Chapter 35 first quarter

My husband's opinion on the "Matsukawa incident" focuses on proving the innocence of the defendants, so the data used seems to be limited to the trial records.In order to prove the defendant's innocence, he only cites the court records, trying to remove the contradictory or unreasonable parts of them to reveal the truth of the facts, and this method is correct.For this reason, it is reasonable for Mr. Hirotsu to deliberately exclude data that are not in court records and that are purely hearsay. Mr Hirotsu said: "Checking the court records and the evidence presented in court, there is not a single piece of information that can prove that the 'Songchuan Incident' was caused by the defendants. Wu Ning said that there are many documents that prove that the defendants have nothing to do with this incident. People often question We, who are the real culprits? If we can answer this question clearly, it will not be difficult to convince people; this, we know, unfortunately, it is impossible to answer clearly at this stage. It is not that we have not grasped enough Some data to help people guess who the real murderer is, but that is only guesswork, but not definitive. In the article, I pointed out how unreasonable it is for the judgment to determine the defendants as the real murderer based on imagination. Of course, I myself want to avoid relying on Imagine who is the real murderer."

In particular, if inferences are made on the basis of "rumors" or speculation at will, it will cause confusion in the defense. Mr Hirotsu said the defendants were innocent.In this case, everyone who cares must want to know who the real murderer is.In fact, it is not that nobody has written articles speculating on these issues.However, after reading these articles, it seems that there is still no clear answer to this question. I also believe that all the defendants in the "Matsukawa incident" are innocent.I would like to explain this rationale below. As for who is the prisoner, of course I can't specify specifically.More than ten years have passed since the incident.During this period, all kinds of evidence have been destroyed intentionally or unintentionally.Compared with the situation when the incident first occurred, I am afraid that there are only a fraction of the remaining materials today; and only a fraction of them remain as the so-called "evidence" data in court, and the rest are all discarded. up.However, I think it is not impossible to make a judgment based on the few remaining materials or data, and roughly guess the shadow of the prisoner.

Unlike Mr. Hirotsu, I intend to discuss the essence of the "Matsukawa Incident" from this perspective. A significant portion of the data that existed at the time of the event has now been wiped out.One of the reasons is that the prosecutorial authorities deleted certain materials that were not directly related to the accused.For the deleted data, I think some of them were deliberately eliminated for some special reason.I say this because most of the deleted parts also contain some materials that can help to understand the actual situation of the case.In other words, I think that a lot of valuable data has been deleted intentionally or unintentionally under the pretext that it has no direct relationship with the current defendant.

Therefore, it is almost impossible to find out the bizarre and complicated "Matsukawa Incident" based on the few materials left today.However, even if it is impossible to specify who is the real murderer, it may be possible to vaguely outline its shadow.

---

Notes: