Chapter 61 "National Numbering System" is required

Please think about such a question, whether an individual should protect the relationship with the state.That is, in any case, should we first protect the relationship between the individual and the state? For example, let's say there is a person named Ichiro Suzuki, and there are 10,000 people with the same name and surname as Ichiro Suzuki nationwide.In this way, it is necessary to distinguish these people named Ichiro Suzuki. Speaking of which, what exactly should we do? For example, the residence can be used as a method to distinguish these Suzuki Ichiro, but the residence is subject to change.There are also phone numbers, work units, etc., which can be used as the basis for identification, but they can also change.And if the person with the same name and surname is a woman, the surname will generally change after marriage, and the only thing that will not change is the date of birth.

Therefore, no matter which one can be the decisive factor to distinguish individuals. In Japan, the state has not kept track of the identity of citizens carefully, and there are no measures to protect the relationship between the state and individuals, and this state is still continuing today with the rapid development of information technology. In fact, the solution to this problem is to implement the National General Numbering System. For example, in the United States, everyone has a "social insurance number". As long as they pay taxes, the country can identify citizens by number.There is also the so-called pension number, which is the same as the basic pension number in Japan.

The basis of all Americans' identity is the "social insurance number". Only with this number can they receive pensions, and only with this number can they legally pay taxes.This number is used both when obtaining a license and when opening a bank account. The so-called social insurance, to put it bluntly, refers to "social welfare and pension".Therefore, this number is not only a certificate for receiving pensions in the future, but also the most basic method for the government to grasp the national situation. I have argued before that the Japanese government must set up such a number for each citizen.Now various countries have made it into an IC card, and it will be further developed into a non-contact IC card in the future.In today's networked society, citizens of many countries in the world have such numbers.

Once you start to build this national structure, you have to use the computer to define a permanent definition of the relationship between the state and the individual, regardless of marriage or not, regardless of whether the residence changes, no matter what happens.In this sense, this is indeed exactly the same as the "state's management system for citizens" advocated by leftists and the Asahi Shimbun. But in today's information society, it is impossible without such a national structure.If there is no certification system, all information will be invalid, and the social system will become worse and worse.

All in all, the explosion of the pension problem is a manifestation of this malpractice. Using the previous example, when Ichiro Suzuki's address changes, no one will know which Ichiro Suzuki is the original Ichiro Suzuki; or, when the phone number changes, he can no longer be contacted; or he If the company is changed, the relevant records of this person will disappear.This kind of problem that often occurred in the past still occurs from time to time in Japan now, and there is no way to solve this problem until now. Therefore, we have to question in what aspect Japan has achieved a high degree of informatization.It is not difficult to understand that as long as the National General Number system is implemented, the current problems can be solved.Therefore, as long as you use your brain a little bit and have a little foresight, it is not difficult to understand that it is necessary to implement this system.