Chapter 80 80. Yu Yingshi is a survivor of the "Republic of China"

■Yu Yingshi, who was held by Long Yingtai. □KMT literati Yu Yingshi published the article "Forty Years of Contradictions and Tragedy" in the "China Times". At the beginning, there was a strange argument. He said: "First of all, I want to put forward the concept of the Communist Party's 'building the country'. I Do not recognize the proposition of the so-called "Communist Party's founding of the country". The founding of the Republic of China ended the 2,000-year-old central dynasty system and established a republic. This is a change in the state system, not just a change of dynasty. At the same time, it has also been recognized by the Qing Dynasty and the international community, so it is legal. The Communist Party has its own theory that it overthrows the bourgeois republic on behalf of the workers and peasants, but the Communist Party's "foundation" is just a new regime that replaces the old regime. , and the country existed long before 1949." What Yu Yingshi said was really nonsense.It is absolutely unreasonable to say that it is not "the founding of the country" but "just a new regime replacing the old regime". How can I ask which "founding of the country" is not based on the replacement of the old and new regimes?If it is just the replacement of the regime, China has long been there, so why did the words "Ming Taizu is the founding king of the country" appear in Yu Yingshi's other articles? (See page 79 of "History and Thought" by Yu Yingshi.) What kind of "country" did Ming Taizu establish?Even Chiang Kai-shek admitted that the Republic of China was a "subjugated country", so why is Yu Yingshi flattering?

■If it is said that "the 'founding' of the Communist Party is just a new regime that replaced the old regime, and the country existed before 1949", then it is fine, and so on. If the Republic of China does not die, the Qing Dynasty will The Emperor did not perish, the Ming Empire did not perish, and the Yuan Empire did not perish...all exist.What kind of historian is this? □Yu Yingshi said that "the founding of the Republic of China was not just a matter of the KMT alone, but was also recognized by the Qing Dynasty and the international community, so it was legal." existed before 1949".These weird words are inconsistent with history and legal principles:

First, the founding of the Republic of China has nothing to do with the Kuomintang. The Kuomintang was established after the founding of the country.Today, it is distorting history to describe the Xingzhonghui and the Tongmenghui as the predecessors of the Kuomintang.In fact, Xingzhonghui, Tongmenghui and the Kuomintang are two different things. Second, the Qing Dynasty was a regime that was forced to abdicate, and it doesn't make any sense whether it admits it or not.Zhang San kicks Li Si out of the house, even if Li Si admits that Zhang San is outnumbered, the fact is that the magpie's nest is occupied by doves.Zhang San is not justified because of this, and of course Zhang San does not need to be legal because Li Si admits it.

Third, as for international recognition, it is nothing. The Qing Dynasty was recognized by all countries. According to Yu Yingshi's strange logic, the founding of the Republic of China was also the replacement of the regime, because the country existed before 1912. Fourth, in international law, although there is a gap between "Recognition of State" and "Recognition of Government", "the Communist Party's 'founding of the country'" is consistent with each other. This is true in history and legal principles. The same is true. ■If this kind of weird logic and weird view of history is established, Yu Yingshi is a survivor of the Republic of China.

□Not only the Republic of China, but also the Qing Empire.