Chapter 36 Another article: The Robber Who Stands for Righteousness

The text mentioned that Lao Feng showed me the case files, and mentioned the case of a prisoner in Hebei. Sa's tell - Lao Sa wrote that this person "petty theft or house robbery", which is more important? Hehe, the so-called Chunqiu brushwork is roughly like this. If it is just petty theft, it can only be called illegal, not a crime, but an administrative punishment.Robbery, obviously, is a problem of a different nature, and it is punishable by imprisonment. my country's distinction between illegality and crime sometimes makes people dumbfounded. In the 1990s, when the economy in Northeast China was not doing well, Lao Sa and a group of people went to Dalian on a business trip. People were robbed.

She was robbed, we were not anxious and afraid, but deeply curious.Because although Ms. Li has a baby face, she looks delicate, but she is a female engineer by profession.This time on a business trip to Northeast China, everyone is free to move around on Sunday. Another male colleague and I decided to go to Laohutan to see the warships. We were walking on the road when the man suddenly pulled me, "Look." "What are you looking at?" Looking across the road, I saw that in front of the opposite food stall, Ms. Li was holding a glass of old wine and a plate of crabs. With her like this, can she be robbed?The engineer carries tools with her. According to her personality, why didn't she take out a wrench and give it to the kid?

Only after careful questioning can I know that the situation is special. At that time, she was wandering in the square, when suddenly a forty-something old Northeast elder brother walked up to her, with a rough face and a strong physique. He stared at Ms. Li for a while, as if he had made up his mind, and walked away from her in the crowd. .Miss Li just wondered why this man kept going and insisted on fighting her way, this man suddenly took out a knife from his pocket, compared it to Miss Li's neck, and rushed over. Ms. Li was startled, but when she looked carefully, she saw that the knife held by this man was really cute, it was actually a penknife for sharpening pencils.Before she could react, the eldest brother shouted with a trembling voice: "One yuan, one yuan!"

... Afterwards, Ms. Li sighed and said that I really wanted to ask him, if I didn't have zero change, would you give me change? Looking around, the constant flow of people turned a blind eye to this, and there were still a few middle-aged men with red eyes walking around in the crowd, all wearing worn-out work clothes. Back in Beijing, when Anecdote and a friend of the policeman talked about it, the other party had a conditioned reflex—one dollar?One dollar robbery is also a crime!A dollar... a dollar, alas. This last sigh is our common—robbery, who would snatch a dollar? That's our old heavy industry base.

A pencil sharpener is not a murder weapon.The police friend finally found a reason to excuse the robbery. I don't know if this sentence is considered black humor, or if it is just grabbing a dollar. In any case, robbing a dollar is also robbery, which can be seen in the strict sentencing of robbery in our country's law.As the experts pointed out, the main crime of the criminal who made the "outrageous" donation was multiple consecutive home robberies. Even without the 1.05 million yuan, other cases added together would be enough to sentence him to 20 years. Donations after a robbery are new, but not unique.

There are cases in China, such as Wen Jianmao, director of the Xintian County Education Bureau in Hunan, who took part of the stolen money to build roads in his hometown after accepting bribes. There are also cases in foreign countries. For example, in April 1999, Japan's "Asahi Shimbun" once reported a similar case. At that time, a fraudster named Mizoguchi engaged in electronic bank fraud in Hyogo Prefecture. He defrauded more than 30 million yen, and then donated all of it to a charity that performed eye surgery for the poor. Mizoguchi confessed that the reason for doing this was that he was blind in one eye, and later the cornea was replaced with the support of this charity and he regained his sight.

The charity returned the money, saying that it could not accept unclean donations. As far as I can see, the Mizoguchi incident did not cause any repercussions in Japan, and it was basically regarded as an anecdote by the rigid Japanese. As for why the Hebei prisoner donated the money to the foundation after the robbery, there is no record in the document, and Team Feng did not say.You can make all kinds of reasonable conjectures. Anyway, Team Feng said that he has no problems in his whole body, and he has nothing to do with blindness, deafness and dumbness. This person not only has well-developed limbs, but also his parents are dead, and his six relatives are unreliable. This has become a problem that makes people scratch their heads when the stolen company and the foundation are in a lawsuit.Because the prisoner has a firm attitude, saying that robbery is robbery and donation is donation, which are two different things, so the company that was robbed should not trouble other people's foundations, but ask for money to find themselves.Because of this "righteousness" statement, this man has a very high prestige in the prison, and someone even beats the water for washing his feet.

The problem is that you are a criminal whose parents have both died and whose six relatives are unreliable. You will be sentenced to at least 20 years. How can the stolen company ask you for money?People should also consider their repayment ability when going to court. But logically, he really has some truth, after all, donations are legal.He insisted that this 1.05 million is not the other 1.05 million, what can you do? The attitude of the foundation is very clear: if the court tells us to pay back the money, then we will pay it back. In contrast, Chinese foundations obviously respect the law and are much more advanced than Japanese charities that only look at the cleanliness of money from a moral perspective.

A truly charitable organization should hope that as many Buddhas as possible, the better, right? Specifically in this case, the current problem has fallen on the medical appraisal. The court said that as long as the doctor judges that the criminal suspect has mental problems and has no ability to act independently, the foundation can be sentenced to pay back the money. According to Lao Feng, this is probably not an easy task. I have seen this guy before, and he is heartless. Lao Feng said that I think his mental state is more normal than mine-how normal is that, How normal. Sa Shigong said: Today people have a theory of two hundred and five, and ancients have a theory of chivalrous robbers. Who is this gentleman like?Hey, it can't be broken.

Of course, the relationship between Mr. Zhao and Mrs. Zhao in the work is only the difference between the prototype and the artistic image. When it comes to this case, the description of the case is inevitably exaggerated and concealed. These are all unnecessary to repeat...