Chapter 24 argue

In 1943, Hu Shi commented on Feng Youlan: "Although Feng Youlan has been abroad, he has seen nothing. ... His views are mostly reactionary, and the trend of conservatism is obvious, and the attitude of maintaining centralization is quite obvious." In 1947, Feng Youlan visited New York When I heard that the title of Xu Yafen’s master’s thesis of Mrs. Yang Shaozhen’s was “Hu Shi’s Influence on Chinese Culture Before 1927”, she couldn’t help but beam with joy and said: “This... this... this topic is very...very... good, because it was too... ...After 1927, he has no...no...no influence!" In 1950, Hu Shi saw Feng Youlan's English version and said disdainfully: "It's really too bad. I should write the history of Chinese thought as soon as possible. End." In 1955, Hu Shi commented on Feng Youlan's "History of Chinese Philosophy": "I want to say a few good words, but I really don't see any benefit!"

Feng Youlan once criticized Hu Shi's academic spirit: "Mr. Shizhi's illness is just too curious and self-confident. He often thinks that he can see what the ancients couldn't see; he can notice what the ancients didn't pay attention to. So he often It is wrong to point out people who the ancients recognized as unimportant to brag about, but to oppose those who were recognized as important by the ancients. This is wrong, because people's eyes can't be so far apart!" The defense said: "There are so many people criticizing Mr. Shizhi now, and some even wrote a book to criticize him. But their attitude is very unfair, because they often attack Mr. Shizhi's words more than 20 years ago. This How is that fair?"