Chapter 51 Chapter 50 Qibao Tower - "Hu Shi Pai"?

Looking at Eileen Chang’s views on red studies, there are many arguments that left a deep impression on me, among which the following are particularly important and prominent—— She has a deep love for Xueqin's original work. She falsely continued to Gao E, denouncing her pain. Love is deep, but there is no sound of positive praise and appreciation.Reminds me of "Zhi Da Wu Ming", she probably didn't want to take a word lightly.Because, once you make an assertion, it is "framed" within the range of that sentence, which is to belittle Xueqin. Therefore, her merciless denunciation of the pseudo-continuation, to the point of shocking the common people, just contrasts her incomparable love and reverence for the original work.

The original work and the pseudo-continuation are Diaogou, Jingwei, Yunni, and ice charcoal...This is her greatest principle, which must not be confused, let alone reconciled. This is also her highest character and clearest declaration in red studies—this is a kind of contribution, so she strongly denounces gangrene and defends the body. Her mind is extremely detailed, and her memory is amazing.After all, she is a female stream, so her textual research shows that she has the strengths and characteristics of women. She sees clearly that research and understanding must start with versionology.It is still unclear whether the text is right or wrong, so where does the so-called appreciation and evaluation start?This shows that opposing textual research and version research is ignorance of what "red learning" is about.

Zhang Ailing's edition study is not "Hu Shi's school", which is obvious at a glance.Therefore, edition textual research is not incompatible with the Hongxue revolutionary argument of "returning to literary creation".Her research is precisely for literary creation. Unfortunately, as a result of her research and textual research, she "dismembered" Xueqin's book and turned it into a "fragmented" Seven Treasure Tower. I don’t know if it’s because it’s impossible to do some research on the author Xueqin’s biography overseas in order to have a closer connection with his creative process, or she doesn’t feel the need to be connected?In short, her version research seems to only read the books without considering the predicament Xueqin was in at that time, so that she imagined too much the superficial "contradictions", which are the relics of her major demolition and revision.

In her treatment of redness, no matter her "face" or "eyes", they are dignified, serious, and serious, unlike some people who are not bright, dishonest, scheming, and scheming.Her character is noble.Therefore, it should be respected and remembered by people.It can encourage students to learn, and can heal the style of writing.This is also a great lesson for her. The most important thing is that although she has a wide knowledge of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign masterpieces of novels, and has a high "historical view of novels" commentary, she has not fallen into the cage of foreign stereotypes after all.Her research opinions and writing style still have a basic foothold, that is, she must have the corresponding cultivation and cultivation of the traditional culture of the Chinese nation before she can write articles like hers, which will not make people feel foreign and high-spirited Everything, always cite foreigners and foreign books to scare honest people.She understands Chinese poetry, and also has a foundation in ancient literature, which is something for future generations to think about.

Zhang Ailing's important contribution is that she actually admitted the "self-legendary" and that Zhi Yan was a woman, the "prototype" of Xiangyun. In this sense, she uses titles that confuse the eyes to create a great illusion.She said "it's creation, not autobiography", and after reading the whole book, she realized that her so-called "creation" refers to "big demolition" and "big relocation", and she proved it with this "creation" method that she thought was "final". "It's not an autobiography", but she also admits that Musk Moon is a maid who stayed with the author (that is, the person in the book is a real person), and that the Grand View Garden is the lost paradise that the author and Zhi Yan have been thinking about since childhood!

You see, how obvious and "hidden" her self-contradiction is! However, here I "exposed" the contradiction between the surface of her writing and the inner heart of her cognition, so as to distinguish the phenomenon from the essence, and let the readers suddenly understand what is going on.This is my joy and comfort. The poem says: It's hard to find out how to mourn for talents who don't stick to one pattern for a long time. A talented woman like Yi Neng pursues studies, and Chinese culture is the embryo.