Chapter 53 8. Looking forward to 2020: a division of resources

When the country bases its consideration on a higher level, gradually tilts resources to private small and medium-sized enterprises, and realizes the support of the people in a real sense, it means that the proposition of efficiency and fairness, which has plagued economists for a century, has been realized. More importantly, such a solution only occurs within the economy and does not need to rely on external factors. Its significance is no less than that of the revolution that changed China 30 years ago. Introduction to the topic: Alternative thinking about resources - polarized allocation schemes

On the topic of resources, we have done a detailed explanation.In fact, with the continuous enhancement of resource awareness, we have become more and more aware of the preciousness of resources. However, getting out of a predicament often means the beginning of a new predicament.When resources become the treasure in everyone's eyes, it means the beginning of a new round of resource competition. What is even more worrying is that this kind of competition for resources is not limited to the international field, even within a country, the intensity of the competition is no less intense. In this new round of resource scrambling, a foreseeable future is that the people and the state constitute the two poles of resource scrambling.

Since the country and the people understand the economy from completely different levels, they also have their own opinions on resource allocation. From the public's point of view, resources are shared by members of the whole society. Anyone who belongs to this society has the right to demand and enjoy his share of resources. If such a desire becomes a reality, then, due to the profit-seeking nature of people, everyone hopes to occupy as much resources as possible. However, there is a mutual restrictive relationship between people, which is absolutely impossible. The phenomenon of allowing others to take more and get more, thus, when the people's desire for distribution is formed, it becomes concentrated into a resource law that requires a comprehensive and equal distribution.

From the perspective of the state, the situation is completely different. Since the state is responsible for coordinating the overall situation, in this way, the state has legally obtained the right to allocate resources from the system. As an independent economic entity, the country also has the demand for profit. Therefore, when the country has the right to allocate resources, the first factor it considers must be the interests of state-owned capital, so it often gives preference to state-owned capital in policy. . Therefore, the resource allocation plan formulated according to the state management theory and the distribution plan formed by the popular game constitute a competition for resources. In the actual allocation of resources, no matter which of the two sets of plans is adopted Both of these will inevitably arouse opposition from the other party.

If we change our perspective, there is a solution to any dilemma. Similarly, in the process of resource allocation, as long as we can base ourselves on the current national conditions of China and establish a basis for allocation on the basis of comparative advantages, it is not difficult to achieve both fairness and efficiency. An obvious fact is that at the current stage of China, we have a large number of cheap labor, so in this field, we have an undoubted comparative advantage. When we are based on this, we will lean more towards labor-intensive industries. When resources are used, the effects are unimaginable.

Due to their competitive advantages, these industries can earn profits faster and realize the fastest accumulation of capital. In this process, the role of private small and medium-sized enterprises cannot be ignored in the next ten years. As we all know, in China, what SMEs lack the most is social resources, which includes both capital and policy care. When the country gradually tilts resources to SMEs and private enterprises, What has been brought about is a qualitative change. With the inflow of resources, the originally relatively scarce resources have gradually become relatively abundant, while the labor force has gradually changed from the original relatively abundant to relatively scarce, which has brought about the evolution of the industrial structure.

When our industry gradually changes from labor-intensive to capital-intensive, the situation marked is completely different. The growth of private small and medium-sized enterprises will bring about the growth of national income, and the growth of national income will bring about the growth of the total economic volume and at the same time realize the common prosperity of the whole people.From this perspective, it is undoubtedly an efficient and fair solution to allocate resources to private enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises. Because of this, some economists clamored for the state to come forward to realize the optimal allocation of resources through planned and targeted support for private small and medium-sized enterprises.In the opinion of economist Li Yining, in order to encourage the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, tax exemption should even be implemented for self-employed individuals with an annual turnover of less than 300,000 yuan.

However, in the past years, as we have analyzed above, we have not yet achieved the unity of efficiency and fairness in the initial allocation of resources. Therefore, when the country considers from a higher level and gradually allocates resources When leaning towards private small and medium-sized enterprises and realizing the support of the public in a real sense, it means that the proposition of efficiency and fairness, which has plagued economists for a century, has been solved in a practical sense, and more importantly, such a solution It only takes place within the economy and does not need to rely on external factors. Its significance is no less than that of the change that changed China 30 years ago.