Chapter 77 There is no "Auverg change" in the real world
Please think about such a question, why is it so difficult to establish leadership in the real Japanese society?
I think it is because of the media first. The media has brought us great harm.In my opinion, those who work in the media are very dull. They have neither the time to improve themselves through learning nor the spirit of investigation and research. They are only busy reporting the so-called news.The current level of journalists and their sources of information may surprise even themselves. Their reports are nothing more than reprocessing some rubbish.
As mentioned earlier, Japanese newspapers, television and other media have lost their function as media.But despite this, those who work in the media still believe that they play a role in correctly guiding public opinion.That is to say, they themselves don't know how to learn and improve, and the benchmark for all reports is "the public only likes simple reports", so they can only provide reports at a level that the public can understand.
Such a top-down method of information transmission leads to a one-way communication, while communication in the online world is two-way. This is the biggest difference between the two methods.
Although there are reader columns and contribution columns in newspapers and magazines, most of them are useless. At first glance, they provide a platform for two-way communication, but in fact it is not the case at all.In short, in the real world, there is no such thing at all.
Under the banner of "extensively listening to the opinions of the masses", the government has adopted a series of measures such as "convening town hall meetings", but it is not difficult to find that the problems involved are all designed in advance to serve the government.
These things clearly prove that there are many illusions in the real world, which are caused by one-way communication.All in all, in the real world, there is no possibility of "Auverg change". In this way, it is impossible to breed leaders who gather the wisdom of the masses, which is extremely regrettable.
Notes:
Notes: