Chapter 50 Where does the "stinginess" of the Japanese come from?

Besides, I don't think income tax is reasonable, I think only property tax is enough.By the way, the tax rate for property taxation is clearly stipulated in the amendment clauses of California, USA, which seems to be 1% (now it has become 1.3%). Wouldn't it be nice to abolish expropriation at source so that wages go directly to employees and property taxes are collected from them?The practice of paying wages to employees after deducting personal income tax, resident tax and other taxes is a great neglect of human independence and dignity. Finally, there should be no taxation on the interests of legal persons (the operation is very simple), but it is reasonable to tax the added value of its output, which is the so-called "value-added tax" (VAT).

Although the current Japanese consumption tax is called a type of value-added tax, it is not a real value-added tax.Some people say that if it is aggravated, it will lead to the rebellion of low-income groups being overburdened, leading to a widening gap between various social classes, and the market will lose its vitality.But I think this statement is incorrect. You must know that the total added value of the people is GDP, no matter how much it is, for example, it is fair to charge a 5% tax on it.Because if the value-added tax can reach 25 trillion yen, then there is no need to collect corporate tax.

There is no example in history of improving finances through tax increases, and economic development certainly should not rely on it. In short, I think taxation should be roughly composed of two parts, that is, asset tax and value-added tax. Of course, ridiculous taxes like bath tax, golf tax, tobacco tax should also be abolished, and income tax, corporate tax, inheritance tax, local tax, etc. should also be abolished, and then 1% of the existing value of the assets of all citizens and legal persons should be levied For property tax, another 5% value-added tax is suffice.Only in this way can the state of "economic illiteracy" of the Japanese be alleviated to a certain extent, and the entire country can avoid continued recession.

Because I advocate the Daozhou system, I believe that value-added tax should be used for the industrial infrastructure of Daozhou, while asset tax should be used to ensure the stability and prosperity of the region. What will be the effect of doing so? First of all, in Douzhou, if the added value that depends on the industrial situation does not increase, then the tax revenue will not increase.Therefore, it is said that the responsibility of the state is to create new jobs and new industries, so that it has a very clear positioning.On the other hand, property taxes are implemented in local self-government groups, that is, at the city, town, and village levels. In this way, there will be taxation on both financial assets and real assets, and the basic services of the entire region will be greatly developed.

If we count these two kinds of taxes, as mentioned above, the asset tax can reach 35 trillion yen, and the value-added tax, if charged at 5%, can reach 25 trillion yen. Taken together, they can secure 60 trillion yen in tax revenue, more than the current tax system collects (approximately 50 trillion yen).This is not empty talk, as long as such a tax system is implemented, this goal can be achieved. This extremely simple and aboveboard tax system can improve the IQ level of the Japanese.To put it bluntly, the current tax system turns the Japanese into "cheapers".The bad habits of tax avoidance and tax evasion are spreading wantonly in this country. If the new tax system is introduced, these bad habits can be effectively curbed.

Take the present as an example, it is very rampant for rich people to evade taxes by concealing their assets or lying about their expenses when starting a company. Even those large companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange will rack their brains to seek tax avoidance. There are many examples. For example, the national land plan and Seibu Railway have never paid taxes before being exposed.Compared with their huge business, the tax payment of large trading companies is very small.Such countless "stingy" cases are born from the current tax system. Finally, it is the current tax system that distorts national politics. Even politicians can tamper with receipts at will. Therefore, the current tax system must bring harm to national life.Politicians concealed office expenses and tampered with consumption receipts, while saying that "if the consumption tax is not raised, the finances will be in short supply."Isn't this what happens in comics?

If the value-added tax and asset tax are used in the two ways as I propose, at least the "stinginess" of the Japanese will be eliminated.Not only that, the Japanese way of life, (if the inheritance tax is abolished) even the relationship within the family may be improved.