Chapter 49 Chapter 51 The Hammer and the Pendulum

Although the theory of crustal movement is beyond the scope of this book, the book "When the Sky Falls" co-authored by Rand and Rose Flem-Ath has a detailed explanation of this theory. As mentioned earlier, the theory of crustal movement was first advocated by Professor Hapgood and affirmed by Einstein.Simply put, this theory holds that the Earth's crust, roughly 30 miles thick, slides over a central core 8,000 miles thick, and that the force of the shifting crust forces most of the Western Hemisphere southward across the equator and on to the Antarctic Circle .When the block is sliding, it does not move on the vertical north-south meridian, but revolves around the current central plain of the United States as the axis.As a result of the movement, the northeastern part of North America (where the North Pole used to be located around Hudson Bay) was dragged from the Arctic Circle to warmer latitudes, while the northwestern part (Alaska and Yukon) was drawn along with most of Siberia. , turning north, entering the Arctic Circle.

As for the southern hemisphere, Hapgood's model shows that much of the landmass now known as Antarctica was originally located at lower latitudes with warmer climates, but that the entire mass has shifted by 30 degrees (about 2,000 miles) due to shifts in the Earth's crust. And between 14,500 BC and 12,500 BC, it entered the Antarctic Circle.However, this great change caused a great shock to the entire earth, and the aftermath rippled until 9500 BC. Assuming that, before the crustal changes, the Antarctic continent was originally a green and living land, is it possible that it was the place where a great civilization developed?If the answer is yes, that civilization is likely to be easily destroyed by changes in the earth's crust.Various natural disasters accompanied by changes in the earth's crust, such as tsunamis, hurricanes, thunderstorms, volcanic eruptions, earth faults, darkening of the sky, and expansion of ice sheets, will occur repeatedly.And after 1,000 years of such destruction, all the relics representing traces of civilization, such as cities, large buildings, and large libraries, were permanently buried under thick ice.

Therefore, if the theory of crustal changes is correct, aren't the fingerprints of "God" that remain all over the world?They are the few clues left by the civilization under the ice on the Antarctic continent.These clues include the activities, deeds, misunderstood thinking and geometric buildings of the civilization under the Antarctic.When that civilization flourished, people traveled together in large ships across the turbulent sea and migrated to distant places.From the Nile Valley (probably originally at the source of the Blue Nile, near Lake Tanna) to the Valley of Mexico (Valley of Mexico), and even near Lake Titicaca in the Andes, and several other places, there are obvious fingerprints...

In other words, in every corner of the earth, we can see the fingerprints of the lost civilization, but we cannot see its truth, because the body of the civilization is buried under the 2-mile-thick ice of the Antarctic continent, which is thicker than the inner side of the moon. It is even more difficult for archaeologists to approach.Is this true? Or fiction? possible? Absolutely impossible? The Antarctic continent is the fifth largest landmass in the world (the surface soil area is nearly 6 million square inches bbb According to the theory of crustal movement, most of the Antarctic continent was located outside the Antarctic Circle around 15,000 BC, so not only could it be inhabited, but it also had the necessary climate and resource conditions for the development of civilization.However, later, due to a major change in the sliding of the earth's crust, the continental block moved to the current position in the center of the Antarctic Circle. bbb), from the perspective of geophysics, it is possible that (1) it was once at a relatively warm latitude, and (2) it was moved to the Antarctic Circle about 20,000 years ago due to changes in the earth’s crust. ?

In other words, is it possible for the Antarctic continent to move? polar desert of death "Continental drift" and "Plate Tectonics" (PlateTectonics, the theory of crustal changes due to the movement of several large slabs that make up the earth's surface) have become the mainstays of explaining the theory of crustal changes to the public since the 1950s. key concept.Here, we don’t need to go into the basic scientific mechanism. We just need to understand that from a certain angle, the continental blocks are actually just “floating” on the surface of the earth, and they will move and change their positions at any time.For example, if we study the relationship of the west coast of Africa to the east coast of South America on a map, it is clear that the two massifs were once one.However, in the past, continental drift was generally considered to be a very slow process. It would take at least 200 million years for two continental plates to approach or separate 2,000 miles from each other.That is, the speed of movement is very, very slow.

The theory of continental drift and Hapgood's theory of crustal changes are not inconsistent with each other.Hapgood thinks that the two may be happening at the same time, that is to say, the land masses on the earth's surface may indeed drift very slowly, as geologists say, but this does not mean that one of them, There cannot be a rapid change by chance, and the relationship with other continents has no effect, but only in whole or in part, towards the two poles of the earth (that is, the north and south poles around the rotation axis are the center, and the area covered by ice and snow all year round) direction or move outward in the direction of the poles.

Is it continental drift? Is it a change in the earth's crust? Both happening at the same time? Or is there another reason? Honestly, I don't know.However, some facts about the Antarctic continent are simple but intriguing, simple but difficult to explain.Without the concept of "sudden upheavals" (and very close upheavals from a geological point of view), we will not be able to understand these seemingly straightforward facts. Before verifying these facts, let us bear in mind that the Antarctic landmass we are talking about now has 6 months in a year where the sun does not rise once, but for another 6 months, the sun does not set at all (from the Antarctic From the point of view, 24 hours a day is daytime, the sun stops only at the low point of the horizon, and draws a circular orbit in the sky again and again every day).

Antarctica is the coldest continent in the world. Near the pole, the temperature can reach minus 89.2 degrees Celsius.The coastal area is slightly warmer (minus 60 degrees Celsius), and it has become a place where a large number of seabirds gather, but there is no native mammal in Antarctica, and only a few plants that can withstand the cold and long-term lack of sunlight can survive for a long time in the Antarctic. The "Encyclopedia Britannica" briefly lists the Antarctic biological species as: "Lichens, liverworts, liverworts, molds, fungi, algae..." That is to say, Antarctica is located at the end of the world. Although it is a vast continent, it is closed by snow all year round and the living conditions are harsh. It is a lifeless ice and snow desert.The situation in Antarctica has not changed in the past 5,000 years of human written history.

However, was this the case in Antarctica before history? evidence one Discover the World of Science, February 1993, p. 17: About 260 million years ago in the Permian period, on the Antarctic continent, deciduous plants that could only grow in temperate climates had lush branches and leaves.That's the conclusion ancient botanists have drawn from fossilized tree trunks found at a 7,000-foot-high site on the transantarctic mountain of Achernar.They found the fossil at a latitude of 84° 22', not just 500 miles from the South Pole. "What's particularly interesting about this find is that it's the only trace of forest so far found, either in living or fossil form, at 80 or 85 degrees south latitude." said the Ohio "The first thing we ancient botanists do when we encounter a situation like this is compare it to the modern record," said Edith Taylor, a paleobotanist at State University. "There are no forests at all at this latitude." We have seen forests that were originally temperate in the tropics. But where there is 24 hours of sunshine in summer and 24 hours of darkness in winter, even temperate zones cannot grow forests."①

Evidence two Geologists have discovered no evidence of glaciers anywhere on the Antarctic continent before the Eocene (about 60 million years ago).But there are indications that during the Cambrian period (550 million years ago), the Antarctic continent was completely, or almost completely, surrounded by warm oceans, because on the Antarctic ocean line, we are in thick limestone composed of reefs, Found many marine invertebrates that became extinct during the Cambrian period: "After tens of millions of years, these marine formations appeared on the surface of the sea, and the warm climate also brought abundant plants to the Antarctic continent. Shekton Sir Ernest

Shackleton found coal 200 miles from the South Pole.Subsequently, during the Byrd expedition in 1935, geologists discovered a large number of fossils on the slope of Mount Weaver at 86 degrees 58 south latitude, including leaves, stems, and trunks.The point where the fossil was found was about the same distance from the South Pole, only 2 miles above sea level. In 1952, Dr. Lyman H. Dougherty of the Carnegie Institution of Washington completed the study of these fossils, and indeed there were two kinds of coniferous forests in the local area.One, called Glossopteris, once spread across other southern hemisphere continents (Africa, South America, Australia), and the other was a giant coniferous forest..." Evidence Three Admiral Byrd once wrote of the discovery on Mount Weber and its significance as follows: "Less than 200 miles from the South Pole, on the most difficult mountain in the world, we have found a definitive evidence of the past of the South Pole. have experienced warm, even subtropical climates."② Evidence four "Soviet scientists reported that Tertiary (probably Dawn or Eocene) tropical plants were discovered in Graham Land on the Antarctic continent... In addition, British geologists also discovered the same species in Antarctica in 2000 The same forest fossils that grew on the Pacific coast of the Americas ten thousand years ago show that after the earliest known Eocene (60 million years ago) ice age, the Antarctic continent was not always covered by ice and snow, but warmed up several times." Evidence five "On December 25, 1990, two geologists, Barrie Mckelvey and David Hau Harwood, discovered fossils of a deciduous forest 2 to 3 million years ago while working 400 kilometers from the South Pole at an altitude of 1,830 meters. " Evidence six The discovery of fossilized trees and plants in 1986 proved that at least part of the Antarctic continent was not covered by ice and snow 2.5 million years ago.Later, some evidence was discovered, showing that until 100,000 years ago, part of the Antarctic continent was not covered by ice and snow. Evidence seven As mentioned in the first part of this book, deposits collected by Byrd's Antarctic Expedition on the bottom of the Ross Sea show that "great rivers, carrying deposits of fine sand" flowed from this vicinity until about 4000 B.C. In this part of Antarctica, the waters of the rivers are still flowing.According to Dr. Jack Hough of the University of Illinois: "According to the records made by the Center N-5 (CoreN-5), at this time 6000 years ago, the deposits on the sea floor It was in the form of ice, but 6,000 to 15,000 years ago, the deposits were in the shape of fine sand, but the exception was that around 12,000 years ago, the sand grains of the deposits were once very coarse and in the shape of fine gravel. It can be seen that, except for 12,000 years ago , except for the icebergs flowing down the river, there was no ice in this area." Evidence eight The Fenaeus world map mentioned in Part 1 of this book quite correctly depicts the state of the ice-free Ross Sea.Moreover, some high mountains along the coast of the Antarctic continent and large rivers flowing from the coast also have detailed location maps.But now there is nothing to see there except a mile-thick glacier. Evidence nine The Boujasche map discussed in Part 1 of this book correctly depicts the topography of the snow-covered Antarctic continent.Was it accidental, or were the map makers of a lost civilization drawing their maps when the Antarctic continent was not yet ice-covered? evidence ten Let's look at the other side of the coin.Assuming that the landmass now in the Antarctic Circle were once in the tropics, what about the landmass in the Arctic Circle?Have you ever experienced dramatic climate change? 10 to 12-foot palm leaves and fossils of beetles that only grow in tropical oceans have been found on Spitzbergen in Svalbard, which shows the temperature of the Arctic sea at that time, Comparable to the present-day Bay of Bengal or the Caribbean Sea.Spitsbergen is located between Norway and the North Pole, about 80 degrees north latitude, and ships can navigate there only two or three months a year. ●From the fossils, we found that in the Miocene (20 million to 60 million years ago), there were lush swamp cypresses growing within 500 miles of the North Pole. At the same time, Spitsbergen also found Passing water lilies: "Whether Grinnell, Greenland, or Spitsbergen, the Miocene plants we discovered need high humidity and a warm climate. Especially the water lilies in Spitsbergen need years to grow." running water. But today Spitsbergen, within the Arctic Circle, is in darkness for half the year and is as far from Labrador as Labrador is to Bermuda. The distance between them is quite, very far." ● There are several islands in the Arctic Sea which were not covered by ice during the last ice age.For example, fossils of alder and birch have been found in peat on Baffin Island, 900 miles down from the North Pole, proving that the local climate was much warmer 30,000 years ago than it is today.And this climate state has been maintained until 17,000 years ago. "During the Wisconsin Ice Age, the middle of the Arctic Sea, where the climate was milder, many animals and plants that could not survive in Canada and the United States moved here." ●Russian scientists confirmed that the Arctic seas were quite warm during most of the last ice age.Oceanographers Saks, Belov, Lapina and others observed this period from the perspective of oceanography, and concluded that: from 32,000 to 18,000 years ago, the North Pole was in the A very warm state③. ●As mentioned in the fourth part of this book, from the Yukon area, through Alaska to the depths of North Siberia, a large number of mammals originally suitable for inhabiting temperate zones were found. After instant freezing, the corpses were preserved in permanent permafrost .Such a large-scale extinction should have occurred between 11,000 BC and 10,000 BC. In addition, there was also a large-scale extinction around 13,500 BC. ●As described in detail in Chapter 27 of this book, between 15,000 BC and 8,000 BC when the last ice age was about to end, especially between 14,500 BC and 12,500 BC, or more precisely It is said that between 11,000 BC and 100 million BC, there were very large-scale changes.In what geologists consider to be a very short period of time, the snowpack, which was two miles thick and spread over a million square miles, suddenly melted away for unknown reasons. "Clearly not due to gradual changes in temperature during the Ice Age...the rapid melting of the snow must have been due to some very unusual reasons for the initial change in weather..." civilized executioner What unusual reason could there be for such a sudden change in the initial weather? Could the sudden end of the ice age in the northern hemisphere be caused by a sudden shift of 30 degrees in the earth's crust (forcing the thickest part of the ice to move southward from the Arctic Circle, thus ending the ice age)?If the answer is yes, why didn't the same 30-degree shift in the Earth's crust move the 6 million square miles of ice-covered Southern Hemisphere continents from warmer latitudes toward the South Pole? On the question of the movement of the Antarctic continent, we know for certain that the Antarctic continent not only moves, but has moved.From the fossils, we have found that the latitude of Antarctica, and the conditions of no sunshine for half a year, are not suitable for trees to survive. But we don't know (and probably never will know) whether Antarctica's continental shift was due to crustal shifting, continental drift, or other as-yet-unknown causes. Let's consider conditions on the Antarctic continent. We've seen it cover a vast area, 5.5 million square miles, covered by 7 million cubic miles of ice.It is estimated that the weight of these ices is about 19×1015 tons.What frightens those who support the idea of ​​crustal movement is the grim fact that the weight of this huge ice sheet is increasing every year. "Ice adds 293 cubic miles per year, equal to adding ice the size of Lake Ontario to the Antarctic continent every year." What is frightening is that under the influence of precession, tilt of the ecliptic, eccentricity of revolution orbit, centrifugal force of rotation, and gravitational force of the sun, moon, and other planets, the weight of the ever-expanding glaciers on the Antarctic continent may become the crust of the earth. The final decisive factor for mass movement. Hugh Auchincloss Brown wrote, with a touch of hyperbole, in 1967, that the growing Antarctic ice cap had quietly, secretly, and inexorably become a force of nature—a source of energy generated by its own rotation.The Ice Cap itself unknowingly becomes the greatest crisis, the obvious threat, the executioner of civilization. Is this "executor" an important factor in the 7,000 years from 15,000 BC to 8,000 BC, which marked the end of the last ice age?The most intense and destructive period of crustal changes should be between 14,500 BC and 10,000 BC.Or was there some sudden and dramatic change in climate in the northern hemisphere during this period that set off this upheaval that melted millions of cubic miles of snow and triggered volcanic activation around the world? Modern geologists oppose this kind of catastrophe and sudden changes in the world, and tend to a "uniform theory", arguing that "from the existing geological phenomena, we can find the cause of the past changes".Catastrophists, however, maintain that "alterations in the Earth's surface are, in general, caused by sudden physical forces".Is it possible, however, that the mechanism responsible for the last ice age, the most recent force responsible for shocking changes on Earth, has both "catastrophe" and "unity" qualities? The great biologist Sir Thomas Huxley said in the 19th century: For me, the thinking opposition between the theory of heaven and earth or the theory of uniformity does not exist.On the contrary, I think that sudden changes are probably the essence of consistent movement, part of it.Let me illustrate.A clock can be described as a model of consistent action, and a good clock means that it can often maintain a consistent and uniform action.But the hammer hitting the bell is basically a sudden and variable action.In the same knocking action, we can use a hammer to hit gunpowder to explode it, or knock open a reservoir to let a large amount of water flow out; through careful arrangements, we can also make the clock at irregular intervals, with different degrees of force and number of times. Knock something different.However, these irregular and variable movements are the result of uniform movements in the end.Therefore, we may have two different schools of thought in the study of clocks: one studies the hammer that strikes the clock, and the other studies the pendulum⑤. Could continental drift be like a pendulum? And the crustal movement is like a hammer? Mars and Earth Scientists believe that crustal changes have occurred not only on the earth, but also on other planets. In the December 1985 issue of "Scientific American" magazine, Peter Schultz's statement that there are traces of meteorites falling on the surface of Mars was published, which attracted the attention of the world.According to the article, meteorite traces in the north and south poles have their own special "signature", because only meteorites in the polar regions will fall on thick dust, ice and snow.Hughes also found two meteorite traces in areas other than the polar regions of Mars, both of which have polar "signatures": "These two regions happen to be on the front and back sides of the same planet, and it is difficult to approach the equator, but they show many aspects. Characteristics of polar deposits..."⑥ Why is there such a phenomenon?After studying the evidence, Hughes put forward a theory that "the outer hard part of Mars is a large landmass. Under the mechanism of landmass movement, the surface crust of Mars moved rapidly and violently as a whole. Then after a long period of Time doesn't move..." If crustal movement occurs on Mars, why is it impossible to happen on Earth?Moreover, if we deny that the crust has ever moved, how can we explain why there are no traces of the last or last ice age under the ice caps at the North and South Poles?On the contrary, the land with traces of glaciers is scattered in many corners of the earth.If we deny the possibility of crustal changes, we must find another way to explain why the traces of ice caps can be found near the tropics of the three continents (Asia, Africa, Australia)? Hapgood has a very simple and commonsense answer to this question: The only ice age that we can reasonably explain is the ice age that is still developing on the Antarctic continent.We can explain this phenomenon very clearly: the ice cap exists only because it is located in the Antarctic, and has nothing to do with changes in solar temperature, galactic dust, volcanic eruptions, movements under the earth's crust, land heights, ocean currents, etc.In other words, the best theory to explain the ice age is that "the ice is located in the polar region".Therefore, we can say that India was once an ice bed in ancient times, but now it is in the tropics.Large ice beds on a continental scale can also be explained by this method. This theory is very logical.Either we accept that the Antarctic ice cap is the first continental-scale ice bed ever to appear in the polar circle; otherwise, we have to assume that crustal shifts, or similar mechanisms, have occurred on Earth. Memories of Polar Dawn Our ancestors likely passed down memories of shifts in the Earth's crust.There is a part of the memory, which we have already discussed in the fourth part: these people are probably witnesses of a great change in the sky and earth during the last ice age in the northern hemisphere.The myths about the Great Change are generally believed to have been passed down between 15,000 BC and 10,000 BC.In mythology, there are some gods who describe the past heaven, and all the gods live in the south (such as the Egyptian Ta-netru), and many have experienced polar states. The great Indian epic poem "Mahabaratha" describes Mount Meru, which belongs to the land of the gods. In Meru, the sun and the moon go from left to right every day, and so do the stars... The peak of Meru shines brightly, overcoming the darkness of the night, making day and night indistinguishable... Adding day and night, it becomes a part of the life of the local people. year…… Likewise, as described in Chapter 25 of this book, the "Ariana Promise," the homeland of the Aryan people in Iran, seemed suddenly to be ice-enclosed and uninhabitable.Years later, "The Promised Land of Ariana" referred to a place where "the sun, moon, and stars rise and set only once a year, and the year is like a day." In the ancient Indian scriptures Surya Siddhanta (Surya Siddhanta), there is such a passage: "The sun rises only once a year, and the gods keep it for half a year after it sets." Rigveda's seventh mandala ( In Mandala, there are many poems about "dawn", one of which (VII, 76) mentions that the dawn has been staying on the horizon and shining brightly, and the third one says that the sun has just shown the dawn until it sees it rise. In between, it takes a few days.There is also a poem that says: "When the dawn suddenly appeared, several days have passed between the dawn of the century and the rising of the sun."⑦ Is this not the testimony of those who have seen the aurora? According to Indian tradition, Vedas should be the inspired language of the gods, which has been passed down from generation to generation since the age of gods.This point may be related to the aurora sighting described above.It may also be relevant that all oral myths describe the world being devastated by cataclysms of unprecedented proportions, which destroyed the original written scriptures.However, after every catastrophe, some form of "sage" survives: (Sages) Before the beginning of a new age, pass on the knowledge left by the ancestors of the previous age as sacred property to the next generation...Therefore, each age (Manvantara) has its own Vader , may be expressed in a different way, but basically there is no difference from the ancient Vader. Age of Chaos and Darkness As all children learn geography at school, they learn that true north (the North Pole) is not the same as true north on a compass needle.The north pointed on the compass needle is the current position of North Canada, which is about 11 degrees away from the North Pole.However, according to the latest research in archaeological magnetism, the polarity of the earth's magnet has reversed by 170 degrees in the past 80 million years. Why is the magnetism flipped 170 degrees? Geologist S.K. Runcorn recently published a paper in the journal "Scientific America" ​​while teaching at Cambridge University. In his opinion: The Earth's magnetic field is somehow related to the Earth's rotation.And this leads us to a startling discovery about rotation... (the inevitable conclusion) that the Earth's axis of rotation has changed.Or to put it another way, as the planet Earth rotates, it is changing its geographic pole position. Bluehole assumes that the poles have undergone a 180-degree reversal, that is, the Earth has turned a full somersault.And similar archaeological magnetic field measurements suggest that the Earth's crust once slipped over geographical poles.No matter which one it is, the impact of these changes on civilization and global life is unimaginable horror. Of course, the blue hole is not necessarily correct.Perhaps the reversal of the magnetic field is not due to the spin axis, but due to other large fluctuations. However, he could also be right. According to reports in journals such as Nature and New Science, the last reversal of Earth's magnetic field occurred about 12,400 years ago -- between 11,000 and 10,000 BC. These 1,000 years happened to be the period when the legend of the Andean Emperor Huanaco civilization was destroyed, and it was also generally believed that the preparation and design of the huge astronomical buildings on the Giza platform were completed, and the period when the Sphinx was eroded by a large amount of rain.At the same time, this is the period when Egypt's "agricultural experiments started in ancient times" suddenly failed, and a large number of mammals suddenly became extinct all over the world.In addition, during this period, the sea level suddenly rose, hurricane-like storms blew up, thunderstorms, volcanic eruptions... evidence eleven Yves Rocard, a professor of science at Baili University, said: "The precision of modern seismographs is getting higher and higher. All the vibration noises of the earth can be detected even without seismic waves. Therefore, seismographs may Some artificial vibrations are recorded, such as the tram running 4 kilometers away, the pressure change given by the wind on the ground, or what happened 10 kilometers away from the metropolis, etc., and the dynamics of the atmosphere will also be recorded. Sometimes, from the seismograph We can even detect the effects of storms in the distance. However, in addition to these, we have always been able to observe a kind of sound from the earth, like the sound of sparks flickering, a faint but obvious noise for no reason, which continues ..." evidence twelve "The North Pole moved 10 feet between 1900 and 1960 along the 45th meridian west toward the position of Greenland ... at a rate of 2.5 inches per year. However, from 1900 to 1968, the North Pole moved 20 feet, that is, between 1960 and 1968, the North Pole moved 10 feet, at a rate of up to 4 inches per year... If this observation is correct (by first-rate and trusted scholars), then we have There are reasons to believe that the earth's crust is not only changing, but also changing at an accelerated rate..." Evidence Thirteen USA Today, Wednesday, November 23, 1994, page 9: Dialogue with the Antarctic Continent: A Student-Antarctic Scientist Newsletter Elizabeth Felton, a 17-year-old senior high school student in Chicago, will directly broadcast remotely through satellites in Antarctica on January 10 next year.Fardon will use data from the U.S. Department of the Interior's Geological Survey to correct the geographic location of the South Pole on Earth and move the copper marker marking the South Pole.Due to the annual movement of the ice bed, the marking of the South Pole must also be revised from time to time. Is it only the ice bed that moves?Is the entirety of the Earth's crust also moving?Moreover, was it just a purely "interactive special education program" held in January 1995, or was it a grand event that made Isha Fadon unconsciously become a recorder of accelerated changes in the earth's crust? Scientists don't think the Earth's crust is changing at an accelerated rate.As will be shown in the next chapter, there is an extremely close correspondence between ancient prophecies and traditional beliefs... evidence fourteen January 17, 1995, Kobe, Japan. The earthquake came suddenly, almost to the point of brutality.One minute we were asleep in dreamland, and the next minute the floor—the floor of the whole building—was jelly and swayed, and that sway was not a gentle liquid oscillation but a rattling Da, as if trying to shake the heart out, the kind of shaking that makes people tremble and tremble... Imagine you are in the safest place in the world - your bed.Your bed is on the ground.You have always thought that the land is the most reliable foundation and the source of security.But without warning, the world starts to turn into one dizzying ride, and you want to get off. And the most terrifying thing should be the sound.It's not that kind of distant thunder, but a deafening roar, coming from everywhere, omnipresent, like the end of the world. (Witnesses report the Kobe Earthquake, January 18, 1995, London, "Guardian", reporter Dennis Kessler: 20 seconds before and after the Kobe Earthquake, magnitude 7.2, more than 5,000 people thus died.) note ① "Discover the World of Science" (DiscoverTheWorldofScience) magazine, February 1993, 17 pages.Fifteen fossilized branches were found, each ranging in diameter from 2.5 inches to 7 inches.It is deduced that the local area should have been a forest.When Taylor studied the tree rings, he found that there were no "froctrings" in the middle, and found that the trees never experienced cold weather as they grew. "For as long as I can remember, Antarctica has been very cold," Taylor said. "It's only from the fossils that we can see that it was also an environment that allowed trees to grow. We found fossil forests at 85 degrees south latitude. , so that we have to think about the climate change that this place has experienced.” According to the survey, the trees died because of flooding or large amounts of sediment wash-both are extremely unlikely to happen in Antarctica today. ② For details, see "National Geographic Magazine", October 1935, "The Amazing Ice Age", DolphEarl Hooker, Those Astonishing Ages, Expostion Press, New York, 1958, p. 44． citing National Geographic Magazine, October, 1935. ③ "Path of Pole", page 66. ④ See Brown's "Earth Cataclysm", pp. 10-11. ha. Brown, Cataclysms of the Earth, p. 10~11． ⑤ See the words of Thomas Huxley quoted in "The Way of the Pole". 294 pages. ⑥ See "Scientific America" ​​magazine. Scientific American, December1995. ⑦ For the part of this paragraph and the following two paragraphs about Indian poetry, please see "The Home of the North Pole Seen by Vida", pages 80, 81, 410-420. Arctic Home in Vedasp. 80, 81, 410-420. ⑧ "The Way of the Pole", appendix 325-326 pages.