Chapter 22 Section 3 Guo Moruo scolds Dong Zuobin

After Dong Zuobin moved to Taiwan with his family and the Institute of History and Philology at the end of 1948, he continued to engage in research on oracle bone inscriptions and concurrently served as a professor of the Department of Archeology and Anthropology at National Taiwan University.After Fu Sinian passed away, Dong Zuobin took over the post of director of the Institute of History and Philology.After Dong took office, he still led the group of talents to do their own research work like he did in Lizhuang, and was not interested in the political struggles on the island and the political events on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.According to Dong, the existence and power of individuals are very small, such as what the former Tsinghua professor Pu Xuefeng called "a speck of dust in the void", or a drop in the ocean, especially as an intellectual, it is better to bury your head and do some practical things within your ability as well.It's just that the tree wants to be quiet but the wind doesn't stop. Dong Zuobin wants to hide in the corner of the isolated island, drink pumpkin salt porridge and do some research on tortoise shells. Come.

Since 1950, the CCP regime, which has gradually stabilized its position, out of a political need, launched a movement to criticize Hu Shi and at the same time, ordered all people who stayed in the mainland, whether they were workers, peasants, students, businessmen, or those who had ties with the Kuomintang Old officials and formerly free intellectuals who have no freedom to speak of must accept the theoretical education of Marxist materialist dialectics and the history of social development dominated by Marxism, that is, new theories such as from ape to man and labor creating man.This new theory is specifically divided into five stages of social development: primitive society-slave society-feudal society-capitalist society-socialist society.Everyone who lives under the red flag in the mainland must firmly believe in this model of social development and evolution. At the same time, they must also firmly believe in the undeniable and universal truth that "capitalism is getting worse day by day, and socialism is getting better day by day." The standard historical development law.Whether or not we are convinced of this law has become a "watershed and touchstone" to test "who is our enemy and who is our friend". ——Under such social and political turmoil, the newly established Chinese Academy of Sciences, especially the Institute of Archeology under its subordinate research on humanities and historical sciences, will naturally stand at the forefront of the tide of the times, fueling this law of development, making one The wave is higher than the other until it reaches the miraculous effect of "infinite scenery on the dangerous peak".

So, in the warm and cold spring of 1951, the leadership of the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Sciences began to organize new and old employees to spend a lot of time squatting in the conference room for meetings. In addition to criticizing Hu Shi’s remarks, they collectively studied the history of social development. , especially Guo Moruo's "Research on Ancient Chinese Society", which became a document for political study.In the continuous in-depth study and discussion, Guo Moruo's work was hailed as "the pioneering work of Marxist historiography in my country", and the author was also named as "creative contribution to the study of ancient Chinese society and ancient Chinese history under the guidance of Marxism". the first person".According to Guo's ancient history system based on historical materialism, the conclusion is:

The Shang Dynasty was an era when gold and stone were used together.At that time, characters already existed, but they were in the process of being formed, so the left and right lines could not be determined. Each character could be written upside down, and a single character could be written in dozens of ways; the production was mainly livestock, and agriculture had just begun; the social form It is a primitive communist clan society, centered on the matrilineal system, so there are systems of "brothers end up with younger brothers", "first concubines hold sacrifices", "multiple fathers" and "multiple mothers".The Shang Dynasty is the real beginning of Chinese history.In the Western Zhou Dynasty, the clan society was transferred to the slave society; after the Spring and Autumn Period, it was transferred to the feudal system; in the last hundred years, it was the capital system.Correspondingly, China had three social revolutions.The first slavery revolution occurred during the Yin and Zhou dynasties; the second feudal revolution occurred during the Zhou and Qin dynasties; and the third capitalist revolution occurred at the end of the Qing Dynasty.

According to Shi Xingbang, a young researcher who participated in the archaeological institute at that time, "the discussion was very heated, and Guo Baojun also participated in the discussion and wrote an article introducing the tragic conditions of the Yinxu people. This is a good material to illustrate the cruelty of class oppression in the Yin Dynasty. In the newspaper It was published on the Internet, which aroused the shock and attention of the academic circles. But at the end of the article, he wrote two very inappropriate words, "As for the facts, as for the relics, inferences should be made for the wise." It means that I am only reporting the facts. As for its historical meaning, please ask Gao Ming It is up to those who know the truth to judge. After reading this report, Mr. Guo Moruo felt like a treasure, because it was the most convincing material to explain the slave society, but he severely criticized the two conclusions at the end of the article. He said that he was holding a golden job. Begging for food. Mr. Guo was very dissatisfied with this criticism. Later, at the meeting of thought reform, he said it several times. From his words, we can understand the historical significance of his martyrdom. , not necessarily as evidence of a slave society, he is not yet prepared for various discourses and new things on the stage of social development. The effects are linked."

As early as 1945, when Guo Moruo published his historical masterpiece "Ten Criticisms" in Chongqing (Southern Note: Mao Zedong warned Guo during the "Cultural Revolution" to "advise the emperor to scold Qin Shihuang less, ten criticisms are not good articles") , once wrote in the postscript: "In addition to scientific methods, I also approached modern literature, philosophy and social sciences. In particular, dialectical materialism gave me spiritual enlightenment. I learned to use this key before I seriously I broke through the barriers between life and learning. Only then did I really understand the meaning of being a human being and being a scholar." He also said: "I am quite bold, and I often put forward opposite opinions to most of my friends in the new history camp. I insisted that Yin and Zhou were slave societies, and put forward more evidence and explanations.”——At this time, Guo Moruo was still able to tolerate different opinions and tried to put forward more evidence and explanations to express his own The doctrines of humility and creativity are not monolithic.He also respects Fu Sinian, Li Ji, Dong Zuobin and other personnel of the Institute of History and Philology.After the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, before the demobilization of the brigade of the Institute of History and Philology, several big names such as Fu Sinian and Li Ji often went to Nanjing to negotiate business, so they stayed in the house repaired by the Institute of History and Philology of the Academia Sinica.At this short historical gap, Guo Moruo, who was invited to Nanjing as a third-party representative other than the Kuomintang and the Communist Party to hold a symposium on promoting peace talks between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, visited the post-war building of the Institute of History and Philology and was able to meet Fu, Li and others .Regarding this experience, Guo Moruo has the following recollection:

The Institute of Historical Linguistics is the last entry in the Academia Sinica.Because today is the master of one third, I arrived early at two and a half o'clock. The Institute is being repaired, installing the grilles on the doors, and painting the railings on the stairs.I was led upstairs in the chaos, but Mr. Fu Mengzhen happened to come out of the last back room on the left with his shirt on.Holding a palm fan in his hand, it complements his slightly fat body, a bit like Han Zhongli in the Eight Immortals.I liked this informal gesture very much, but when he saw me, he let out a welcome surprise, hesitated a little, and went back to the back room.He turned around and put on an undershirt and came out.

——Why bother to keep track?Isn't it good to be shirtless?I apologize to him. Meng Zhen just smiled at his childish innocent smile.He just said repeatedly: It's still early, they haven't come yet, I'll lead you to see Jizhi. Jizhi is the nickname of Dr. Li Ji, who was the leader in excavating the Yin Ruins in Xiaotun, Anyang.I saw in the newspapers that he went to Japan to clear up antiquities. Of course, he just returned from Japan. After all, it is another kind of taste for people who are engaged in learning.Go through the corridor and meet Mr. Ji Zhi in a rather spacious back room at the east end.There were two other scholars who were also introduced, but unfortunately I couldn't hear who they were because of my hard ears.Mr. Jizhi's upper body was wearing a white sanitary shirt that had turned gray, and there were several holes on his back and elbows.Somehow, it was as if I had met a loved one.I have come into contact with the glorious side of our China. Compared with those party and state dignitaries who wear card jackets and tie glass belts, they are indeed more shining... The guest of honor met with Xiaoxu, led by Li Ji, Guo Moruo visited a few parts Antiquities excavated in Anyang and made a simple academic exchange.

Judging from Guo Moruo's recollection, it seems that he and Fu Sinian had already met and made contact during Chongqing, and he and Li Ji met and had a deep friendship when they were in Chongqing. The feeling of "meeting a relative" and at the same time seeing the "glorious side of China" from the other party, but this "shining" "glorious side" is fleeting.With the sudden changes in the political situation and the exile of personnel from the Institute of History and Philology, in the eyes of Guo, Li Ji, Fu Sinian, Dong Zuobin and others have also become "dark" or "China's shame".

In 1950, in the postscript of the revision of "Ten Criticisms", Guo Moruo wrote a special article "Lizard's Remnant Dream" on February 17 of this year, and publicly challenged Li Ji, Dong Zuobin and others from the Institute of History and Philology. Said: "The former Academia Sinica once excavated the ruins of the palaces of the Yin Dynasty and the tombs of the Yin Kings in Anyang Xiaotun and Houjiazhuang, and a large number of living people were buried in the ground for underground protection. In terms of tombs, the burial of a tomb There were as many as three or four hundred people. This is unprecedented in history. "Historical Records Qin Benji" records that there were sixty-six people who died in Qin Wugong and one hundred and seventy-seven people who died in Qin Mugong. Inferior. In the tomb of King Ur in ancient Babylon unearthed in the Middle East more than 20 years ago, only fifty-nine people were buried and shocked the whole world. It is even more insignificant. Such large-scale human remains are naturally slaves These materials have never been published, and all the relics have been moved to Taiwan, so there is no way to examine them for a while..." He also said: "We should thank Mr. Guo Baojun. The material he provided is very important. About the society of the Yin Dynasty system, many friends have taken a very cautious attitude until now, and dare not conclude that it is a slave society. With this information, I think there is no room for doubt. People who used to engage in field archaeology probably lacked social development Some people don’t believe in the class division of social development history at all, so they don’t pay much attention to these historical materials, or they are cautious about the scale of ancient artifacts, or they deduce the so-called “ Yin Li', it can be said that he is holding a golden rice bowl and begging for food."

The collation of ancient artifacts mentioned in Guo Moruo’s article refers to the actions of Li Ji and his disciple Wu Jinding and others. Scholars of this school had done research on unearthed pottery and bronze wares during the Anti-Japanese War in Kunming and Lizhuang in exile. In Guo Moruo's view, detailed measurement, weighing, classification, etc., are cumbersome textual research. Later archaeological circles specially organized forces to criticize the so-called "cumbersome textual research", aiming to eliminate the "trivial textual research" of the archaeological school represented by Li Ji. pernicious influence".The so-called derivation of the Yin calendar naturally refers to Dong Zuobin.When Dong was in Lizhuang, based on the information revealed by the oracle bone inscriptions of the Yin Ruins, the imperial work "Yin Calendar" was widely known and highly respected by the academic circles, including Chen Yinke, who was teaching at Yenching University in Chengdu at that time.And Fu Sinian said: "The books of today's Yantang, without the practice of class books, without dogma, are arranged as far as possible from the inscriptions that can be seen. If they are consistent, the work is as good as Mendler's beginning with the atomic periodic table. , and the matter is especially complicated" refers to this work.Following the publication of "Yin Calendar", Dong Zuobin compiled "Yin Ruins Text A" in Lizhuang and Qu Wanli. In 1947, Dong Zuobin went to the University of Chicago to give lectures. He put forward different views on the historical views before and after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, and clearly opposed the statement that the Yin Dynasty was a slave society.One of the passages says: The Yin Dynasty was not the era of the creation of characters, so we cannot study the social background of the Yin Dynasty based on oracle bone inscriptions. ... We cannot say that "min" is blinding the eyes, "minister" is obedient, and min and ministers are slaves, and the subjects of the Yin Dynasty are also slaves, so we can conclude that the Yin Dynasty is a slave society.This is very problematic.Is this the intention of creating the words "Chen" and "Min"?Even so, has it been borrowed again?The people of the Yin Dynasty were also called "people" or "people"; the people were one place, and there were three people, so why did they have traces of slaves? Whether Dong's point of view is reasonable or not, Guo Moruo has not responded for three years.When the Dong family went into exile in Taiwan, Guo Moruo, as the official of the new dynasty, stepped onto the political stage, suddenly drew his sword out of its sheath, and began to fight back against Dong Zuobin with a sharp blade. The article said: "Although Mr. Dong did not directly point out my name But it is me who is blaming me, so there is no problem. But it is a pity that Mr. Dong's closed-doorism has reached home. Although he is also participating in the excavation of the Yin Ruins, and he is excavating a typical slave society, he cannot find out 'Traces of slaves' is indeed worthy of sympathy." He also said: "Dong Zuobin only grasped one or two words, and based on his own hatred of the enemy, he wanted to negate the essence of slaves and the Yin Dynasty. The statement of the slave society is negated. This is not the attitude of a scholar at all. It is this non-academic attitude that forced him to go to Taiwan today to prepare for the funeral. I can fully understand this level." Next, Guo Moruo reprimanded in the tone of a grandfather teaching his grandson: "Who told you to look for 'traces of slavery' on it? It's so illogical! To be honest, a scholar can't do this. You must be open-minded, and you must experience other people's writings first, and understand others from a comprehensive perspective before you can criticize them. Don't pretend to be an expert if you don't understand. The result of pretending to be an expert is just to show your ignorance. Simple ignorance is okay The cure, as long as you read more books with an open mind and correct your mind, knowledge will be accumulated. If the enemy is added to the ignorance, and the enemy is very strong, as towering as a great authority, yes, that’s true. It is 'very problematic'! From today's point of view, the statement that Yin and Zhou were slave societies is indeed an irrefutable case based on the information I have come into contact with." Finally, Guo Moruo used dinosaurs and lizards as a metaphor, saying that the old, bourgeois scholars represented by Li Ji and Dong Zuobin, former historians of the Academia Sinica, "the era has passed long ago, and this and the era of reptiles are gone forever. Same". Although Guo's battle essay was not as powerful as Mao Zedong's later published "Four Volumes of Xiongwen" (in Guo Moruo's language), it also caused a strong shock in society, especially in the academic circle.As a result, scholars all over the world moved after hearing the news, and those who took the opportunity to compose poems and compose songs to suit their interests came in droves.His voice spread far and wide, and his momentum was so loud that since the founding of New China, he has rarely been matched among scholars in the academic circle.More good people, such as Yin Difei of the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, compared Guo and Dong Ershi, saying: "The reason why President Guo Moruo's statement is correct is because President Guo is under the guidance of Marxism-Leninism. Archaeological research is conducted on the theoretical basis of dialectical materialism and historical materialism....Dong Zuobin is completely opposite to this, he is just 'ready to be buried'' so it is decadent and absurd.Perhaps out of pressure or voluntarily, Li Xueqin of the Institute of History of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, while heeding Mr. Guo's fervent call, began to fire at Dong Zuobin and the deceased Luo Zhenyu and others, saying: "Although the research on oracle bones has more than half a century of experience, However, due to the long-term monopoly of feudal scholars such as Luo Zhenyu and bourgeois scholars like Dong Zuobin, the development of this science has been hindered." These bourgeois scholars actually did not make much contribution to the compilation of oracle bone historical materials. What they cared about was just a bit of isolated word and meaning, or the absurd so-called "Yin calendar"; , and even the historical events of the Yin Dynasty, they are completely ignorant." He also said: "The real oracle bone science was established by Mr. Guo Moruo. Thanks to the hard work of Mr. Guo Moruo and other Marxist historians, we have a good understanding of the Yin Dynasty. Therefore, in the current field of oracle bone science, “the white flag must be pulled out quickly and thoroughly, the red flag must be held high, and a relentless struggle against the bourgeois academic line must be waged.”In the article, Li also accused Chen Mengjia's "Summary of Yin Xu's inscriptions" on recruiting parties' course of basically plagiarizing Dong Zuobin's statement, and asserted that Dong Zuobin and Chen Mengjia's textual research on the age and geography of this group of recruiting inscriptions was "completely wrong of". In a series of gunshots, Dong Zuobin and his apprentices and grandchildren became "absurd" ugly people, and the respected Mr. Guo became the originator of oracle bone science and a great standard-bearer who will fly forever.Related to this, the "iron case" that "the martyrs of the Yin Ruins were slaves, and Shang and Zhou were slave societies" appeared on a large scale in the textbooks of college, middle and primary school students, and Guo's theory became an unbreakable cast iron cast iron case. The solid historical and cultural treasures that have been formed have the power to shake mountains easily and Guo's "iron case" is difficult.Just when the "iron case is like a mountain" and Guo's theory is as powerful as climbing to the sky, there are also a few thorns who don't know current affairs, or those with "granite heads", just like Monkey King who is crushed under the Five Fingers Mountain. Shrinking in the mountains and stretching out his head, he shouted a few times from time to time to show his struggle and resistance.Born at the same time as Wu Jinding in Jingzhi Town, Anqiu County, Shandong Province, and the two families are only separated by a river. Zhao Lisheng, who studied at the Department of Foreign Languages ​​of Tsinghua University before the Anti-Japanese War and was a compiler at the Compilation Bureau of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, was inspired by heroes such as heroes in the green forest in his hometown. Influenced by performance, facing Guo Moruo's arrogance and vanity, he couldn't help becoming angry, and wanted to compete with Guo. In his later years, Zhao Lisheng wrote a memoir called "Self-report of Lijintang". This book recalls the people and things he interacted with in short and concise articles.When talking about Guo Moruo, he first said that he couldn’t stand it because Guo Moruo slapped the table and reprimanded Tao Menghe, so Zhao wrote to People’s Daily to report the situation. .Not long after, the challenge with Guo Moruo officially began.Zhao Lisheng said in the article: The other conflict was because of an article I asked him to write, titled "Lizard's Remnant Dream", in which Dong Zuobin and Guo Baojun were scolded without naming names, saying that such people had to go to Taiwan to be "buried".This time, we are in a difficult situation. Dong went to Taiwan. It doesn’t matter if he is called a “sacrifice”, but Guo is still a researcher at the Institute of Archaeology. Is it appropriate to call him that?I asked if I could change it?Guo Moruo said very bluntly, "You don't like it, bring it back to me, other newspapers will ask for it!" There is no other way, "print it as it is".My anger got worse and worse. I was only thirty-two or three years old at the time, and I was so angry that I wrote three letters in succession: resign!Of course, Guo Moruo was not a vegetarian, so he asked someone to hand me a note: "The editor of the Compilation Bureau, Zhao Lisheng, resigned three times. If it is difficult to stay again, he should be allowed. Guo Moruo."In this way, I have met the two leaders of the "Creation Society" in my life, but they all ended in failure.I failed, but the spirit was cheerful. Born in the new era of "people's dictatorship", the ignorant Zhao Li dared to challenge the first-rank officials of the dynasty to make trouble. Like most green forest heroes in his hometown, he ended up in failure and left in disgrace. .Zhao left the Compilation Bureau of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, first taught at Shandong University, and then transferred to remote Lanzhou University. During the nationwide "anti-rightist movement" in 1957, Zhao was arrested and criticized by Shandong University and labeled as an "extreme rightist" element. During the "Cultural Revolution", Zhao was sent to the school-run farm in Shandan County in the Hexi Corridor for labor reform.His second daughter, Zhao Ji, a senior high school student with excellent academic performance, fell to the cliff and died because of unbearable hunger, and a female classmate of hers picked wild vegetables to satisfy their hunger.Zhao Lisheng survived a narrow escape. After Guo Moruo's crusade was "reprinted as it is" by Zhao Lisheng who was suffocating, he was quickly reprinted by "People's Daily" and other newspapers, which caused shocks and echoes from all sides.Under this momentum, it crossed the ocean and spread to Japan and Australia, and then spread to Taiwan by Japanese scholars.When Dong Zuobin, Li Ji and others heard about it, they were shocked and scoffed, and began to organize forces to fight back.In addition to Zhu Jiahua organizing manpower to write articles, in 1954, Dong Zuobin gave a speech entitled "Self-examination of Yin Lipu" at the 100th symposium of the United Nations Chinese Comrades Association, in which he responded to Guo Moruo's denunciation.Dong said: Recently, I saw "The Age of Slavery" brought by an Australian sinologist, Bainer. There was an article written by Guo Moruo in 1950 called "The Remnant Dream of Lizards", in which he scolded me for "Yin "Almanac", said: People who engaged in archaeology in the past probably lacked knowledge of the history of social development... He did not understand my "Almanac of Yin", which is of course.I remember that in the thirty-fourth year, after Mr. Fu Mengzhen gave him a "Yin Calendar", he wrote to me, saying, "It's a pity that I haven't been able to read it carefully."I think not only did he not read it carefully then, he has never read it until now; even if he read it, he might not necessarily understand it.Because he only accepted the "dating research method" and only took the first step.During the Anti-Japanese War, he had abandoned the study of bronze inscriptions and oracle bones. ... Only then did I understand why Chen Mengjia only copied my sacrificial ceremonies when he wrote "Oracle Bone Chronology" in 1951, and did not dare to talk about the calendar.This is also good, it can be regarded as giving him a chance to hide his clumsiness. Many years after this incident, Shi Zhangru still remembers this incident, and Shi said: "He (Guo Moruo) judged that the Yin Dynasty was a slave society based on the Marxist viewpoint, and he believed that the people buried in the Yin tomb were all slaves. However, there are more archaeological materials in the field later, so this statement is debatable, but that is a thing of the past. I worked on the burial group in Area C of the Yin Ruins, and the martyrs there were not slaves, but soldiers, which is different. He He was highly praised by the CCP and became a unique figure. He once said that the researchers of the Institute of History and Philology who moved to Taiwan were "begging for food with golden rice bowls" and so on." Shi Zhangru obviously expressed dissatisfaction with Guo's theory, but In terms of Shi's honest and honest character all his life, he did not ridicule or scold excessively. Marked by the publication of Guo Moruo's call to arms, the communication and friendship between Dong Zuobin and Guo Moruo were completely severed, and there was no further contact. In 1953, the second volume of "Yin Ruins Characters II" edited by Dong Zuobin was published in Taiwan. The book recorded 2,833 pieces of oracle bone inscriptions and included a large number of complete materials from the thirteenth excavation of the famous YH127 pit at Yin Ruins, which is of extremely important academic value.After the book was spread to the mainland, Guo Moruo immediately instructed the Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Sciences to reprint and publish it as if he had found a treasure, and wrote an afterword for it himself, but he avoided talking about the editor Dong Zuobin.The occasional mention of Dong Zuobin, which became known to the outside world later, was Guo Moruo’s letter to Yang Shuda, a former academician of the Humanities and Social Sciences Group of the Academia Sinica, the dean of literature at Hunan University at the time, and a famous linguist. The tone has changed dramatically from a few years ago. On September 23, 1953, Yang Shuda wrote in his diary: Guo Moruo wrote a letter... Yun Dong is a fool, and his words cannot be fully believed.It is recorded in "Tong Zhuan of Bu Ci" that he read Dong's dating research cases, and he was overwhelmed by the case, but now he is dismissed as delusional, Ding Tang is really wonderful! When Yang Shuda received Guo Moruo's letter, Mr. Yang, who had a serious personal relationship with Mao Zedong and kept in touch with letters, probably didn't realize that since Dong Zuobin had been "buried" in exile on an isolated island in the Taiwan Strait, the famous tortoise shell—"Big Turtle Four Edition" "It has been used up, "Hongmeng" has been hacked, and now the country has changed hands, and the subject and the object have been reversed. The era of "slamming at the table" is over, and the course of history will naturally be replaced by the era of "screaming at the table".Deeply enlightened by the spirit of dialectical materialism, and "really understand the meaning of being a human being and being a scholar", Mr. Guo Dingtang, who is the only one who has a great responsibility from heaven, can not become a "wonderful person" with a sudden change of color? After the Kuomintang and the Communist Party took control of Taiwan and the mainland respectively, intellectuals in Taiwan began to write some reminiscences and concluding articles in the increasingly stable political environment, while the intellectuals in the mainland were also writing voluminous ideological reports in the midst of continuous political storms. with political checks.The difference between the two is just like the Chinese-American historian Tang Degang said: "Taiwanese scholars are singing and hugging their butts-self-praise; while mainland academics are calling bastards in front of the mirror-self-blame." , hit the nail on the head. On April 14, 1966, the 30th enlarged meeting of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress was held in Beijing. Guo Moruo, who was the vice chairman of the National People's Congress at the time, listened to the report "On the Socialist Cultural Revolution" made by the Vice Minister of Culture Shi Ximin. I made a heartbroken review and announced on the spot: "For decades, (I) have been writing with a pen, and I have also translated some things. In terms of word count, I am afraid there are several million words. However, by today's standards Strictly speaking, all the things I wrote before should be burned. They are worthless. What is the main reason? I didn’t learn Chairman Mao’s thought well, and I didn’t use Chairman Mao’s thought to arm myself. Therefore, class Opinions are sometimes blurred,” and therefore should be burned entirely.In the end, Guo said "ashamedly": "In fact, many peasants have learned Chairman Mao's works better than any of us, much better than us intellectuals. We intellectuals, what kind of philosophers are we? , historians, what kind of family, simply not a family", it can be said that it is not as good as shit. Guo's self-deprecating and self-deprecating "little slut" speech, after being circulated to Taiwan through the media, once again caused a shock in the academic circle, and many scholars shook their heads and sighed.At this time, the "crazy man" Dong Zuobin was dead, and he was unable to make any further comments and shook his head and sighed. Li Ji, who was still alive in the world, made public criticisms in anger, thinking that Guo was a "talented man" and "very talented", but "No self-confidence", the reason why there is no self-confidence is due to the lack of "self-discipline" in learning.Later, Li Ji made a summary evaluation of Guo's ethics: "Guo is a very talented talent, but it is a pity that he has no bones" and so on.