Chapter 79 Who wrote the history in ten thousand years

Who wrote the history in ten thousand years Feng Tang When I was young, one of the teachers' favorite questions was, what will you do when you grow up?If you don't study hard, you can't do anything. My answers vary a lot, and there was a time when I said, I want to be a scientist.Later, I studied medicine, first in Biology at Peking University, and then at the Basic Institute of Medical Sciences at No. 5, Dongdan Santiao, where I studied basic medicine. I met too many idiot scientists, illiterate scientists, political scientists, liar scientists, and migrant worker scientists.The only one who has the potential of a master is a man from Chongqing who taught me to do experiments. He grew up in the laboratory like an experimental animal.He played with 96-well plates and eppendorf tubes, he separated various lobules from the brains of small mice, and I thought of Paodingjieniu.While running DNA electrophoresis, he watched a black and white TV with only two channels. A three-meter-long wire was connected to the TV as an antenna, but the picture was still unclear. To change the channel, he had to twist it with electrician pliers. I remembered Yan Hui's "one Eat in a basket, drink in a ladle, in the back alley."While cooking instant noodles in a 1000ml beaker, he muttered in a low voice: "The dog simulating high blood pressure at the opposite door is about to be dealt with, and there will be meat to eat again."He ate instant noodles in a beaker, smiled and said to me, "It's as warm as my wife's hand."

People like this make me short of breath. I have never had such talent in science. In retrospect, there is nothing more absurd than wanting to be a scientist when I was a child. My mother is also a person who is always calm when faced with major events. Why didn’t she wake up with a big mouth at that time? I? I have loved all kinds of translucent things since I was a child: lotus root powder, paste, popsicles, jelly, jade, writing, history, hands and faces of fair-skinned girls, and sorghum glutinous rice.A text, I can tell if it is rubbish when I weigh it.The good words quickly made me realize the hard work and hard work behind it, and my nose immediately became sore.For a good history, I know that there are no good people and bad people as soon as I close my eyes.In the final analysis, experience and opportunity determine achievement, buttocks direct the brain.

To use a metaphor, if time or human experience is concentrated together into a sausage, literature studies are cross-sections: good literary youths, in their arduous efforts to restore a certain era and a certain state, create a A reality more real than reality.Historiography studies the longitudinal section: how long does it take before another piece of garlic appears in the sausage.As for philosophy, I have never read it. I guess it is the study of time or why human experience is sausages instead of bananas. Chinese historiography has basically no similarities with Western historiography.Western historiography is more like natural science, which studies the general laws of the passage of time and does not care about changes in details.What it wants to explain is why no matter how big or small Cleopatra's breasts are, they can't stop the wheel of history, and why there is no Napoleon in France due to various political, economic and religious reasons. There will be Lunpolena, leading the French, showing their rare military exploits.

The study of Chinese historiography is microscopic and practical anthropology.If Ban stubbornly wrote the "Book of Han" of the Ptolemaic Dynasty, there might be such a text: Zan said: "The fate of the country is over, and it is difficult to recover with manpower. However, the heroine described Miaoman as courageous and resolute. With the strength of one person, Almost perfect emperor. If the breasts are two inches thicker, or the two thieves, Canides and Augustus, can’t bear to use them. Woohoo, what a pity!” The emergence of Napoleon or Lunpoleon, from France or Europe for a hundred years From the point of view, there is no difference, but there is a big difference for Napoleon or Lunpoleon's second uncle and fourth aunt.

Chinese historiography seems to have always had two major approaches, Shaolin Boxing and Sunflower Collection.The Shaolin boxers represented by "Twenty-Four Histories" have superb internal skills, detailed historical materials, good historical knowledge and writing style.What's annoying is that Master Xiucheng is okay, but less talented, just a boring monk.The Sunflower Books, represented by various unofficial history notes, are mostly temperamental people, but they often run the train with their mouths full, and the wine is strong, the wind is cold, the moon is cold, and the writing is cool. Damn it has become a science fiction novel.So, so far, the most powerful one is Sima Qian who first practiced Shaolin boxing, and then by chance, he practiced the Sunflower Collection.

I recently got Tan Boniu's "Battle against Tianjing", about Zeng Zuohu Li, the last batch of big figures in Chinese history who cultivated Qi Zhiping, and they finished reading it in two days on the toilet.For a long time, I hardly read long novels in modern Chinese, and "Zhan Tianjing" is a rare exception. Its greatest value lies in its detailed, appropriate, vivid and powerful explanation of the affairs between those people. Those who write the official history have practiced Shaolin boxing all their lives, and they are as clear as a mirror in their hearts, but due to traditional concepts and central document regulations, they just don’t talk about it.From a certain point of view, "Twenty-Four Histories" is a huge set of 3,000 volumes of exercises, without teaching references and correct answers.Zeng Guofan's long history reading is like a business school using case teaching to train small managers: "The way to read history is to put yourself in the same place. Every time I look at it, I am chatting and laughing with the people at that time." See what he wrote: "I read ten pages of "Twenty-Three Histories" every day, even if I have something to do without interruption." I often think of the days when I read English cases and chatted on the Internet at the same time.As for these matters between people, those who write unofficial history may not necessarily understand, and what they understand may not necessarily be free from personal thoughts. After all, they are people who have no private parts, and their thinking and words are inevitably extreme.

The value of Tan Boniu is that he inherited Sima Qian's mantle, stood between Shaolin Boxing and Sunflower Classics, and showed talent, without losing historical knowledge and straightness, the differences in starting points and the balance of interests between people.According to the words of the ancient petty bourgeoisie, you should burn a stick of incense, fry half a cup of tea, and listen to the autumn rain reading it under the window, not knowing that the sky will be white.Go to work the next day, and distribute what you have learned in batches to your immediate boss. Because of this, if "Historical Records" gets 100 points, "Zhan Tianjing" can get 70 points.

On the way to chase Sima Qian, if you want to continue, there are roughly three ways.The first is the most tricky, but the easiest to fall into the magic way: extract one or two core words, and repeatedly speculate.Successful examples include Wu Si's "hidden rules" and "the law of blood rewards".The second is to accumulate quantity. Sima Qian wrote ten books in refined ancient Chinese with implicit official history. Tan Boniu must write at least 2 million characters to explain everything clearly, right?If you don't want to vomit blood, you can only draw the sword from the palace.The third is to learn from Western historiography, fully summarize and summarize, and bring out our own system of Chinese studies.Sima Qian didn't do this. If he succeeds, he can get extra points, and the total score will exceed one hundred.Gao Yang and Tang Haoming's method is not just the way, the old cow pulls two or three carts, and it's just a fake name.