Chapter 43 In court, the court's judgment is empty words

However, when she found a newspaper in the south where Deng Shixiang worked to report Deng's ugly behavior, the relevant leaders ignored it.Chen also learned that as early as January 1997, when Li Mei found out that Deng Xiang continued to live with Chen Liangqin, she carried the child and ran to the newspaper office to complain. Deng Shixiang was fired immediately; but Chen Liangqin couldn't figure it out. Yes, a year later, Deng entered this southern metropolis newspaper again in a grand manner and became a reporter. On August 24, 1998, the unbearable Chen Liangqin brought the morally corrupt Deng Shixiang to court with a pleading, requesting the court to terminate the illegal cohabitation relationship between the two parties according to law, and ordered Deng to pay his son in one lump sum of 750 yuan per month. Deng Ke paid child support and education expenses at the age of 18, and apologized to him face to face.On the same day, the People's Court of Baiyun District, Guangzhou accepted the case.

With the help of lawyers, Chen not only found out the specific facts that Deng Shixiang had bought two rooms and one living room at Room 308, Dongti, Building 2, Guangzhou Garden, Dongping, Tonghe Town, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, and had a son and a daughter with Li Meisheng.They also learned about Deng Shixiang's purchase of a car worth more than 100,000 yuan. After receiving Chen's bloody complaint, in early September 1999, relevant leaders in charge of publicity and family planning work in Guangdong Province personally issued instructions, requiring the newspaper's competent department to quickly investigate and deal with it seriously.Soon, Deng Shixiang was fired from the newspaper again.It is quite puzzling to say that as early as January 1997, Li Mei found out that Deng Shixiang continued to live with Chen Liangqin behind her back. In a rage, he ran to the newspaper office with the child in his arms and complained. Deng Shixiang was fired immediately, but A year later, Deng entered the newspaper as a reporter in a grandiose manner.

Deng, who was the second to be fired from the newspaper, learned that Chen was suing them in Guangzhou, so he hurriedly moved Li Mei and the two children to another place to live in seclusion. The door was locked, and then he ran back to his hometown in Guangshan County, Henan Province, and on September 6, he actually pushed Chen Liangqin to the local court, demanding that "the verdict confirm the parent-child relationship between Chen Liangqin's son Chen Ke and the plaintiff."In the indictment, Deng refused to admit that his son was his, and deliberately referred to "Deng Ke" as "Chen Ke", requesting a paternity test for "Chen Ke".

When the mediation failed, the judge finally told Chen Liangqin that a paternity test was done in Beijing on October 1, 1999. On October 1, 1999, Chen Liangqin, who was filled with righteous indignation, stated in detail what happened between her and Deng to two judges in Guangshan County who came to investigate and collect evidence at home, and showed the love letter written by Deng himself in Guangzhou before the birth of her son. .In this Deng's personal letter, it shows the process of Deng naming his son "Deng Ke".But at this time, the judge said to Chen Liangqin: Deng Shixiang has admitted that the child was born by him, and is willing to pay the child's support.

In a few days, the court will handle the relevant procedures for them, terminate the illegal cohabitation relationship, and pay child support in person.Chen Liangqin had no choice but to take her son back to his hometown in Henan after hearing what the court said. On the afternoon of September 16, Chen Liangqin rushed to the court after receiving a court summons.When Chen once again presented the lawsuit and relevant evidence accepted by the Guangzhou court, and repeatedly stated that the case had already been accepted by the Baiyun District Court in Guangzhou, the judge ignored it, but proposed to Deng that as long as she was willing to go to Guangzhou to withdraw the lawsuit, Deng was willing to go to Guangzhou to withdraw the lawsuit. 40,000 yuan in child support.Chen Liangqin refused.

When the mediation failed, the judge finally told Chen Liangqin that on October 1, Chen Liangqin came to Beijing with the child, and the judge told her that Deng Shixiang had recognized the child as his own and was willing to pay child support.In the past few days, the court will handle the relevant procedures for them, terminate the relationship, and pay the maintenance immediately. On the afternoon of October 14, 1999, the People's Court of Guangxian County, Henan Province held a trial of the plaintiff Deng Shixiang v. the defendant Chen Liangqin on the grounds of "dissolving the illegal cohabitation relationship". The following judgments were made on the grounds of no fixed income: 1. The plaintiff Deng Shixiang and Chen Liangqin's illegal cohabitation relationship was terminated. 2. The plaintiff's illegitimate son, Deng Ke, was raised by the defendant Chen Liangqin. The plaintiff was responsible for alimony of 100 yuan per month until Deng Ke was 18 years old. The total amount was 15,600 yuan, which should be paid within three days after the judgment came into effect.The case acceptance fee is 600 yuan, and the plaintiff and the defendant each bear 300 yuan.

However, according to Chen Liangqin, their mother and son have not received a penny so far, and the judgment has become a dead letter.At this time, Deng Shixiang, who had studied at Renmin University in Beijing and returned to Guangzhou, used the pseudonym "Paul" to sneak into another newspaper in Guangzhou as a reporter. Immediately after the article was published, it aroused strong repercussions from all walks of life. Some legal experts, sociological experts and lawyers expressed their views on the case one after another—— Lawyer Cui Lianying of Beijing Chaoyang Law Firm believes that Deng's two marriages are not only a manifestation of moral corruption, but also a serious illegal act that should not only be condemned by the moral court, but also should be punished by relevant laws.According to the definition of the crime of bigamy in my country's "Criminal Law" and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court: "...if they are commensurate as husband and wife and live together in public for more than six months, they shall be deemed as bigamy." On December 14, 1994, the highest The people's court pointed out in the reply on whether bigamy cases occurred after the implementation of the "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" that bigamy cases occurred in the name of husband and wife who did not live together in the name of husband and wife: "A person who has a spouse lives with another person in the name of husband and wife, or knowing that another person has a spouse Those who live together in the name of husband and wife should still be convicted and punished as bigamy." It can be seen that the legal requirements for constituting bigamy are: the parties live together in the name of husband and wife without completing the marriage registration procedures.However, Deng, Chen and Li have not only lived together for more than half a year, but they have also given birth to children. In particular, Deng is on two boats and has lived with two women in the name of husband and wife for a long time. His behavior has actually constituted bigamy. crime.It is obviously unfair that the Guangshan Court in Henan Province only ordered Deng to pay 100 yuan a month in child support, knowing that he already owned a house and a car.

Wang Zhenyu, deputy director of the Institute of Marriage and Family Research of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, believes that because my country's "Marriage Law" and "Family Planning Regulations" and other legal systems are not sound, some problems that actually occur are particularly difficult to determine and difficult to classify.Deng took advantage of this loophole, so that the victim, Chen Liangqin, could not enjoy the fair and comprehensive protection of the law, and at the same time, he escaped legal sanctions by chance.Several children born to Deng are innocent, but these children have no household registration and belong to "black households". They have seriously undermined the country's family planning policy and become a major hidden danger to society.

On March 12, "Shenzhen Legal News" published this article again in a full page under the title "Unscrupulous Reporters Belonged to Mistresses, Unfortunate Women Who Give Birth to Unmarried Children Are Abandoned".At the same time, the editor of the newspaper, A Yu, wrote a miscellaneous commentary on this with "Behind the Invalid Marriage", relentlessly criticizing Deng Shixiang's ugly behavior—— What happened to the working girl Chen Liangqin is sympathetic. Through her bitter tears, readers can feel the humiliation a woman bears.Compared with the heroine in the movie "Moscow Doesn't Believe in Tears", who was also played with and bullied, Chen Liangqin's misfortune was more caused by the harm brought to her by "de facto marriage".

Seven years ago, she and the man lived together in the name of husband and wife and gave birth to a child. The families, relatives and friends of both parties recognized and accepted this de facto marriage, although they did not go to the civil affairs department to register their marriage.This situation is not uncommon in rural areas.According to the results of a sample survey conducted by the All-China Women's Federation in 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the central government in April last year, it is shown that: At present, 46% of married people in China are married but not registered, and in rural areas, this situation accounts for 46%. 75%.

The consequences of unregistered marriages are obvious.my country's "Regulations on the Administration of Marriage Registration" clearly stipulates: "If you live together in the name of husband and wife without marriage registration, the marriage relationship is invalid and will not be protected by law." Facts have proved that once there is a problem with this relationship, it is often the woman and Children's rights.Although children born out of wedlock enjoy the same rights as children born in wedlock, Chen Liangqin has not received the pitiful child support so far.As for Chen Liangqin herself, how can she assert her personal rights? Seven years of youth, flowery years, one childbirth, three abortions, and the psychological shadow that will accompany her forever. The behavior of the romantic reporter Deng Shixiang is extremely disgusting. He used despicable means to deceive the two women to live together as husband and wife for a long time and have children. His behavior should not only be condemned by morality, but should also be punished by relevant laws .Recently, cases about having a mistress and being sentenced by his wife for bigamy have begun to appear in the media.Does a case like Deng Shixiang who has never fulfilled the marriage formalities also constitute the crime of bigamy?This is a question worth exploring.With the revision and promulgation of the new "Marriage Law", it is believed that the day when such unscrupulous men will be brought to justice will not be far away. Afterwards, dozens of newspapers and periodicals across the country, such as "Modern Express" in Nanjing, "Jinan Times" in Shandong, "Qilu Weekly" and "Legal Wencuibao" reprinted the long report I wrote, and several newspapers and periodicals also distributed it at the same time. Deng Shixiang and Chen Liangqin's intimate group photo, Chen Liangqin crying bitterly, little Deng Ke crying sadly in front of the dilapidated bungalow where he was living. While some readers praised me as a journalist for daring to expose the ugliness in the news world, to supervise journalists’ professional ethics, and to stand up for justice for weak women, they also expressed great sympathy for the victimized Chen mother and son . Although I know that Deng is a person who will not easily bow his head and admit his mistakes, I did not expect that this colleague would crazily frame me and related personnel... Not long after the article on the "Worker's Daily" was published, I suddenly learned that Deng Shixiang, who was working as a reporter for "New Express" under the pseudonym "Paul", openly used the names of "Yangcheng Evening News" and "New Express", By fax and mail, he sent a large number of materials fabricated by him to attack me, falsely claiming that I was "a The fugitive who is wanted by the Guangdong police and is involved in a serious case, has long been pretending to be a reporter from the Workers' Daily to defraud money, money and sex all over the country, especially in Guangzhou..." The so-called materials prepared by him are more than 30 pages long. On March 15, the second day after the relevant article in Shenzhen Legal News appeared in the newspaper, Deng hurriedly provided thousands of words of shocking materials against me by fax and express mail, and repeatedly demanded "Shenzhen Legal News" published a correction and apology notice on the front page, otherwise he will file a lawsuit!Later, in the name of "Yangcheng Evening News" and "New Express", Deng plausibly reported false cases to the Huanghuagang Police Station in Dongshan District, Guangzhou, near the newspapers, falsely claiming: "Shi Ye used to extort 120,000 yuan from me many times during the Spring Festival in 2001. If you don't give it, you will write fake news to get me..." The editor-in-charge Liu Yu and the leaders of the newspaper office were stunned for a moment!However, after several telephone inquiries and verifications, all the crimes listed by Deng were self-defeating, and they were all fictitious.Especially in this large pile of materials, many facts and time are full of loopholes, inconsistent and difficult to justify.Everyone sneered at this and ignored it. In fact, this article had already been published in the January 2001 issue of "Zhiyin-Donggong" magazine and the February 22 issue of "Worker's Daily". "Shenzhen Legal News" did not publish this article until March 14.How could I publish this article because of "extorting 120,000 yuan from Deng will not succeed"? Former U.S. President Abraham Lincoln said this: the quality of a man is like a tree, and the reputation is like the shadow of the tree. The shadow can be moved by our will, but the tree never moves.I think, the body is not afraid of the shadow crooked.What kind of person I am, Ishino, has long been seen by the press. It is impossible for these random fabrications and malicious slanders to change my character. But since then, Deng has continuously sent dozens of materials slandering me to Shenzhen Legal News and relevant Shenzhen authorities through phone calls, faxes, letters, and e-mails, and at the same time threatened and intimidated the relevant editors.Shortly thereafter, the Disciplinary Inspection Department of the Propaganda Department of the Guangdong Provincial Party Committee read my report and ordered the Yangcheng Evening News and New Express to fire Deng Shixiang.Comrade Lin Haihua, who was in charge of handling the matter at the time, said angrily to people: He has dealt with Deng Shixiang's bad behavior before. Journalism is a sacred career, and we will never tolerate such a corrupt person as a reporter.But what I can't understand is that Deng Shixiang was able to enter the "New Express" later in a grand manner, and he is still working there as a reporter. According to relevant colleagues in Guangdong: Deng Shixiang's life is very good, and he even made double-faced attacks in Yangcheng. A supermarket, very rich, we are inconceivable that a man like him can still be a reporter... As Deng's slander against me became more and more rampant, I decided to go south.I want to clarify the facts face to face. This will not only reduce the pressure on the newspaper, especially the responsible editor who compiled and distributed this article, but also expose Deng's true colors more deeply. "Shenzhen Legal News" is a comprehensive legal newspaper with great social influence at home and abroad, and it is currently the only regional legal newspaper with the largest number of pages and the largest circulation in China.Since 1998, I have successively published "Seventy-year-old "Dead" Revives for Justice", "A 13-Year-Old Girl Lost Her Body in a Bathing Center", "85 Consumers Sue China Telecom", " Fake Drug Rehabilitation Defrauded Millions of Yuan" and more than 20 feature articles, and maintained good relations with the responsible editors of this column, Tan Jianwei, Liu Yu, Wu Jiansheng, etc. I showed my colleagues at the Shenzhen Legal Newspaper many love letters that Deng Shixiang wrote to her during Chen Liangqin's pregnancy a few years ago, including the whole process of naming his son "Deng Ke" in his own handwriting; There are many complaint letters of blood and tears, including the indictment that Mr. Deng first sued Chen Liangqin and the text of the request for change, the judgment of the Henan court to terminate the two people's illegal cohabitation; there are many newspaper articles that Deng and I co-authored in the newspaper office... The colleagues of the "Shenzhen Legal News" were both shocked and angry after seeing this pile of iron-clad facts.In order to thoroughly investigate the truth, the newspaper immediately set up an investigation team composed of reporters and lawyers, and went to Guangzhou twice to conduct a comprehensive investigation and verification of the relevant content.As a result, they found that the content of the manuscript I collected and written was not inaccurate, my manuscript contained no falsehood or exaggeration, and the facts disclosed were objective and fair.After research, the newspaper office decided not to pay any attention to Deng's unreasonable pestering; if he wanted to go to court, the newspaper office would accompany him at any time. While I was collecting evidence in Shenzhen, Zhai Yongcun, the editor of Guangzhou Magazine, suddenly told me on the phone: "Someone accused me of charging you 4,000 yuan to publish the article about you by means of anonymous letters and phone calls." Article, the leader is investigating this matter! I also saw two anonymous letters suing you from the leader of the unit..." Needless to say, this must be what Deng Shixiang did! In the second half of April 2001, the magazine published an article titled "Adventures of a Reporter's Unannounced Visit to a Dark Den", which reported that I was besieged by gangsters armed with knives and guns during my undercover visit in April 1998, and finally escaped from the tiger's mouth with wit and bravery. experience.This was written by Zhai Yongcun himself.Zhai Yongcun is my colleague at Southern Metropolis Daily.She knew about my adventures a long time ago, so she interviewed me in a small hotel in Kecun while I was back in Guangzhou, and then edited and distributed this article, along with a photo of me; The colleague Xiao Li is Deng, but because Zhai Yongcun knows Deng's character well, he only replaces him with Xiao Li, and he doesn't bother to mention Deng Shixiang's name.After this article was published, it was reprinted in full by Digest Daily, and many domestic newspapers also reprinted it. Unexpectedly, when Deng saw this issue, he became furious. He not only falsely accused Zhai Yongcun, the editor in charge of the article, of writing fake news after accepting 4,000 yuan from me, but also, in the name of Nanfang Daily’s office and security department, published a report on April 2001. On April 4th and April 7th, he made false accusations against me to the leaders of the magazine. He repeatedly falsely accused me of being a fake reporter and of being the "new Jin Ruchao (the criminal who killed more than 80 people in Shijiazhuang in March 2000). ), repeatedly colluded with criminals to blow up Tiananmen Square in Beijing and the Nanfang Daily building”!At the same time, Deng was still waiting for a copy of my article to be published in a magazine, writing the text in his own hand, slandering me for spending money to publish the article, in order to "deceive money and sex, I have never been a reporter from Nanfang Daily..." In these two letters, the content is extremely Deng Jun left his own handwriting on the vicious "report materials" that lasted nearly 20 pages. On April 10, I rushed to the magazine office by the Pearl River, found the person in charge, Mr. Wang Kouqing, and showed him relevant evidence of Deng Xixing.Mr. Wang, who has a sense of justice, immediately issued relevant certificates on the two false accusation letters with Deng Shixiang's pen and ink, and stamped the official seal of the magazine, which became one of the strong evidences for me to sue Deng. What makes people laugh and cry is that while Deng used all means to belittle me, he also attached some relevant "evidence" touting his achievements. On January 1, when I made an unannounced visit to the rented house of Wangshengtang in Guangzhou, I was almost hijacked by gangsters and silenced; but in his personal letters to relevant leaders and news units and articles published on the Internet, he repeatedly falsely accused me of "going to Wangshengtang to find prostitutes, and then Caught by the Baiyun District Public Security Bureau..." I really don't know how he can explain this? Deng also used the same method to falsely accuse Wu Yan, director of the political and legal department of "Workers' Daily" and reporter Zhou Xingwang; My lawyers are slanderous... I was also shocked to learn that Deng Shixiang obtained from the office of Southern Metropolis Daily a copy of my ID card, personal resume, and family-related information from the office of the Southern Metropolis Daily. I made several copies of my ID card and made false accusations everywhere, and even framed my family members in Daye, Hubei, and sent reports to the relevant political and legal departments of Daye City many times to falsely accuse my parents’ residence of “containing guns and explosives. The house was built with fraudulent money..." The relevant local authorities investigated my parents' residence, and the accusations in the letter were all groundless.Afterwards, the Daye Municipal Legal Committee specially issued relevant certificates for me. In October 1999, the relevant departments, accompanied by the staff of the political and legal department of my hometown, visited my hometown three times around October 1, 1999 to conduct investigations, which cast a shadow over my parents and the whole family. My old father was very angry. Passed out on the ground several times. In June 2001, my father was diagnosed with "heart disease" after examination by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The investigation also made my fourth uncle's son, my cousin Shi Meng, sign up for the army and pass all the physical examinations. During the political review, he was disqualified because "the relevant departments are investigating the matter of Ishino". The repeated investigations by the relevant departments caused frequent misunderstandings and discussions among the villagers about me and my family, which caused extremely bad effects in the surrounding villages. While I was traveling south to collect evidence, several friends in Beijing, Guangzhou and other places told me one after another: a person named Deng Shixiang published relevant materials that slandered me everywhere on the Internet.I hurriedly checked online, and sure enough, it was another "masterpiece" concocted by Deng!All the content on the Internet is exactly the same as what I have published in "Shenzhen Legal News", "Worker's Daily" and magazines.While I clicked on the relevant defamatory texts from NetEase, I also found other defamatory texts posted by Deng Si from 151 other websites. Because Deng left my phone number and pager in the so-called reflections on the Internet, many netizens who didn't know the truth called me to criticize and curse me, which made me speechless.In order to preserve these online evidences, I went to the Beijing Notary Office for notarization in July 2002 in order to better preserve the evidences. In fact, as early as the autumn of 1999, Deng Shixiang took advantage of the opportunity of studying in Beijing to start viciously attacking me, accusing me everywhere of "being a spy, currently lurking in Beijing, trying to steal the national leader's review of the armed forces on the 50th anniversary of the National Day". intelligence". In early 2001, Deng Shixiang, who studied journalism at Renmin University of China for a year and returned to Guangzhou, used the aliases of "Deng Zilong" and "Paul" to sneak into "New Express". In March 2001, after relevant media disclosed his ugly behavior, the Disciplinary Inspection Department of the Propaganda Department of the Guangdong Provincial Party Committee and the "Yangcheng Evening News" once again removed him from the list.Later, the supernatural Deng Shixiang entered another "Information Times" under the pseudonym "Deng Zilong" by deceptive means.While continuing to swagger as a reporter in Guangzhou, he used the newspaper's fax and phone calls to continue to frame me in the name of the office and security department of a certain daily in the south.Even as long as he finds that relevant newspapers have published articles signed by me, he will follow up and send false accusations. Seeing that many "complaints" were ignored, on April 16, 2001, Deng brought the two authors of the "Shenzhen Legal News" article and the editor in charge of the article to court under the pretext of infringing his right of reputation, and made a big statement The local government demanded compensation of 1 million yuan for its huge loss. When I received his nearly 10,000-word civil complaint, I was once again dumbfounded that Deng Shixiang once again turned black and white in the complaint and attachments to the People's Court of Huadu District, Guangzhou. , made up random things, produced false evidence with confidence, and attacked and slandered me. Facing Deng Shixiang's arrogance and confidence, I realized that I can no longer remain silent like this!If I remain silent, it will only further fuel Deng's arrogance.I decided to use legal weapons to protect my legitimate rights and interests, and use the law to severely punish this unscrupulous and arrogant colleague!I decided to take him to court by way of criminal private prosecution, not only asking the judiciary to pursue his criminal responsibility, but also asking for compensation for economic losses and spiritual losses.Not long after I submitted my private complaint to the Beijing Chaoyang Court, Deng also filed a lawsuit with the Huadu District Court on the grounds that Shenzhen Legal News and I violated the right of reputation.While preparing for my defense, I decided to file a countersuit against Deng Shixiang. On June 30, 2001, I resigned from a newspaper in Beijing and decided to go south to fight the lawsuit with Deng.A few days before the trial, Deng Shixiang also asked someone to threaten me on the phone: You are a major fugitive wanted by the Guangdong police. The police are looking for you everywhere. A certain department in Guangzhou wanted to arrest you three years ago!If you dare to appear in court, the police will arrest you on the spot! On November 15, the day of the trial, not only did I travel from Beijing to Guangzhou to appear in court, but Chen Liangqin, who was an important witness, also appeared in court to testify for me!Ten minutes before the trial, I finally saw Deng again.I saw him carrying a very elegant interview bag, and his attorney, Liu Xiangwu, director of the legal department of Nanfang Daily, strode into the court with his head held high.It was the first time I met Deng in July 1999, and no one thought that we would meet in court. With extremely complicated emotions, I couldn't help but look at this special opponent who was close at hand. This former colleague, my friend who I had experienced life and death with, had been beating me around for more than two years. Wanton slander, has tried many times to put me to death.I saw him wearing a dark shirt on his upper body, a black thermal vest over his upper body, a pair of gray jeans on his lower body, and a pair of well-polished black leather shoes.Except for a little sadness on his face, his face was still as fair as usual, and his face was still as round and rich as before.His resentful eyes glanced at me through thick myopia glasses, and seeing that I was staring at him, he quickly avoided my direct gaze. At 8:30, the court opened on time.The presiding judge Zhang Wenyi, two female judges and a female clerk entered the courtroom and sat down respectively.Since both the plaintiff and the defendant are journalists, most of the citizens who participated in the auditorium at the same time were from the news organizations.When entering the courtroom, a bailiff conducted a strict check on everyone who entered the courtroom, and was not allowed to bring cameras, tape recorders, and video cameras.Next to the dock are seven or eight colleagues from Shenzhen Legal News who came here specially from Shenzhen; next to the plaintiff are a few reporters brought here by Deng, except for a reporter named Wang Daochun whom I know well. , the rest are unfamiliar faces, I can feel their hostility towards me. The trial begins.The presiding judge asked the plaintiff to apply to the court for the claims and the facts and reasons.Deng didn't open his mouth, but his lawyer Liu read out the long complaint slowly and according to the script.Then, as the first defendant, "Shenzhen Legal News" defended.The two representatives of the first defendant are both leaders of the newspaper, one is Zhao Long and the other is Liu Gangqiang. They are not only journalists and editors, but also senior lawyers and are very familiar with legal knowledge. Then I also defended, and refuted the plaintiff's so-called facts, and submitted a lot of evidence to the court.After a proposal to the court, Chen Liangqin, the main witness of the defendant, walked into the court with a desolate face.Everyone clearly saw that when Chen Liangqin entered the courtroom, Deng's face suddenly turned pale, and his legs began to tremble. His lawyer, Liu Xiangwu, also showed an extremely unnatural expression. Chen not only testified how Deng used his hometown and brother's colleagues to deceive her trust, deceived her from Beijing to Deng's house, and raped her in the dead of night, how she humiliated her under pressure She and Deng's illegitimate son, Deng Ke; and Li, who witnessed Deng taking labor, blatantly returned to his hometown to give birth to their son, and deceived her many times with sweet words.At the same time, Chen also showed many intimate photos of Deng and Li in court, as well as many original love letters that Deng wrote to her several years ago.Facing Chen's bloody and tearful accusation, although Deng Shixiang, who tried to remain calm, had to lower his head several times, he still argued hoarsely: I never knew a woman named Li. A female colleague of mine; Chen Liangqin and I only had a short-term relationship before, but we never lived together with her, let alone had a son with Chen Liangqin.When the presiding judge brought in front of Deng several autographed love letters he had written in Guangzhou to Chen Liangqin in the capital a few years ago, and questioned whether the content on them was written by him himself, Deng seemed at a loss. He had no choice but to admit in a low voice that he wrote the letter because he had been in love with Chen for a few days at that time; Still muttering unconvinced: I have never had a son with her, and I am still unmarried.In order to prove his unmarried status, his lawyer specially presented to the court a certificate of unmarried status issued by a sub-district office in Huadu District, where Deng's current registered permanent residence is located. As the main witness, Chen Liangqin testified in particular about two things in this case: first, regarding Deng Shixiang's rape of Chen Liangqin mentioned in the "Shenzhen Legal Daily" article, Chen Liangqin repeatedly confirmed in court that she didn't like it at all. Deng, he lured her to his home by deception, and raped her in the middle of the night with a drone.Second, whether Deng Shixiang cheated her feelings and lived with her and gave birth to a son.Chen Liangqin showed the court the intimate group photo of Deng Shixiang and her at the time, the related photos of Deng and his son, and provided the love letter that Deng personally wrote to her during her pregnancy in 1994, among which Deng Shixiang was his unborn son Several original love letters signed by himself.Third, Chen Liangqin specifically confirmed that she met Shi Ye through the pager told by Deng, and she just told me about the situation between her and Deng so that I could advise him as a colleague and friend; August 1999 In July, she saw Shi Ye for the first time after she brought her son to Guangzhou. She also had Shi Ye's girlfriend at that time; The "cohabitation relationship and improper relationship" referred to are completely malicious slander by Deng Shixiang. The second person to testify in court was my girlfriend.His girlfriend testified in court: first, I was there every time the defendant Shi Ye met with Chen Liangqin's mother and son, and Shi Ye and I just helped their mother and son out of sympathy and righteous indignation, and helped the poor mother and son; second, during this period, I and Chen Liangqin Ishino has always been in a relationship, and it is absolutely impossible for him to have a cohabitation relationship or misbehavior with any other opposite sex. This is just because Deng framed Ishino for exposing his scandal in the media. After the first defendant finished his defense, I immediately responded to the relevant facts of the plaintiff's lawsuit.At the same time, I filed a countersuit against Deng Shixiang in court, and demanded compensation of RMB 100,000 in total for my mental damage and other related losses.The court immediately accepted my lawsuit.However, when another defendant, Shenzhen Legal News, filed a counterclaim against Deng, the court refused to agree on the grounds that "it should be brought back to Luohu District, Shenzhen to sue".Later, the newspaper took Deng Shixiang to court in Luohu District.But what is incredible is that the Huadu court has ignored my counterclaim. At the same time, Deng's agent, Liu Xiangwu, the director of the legal department of the Nanfang Daily Newspaper Group, denied in court that Deng Shixiang had been arrested by the South. The Daily and Southern Metropolis Daily were expelled twice, Deng never had children with Li Mei and Chen Liangqin, Deng is still unmarried, etc... With the investigation of relevant facts by the court, the truth of the matter has long surfaced.The few reporters that Deng brought could not sit still in the face of hard facts.The afternoon trial had just begun, and they all left the court one after another.Despite this, Deng remained calm in court, and his words and deeds aroused the anger of everyone.During the court break, a young editor surnamed Wang of Shenzhen Legal News couldn't bear it any longer. He pointed at Deng's nose and scolded him, "It really embarrasses Chinese journalists!" Finally, when the judge asked the plaintiff and the defendant whether to accept mediation, Deng immediately expressed his willingness to mediate with me, but asked me to pay him a sum of money; while I firmly refused to mediate. Of course, Deng never dreamed that Chen Liangqin, who has always been honest, would go south to testify for me at a critical moment. Although he was furious, there was nothing he could do.That night, Chen Liangqin, who lived in the hostel, received several threatening phone calls from Deng; later, another man who claimed to be Deng's friend called Chen Liangqin's mobile phone, accusing her of being too heartless and calling her wrong to appear in court for Shi Ye. Testify that no matter how bad Deng is, he is also the father of your son Deng Ke.Half an hour later, Chen Liangqin received another threatening call from a strange man. Chen Liangqin, who was already timid by nature, didn't dare to stay in that small guest house anymore, so she hurriedly called my girlfriend and me for help.My girlfriend and I immediately took a taxi to take her to a safe place to settle down.Just in case, the next morning, I sent her to Shenzhen, and then took the train from Shenzhen to the north. On November 6, 2001, "Shenzhen Legal News" also filed a countersuit against Deng and demanded compensation of 500,000 yuan for related losses. Gu Liaohai, executive vice president of the Press Infringement Research Association of the China Behavior Law Society and senior lawyer of Beijing Liaohai Law Firm, specifically pointed out in this case: First, conduct the investigation based on the facts identified by the court’s effective civil judgment and evidence from multiple investigations and interviews. Reporting does not constitute defamation infringement. "Shenzhen Legal News" reported that the court's franchise of effective legal documents should be protected. The author of the article "Unscrupulous Reporters Get a Second Wife" (hereinafter referred to as "Wuwen") mainly reported how Chen Liangqin Knowing, cohabiting, and giving birth to Deng, how Deng liked the new and disliked the old later, finally led to the tragic experience of abandonment of mother and child.Before the effective civil judgment is overturned and denied, the facts reflected in the article such as the protagonist's "long-term illegal cohabitation" and "raising of children born out of wedlock" are very definite and true.Therefore, the author and the newspaper did not have any act of fabricating facts, and they were not at fault subjectively. The main idea of ​​the "Wu" article and the postscript of the newspaper are to uphold justice, protect the weak, castigate the ugly, strengthen the righteous and eliminate the evil, and warn people to take warnings, so as to achieve the purpose of popularizing and enhancing citizens' legal awareness.According to the clear provisions of the Supreme People's Court's "Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Right of Reputation Cases" that came into effect in September 1998, news organizations enjoy the "franchise right" to report on public documents and official powers of state organs. The "Nothing" article is a critical news report, and the issues reflected in the article are basically true, and the content that the plaintiff believes is insulting to his personality mainly comes from the effective judgment.Therefore, this case does not constitute a reputation infringement.Second, the plaintiff's right to privacy should not be protected.If the plaintiff and the heroine in the article are in a normal love or cohabitation relationship, it can be considered as a private matter that has nothing to do with social and public life. Even if administrative punishment is imposed, the media should not report it;败坏，长期与两位女子非法同居，并与她们生儿育女的畸形状况，是一种丑陋的行为，更违法行为，损害了社会公共利益和法制的尊严，报纸和社会大众予以公开批评、谴责，是完全正当的。因此，原告在诉状中认为侵犯其隐私权的理由是不能成立的。 如今，时间已过去了三年时间，也不知何故，我们的那个案子，至今都没音讯。 怀着极为复杂的心情，将满面憔悴的陈良琴安全地送上了北上的火车后，我心中的一块石头终于落下了地。但是我没有想到，更大的灾难却在后面等待着我……