Chapter 83 "Never be an official and never withdraw shares" shows the disadvantages of coal policy

"I would rather not become an official than withdraw my shares." This is a private statement made by some local coal officials after their superiors asked them to withdraw their investment funds from coal mines run by coal bosses. Such absurd and hostile remarks are really embarrassing. big talk, Shame on you. sad husband!sad husband! This is an ironclad "rule": almost every mine accident is "almost" inextricably linked to "official coal collusion" or "power-for-money transactions". isn't it?Please see, those coal mines that were ordered by their superiors to "suspend production for rectification" yesterday are now in full swing and vigorously "Great Leap Forward".Driven by profit factors, some local officials give the "green light" to coal bosses' illegal behavior.Some even took the risk to support these people, acted as a "protective umbrella" for these illegal coal bosses, or were willing to be "pawns" for these people's illegal "big cause".Therefore, when "rights" and "money" are successfully "married" in an "abnormal" transaction environment, both parties "take what they need" and "marry" smoothly, a disaster that frequently occurs in mining disasters comes.

In this regard, an official of the national competent department once reprimanded: "Mine owners get rich, miners die, and the government pays the bill. This situation cannot continue!" The hard facts tell us that the objective existence of the phenomenon of "official coal collusion" in some places is already an indisputable fact.Especially in some areas where mineral resources are relatively concentrated, the local people seem to have become accustomed to this phenomenon of "collusion between government and businessmen" and "collusion between government and coal".

What's more, individual city and county-level party members and leading cadres and local coal bosses call brothers all day long. This kind of "black money" interest is very strong, and there are even some "sworn brothers" who used to be "sworn brothers". In the farce of "inserting a knife", they "cared for" each other when they acted specifically, and the two sides formed a special "community of interests", like raccoons of the same breed, working together. The "sincerity" of the two "loyalty" and the "closeness" of the relationship between the two parties can be seen.

However, in the face of repeated orders from the central government to divest the capital, some local coal officials even uttered the angry and wild words that "I would rather not be an official than withdraw my shares". This is really sad, really depressing. Behind the frenzied rhetoric of "coal officials" in some places "would rather not be an official than withdraw their capital" reflects the "common voice" of an alliance of vested interests in this "power-for-money transaction" chain.At the same time, it also illustrates the dying struggles of those who uttered these outrageous words with a guilty conscience.

It is best to have both wealth and power, because having wealth means having power, and having power can grab more wealth. This is the true expression of those "coal officials" who make wild words. And they are afraid of losing their official positions and losing their money, which is their real state of mind. At this time, they are just hesitating, wandering on the sidelines, and even taking chances. You must know that their thinking hallucination like a gnat may shake a big tree is nothing more than a mantis arm blocking a car!