Chapter 37 Act 35 The Trial of Johnson

The scene is the same as Act 1. God Lee: (Stands up, hits the gavel) Now announce the opening of the 35th Court of the "Last Judgment" (sit down).The defendant is the 36th President of the United States, Lyndon Johnson. (Johnson stands up.) God Lee: Are you the "God Johnson" who puts his hand on someone's shoulder? Johnson: I have broad shoulders. (I have broad shoulders, which is enough for a heavy responsibility.) Putting two hands on my shoulders is not enough. (Laughter.) God Lee: In 1958, you said you were "a free man, an American, a US Senator, and a Democrat, in that order".

Johnson: Not wrong.That year, I said, "I'm a liberal again, a conservative, a Texan, a taxpayer, a rancher, an industrialist, a consumer, a kid A man, a voter, not as young as I used to be, nor as old as I expected to be.—I have these many identities simultaneously and in no order.” God Li: Those of you who don’t have a certain identity, there is a kind of identity that you have left out. Johnson: What?What kind? God Lee: The murderer. Johnson: What murderer? God Lee: The Vietnam War Murderer.You must have heard the cry: LBJ, LBJ, how many kids have you killed today? (Johnson, Johnson, how many young men have you killed today?) On November 22, 1963, when you became president, there were only 16,000 American soldiers in Vietnam. In less than 4 years, they rolled to 500,000; Many American soldiers killed and were killed again, so as the president of the United States, you are both a murderer externally and a murderer internally.Now, with a certain order, you who are ranked first are the murderer.

Johnson: Is that serious?Do you want to use such a serious and ugly word as "murderer"? God Lee: Isn't it serious?Is there a more accurate word than "murderer"? Johnson: I didn't start the Vietnam War. God Lee: But you continue, expand, and cannot extricate yourself. Johnson: I have been pulling out, even I gave up the re-election of the president and concentrated on pulling out. God Li: But you didn't pull it out, but you got deeper and deeper. In 1954, when French imperialism could not cover the Vietnamese colonies, President Eisenhower refused to send American troops into the country.In the era of President Kennedy, it began to get involved.In the era of President Johnson, you are getting deeper and deeper.

Johnson: That's because on August 2 and 4, 1964, North Vietnamese torpedo ships deliberately opened fire on two American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin, off the coast of North Vietnam.I am asking Congress to allow me to respond militarily to these unjustified attacks. On August 7, the Senate and the House of Representatives granted the president the requested powers, which meant that the president got a blank check from Congress to support his Vietnam policy, so the game became bigger and bigger. God Lee: The history you just mentioned is problematic.Let me tell you.The time was August 2, 1964, during your U.S. presidential election. As president, you announced that North Vietnamese gunboats attacked the U.S. destroyer USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin between North Vietnam and China.Two days later, North Vietnamese ships fired again on the USS Medex and another destroyer, the USS Joy (C. Turner Joy).That night, you appeared on television and announced to the nation that you were ordering strike teams to bomb North Vietnamese ships and troop bases, the first American bombing of North Vietnam.Next, you asked Congress to pass the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" (Gulf of Tonkin Resolution) trial.If this resolution is passed, it will give the President of the United States the power to "use all possible methods to maintain national security in order to prevent the United States from further aggression when the United States encounters armed attacks."Generally speaking, the Congress seldom vetoes the president's military actions when they put forward a bill afterwards. Therefore, the "Tokyo Gulf Resolution" was passed with an overwhelming number of votes.Many historical experts believe that you took advantage of the Gulf of Tonkin incident to cause a rebound in American sentiment to establish the resolution, allowing the United States to directly intervene and expand the war with Vietnam.In fact, many historians believe that the attack on the "Medex" was caused by the first provocation by the United States. As for the second attack, it may not have happened at all.

Johnson: (angry) With that accusation, do you mean I fabricated the incident? God Lee: It's not my turn to say that, it's your American historians who said it.Looking back at this period of history, it is undeniable that the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" was a turning point for the United States in the Vietnam War.At the same time, most people believed that this resolution was just a way for Johnson to counterattack and retaliate against North Vietnam through the approval of Congress.However, few people would expect that the President of the United States has the power to decide how to fight back.This resolution enabled the United States to take the first step to directly participate in the Vietnam War by force, and the Vietnam War has become a big game since then.It is very obvious that the "Tokyo Bay Incident", like the "911 Incident", gave you Americans the atmosphere and excuses of "same hatred and hatred", and the US President's trigger-happy (like shooting guns) got what he wanted.As a result, the President of the United States will harm the United States and himself sooner or later.

Johnson: In fact, the war in Vietnam was caused by the belligerence of the Americans, and I, the president, and our "king's men" cannot be blamed entirely. God Lee: I agree that it is unfair to a small group of people to regard the US's militarism as a matter of a small group of people.In fact, militarism has always been the majority of Americans.Take the Vietnam War as an example. In August 1964, while you were seeking a congressional mandate to resolve the Gulf of Tonkin crisis for you to secure freedom in South Vietnam, Senators -- only two -- Ernest Gruening and Wayne Morse ) against you, and no member of the House of Representatives objected, let you go ahead and fight.Even on the most vocal college campuses, 49 percent of students interviewed in May 1964 supported the Vietnam War and described themselves as hawks.Only 35 percent of the students opposed the Vietnam War, calling themselves dovish.Don't think that Americans are anti-war. When the voice of anti-war is the loudest, there are still a majority of people shouting and beating.When the Vietnam War was fought until 1967, a Gallup poll of that year showed that 53% of the American people were in favor of an increase in the U.S. military.

Johnson: After listening to what God Lee said, I feel the justice of God Lee.This fairness absolves the responsibility of the President of the United States. God Lee: I just Give the devil his due. (Even the devil treats him fairly).In fact, there is no shortage of blame for the president of the United States. In January 1968, you delivered a major speech on the Vietnam War.Guarantee that 65% of the people in South Vietnam will be safe and sound under the protection of the US military.You also assured the American people that America would win the war.However, on the last day of the month, the North Vietnamese launched a massive counterattack.The counterattack was named "Tet Offensive" (Tet Offensive), Tet is the Vietnamese Lunar New Year.They quickly occupied countless towns and villages, including 64 local cities, 80% of South Vietnam's major metropolises, 12 US military bases, and the US embassy in Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam.The live footage of the Viet Cong attack was broadcast on the U.S. evening news, especially the fierce fighting near the U.S. embassy and the ancient capital of Hue, which surprised the American people even more.The assurances that your President of the United States still hears are obviously either lies or illusions.How can the United States protect the people of South Vietnam when it cannot even protect its own embassy, ​​and how can it claim to have won the war?So, your militarism in the United States is of course supported by public opinion, but as the president, you are also leading the hype.As the president of the United States, you are duty-bound. You are not only the murderer, but also the leader of the murderer and the culprit. You are the one who coerced the Americans into the battlefield.

Johnson: As the president of the United States, we always have a sense of mission, right?Our sense of purpose is not limited to the Vietnam War, there are others. God Lee: I see what you mean by "other".I am now reading a dialogue from your NBC interview on September 9, 1963 (takes out a piece of paper): Huntley: Now, is it possible that we will reduce aid to South Vietnam? THE PRESIDENT: ...withholding aid would lead to the collapse of a government!What is still fresh in our minds is what happened in China at the end of World War II: where China was lost A weak government will lose all ability to control the overall situation, which is The truth we don't want to see!

Hendry: Mr. President, do you have any reason to be skeptical of the "domino theory"—that if South Vietnam falls, the rest of Southeast Asia will also fall. THE PRESIDENT: I ​​believe it!I believe it!I thought: That was a sharp struggle.China's shadow is too big, to cover places beyond its borders; if South Vietnam collapses, although the CCP will not attack Malaya, it will leave the impression that the future of Southeast Asia is in the hands of In the hands of China; the future Southeast Asia will be a communist Southeast Asia! ... From the above dialogue, it is clear what your "other" intention is, you are hostile to China.

Johnson: For the sake of a sense of mission, in Asia and in the East, we must guard against it. Even if American soldiers suffer casualties, we will not borrow them. It is also a mission. God Lee: In your speech on April 7, 1965, you pointed out that the casualties of American soldiers in Vietnam, like the casualties of their ancestors in the mountains of Pennsylvania in the revolution two hundred years ago, were all fulfilling a common ideal, didn't they? Johnson: Yes. God Li: Your sense of mission still made sense in the United States back then, but when you went to Vietnam two hundred years later, you still said that your ideals were the same. Are you being too ridiculous?Since you like to make historical comparisons, let me make a comparison: the "Tokyo Bay Incident" is an excuse to create a war. The incident is fabricated, just like the sinking of the US warship "Maine" in the "Spanish-American War". Same.You Americans really follow the rules to find fault, even the lies are the same. Same old lie, old lies, and the props are still warships.

Johnson: Where is the evidence that I fabricated the "Tokyo Gulf incident"? God Lee: In The New York Times, October 31, 2005. Johnson: Oh.The military in our country is actually very powerful, so the voice of the military often comes out with a sense of mission. God Lee: Do you want to recall a famous quote from the Vietnam War? we're going to bomb them back into the Stone Age. Whose words? Johnson: These are the words of our most famous Air Force Admiral LeMay. God Li: Li Mei’s name is Curtis “Emerson” LeMay, Emerson (Emerson) is included in it, his English is very lively, but he is very Emerson, but it’s a pity that he is Emerson holding a bomb pregnancy.How do you feel about the words of your American general and chief of staff of the Air Force?Li Mei said that his solution to the Vietnam War was to tell North Vietnam frankly that if you don’t back down and stop the aggression, I will blow you back to the Stone Age. Who is this talking to?Is North Vietnam attacking South Vietnam an invasion?Is your America Vietnam?I am in a civil war in my country, can the definition of aggression be applied to us?You America is the aggressor, right?The wonderful thing is that the person who said this, with the bomb in his hand, didn't even think about which country he was from. What right did he have to blow a country that didn't invade the United States back to the Stone Age?Li Mei was also your candidate for the vice president in the 1968 general election of the United States. Johnson: His group, the presidential candidate was Wallace, they were a pair of bombs. God Lee: Don't forget that they got 13.5% of the votes, which proves that you Americans have a large proportion of "threat bombers". Johnson: Bombing back to the Stone Age is too harsh on other countries. Li Mei is a soldier, not a civil servant. God Lee: Are civil servants merciless?The files are now published.It turned out that President Roosevelt's Secretary of the Treasury gave the president a secret memo: After the Second World War was won, Germany should be turned back to an "agricultural society"!Isn't the Minister of Finance a civil servant?Soldiers blow up others, blowing back to the Stone Age; civilian officials twist others, turning back to agricultural society, who said that your American civil servants are more moderate?How is your mentality different from that of the imperialists 2,200 years ago, "Carthage must be destroyed" (Delenda est Carthaga. Carthage must be destroyed.)?The only difference is that the Romans did not leave so many residual poisons of biological and chemical weapons to other countries. To this day, Vietnam is still suffering from your American biological and chemical weapons.To sum up, for your sense of mission in the United States, other countries cannot be unified if they want to be unified, and civil wars are not like civil wars, and they have to risk being bombed back to the Stone Age. What kind of world is this?In the final analysis, it is just one sentence: the United States fought the Vietnam War, all wrong. Johnson: I am the President of the United States. Of course I know that I have unshirkable responsibilities. However, I also respect experts when making various decisions about the Vietnam War. This respect is not selfish because of my personal political affiliation. The Secretary of Defense I use is the Secretary of Defense left by the former President Kennedy. God Lee: You mean McNamara? Johnson: Of course he is.McNamara is the youngest ever Secretary of Defense of the United States at 43 years old.At that time, the Vietnam War was carried out with scientific methods, long-term talents, thunderous intentions, and thunderous methods. As a result, Vietnam was riddled with holes and the United States was disgraced.Before the end of the Vietnam War, he completed his masterpiece "The Essence of Security-Reflections in Office" (The Essence of Security-Reflections in Office) before he left office, enumerating the virtues and prospects of his 7-year tenure.The Vietnam War can go on, it all depends on him, and it all depends on me trusting him. God Lee: When you talked about McNamara, you only talked about the first half. You talked about him fighting in the Vietnam War and fighting the Vietnam War with you.Did you know that in 1995, 22 years after the Vietnam War, 22 years after your death, he McNamara was old, and he published "In Retrospect-The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam" (In Retrospect-The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam) Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam) (takes out book).In this book, he repented, blamed himself with words such as "big mistake", "terrible big mistake", "unwise", and mourned for the Americans who died in war. We made our decisions in light of those values. Yet we were wrong, terribly wrong. We owe it to future generations to explain why. In the end, we must confront the fate of those Americans who served in Vietnam and never returned. Does the Unwisdom of our intervention nullify their effort and their loss? I think not That our effort in Vietnam proved unwise does not make their sacrifice less noble. It endures for all to see. Let us learn from their sacrifice and, by doing so, validate and honor it. He himself is ignorant, but what about the Vietnamese?What about the beaten Vietnamese? Johnson: (hate face) I didn't know this kid wrote the book, I didn't get to see it.How could he reverse the case 22 years after my death? God Li: You always have to give the old birthday man time to repent. Johnson: He is too much of an American to be the exception. God Lee: Exception?There is another one, which is exactly the opposite of your defense minister's play.McNamara first approved of the Vietnam War and then opposed it. This person first opposed the Vietnam War and then approved it. Isn’t it strange? Johnson: Who? God Lee: It's Jane Fonda. Johnson: It's her, the troublemaker, I remember.The big star Jane Fonda, with the light of her father Henry Fonda (Henry Fonda), sprang into the film industry. During the Vietnam War, she turned into a fanatical anti-war activist. In 1972, she married an anti-war leader.During the anti-war period, she went to the enemy camp during the day, appearing as "Jane of Hanoi", wearing a helmet, and sitting in the North Korean anti-aircraft gunner's seat.In a strict sense, her "Vietnam Show" was an act of treason. God Lee: However, 16 years later, in 1988, under the pressure of the movie box office, she changed. On the ABC TV news program, she publicly confessed that she was too naive back then. Veterans and their families apologize.After 16 years of rotation, she herself repented, but what about the Vietnamese?What about the beaten Vietnamese? Johnson: Oh my goodness (covering forehead with hand), another "American exception".How old is she, do you want to give the old birthday man time to repent? God Lee: She is younger than you, but has lived longer than you.You died at 65, she was alive at 70.At the age of 70, she is still writing a book (take out a book), which is this JANE FONDA MY LIFE SO FAR, her memoir, 600 pages in total, nonsense, sometimes confused about what she thinks of her Whether I agree or disagree, anyway, movie stars are putting on a show, so it is not necessary to take it too seriously, but obviously, she is no longer "Jane of Hanoi". Johnson: Oh, regardless of McNamara's "exception" or Jane Fonda's "exception", we Americans are sincere and straightforward. If yesterday is not today, we can correct our mistakes and even apologize. Confession, this is American plasticity, American greatness. God Lee: But this is no longer a matter of what happened yesterday is not what it is today, or that you can correct what you have learned, nor is it a question of apologizing and repenting. , who is the one who has caused the greatest harm and is devastated by the upside-down of you Americans?In "Liao Zhai", the frog protests to the little boys, saying that it is a sport for you, and it is killing us; in "Liao Zhai", the butterfly protests to the county magistrate, saying that it is a tool of atonement for you, and it is torture and death for us.These comparisons all show that the two sides have different positions and how big the gap in opinions is.For you Americans, it is a question of right and wrong 16 or 22 years later; for the Vietnamese, it is a question of life and death, the destruction of the country and the family.Vietnam has been destroyed like this by you. A large area of ​​Vietnamese land has really become a stone age wasteland, even worse than a wasteland, because your chemical weapons have made these lands barren.Not a blade of grass grows is originally an adjective in literature, but you, the United States, have turned literature into science, you are really good at it! In 1968, Benjamin Spock, a famous anti-Vietnam War doctor, satirized it well: "To win in Vietnam, we will have to exterminate a nation." (To win in Vietnam, we will have to exterminate a nation.) Really, Vietnam This country was being wiped out by you at that time. Johnson: My presidency, until January 1969, when the Vietnam War was still going on, strictly speaking, my executive responsibility ended in January 1969.According to my account, the lower limit is January 1969. God Lee: Do you want to calculate carefully?I can give you the figures calculated carefully, even before January 1969. In the early 1960s, the United States invaded Vietnam. In four years, the number of American troops increased rapidly from 11,326 at the end of 1962 to 485,300 at the end of 1967, and reached 542,400 in January 1969.The U.S. military carried out brutal military operations in Vietnam, carried out chemical warfare and bacterial warfare, and used various new weapons such as incendiary bombs, bacterial bombs, tear gas bombs, and suffocating bombs.The United States spent 7 million tons of ammunition throughout World War II, and 15 million tons were used in the Vietnam War.Compared with World War II, the average ammunition consumption per combatant in the US military has increased by 25 times.On average, it takes several tons of explosives to kill a Viet Cong. You Americans are so reckless in Vietnam. There is only one reason. Your Vietnam cannot be unified, and the United States does not allow the Communist Party to unify Vietnam.But what people want to ask is: Why should the Vietnamese choose to be dealt with by your American bombs?Why? Johnson: (helplessly) Oh, oh, what happened after January 1969, you have to ask President Nixon, when he was in charge. God Lee: Well, just ask President Nixon, President Nixon, please stand up. (Nixon stands up.) God Lee: In the era of your President Nixon, at the beginning, 31,000 American lives were lost, and the United States spent more than 25 billion U.S. dollars on this war every year.More tons of bombs were dropped on Vietnam than were used by all of Europe's Allies during World War II.But there is no solution to the problem, 500,000 US troops cannot be withdrawn, and North Vietnam is endless.You Nixon don't want to play anymore, but out of respect, you want to "end the Vietnam War with honor" and "peace with glory".Therefore, I tried every means to negotiate with North Vietnam, which was tantamount to asking North Vietnam to let me go, and Vietnam was left to you Vietnamese. It is a beautiful way to say, "Vietnamization of the Vietnam War", but in fact, it is "the release of the United States." On January 27, 1973, the so-called cease-fire agreement was reached. Fifteen months later, on April 30, 1975, Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam, was lost.“The peace we negotiated has been overthrown by force,” says your negotiator, Henry Kissinger, who is about to hand back the Nobel Peace Prize.Let’s do the math, in the Vietnam War, you Americans killed 58,000 people, injured 300,000 people, and refused to be drafted into the army by 70,000 people.Of the 58,000 people who died, almost 45% died under your Nixon presidency. In 1968, when you were elected president, you said you had a secret plan to end the Vietnam War as much as possible. It turned out that the secret was to delay 4 years and kill 26,000 more people. life.This is only your American side.In a Vietnam War, Vietnam killed 20 times more people than you, at least 1.2 million people died.what do you say? Nixon: (reluctantly, spreading his hands together) What should I say?what can i sayI can neither rely on Johnson nor Kissinger. I am really angry. I said to myself: Fuck the United States, stop doing self-righteous good things, don’t believe that the United States can do good, and never believe that the United States can.” Act on behalf of the sky", and can do a good job in "acting on behalf of the sky".The lesson is: this is not an American problem, but a "human nature" problem.As the 19th century British historian Lord Acton wrote in a letter to the bishop: "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." (Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. ) anthropomorphize America, exactly.Wealthy and powerful, even more powerful, the United States holds power, without restrictions, the ugly side of "human nature" will come out.In fact, we should thank the Vietnamese for restricting us and teaching us lessons, so that we know that wars should not be fought indiscriminately, and what to do if we fight wrongly. The first reason for fighting the Vietnam War was wrong, and the more we fought, the less reasonable we could find.Americans learn this lesson. God Lee: Got it?Just ask Bush Jr.President Bush, please stand up (Bush stand up).How did you fight Iraq, did you learn your lesson?What's your first reason? Bush: The first reason is that Iraq has destructive weapons and we want to fight them. God Lee: You Bush Jr. said at the time: "America must not ignore the threats that gather around us. In the face of clear signs of danger, we cannot sit and wait for the final proof - the smoking muzzle - that it may end in a mushroom cloud However, after six weeks of searching by your Special Forces 75th Commando Regiment, not a single shell or missile head was found, nor a barrel of chemical agents nor a liter of biological agents.Said one member of the unit: "We came to bear country. We were sent to find bears. But we found that bears were not there." No bears, and certainly not your U.S. government The whole world asserts that thousands of liters of anthrax bacillus, botulinum toxin, tons of VX nerve gas, mustard gas and other chemical agents, tens of thousands of chemical artillery shells, dozens of long-range missiles and even the enriched uranium project hidden in Iraq are all gone. turn up.At the press conference in March 2003, you swore that the "only reason" for the United States to send troops to Iraq was that Iraq had destructive weapons. What should we do?As a result, Iraq was beaten to the ground, but no bears or such weapons were found.You said there was public support for fighting Iraq. Now, let’s look at the numbers. On June 24, 2004, polls by USA Today, CNN, and Gallup all pointed out that more than half of Americans believed that sending troops to Iraq was a mistake. Bush Jr.: (angry) Opinion polls are unreliable, because the people who called for the beating at the beginning were the people;Polls are flowing and turbulent. God Li: At the beginning, the people often go with the government, but later, the people will stop first. This is where the people are more virtuous than the government.According to the poll, 54% of the 1,500 people surveyed believe that the Iraq War was a mistake. "USA Today" pointed out that this is the first time since Americans thought the Vietnam War was a mistake in August 1968, and more than half of the people directly pointed to a major US military deployment as a mistake.During the Persian Gulf War in 1991, the highest percentage of Americans who believed the war was wrong was only 30%.In other words, 70% of the public opinion back then supported you to fight Iraq. Now, your people are awakened, but what if they are awakened?Iraq has become the second place in the Vietnam War again, the Iraqi people are intertwined with blood and tears, and you, the United States, are here again. What are the lessons of the Vietnam War?You Americans, you Americans! Bush: However, we, the United States, have a moral conscience, we have the responsibility and determination to save the world, and we have firm confidence in the sacred destiny of our country. God Lee: This is the "Last Judgment". Who wants to listen to your Manifest Destiny? You invented your own determinism, and then derived it into "American exceptionalism". Everything is based on your American interests and unilateral interpretation of the United States. And have your God running after you.Killing, genocide is wrong, but killing Indians is wrong; killing buffaloes is wrong, but killing buffaloes to starve Indians is wrong; aggression is wrong, except taking half of Mexico; bombing people It is wrong to go back to the Stone Age, but the Communist Party of Vietnam is an exception; it is wrong to beat others without a reason, but Iraq is an exception.You don’t respect treaties, international law, the United Nations, or the sovereignty of other countries. You bomb when you like, and you fight when you like. If you make a mistake and for the wrong reason, you continue to fight as usual, looking for While fighting for a new reason, what are you guys?What do you mean? Bush Jr.: Maybe there is a real reason, but it is not convenient to say. God Lee: According to Alan Greenspan (Alan Greenspan), the war against Iraq is all about oil. Bush Jr.: (laughs) Greenspan was dishonest. God Lee: But: Is Paul Wolfowitz honest?When he was interviewed in July 2003, he was asked why the United States continued to fight Iraq when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.His answer was extremely shameless. He said that there are actually "several reasons" behind the decision of the Bush administration, but, "For administrative reasons, we are sure in one aspect-weapons of mass destruction, because this It’s a reason that everyone can accept.” You see, the reasons why wolves eat sheep are more straightforward than yours.It turns out that the reason you beat people is an ameba, an amoeba.A majestic big country can be turned upside down like this, how can it be respected?Well, Nixon and Bush, please sit down (Nixon and Bush, please sit down), and I have to ask Johnson.President Johnson, in order to support the reactionary regime, you, the United States, not only do not abide by international law, but also do not abide by domestic law. Johnson: I admit that the United States does not abide by international laws, but it follows the rules for domestic laws. God Lee: Follow the rules?Let me ask you: When the democratically elected government in Peru was overthrown by the military, how are you helping the military? In the spring of 1970, before the great earthquake in Peru, you gave financial assistance and continued to set a quota for the export of Peruvian brown sugar to the United States.In fact, doing so is illegal.Because, according to the Amendment to the U.S. Foreign Aid Act: Once the recipient country confiscates the property of the Americans and fails to provide reasonable compensation within six months, the U.S. aid must be stopped.In October 1968, the Peruvian government nationalized the US-funded oil company and refining equipment in the country without any compensation.Officially estimated $71 million in confiscated property, yet your government and Congress and others have remained silent, all of you Americans flouting your own laws in support of the persecution committed by the Peruvian military!The evidence is clear here, what do you say? Johnson: Oh, oh. (looks left and right) We in America have another annoyance when it comes to Latin America.Maybe I should admit frankly that we in the United States are not worthy of Latin America. Basically, they are too weak. We are fighting for power in the world, and Latin America is sidelined. God Lee: Since the Monroe Doctrine, although you have been selfish and negligent to Latin America, you have generally been invincible. As you said, they are too weak to compete with you.However, after the 21st century, times have changed, especially in Mexico, it seems that you are in trouble. Johnson: It is indeed getting more and more troublesome. God Lee: When your American population reached 200 million, you happened to be in power, and you held a grand celebration ceremony, didn't you? Johnson: Yes, we Americans, the population reached 200 million in 1967, then 300 million in 2006, 400 million in 2050, and 500 million by the end of the 21st century. God Lee: Stop counting.Your world of white people may not be so beautiful anymore. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the descendants of the Anglo-Saxons, Irish, and Germans formed the mainstream of society, with nearly 200 million people.But there is a problem, that is, the descendants of the black slaves brought from Africa by the white people have rolled to 40 million people, and the black-faced Americans can't stop them.What's even more frightening is that Latinos in southern Mexico have an average of 1.35 million births per year, which has long surpassed the 40 million black-faced people.By 2050, when your American population is 400 million, 100 million will be Latino. Johnson: Looks like there's going to be a lot to eat. God Lee: As for Mexico, can you immediately march into it like you did back then? Johnson: Times have changed, modern times can't. God Lee: How do you review what you have done in the United States?You proudly said: We cannot, and will not, withdraw from this world. We are too rich, too powerful, and too important, And we are too concerned. (We cannot, and will not, withdraw from this world. We are too rich, too powerful, and too important, And we are too concerned. Wealthy, too powerful, too important, and we care too much.) Now, the whole world, especially Vietnam and Latin America, have fully learned everything you said above. For the countries that suffer from it, the more you care about the United States, The more their nightmare.The whole world is not full of Indians or Native Hawaiians. They seem to have lost the ability to resist. There are still too many ethnic groups in the world who will fight against your domineering America. The resistance of the Mexicans is the closest to you.There is no longer a strange border in the world, it is 20,000 miles long, just a line drawn on the ground and a shallow river in the middle, used to divide a first world country and a third world country, this is The United States, which invaded half of Mexico in the past, and Mexico today.Now you have tasted the bitter fruit.The most amazing thing is that in the history of your United States, no immigrants from any country can claim sovereignty on the territory of the United States, but Mexicans can. Johnson: That's what worries us the most.Maybe one day, America will no longer be so American. When the America created and maintained by WASP is finally squeezed out due to insufficient population, America will be finished. God Lee: At that time, you can no longer say: Move over, this is your president. (Turn around, I am the president). Johnson: (surprised smile) I will change to: Move on, this is your president. (Let's go, I am the president). God Lee: All right, leave the court (with a hammer hit, stand up). (The curtain falls.)