Chapter 20 answer "concurrently"

Abundance After I wrote an article "Pu Kong" a few days ago, I didn't want to talk about "and" Selected Works".The next day I saw Mr. Shi Zhecun's "Letter to Mr. Li Liewen" on "Free Talk", which also "shown" me, so I will say a few more words.Because Mr. Shi refuted my three items, I think none of them are pertinent—(1) Mr. Shi said that since "some new youths can have old ideas, and some old forms can also hide new content", then like him " The old idea of ​​"one limb and one joint among the leftovers" can also be left behind, and it's okay to write such ancient prose.Of course, if you want to write it like this, you can also say "maybe", and the universe will never be destroyed.But I always think that today's young people don't have to give up the vernacular and write, but go to read it and learn its grammar to write articles.As for keeping it and leaving it alone, that's certainly possible, but what's the harm in discussing it?Isn't Mr. Shi unwilling to "keep and forget" the clumsy grammar and lack of vocabulary of young people, as well as my "Ganjiu"?

(2) Mr. Shi thinks that "select scholars by words", and persuade young people to see that there is a distinction between "forced" and "contributed" with "Wen Xuan", and my ratio is not right.But I don’t know if Mr. Shi, when he was a Chinese teacher, would choose those with rich grammar and the vocabulary in “Wenxuan” as the best essays for students’ compositions, and whether he would also choose such works as the top ones after he became an editor?If this is the case, if you are an "examiner", I think you should use "Wen Xuan" to select scholars.

(3) Mr. Shi quoted Lu Xun’s words again, saying that he once said: 1, “If you read less Chinese books, the result is nothing more than not being able to write essays.” [2] It can be seen that you have admitted that if you want to be able to write essays, you should read more Chinese books; 2) , "... I thought that if you want to get old ones, you might as well rely on Zhang Zhidong's "Bibliography Questions and Answers" to find the way." I know that I have never objected to young people reading ancient books.This is Mr. Shi ignoring the time and the environment.When he said a few sentences, it was a time when many people clamored to write vernacular Chinese, and they had to read ancient books, so those few sentences were aimed at them, and he said that even if it was exactly what they said, they could not write essays. , but reading ancient books is more harmful than not being able to write.As for the second, it clearly designates young people who study old literature, and Mr. Shi's proposition involves a big difference in general.If we want to study the history of ancient Chinese literature, don't we still have to read "Book of Books" [3]?

In fact, Mr. Shi said that when he filled out the bibliography, he was not as serious as I guessed, and I think this is true.Let's think about it, if there really was such a young student who was ordered to be cautious, and after a lot of hard work, used the original grammar and the vocabulary of "Wen Xuan" to write and develop the morals of "Mencius" and "Yan's Family Instructions" 's article, "Isn't This Ridiculous?" Yet my "Nostalgia" was serious.I didn't want to "get more people", nor did I hate Mr. Shi for not recommending the sequel; nor did I have any other "motives", such as because I got fewer marks when I was a student, or the manuscript was confiscated when I submitted it. Use this to report personal grievances.October twenty-first.