Chapter 40 Forty, Long Yingtai saw only one Peng

The "reason" is getting bigger and bigger, and there are more and more clues.It is strange to answer one thing that Long Yingtai did not understand. The answer is not in the Northeast, but in Taiwan.Let's go back and track it from "228". □This is called interlocking.What happened in the Northeast in 1946 was actually hidden from the "February 28" in 1947.Still look back at "228". ■Long Yingtai only quoted Peng Mingmin's "February 28", did he commit the problem of isolated evidence? □Of course it is.According to the "February 28 Incident Report in Kaohsiung City": "...if there are evidences available, thirty-one public and religious personnel were injured and eight were killed. Except for those who were arrested by the thugs, seven people were killed and the public injured. Of the five or four people, eight or six died, and for the rest of the unidentified, two or four died, and a total of one to two five were killed, and eight or five were injured." It is sufficient evidence that there were deaths of people from other provinces; and according to Chen Tong's "Deliberate Incitement on the Origin of Killing" "Liberty Times", February 27, 1991): "...(thugs and hooligans) even kidnapped people from other provinces and put them under house arrest in Kaohsiung Middle School. They were only provided with one rice ball every day. The situation was quite miserable..." It is enough to prove that the people from other provinces have been detained.It can be seen that what Peng Mingmin said is a one-sided statement. He did not hear about the killing of people from other provinces in Kaohsiung and only remembered what happened to Peng Mengji. "Meng Ji Interview Record", it was Tu Guangming who drew his gun first at the meeting table.Peng Mengji is definitely not a kind person, but this Peng is not the same as Peng, and there is no other way to say it. Long Yingtai should also know.As for Long Yingtai quoting Peng Mingmin, "After the 'judgment by military law', Tu Guangming was shot" and so on, it was like putting rouge and powder on Peng Mengji's behalf. How could there be a "judgment"?In the midst of chaos, will a villain like Peng Mengji give you a "judgment"?

■Looks like Long Yingtai was fooled by Peng Mingmin when he pulled out "February 28". □She was fooled because she didn't study hard; Peng Mingmin and the others were too paranoid to only look at one-sided history.In fact, this is a kind of "paranoia of the weak".Talking about "February 28", everyone spoke out, positioning the tragedy on the faults of the people from other provinces. To put it bluntly, this is "the paranoia of the weak."Once a person becomes "paranoid", he cannot reflect on himself despite suffering. In the eyes of local people, the "February 28" incident was 100% blamed on the people from other provinces.But I doubt whether there is a decimal point in the end—a decimal point that is 100% blamed by the outsiders, and the natives may as well reflect on it?For example, at the beginning of the incident, the anti-smuggling officers shot and killed a bystander by mistake in a panic. This kind of anti-smuggling officers should be dealt with strictly, which is right. However, the masses surrounded the police station and demanded "immediate execution on the spot". No official can fulfill the request.If they can't do it, they will riot, beat, smash, rob, and kill innocent people from other provinces, rape women, and throw babies to death. Shouldn't this kind of behavior be reflected upon?Can the tyrants send troops to land and kill indiscriminately caused by this kind of indiscriminate killing by the mob? Can the provinces be 100% blamed?I am definitely not saying that the Kuomintang government was right to cause and handle the civil uprising, but relatively speaking, the people in this province have reacted to the violence and disasters, and there is something to reflect on.However, until today, sixty-four years later, how many of you have reflected on it?

At the beginning of the incident, Chen Yi promised "punishment and compensation" and "not to settle accounts later". She had already settled down and surrendered. However, the price of people in this province has been rising steadily. Two, the ignorant requirements made it impossible for any official to meet them, and in the end they had to fight each other, which further caused tragedy.This kind of haggling without a reserve price is like the students in front of Tiananmen Square in June 4th, who finally raised the price randomly, forcing the other party to be unbearable and had to resort to violence.Now a family crying leads to crying all the way, crying all the way causes the whole island to cry, saying that you shouldn’t use violence, you see you beat me like this, it’s true that you shouldn’t use violence, but if you don’t use violence, what should you do to calm down the riots? What about riots?Sixty-four years, who assumes that, if you put yourself in that position, what would you think?If you are a veteran of the 21st Division of the Anti-Japanese War, I fought the Japanese devils for eight years and regained Taiwan, and the Taiwanese actually wore Japanese military caps, sang Japanese military songs, and picked up Japanese sabers and guns. Beating and killing people from other provinces along the street, this habit of subjugated slaves, won't I teach you a lesson? — If you were that kind of veteran, would you behave more rationally?