Chapter 74 we should be nicer

In the message, I found some typical questions to answer.Of course, in order to comply with the relevant Internet regulations, I have filtered the exact words of these questions so that we can see a conversation. 1: Han Han, you said that the media took the meaning out of context, but according to my opinion, you haven’t graduated from high school, so you don’t need to translate it based on your English level. It’s you who took it out of context, or your English level is problematic, your The translation should not be taken out to make people laugh. Answer: Yes, I also took into account my English proficiency, so I didn't translate it. I copied the translation directly from Netease's official news and Hong Kong media.

2: Even if Sharon Stone’s later words contained reflective feelings, she is a good friend of DL, and it was only after she received the letter from Tibet that she felt that there was something wrong with her previous thoughts, so she is a member of ZD, she Support ZD, we should also scold her to death on this point. Answer: First of all, not everything from Tibet is ZD.I have been to Tibet, where most people do not agree with ZD, and the people there are also very friendly and honest, and do not want the motherland to be divided.We can't think that it wants to split the motherland as soon as we hear it is from Tibet, and it is a member of the Communist Party.Many people in the West, they don't support ZD, they just sympathize with Tibetans, wrongly thinking that Tibetans have been victimized in vain.But that's not the case.So we have to tell them the facts, instead of insulting and labeling and blocking all those who don't understand the real situation.This will deepen their misunderstanding and feel that we are indeed helping people who like to harm others in vain.I believe that if we are generous and realistic, they will change.

As for DL, if he does not engage in ZD, does not split China, and uses his appeal to make the country more peaceful and tranquil, I think it is a good thing.Although we don't know the real situation of a certain society that Sharon Stone mentioned asking him to help the disaster area, but a certain society asked her to help the victims, which made Sharon Stone cry for his own thoughts before, thinking that this would be a good thing for the people. She is a lesson, at least at this point, it will influence a person, causing her to want to help others.Wouldn't it be a good thing if a certain meeting or someone was always like this.

3: On behalf of the 70,000 compatriots who died in the earthquake, I condemn Sharon Stone, she XXXXX Answer: The living people are often represented by others inexplicably. Let the dead people rest in peace. You can't hold these 70,000 innocent lives that can't speak to show and perform your morality.In the face of Sharon Stone, are we really that angry, or are we afraid that the point of anger that does not show will not draw the line clearly enough?Why are we so much more outraged at a foreign woman than at the head of some engineering questionable school?I leave my anger and boundaries to them.

4: You judge the heart of a gentleman with the heart of a villain. When other countries are in disasters, I never think as much as you said, and there are no people around me. I am afraid that you are the only one in China who is responsible for the Indonesian tsunami and Japan. Earthquakes and 911 and American hurricanes gloated. Answer: Yes, only me, and I plead guilty. 5: I haven’t read the full text of Sharon Stone in the newspaper, but I saw a special commentator in the afternoon news wrote this today—Han Han accused the people who condemned that “S” for not having the patience to read the full text, so In the article, he specifically cited the English version of the "retribution" that "Sz" attacked the Wenchuan earthquake.Na "Si" said: "I am not satisfied with the way the Chinese treat Tibetans, because I think no one can be unfriendly to others. Therefore, I have been thinking about this matter, thinking about what to do , because I don't like them doing that. Also, I've been thinking about what to do with the Olympics, because they treated the DL Lama badly, and he's my good friend. Then there was an earthquake and so on. So, I was thinking: this Is it just karma?" I also saw that the newspaper reported that Sharon Stone said: "The earthquake is really interesting. They have been treating my friend DL badly, and the earthquake happened. I think this is karma. Now that they've done that to my friends, I'm thinking about how I should treat the Olympics."

Answer: These freelance commentators are kind of bad, and he reworked what Sharon Stone said to suit his needs.In order to stigmatize a person, they don't hesitate to organize other people's words according to how they can easily arouse public anger.In this extraordinary period, it is too easy to put people to death.As an authoritative media in Shanghai, when he wrote this, everyone felt that the paragraph written by Mr. Wu himself was the original text of Sharon Stone after reading it.Here, I paste the original text of Sarang Stone again, and her attitude towards the Olympic Games.After I read her original words, I think we can tolerate and forgive Sharon Stone.You say that I have no big right and wrong, but I want to tell you that this is my big right and wrong, that is, to seek truth from facts, and not to misuse your power of public opinion in special times.A country that takes pleasure in banning a person and resisting a thing is backward. When you find that the pen in your hand has a little power in a special period, don't keep thinking about using it to kill people.

Last time it was a domestic translation, this time it is a Hong Kong translation CEN Reporter: Did you know that an earthquake occurred in Sichuan, China? Sharon Stone: Of course I know CEN Reporter: How do you feel Sharon Stone: You know (my shift in thinking) it's an interesting thing, because first of all, I really don't like the way China is treating Tibet, I think everyone should be kind to people, so I've always been concerned , how can I think about what to do, because I don't like this kind of thing. And I have been concerned about what we should do with regard to the Olympic Games, because they (the Chinese side) are not friendly to the DL Lama, and DL is my good friend, and is the earthquake happening now a causal cycle?When you are bad, bad things happen to you.Then I got a letter from a Tibetan organization that they were going to help in the disaster area, it made me cry, they asked me if I would consider doing something, I said I would.

This is a great lesson for me, sometimes you have to learn to serve others with humility, even if you face people who treat you badly, it is a kind of evolution and a learning process for me. CEN Reporter: Should we watch the Olympics as usual? Sharon Stone: Of course, we can't isolate others. We should be kind, set an example, and expect others to do the same. We should do our best. I don't think denying the Olympics is the answer. We should be more friendly, and China should also If so. The only problem with Sharon Stone in this conversation is that she thinks we are doing harm to the Tibetan people, or her friend, the DL Lama, by isolating and doing nothing.She didn't know much about the former serfdom system in China's Tibet, so he had prejudices against China and believed that we were not friendly.In fact, we immediately became unfriendly to her. Her words were like a buffet. Everyone randomly picked out one or two sentences they needed to spread, such as "the earthquake is very interesting" "China got retribution" "DL is my friend , The Chinese are not good to DL", "I am considering whether to boycott the Olympics" and so on.

This shows that in our country, the seriousness of doing wrong things is sometimes far less than that of saying wrong words, and the condemnation of doing wrong things that kill a few people is not as serious as saying wrong words that hurt feelings. condemnation.Even if you are not wrong, or you are not wrong enough, we can make you very wrong through our own arrangement.We will not publish your full text in the media, because your full text is as long as two hundred words, we will shorten it to twenty words, in order to save space, and then we will use two thousand words to analyze the twenty words we choose Comments, at this time, we have a lot of space.The result of the comment is that you are immoral, we want to ban you for boycotting DIOR, you are inhuman, you ignore so many victims.And we are always on the side of condemning you for the victims, so we are moral.

However, she thought of helping others. Although she has prejudices against China, why can't we influence these people? Why don't we try to make them understand China better? Why do we have to push them completely to the opposite? Sharon Stone really deserved to die? Are you really so angry that you must deliver the most vicious insults? Do you think scolding her is for your own pleasure, or is it because you really think of the people affected by the disaster in your heart that you are so angry? Although you said that you will never watch her movies again, are you waiting to watch her good plays?

Why does our anger seem a bit like carnival? Why are there no words behind Sharon Stone in almost all the paper media in China?Is it because the latter words will weaken the anger of the raging people? Wouldn't it be exciting enough if the people weren't so angry? Does it mean that if you mention the grief for the earthquake and sympathy for the victims in the article, you will be morally invincible, and you can edit the words of people you don’t like to incite people? Is this called "national righteousness in the face of big right and wrong"? We should be kinder, everyone should be.