Chapter 49 Oppose for the sake of opposing, knock down for the sake of knocking down (2)

After I became a reserve officer, after I was distributed, I was assigned to the 17th Division of the Kuomintang, which is the direct line of the Kuomintang.The commander of the Seventeenth Division was called Wang Jingxu, a colonel at the time, and later this person became a general, and became the director of Taiwan's so-called National Security Bureau.He gave an order to kill me.Do you know? My teacher wants to kill me.What is the reason?According to the information obtained by my good friend Guo Guanying, at that time the underworld found Wang Jingxu, the director of the Security Bureau, who was my teacher's head. They said that "Taiwan independence" used local gangs to grow, and the underworld's Bamboo Union Gang could serve national security and should not be suppressed. .Admiral Wang Jingxu said it could be considered.Later, Chen Qili and the others asked about the result of the meeting, and Shen Ye went to see Wang Jingxu again.Wang Jingxu said: I am the director, how can I casually meet with the members of the gang? They are the members of the gang, and if they are really patriotic, they need to show some performance before talking about it.Shen Ye asked what to do, how to do it.Director Wang said: Go and teach Li Ao a lesson.Their lesson is to get rid of you.Shen Ye and others told Chen Qili, and Chen Qili said it could be done.At this time, Chen Qili met Wang Xiling because of the director Bai Jingrui. He was the director of the Intelligence Bureau. His name was Wang Xiling, and the director of the Security Bureau was Wang Jingxu.The two surnamed Wang issued orders separately.Wang Xiling, director of the Intelligence Bureau, said that Jiangnan should be killed first, that is, the Jiangnan who wrote "The Biography of Chiang Ching-kuo" in the United States.Chen Qili and the others went to the United States to kill Jiangnan, and Jiangnan was killed like this.After Jiangnan was killed, this matter became a big deal, because it was solved by the Americans, and it was solved. It became a big deal, how could Taiwan send the underworld to kill our American citizens?This matter has become a big deal.From then on, Taiwan's public security units began to restrain themselves, the head of the Intelligence Bureau stepped down, and I, Li Ao, escaped a catastrophe. This is another piece of good luck for me.I admit: if you go to make trouble, you will pay the price for whatever freedom you strive for, but sometimes there is special good luck, and someone dies for you by accident.

The first characteristic of fighting for freedom of speech is: I want to oppose because I oppose.Some people say that your objection is irrational and wrong. U.S. Justice Homes, one of the nine justices, when a justice’s interpretation is approved by others and passed unanimously, he must vote against it, which becomes eight to one.In terms of legal principles, he knew that it should be passed, but he said he would oppose it.Why object?He said: We must let our compatriots understand that it is impossible to have unanimous and unanimous approval in the Supreme Court, and we must have the spirit of expressing opposition.Therefore, the spirit of opposition is more important than that of approval.So I think fighting for free speech, people like us, is fighting for the sake of being against.

I really like a cartoon, it is this cartoon, a painter must be down with.Beat what?why?He knocked down for the sake of knocking down.Why knock down for the sake of knocking down?Because this is one direction of true freedom of speech - to strike down for the sake of knocking down.I have talked about the cliff theory with you, this is the cliff, right, see if there is no such cliff?Looking at the cliff, it means that you dare not come to the edge because you are afraid of falling.However, I have given you an example, a person with ability can stand on the edge of a cliff without falling, why?Because those who control freedom of speech, pay attention, he is not our enemy, but they sometimes have different views from us.They keep saying that it violates the provisions of the law. Let me tell you what the provisions of the law are, and I will give you an example.According to the law, according to the standard of Germany, it is allowed except what is legally not allowed; according to the standard of France, nothing else is allowed except what is legally allowed; According to the standard of the law, it does not matter whether it is legally allowed or not; according to the standard of the Kuomintang in Taiwan, it does not matter whether it is legally allowed or not.

Why are there so many changes?It is the interpretation of the flexibility given to it by law.Napoleon once proudly said that his ability was not in conquering east and west to become the emperor of France and conquering Europe, but his ability was to create a "Napoleonic Code".But he added that if anyone interprets this code, my code will be ruined.This law is afraid of interpretation.Just now I cited the Kuomintang puppet regimes in Germany, France, Italy, the Soviet Union, and Taiwan. Their interpretations of the law are different.This tells us whether freedom of speech is allowed or not. There is a lot of flexibility in it, that is, if I say you can, you can, and if I say you can’t, you can’t. This is flexibility.We have to find out this flexibility.

Let me say it again, people and units that interfere with freedom of speech, they are not our enemies, but their ideas, their blood pressure, their emotions, their winning or losing at cards, whether they quarrel with their wives, will all affect this freedom of speech All standards will determine whether he should seize you, whether he should cover you with advertisements in TV programs, block you, and filter out your programs.Let me say it again, they are not enemies, but sometimes they can't keep up with their brains. At this time, we have to keep pushing, pushing, grinding, and fighting. Why?To get a chance, the chance to tell the truth, in other words, these are all activities on the edge of the cliff, to be active on the edge of the cliff.At this time, let's talk about a sentence in English for everyone to see, saying: Those who go tiger hunting (he went to fight tigers), should remember that (he remembers), there are tigers and tigers.People who fight tigers should remember this—tigers and tigers.What do you mean? It doesn't mean "tigers, tigers", that's not what it means, it doesn't mean "a lot of tigers", and it doesn't mean that.What does this mean in English? tigers and tigers, is "some tigers are easy to fight, and some tigers are difficult to fight", called tigers and tigers.

Some of these people who interfere with us and control us in terms of freedom of speech are easy to reason with, and some are not easy to reason with.Those who can make sense will make sense, and those who can't make sense must be adjusted until we finally make sense.Therefore, Taiwan found this phenomenon. The person who actually banned my book, James Soong, came to my house and felt that the banning of my book was wrong. If it was not banned, the so-called country would not perish.General Xu Linong, the "Director of the General Affairs Department of the Ministry of National Defense" who banned my books back then, did the same (like this). He banned so many of my books back then, and later apologized to me in public, saying he was sorry.They found out that if these books were banned, their government would die, and they figured it out.Of course, most of them woke up from the nightmare after they stepped down.But, finally figured it out, is a good thing.That's what I'm saying: they're not our enemies, but their brains need a new makeover.We need our help and push for facial cleansing innovation. This is a very important point.

Have you seen that recently the mainland customs have seized books on the grounds of smuggling contraband (printed materials) without a clear definition? Have you seen it?As a result, the "Asia Weekly" in Hong Kong was banned. The editor-in-chief of "Asia Weekly", my good friend Qiu Liben, Jiang Xun and Wang Jianmin came forward to sue whether the ban was right.How did you fight?The book was confiscated and reported to customs, and they won the lawsuit.This proves that mainland China's laws are not untestable. It turns out that this law will protect our freedom of speech.So, see, Zhu Yuantao lost the first trial, and he appealed to the Beijing Higher Court. As a result, the Beijing Higher Court issued a verdict in August this year, revoking the judgment of the Intermediate Court and the customs penalty.Zhu Yuantao believes that winning the lawsuit marks a step forward in the construction of the mainland's legal system.I won the lawsuit, but I will sue you if the customs randomly seized my books, how about that? I won the lawsuit.So I said, the results of our efforts are not in vain. Freedom of speech can only be obtained by fighting for it, and we can really obtain it.