost of tens of thousands of security personnel around the world, the delay cost of the transportation industry for security inspections, and the security costs that must be paid for surveillance and wiretapping to prevent attacks, it is quite reasonable to spend $100 billion. estimate.Add to that the invisible costs of victimization of individual liberties and loss of trust in society, and it becomes even less clear.What are these expenses called?Call it the "terror tax". Bush Sr.: We Americans are pragmatic. We admit that what this asymmetrical "Battle of David" has done to us is tantamount to a "terror tax".From this point of view, although we did not lose because of defeat, we lost because of blood loss. God Lee: Blood loss is also a defeat.The more you America loses, the less likely you are to win; the more your terrorists win, the less likely you are to lose. Bush Sr.: We admit that the "Battle of David" is terrible.It seems that unless American soldiers withdraw from the battlefield, there will be nothing but watching American soldiers continue to die every day and spending tens of billions of dollars every year.It seems that the greatest irony of the 21st century is the fragility and helplessness displayed by the strongest country on earth when facing the smallest opponent.The troops of international terrorist organizations are no more than a few thousand, and the weapons are no more than trucks, dynamite, sniper rifles, and so-called Improved Explosive Devices (IEDs), but David has to keep us running, which really puzzles us. Shen Li: The reason for your confusion is that you have learned the asymmetry of "David's method of warfare", but you have not understood the unknowability of "spirit of death together".Expounding the "spirit of dying together" is found in Chinese classical literature. This spirit has been brought into full play in the "911" incident. You Americans only see "David's tactics", and what is even more terrifying is the "spirit of dying together" , your enemy is not afraid of death, but you Americans are greedy for life and afraid of death. On the line of life and death, you lost, and you lost in a daze. It turns out that you can't understand the greatness of the "spirit of death together", and you only use a low vision Think of people as terrorists, in fact, the nine people who hijacked the "911" plane, they are saints, Saints, you Americans "see people as low as dogs", you don't know. Bush Sr.: I am surprised that God Lee put the content of judging my son Bush Jr. in front of my eyes to judge me. God Li: (smiling) Like son, like father (Like son, like father) And, listening to your statement, I can better understand what your son said.Retire from the court (beat the mallet and stand up). (The curtain falls.)