Chapter 19 19. What is the fundamental problem of Long Yingtai?

■Long Yingtai's fundamental problem is of course not limited to this one. □Long Yingtai's other fundamental flaw is that she is not qualified to talk about problems but likes to talk about them.As a result, books were published one by one, and jokes were made one after another.Talking about issues requires training, especially when talking about historical issues, you must have "historical training" first, and this kind of training cannot compete with the academic teams in front of you, because these academic teams have also failed.Although they have Academia Sinica, various universities, "United Daily News", "China Times" column newspapers tout and hype, these are all derivative parts of the "phenomenon" of Long Yingtai.No matter how cleverly this group of scholars set up names, beautify themselves, beautify Chiang Kai-shek, and say that what they write is "big history".That history is not very big, Huang Renyu, Chiang Kai-shek's imperial scholar, really stinks.

■Smelly shit? □Look at the works for big traitors ── "Mr. Tao Xisheng Jiu Zhirong Celebration of Birthday Essays" and "National History Commentary" (does Du Zhengsheng be the executive editor), and look at the "Chiang Kai-shek's History" written by Huang Renyu "Status", the whole article is extremely nasty, calling it stinky shit is not scolding the Kuomintang literati, but stating the facts. ■Are you being too cynical when you say you eat stinky shit? □Why dodge?We've been eating stinky shit.Decades ago, it was the old K brand stinky shit, and decades later, it was eating the old K disciples brand stinky shit.To be more specific, decades ago we ate Chiang Kai-shek's stinky shit, but decades later we ate it in beautiful packaging, whether it says "wildfire" or "big river and sea" on the wrapping paper, it's all the same.

■When people read Long Yingtai's book, they never expected that it would be graded in this way. □That's because most people don't have enough knowledge.Reading the "legacy" and "legacy" of the leaders of the Kuomintang is like eating stinky dog ​​shit; reading Long Yingtai's "Dajiang Haihai" is like eating rotten apples picked up from the pile of stinky dog ​​shit.One of the characteristics of a rotten apple is that you can't eat it, you turn around and you can't find a place to eat it.There is something wrong with it, yes, the problem is that there is something wrong with it, something is missing and something is more.In other words, even if Long Yingtai wrote "Phenomena", there was a problem, because she was not good enough, and she was just blind to "Phenomena". When she touched a leg, she said it looked like that.

■You use the phenomenon of "phenomenon" to dismantle Long Yingtai, and your opinion is really sharp. □ When it comes to "phenomena", it's worth seeing.Long Yingtai is best at writing "phenomena", while Long Yingtai is worst at writing "phenomena"—a "phenomenon" like a blind man touching an image.She doesn't know how to interpret "reasons" and she doesn't know how to uphold justice. She also likes to make sarcastic comments, blaming "Chinese people why aren't you angry".Long Yingtai can only write "phenomena" but not "causes" because she doesn't know "causes".What's more serious is that viewing the "remnant mountains and rivers" as "big rivers and seas" even misses the "phenomenon".It is obvious that there are "remnants of mountains and water", so how come "big rivers and seas"?It can be seen that even the "phenomenon" she observed was wrong.Because she is too blind, like a blind man touching an elephant.