Chapter 55 One question: Who is the "overlord" of "law enforcement"?

Surreptitiously earn "tickets" and live in fear. This is a portrayal of the life of coal boss Li Guomin. A few days ago, he had just spent 30,000 yuan to send away the county "new rural construction law enforcement inspection team". Then he received a call from the township, saying that the township "family planning law enforcement team" would arrive in the afternoon. He knows that these people are called "inspection and law enforcement", but they are actually forcing fees. "Oh, it's really unlucky. There is nothing wrong with meeting these people." Boss Li looked helpless.

In this regard, some people pointed out that the behavior of some local departments to "overlord law enforcement" is to some extent the result of a "mediocre" thinking. The main reason for some local officials' "mediocre" behavior is that they often consciously or unconsciously amplify their law enforcement power "self" in real life.Sociologists believe that power can only play a role when it is restrained, but now, in these "law enforcers", the general public seems to be unable to see "a certain restraint" on the "law enforcement power" in their hands.Perhaps, they have not been aware of this, and they keep saying that they are "law enforcement officers", and they often "charge" coal bosses in a "fishing-in-the-dry" style.

In fact, these "illegal" coal bosses in the market economy environment are not under their management, which means that these workers are actually the real "illegal acts". In actual work, if the law enforcers "amplify" their own power without permission, it will directly or indirectly lead to the "dislocation" of the law enforcement awareness of these departments.And in the face of these departments frequently implementing "overlord law enforcement" against the wealthy class represented by coal bosses, the local government cannot absolve itself of the blame.

We know that in the perspective of modern administration, the "administrative subject" is the "manager of administrative power" in the country.That is to say, as a government department, in your specific life, you must administer according to the law, and you must "actively act" according to the law. Special attention should be paid to the "action and omission" mentioned here, which is no longer a generalized moral obligation, but a legal responsibility in a strict sense. In specific work practice, if law enforcers fail to fully and effectively exercise their powers according to law, we can consider them to be passive "abuse of powers" in essence.In this case, the "administrative inaction" of the government's functional departments has affected the image of the government to a certain extent, and eventually led to a serious disconnect between the government's "administrative power" and "administrative responsibility".

Today, due to "administrative inaction" or "disorderly action" such as dereliction of duty, dereliction of duty, prevarication and delay in the process of "administration according to duty" by some functional departments of the local government, the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations have been lost. The lack of security has gradually become the focus of social attention. In real life, some coal bosses are often dragged to "take turns in court" by some "law enforcement agencies" is an example. In this regard, some people believe that the state should clearly list the "administrative inaction" of government departments as the focus of public complaints accepted by administrative supervision organs through legal means.At the same time, the responsibility for "administrative inaction" should be included in the state's compensation liability, and corresponding punishments should be given to the specific public officials who are responsible in a timely manner.

As a result, "overlord's law enforcement" is expected to become "humane law enforcement".