Home Categories Essays Buddha is on line 1

Chapter 28 What does the old vest cooperate with me?

Buddha is on line 1 李海鹏 1475Words 2018-03-18
Stockholm Syndrome may sound unimaginable, but it is actually quite common. Two days ago, I watched half an episode of a war TV series about the night attack on Jinzhou.Amidst the earth-shattering explosions, I saw a piercing, a pillar, hidden in the flames, which looked like a cannonball.The female battalion commander is heroic, but she is overly nervous, because she has the style of an old sports commentator, no matter what happens on the screen, she has to explain it: "The enemy's artillery fire is too fierce!" The machine guns on board are firing!" "Look, the three platoon leaders are blown up!"

The director's painstaking effort is probably to use this to explain the enemy's strong firepower, thereby proving that the war is extremely difficult, but I don't think it is necessary to babble like this, and secondly, the line "blown up" is ridiculous.This is the same as a smart elementary school classmate of mine. He wrote an after-view of a revolutionary movie, talking about forcibly crossing the Dadu River: "The enemy's criminal gunshots rang out, and the Red Army soldiers fell into the river like dumplings. .” Also, I'm obsessed with that gangbang.You have to be professional when doing things. It’s okay to pass through once, but how can you pass through every explosion scene?Some viewers may not care, but I was alienated: Shit, it made me dizzy, isn't it just a firecracker?

As you can tell, the twenty-odd minutes I spent watching this show was not a pleasant experience for me.The name of the actress who played the leading role was next to me on the Sina blog list earlier, and it was quite popular at one time - before I was caught by them and kicked off the celebrity list - I asked people, who is this person ?People say that this is a very famous actor.I've never seen her play anything, but this time I saw it, mother, is this okay?The crying expression looks like he is about to kill someone.I wonder why in the vulgar Hollywood, every actor is so natural?Why do our actors never seem to know how a normal person reacts?

It's not just a matter of hyperbole.Exaggeration is fine at best, golden sound and jade vibration are also a style—unfortunately not.It was also on TV that I saw Xia Yu get angry, that was ferocious, and the opposite was a woman, and he had to bark his teeth, I think it's too much for a man.Even if he is the male lead, or the heroine mentioned above, the audience is still sitting in front of the TV, happy for them and worried about them.I have seen many people, especially the elders, stuck in front of the TV like a taro after work, being deeply attracted by the bad TV dramas, although occasionally muttering in disappointment, "This girl doesn't act like Ah!" I don't know how to explain this phenomenon from the psychological mechanism, I can only say in layman's terms that our cooperation is too high.

I think this is because on the one hand, everyone lives a rough life and cares about every minute of life, and on the other hand, it is also because they have never seen good things before, and there is no way to compare them, let alone appreciate them.I don't intend to slander popular culture from an elite standpoint, but I just think that everyone's life is too tolerant, just like a certain unfortunate couple earlier, although life is unhappy, but they are coping with it! This degree of cooperation is actually close to the Stockholm Syndrome.This is the worst kind of cooperation, which means that the victim has a sense of dependence on the perpetrator, and even assists the perpetrator in turn.This incident sounds unbelievable, but it is not uncommon.When encountering some things nowadays, peacemakers often call for "understanding the general situation." In my opinion, "understanding the truth" in social ethics in the past belongs to this case.There is no such thing as a high-level argument, but I just can't beat this twist-if things like "generality" and "reasoning" are common sense, they must be understandable by donkeys, so why bother to teach the officers and elders what "knowledge" and "clearness" are? "Woolen cloth?But there are always many people who, contrary to me and the donkey, believe in those nonsense.Of course, the goal of any force is to conquer the mind, and it is really natural for ordinary people to be institutionalized.

For example, if I criticize a TV series here, there may be passers-by who don't like it.This person may also be a little dissatisfied, but he still wants to flaunt himself as a sensible person, so he just said in a muddled way that it is not easy for other people to direct, and you can't direct you.More likely, why should one be so mean? Frankly speaking, this kind of person is too low-pumped.I'm just outspoken, but you like to pretend to be a grandson.In the same way, someone who is a taxpayer and has received poor public services will say "nothing is easy, you should understand" and so on.Understanding isn't a problem, I suppose, but where does your little self stand in the light of "what?"If the interests are often damaged, but you are used to thinking from the perspective of the aggressor, as far as the individual is concerned, I think the character is too sticky, but as a whole, I will marvel that the degree of coordination is higher than the wings of a skylark.

Press "Left Key ←" to return to the previous chapter; Press "Right Key →" to enter the next chapter; Press "Space Bar" to scroll down.
Chapters
Chapters
Setting
Setting
Add
Return
Book