Chapter 49 under shell (3)

In the morning, generally speaking, I always spend some time listening to music in my room.Music plays an important role in my life.Music is the only thing I can stand... well... what I need to put up with: my sister, my mom, school, Achilles Grandfernay, etc.Just as food is not just a taste enjoyment, and paintings are not just a visual enjoyment, music is not just an auditory enjoyment.There's nothing unique about why I listen to music every morning: it's just trying to set the tone for the day with music, and it's so easy, and at the same time, a bit confusing: why we think we can choose our moods, That's because we have thousands of layers of consciousness, and we have a way to enter the layers of consciousness.For example, if I want to write something with deep thoughts, I must enter the consciousness layer, otherwise the thoughts and vocabulary will not come out. I must have self-forgetfulness and a high degree of concentration at the same time.But it's not about "willpower," it's just our mechanical response to whether or not to act, like scratching our nose or doing somersaults backwards.When it comes to mechanical responses, there is nothing more satisfying than listening to a ditty.For example, when we want to relax ourselves, I will play some music that allows me to enjoy an otherworldly state of mind that is beyond the reach of everything, just like watching a movie: this is a kind of "transcendence" level of consciousness.Generally speaking, if I want to get into this level of consciousness, I listen to jazz or the slower but more effective Dread Straits Dire Straits, a four-piece rock band formed in Newcastle, England in 1977 , whose main style is classic rock (Classic Rock), has won many awards such as Grammy, and the 1984 best-selling single "Money For Nothing" (Money For Nothing) is its pinnacle. --Annotation (Long live Mp3).

So, this morning, before I left home for school, I listened to Glenn Miller, the famous American swing jazz originator of the 1940s. --Annotated music.It has to be believed that this didn't last long.When that accident happened, I lost all sense of detachment.It was during Mrs. Maiger's French class (she herself is exactly the opposite of her name. Mrs. Meiguer's name is Maigre in French, which means: thin.-Annotation, because she has bulging fat).Moreover, she also wore a pink dress.I love pink, I find it's a color that's been mistreated, people see pink as something childish and flashy, and pink is a very subtle and delicate color that's used a lot in Japanese poetry See a word.But pink and Mrs. Miguel, like jam and a sow.Anyway, this morning, I have her French class.The class itself was a chore, whether it was grammar or reading, Mrs. Megull and her French lessons could be summed up as a series of skill exercises.In her class, it seems like writing essays is just about identifying the characters, the narrator, the place, the plot, the pace of the story, and so on.I don't think it ever occurred to her that articles should be read first and resonate with readers.Can you imagine she never asked us the question: "Did you like this article/book?" However, that's the only thing that gives us a sense of analyzing narrative or story structure...not to mention , in my opinion, the literary thoughts of junior high school students are more open than those of high school students or college students. Let me explain: At our age, teachers only need to mention a little about passion or dialing to us. Things that touch our heartstrings (like love, rebellion, new things), only these can have a chance to achieve their purpose.Our history teacher, Mr. Relmit, wowed us in just two lessons by showing us photographs of severed hands or cut lips of people who had been arrested for stealing or smoking. sentenced to death.However, he doesn't show us in horror movie style.It was really exciting, and we were very focused for the rest of the class, which was mostly about human madness, not about Islam in particular.Well, if Mrs. Megull bothered to trill us a Racine poem (Sunrise Sunset/Titus Farewell to Berenice), she might find us puny teenagers so mature about love tragedy .But for high school students, it can be much more difficult: they are approaching adult age, and already have an adult sense of morality, they will ask themselves what their inherited role and position in this drama, and then follow When something goes bad, the goldfish bowl is no longer far away.

So, this morning, after I finished a boring French class, a literature class without literature, and a language class without language wisdom as usual, I had an inexplicable feeling that I couldn't control myself .Mrs. Meigel explained quality adjectives and attributives in particular. The excuse was that we didn’t use them in the composition at all, “You should have learned to use this when you were in the second grade of primary school,” “It’s really unexpected to see students with such poor grammar ’” she added, with a special look at Achilles Grandfernay.I don't like Achilles, but on this point I share his opinion when he asks the question.I think this must be mentioned.Besides, it is as inconceivable that a liberal arts teacher forgets to negate words, as a street sweeper forgets to sweep dust. "What's the use of grammar?" he asked. "You should know. I'm well paid to teach you," replied the lady. "But I don't know." Achilles replied, and this was the first time he was being honest. "No one has ever taken the trouble to explain this to us." Mrs. Megull sighed, with a "I Do you have to answer this stupid question?" emoji replied: "That's for people to speak well and write well."

As soon as this sentence came out, I felt like I had a heart attack.I've never heard such nonsense.I don't want to say it's "wrong", I want to say it's "literally ridiculous".Telling a teenager who knows how to speak and write what grammar is for is like telling a person that toileting and defecation is only possible if they have read about the centuries-old history of toilets.Nonsense!It would be better if she gave us some examples and told us that we need to know certain things in language to use language well, but why doesn't she do that? Grammar is, so to speak, a Preparation.For example, if we learned how to conjugate verbs, we would avoid the huge disgraceful mistake of not conjugating verbs at a social dinner (such as in "I could have come earlier, but I went the wrong way"). In the sentence " jai pris is jai prenu), or write an accurate invitation letter, informing friends that a small family gathering will be held in the Palace of Versailles, at this time, knowing the matching rules of quality adjectives and attributives is crucial. It came in handy, we omitted these words: "Dear friend, the original text is Chersami, the adjective is not matched, the correct spelling is Cherami., I would be grateful if you could come to Versailles tonight. Marquise de Grandfernay Yours sincerely." But Mrs. Megull thinks that's all there is to grammar... We know how to use verbs and be able to conjugate them before we know what a verb is.Even if knowing grammar helps us, I still don't think it's decisive.