Chapter 43 Issues of New China Construction (Excerpt) (October-November 1911)

narrative In the past ten years in China, if the houses were dilapidated on the swamps, there would be no great order unless there was a great chaos, as this five-foot boy can know.The whole country gathered to respond to the incident in Wuhan. This is in line with the requirements of the current situation, and it is in line with the psychology of the people of the whole country.It is the feeling of voice and breath, which can be cured both at home and abroad unexpectedly.Today, more than half of the work of destruction has been done.From now on, what the current situation requires is the great cause of building a new China.However, the difficulty of this industry is so great that it has never been determined in the past. This cannot be determined by the intelligence of one or two people.Qichao's knowledge and talents are not enough to say this. Gu also tried to accumulate ten years of research and research, and after a month of hard thinking, the big problems that hang in most people's minds are extremely difficult and have the courage to solve them. Those who speak, there are also those who dare not make a decision.I will raise the income clauses to quality the citizens.I will see more in the future, and I will continue to publish it.

Xinhai September Author's Recognition ... Part Two: The Problem of the Regal Republic and the Democratic Republic In the future, the new China should adopt a republican form of government, which has almost become the public opinion of the majority.Gu and others are republics, and their types vary widely. Our country will ensure what is suitable for it. It is necessary to observe its interests and choose carefully. The first type is a republic in which the people publicly elect a general and the general holds administrative real power.The most prominent of this republic is the United States.Central and South American republics belong to this category.

The second type is a republic in which the Congress publicly elects a general who has no responsibility for the general.France is also.The French general is elected by the upper and lower chambers, unlike the United States, which is elected by the people.And its status is completely different from that of the United States. It is similar to the monarch of the United Kingdom. It does not bear political responsibilities, and the power is in the cabinet.Therefore, the election of a general in the United States is extremely competitive; the change of a general in France is far less sensational than the change of cabinet.

The third type is a republic in which the people elect a general for life.It was done in the Augustinian era in Rome and the Napoleon era in France.These are all the ladders of tyrants, not the right track of the republic, and there are no examples in this world.However, in the era of Mexico's Dias, he was re-elected for more than 20 years, and he was almost lifetime.Those who practice this system, although the name is a republic, are actually the most dramatic autocracy. The fourth type is a republic without a head.Such as the Swiss Confederation is.The head of state of Switzerland is a collegiate body, not a dictatorial body.The highest organ in Switzerland is the Senate, which consists of seven members. One of them is elected as the speaker. Externally, the speaker acts in the name of the speaker. However, the speaker and the other six have equal powers.

The fifth type is a republic with a false monarch.UK is also.The British always call themselves the United Kingdom of Great Britain (Great British United Kingdom), or call themselves the Republic (Public Kingdom).Its name is no different from beauty, and ordinary people may be surprised to hear it without saying a word.I don't know that there is a king in Yingzhi, but he thinks it is an ornament without the slightest real power. He is called sacred and equal to an idol.Therefore, when discussing the political system, Heng Yiying was included as one of the republics.Later, Belgium compiled this intention into a written constitution, and many small states in Europe followed it.Therefore, ninety-nine countries in Europe today belong to the republic of the false monarch, and the name of the province is called the republic of the false monarch.

The sixth type is the republican government in which honorary officials are falsely appointed.The same applies to the self-governing colonies of the British, such as Canada, Australia, and South Africa.Although these names belong to vassals, they are actually a country by themselves, and the governor placed by the British court has the same status as the British king.The legal scholars of the old country unified their eyes as a republic. Among the six types of republics on the right, the ones most familiar to Chinese people are those of the United States and France; the ones that are especially desirable are the American ones.In fact, each of the six has its own strengths, and the choice of a latecomer country to emulate should be based on the situation that suits its own country.As for the sixth type, it cannot be used in a completely independent country. Unless our country adopts a federal system to apply to all states (that is, the provinces today), there is room for discussion, so let's not talk about it now.Please take the first five to compare their benefits:

First, what about a republic in which the people elect a general for life?The most disgusting thing about this republic.Why?All other types are republican constitutional regimes, but this one is a republican autocracy.It is said that this kind of political system can be adopted, and the people will spit on me.Although, Xi Zhe has a constant saying: "There is no absolute beauty in politics. It cannot be said that constitutionalism must be beautiful, but autocracy must be evil." In any country with such a political system, the person who is elected as the lifelong commander must be a man of great talent. Strange heroes, the inside implements an enlightened autocracy to order the people, and the outside promotes the country's prestige in the world.If China has its own people today, they are the ones who are most suitable for the requirements of the current situation.Although, this person can be met but not sought.If it is there, then he can take it himself, and there is no need for our generation to discuss it, so it can be left alone.And the final result of this kind of government will be an absolute monarchy.The fruit becomes the cause, and the cause regenerates the fruit, which will lead to the second revolution.The father of Mo, Yashi, is also the author of the most recent evidence.Therefore, if there is such a person in our country, it will be enough to save the time; if there is no such person, it will be a blessing to the country.Or say: In order to prevent the disadvantages of disputes in the election of the chief commander, it seems to be the same way to appoint a Chinese material as the lifelong chief, making it irresponsible like the French system.The answer is: This is almost impossible.The head of state of a country is always in the same heart.The hereditary monarch is regarded as a matter of course, so it may not be surprising that he is a child.

Second, what about a republic without a head? Only a very small country like Switzerland can do this without harm.All the central organs in Switzerland have very weak powers, and the Congress does not dare to decide arbitrarily on some major bills, so they have to put them to the people's vote, not only the executive organs.It is an eternally neutral country with no external aggression, while the interior is narrow and the people are few, and the practice of self-government is very complete, and there is no strong government.In our country today, we must have a very strong central government, how can we be a country?However, using a collegial body as the head of a country is a powerful way. On the contrary, it is useless and cannot be debated.

Third, what about a republic in which the people publicly elect a general and the general holds administrative power? After the independence of the United States of America from Britain, the new political system created according to Montesquieu's theory of three powers is the most envied by our people.Most of the republics known to ordinary people are only of this type.Although, this can be said to be the worst of all kinds of republics, it can only be practiced in a federal state, and it must not be practiced in a single country; only the Americans can use it, but no one else can use it.If our country rashly wants to follow it, it will not only fail to bring order, but will inevitably lead to chaos.Please explain why:

First, in every constitutional state, under the head of state, there must be an executive government, which is responsible for the legislative government, and the two governments are mutually beneficial, and the governance is healthy.The United States alone is not the case.He is also the Minister of State who is in charge of the government, but he is responsible for the subordinates of the commander-in-chief, not the parliament, because their systems are different.But is the chief executive who is the chief executive also responsible to the parliament?Said: No no.The parliament is elected by the people, and the general is elected by the people, and those who receive the same are the same, and they cannot be opposed to each other.Therefore, the U.S. government is really a government without responsibility, and it is the opposite of the so-called responsible cabinet in European constitutional countries.So what is he doing and not becoming autocratic?In the federal state of the United States government, most of the power is reserved by the state governments, and there are very few who give up their love to the central government.And that is to say, in this tiny regime, all the legislative power is in the two chambers, and the executive government has the right to make proposals and the right not to adjudicate, but neither.The remaining important part of the executive power is still restricted by the House of Lords.Therefore, the U.S. executive government has the narrowest authority and the most fragile power.my country wants to follow Peter?It must also be like that who broadly endows political power in the Federation and strictly draws boundaries between the two chambers, leaving the government with little room for maneuver and few disadvantages.And let me ask, is this kind of government really suitable for today's China?Today Rutherford and his generation are clamoring for the public every day, that is to say, they want to change this system instead of building a strong government.I've seen it all too well, would I rather follow through?

Second, how about using this system to give the general a wide range of authority?Said: It is possible, but the trend will inevitably return to autocracy. This is most visible in the Central and South American countries.Those countries all took the written constitution of the United States to build a country. As the name suggests, it is a democratic republic, and the people's haggard tyranny is worse than an autocratic monarchy.It is the one that our people can remember the most, and it should be like Dias, the leader of Mexico who was deposed a few months ago.He has ruled Mexico for thirty years, and Louis XIV and Napoleon have not been able to act like one of them.Other countries in Central and South America are all like ears.The constitutions of the other countries are of the same line as the United States, and if the result is the opposite, why?Most of American politics comes from the federal states; while other countries are all concentrated in the central government, where the power is concentrated, and other agencies do not ask their responsibilities.Today, the constitution of our new republic will be purely effective for the United States of America?Then the authority of the government is too narrow, which is not suitable for the current situation; will it follow the example of Central America and South America?If the power of the government is too high, it will return to autocracy.Therefore, there is really no one way to apply the legal system of the United States to our country. Third, I have repeatedly said that I hope to have a strong government, but if the American legal system is adopted, a strong government is suitable as a medium for continuing the revolution.In the countries of Central America and South America, revolutionary tragedies have occurred almost every year, and those who have heard about this country can know it.Just like in Mexico, Gedias of Madero was replaced as the great commander, three months ago; now Bharara has risen again and replaced Madero, plundering half of Germany, forcing Mojing to demand subjugation. bit carry on.It is true that the Latin nations are inferior and cannot use constitutional government. However, there are quite a few constitutional states among the Latin nations in Europe, so why is the emergency not as serious as the others?The source of this is partly due to poor legislation, which must be investigated.In European countries, there is a head of state who is above the government, and the government is responsible to the Congress. If the people are not in the government, the government will resign.The government changes too frequently, although it is not a blessing for the country, but it still does not disrupt order and endanger the foundation of the country.In the American countries, the general is the head of the executive government, and the term of office is fixed, and the disobedience of the parliament is not regarded as advance or retreat; the people are not in the government, so why not give up the revolution?It is the most dangerous thing in the world to be the head of state and the head of the administrative department in one person.This is the reason why absolute monarchies are prone to produce revolutionaries, and this is also the reason why American republics and democracies are likely to produce revolutionaries.That's why the European-style constitution has a round body, and the American-style constitution has a square style; the European-style constitution is flexible, and the American-style constitution is dead.And the mechanism of their differences is all here.I hope that those who are obsessed with the constitution of the world will just blindly say what I say; I hope that those who have the responsibility of compiling the constitution in the future will choose carefully, and do not rush to imitate it, and bring infinite sorrow to the country. Fourth, the general public regards France's move as a great leader, and its solemnity only regards its members as a little bit higher.The United States has a large-scale leadership, but the two parties are weak, the whole country is in an uproar, several types of martial law, bribery, and more than 100 billion yuan.In the case of Central America and South America, every re-election does not or does not kill people, and it cannot be won without a heavy army.Etc. is a democratic republic, but the distance between each other is like the other, and the reason is conceivable.The ruler of the law is all imitated by the monarchs of European countries. He does not practice politics himself to be responsible. It is called sacred and inviolable.To put it bluntly, it is a useless ornament, and one person cannot be used directly, and one person cannot be directly administered.Not so in the Americas.Although the power of the United States to run the government is narrow, the officials under its jurisdiction are all under the command of the Grand Commander. Although the Constitution stipulates that the consent of the Senate must be obtained, in fact, the Grand Commander exclusively acts.Therefore, every time there is a re-election of the general, if the successor is not his party, he will go up to the cabinet ministers, down to arrest postal porters and customs inspectors.Although the candidate for the Grand Commander may be a grand duke, there are too many people who are climbing the scales and wings, and they are forced to do it in a fierce and despicable way.Fortunately, the United States was built by the Puritans. Its morals are more beautiful, and the practice of self-government is very complete.Otherwise, how can it be different from those in Central and South America?In Central and South America, the power of the great commander is more respected, and the people's desire for it is more serious, and the people lack the quality of self-government, lack the training of political parties, and they are constantly fighting. Xiangtu, the country will sink forever, and it will not be able to extricate itself after many calamities.Alas!The people of our country want to imitate the United States, and I am afraid that this disaster will flood my Shenzhou.The power of other countries is only one county compared to mine, and its head of state is a little smaller than mine in ancient times, and the fierce battle is just like that.If this seat is decided by a vote of 400 million people, and then the heads of the provinces and the federation are also decided by this law, what is the proportion of the tragedy?Thinking of this, it can be chilling. I know that those who hear my words will look at them sharply with the sword and say, "Who are you?"He dared to insult the people.How do you know that our people are not as good as those in North America, but you compare them to Central America and South America?My husband does not dare to insult the people, but he dares to flatter the people face to face.The United Kingdom and the United States, played by the Teutonic nation, are the most self-governing, the best at training political parties, and the most capable of political struggles for order. No country in the world can possibly match them.It is public opinion in this world.It is deceitful to say that our people can compete with their appearance and deeds.How can self-deception be taken?I heard from the side that the gentlemen in the first incident in Wuhan are quite comparable, and they have the style of Zhao Quelian. This is a very gratifying phenomenon.However, I heard that I should discuss the way myself and make laws for the people. All legislation should be a century-old plan, so that ordinary people can follow it.Now that the enemy is in the front, and the enemy is united in the same robe, we can't afford it, and then this change, can we not prevent it?At the beginning of the French Revolution in the past, Dilang's gentry party was actually the leader of the righteous, and it was not long before they were slaughtered by the Mountain Party; among the Mountain Party, Roberts Beale, Marat, and Denton were slaughtered again and again.Husband has never been a person who works together with all his strength?Then if you are like that, the momentum will follow.I sincerely hope that there will never be such ominous things in our country, but I especially hope that at the beginning of creation, we should not use legislation to punish it and encourage its momentum. And there is one thing in particular that our people must think deeply about. I have repeatedly said that what our country desires most today is to have a strong central government.This righteousness should be shared by people with a little knowledge in the whole country.However, since this is the case, it is tantamount to an enlightened autocracy under a republican government. To put it bluntly, Dias' Moan Mexico is a trick.However, it seems that this is the most likely to lead to a second revolution, and it is the most important thing for our people to pay attention to. (The reason why Dias was able to stay in his position for a long time before was that after more than a hundred years of chaos, people's minds were extremely ruled, and he did not hesitate to sacrifice everything in order to obtain an autocratic head of state. It is the same for the risers. This year, after only a few months after Madero Cedeas, the second revolution started, and the situation is different.) That is why the United States of North America can enjoy long-term peace and stability, while Central America and South America suffer from frequent wars. The level of people in North America is better than that of Central America and South America.What is the difference?So federal decentralization and centralization are the same.If the central authority of Central America and South America is as narrow as that of North America, it may not be possible to be well-off at the beginning;Therefore, the issue of the level of people is exclusively used as the root cause of the differences in political phenomena in North, Central, and South America. The so-called knowing one is not knowing the other.The reason why Central and South American countries cannot implement the federal system of decentralization is due to the root cause in history. Although they strongly want to imitate North America, they cannot achieve it.I hope that the virtuous and gentlemen who prefer the beautiful system should not ask how our people regard beauty, but especially ask how our country's national strength regards beauty. To sum up, if we want to adopt the American system, there are various prerequisite issues that must be studied: (1) The central republican government of the United States is actually built on top of the federal republican government; Get used to it.Can our country produce a solid federation in the shortest period of time? (Second) Most of the U.S. government is in the states of the United States, and what they give to the central government is only a small part.If our country follows it, can it be suitable for today's situation? (3) The United States practices the absolute doctrine of separation of powers, and the executive department cannot intervene in the legislative power of the central government. Can this system be called a benevolent system?If our country uses it, can it make the country prosperous and strong? (4) The United States was transplanted by the British Puritans, and the style of the two major political parties has been cultivated, so the order of political disputes is orderly.Can the Chinese treat each other as indifferent? (5) When the United States was first founded, there were only thirteen states and only three million people, and its electoral institutions were already in place.How is the situation in our country today different from that?I would like to like those who have a beautiful system, and I will add my meaning to all these questions. Fourth, what about a republic in which Congress publicly elects a general who has no responsibility for the general? This French system is also superior to the American system in four ways: 1. The election of a general does not require a national vote, and the scope of disputes is narrower.2. The great commander and the monarch of a constitutional monarchy have no power because they have no responsibility, and people don't like to fight for it, so the degree of disturbance is reduced.3. Since the grand commander is beyond the government, if the politics is not in the hearts of the people, the extreme will end with the resignation of the government; it is not like the integration of the grand commander and the government in the American legal system, injustice in governance, and revolution.4. The government is organized by the majority party in Congress, and the Legislative Department and the Executive Department are in constant contact. It is not as clumsy as the extreme separation of powers in the United States.This is its director.The reason why the French people created this system: (1) The French republic was established in the United States. In view of the abuses in Central and South America, and the experience of repeated civil strife in the past 80 years, it was a last resort. (2) The land is in Europe, and it has been influenced by various constitutional monarchies, so its name is obscured and its reality is used.If our country must adopt a democratic republic, it is better to learn from it than to learn from it.However, the legal system is inferior to the American system. There is one thing: the American government is the same body as the commander-in-chief, and the commander-in-chief has a fixed term of office and is irresponsible to the Congress.Although the ruler of the law does not move, the government changes frequently.The non-competition of the law is quite due to this.Although, if the legal system is not done well, it will be enough to weaken the ears; if the American system is not done well, it will be enough to bring chaos to death.Why?In any country that uses the American legal system, if the government is not trusted by the majority of the people, it cannot be changed without revolution.There is no other reason for this. In the European legal system, the Congress supervises the government, and the Congress and the government are in close contact; Compared with the American system, the legal system has the same advantages and disadvantages; if compared with the British system, it is inferior to the British in two ways: 1. The king of the United Kingdom and the ruler of France, although they stand above the government and the Congress, are the same. However, the king of England does not join a political party, and the leader of the French University uses the power of the political party to be elected.There is no hindrance if the commander-in-chief and the prime minister are often in the same party, but this is absolutely unique.The French cabinet must be changed every few months. How can you find someone who is often in the same party as the commander-in-chief?If they are not in the same party, the commander-in-chief can often use his legal power to restrain the prime minister, either explicitly or covertly.The conspiracy of Bi Mai Mahan (the second largest commander in the Third Republic era) did not follow the law, and it is not uncommon to see it after that.In the French political circles, there are often signs of sluggishness, and this is one of the reasons.2. Although the king of England is called a king in name, he is actually a puppet.This kind of position is the most suitable place for a rich man.Since the leader of the French University is elected, he is not a country's talent and cannot be elected.Since it is the talent and hope of a country, it is a pity for the country to leave it idle and use it as an ornament for several years.When Napoleon I was first elected as consul, he said angrily: "I don't want to be a fat pig." That's what it meant. Based on this discussion, the legal system is regarded as a beautiful system, although it will last for a day, but it is still not yet perfect.The recent Portuguese republican constitution is the most recent, and it intends to take the advantages of the United States and France while discarding the disadvantages.However, it is basically the same as that of the United States, except that the leaders of the United States are elected by the people, while Portugal adopts the legal system and the ears are elected by the two houses of parliament.The inherent disadvantages of the American system cannot be avoided in Portugal. Fifth, what about a republic with a false monarch? Although this does not dare to be called the best political system, but compared with the various current political systems, it is perfect and perfect.This system originated in England, and it was all formed by the accumulation of habits. Later, Belgium wrote a written constitution, which became a model for all European countries.It is also a system, there is a hereditary monarch who is honored and honored above Zhaomin, which is no different from an autocratic monarchy; and the government, no matter how big or small, comes from the cabinet, and the cabinet must win the trust of the majority of the parliament. The general opinion of the people is also.In fact, it is no different from those in countries such as the United States and France where the sovereignty rests with the people.It is said that scholars of national law may be incorporated into the republic.The only reason for the difference is to wear a hereditary grand master as an ornament, and the citizens treat it with special gifts, and the royal family spends a certain amount of money every year to feed it.Why do the people of Fuou rely on these ornaments, while the people of the whole country condescend to pay respects to them, and spend their blood, sweat and money to support them?It can determine the will of the people because it can fight internally.Take the terrorist era of the French Revolution, half of the people in the country died, and the chaos began after more than 80 years; take the election of Central America and South America every time there is a revolution every time the general is elected; how much is the loss of the country?Combining the mere royal fees and the vain texts that are respected as usual, the price in the world is the cheapest.That is why there were no countries in Europe in the nineteenth century that did not go through revolutions. There was no revolution that did not make enemies of the monarch, and even if it was successful, it would still have a monarch in vain; Man is a monarch, and he welcomes a man of a different country and race, but only makes him take an oath of naturalization and an oath to abide by the constitution.If Belgium, if Bugaliya, if Romania, if Greece, if Nawei, are all examples.Husband, there is no talented person in the country who can be a great commander, so why do you care about such a far-fetched and foolish move?The reason for this is also conceivable.The reason why the revolutions of the Central and South American countries have never had their own time, and the reason why the other countries have a permanent state after a revolution is that their operations are very ingenious and clumsy. Moreover, in today's world where national competition is extremely dramatic, if there is no strong government, there will be no country that will not decline.However, in countries with American legal systems, since the general is in the same body as the government and is equally empowered by the people, the Congress cannot ask him to be responsible.Therefore, the U.S. government cannot sit in Congress, cannot introduce bills in Congress, and cannot dissolve Congress, but only implements the laws enacted by Congress.It is important to have a plan in husband politics, and the person who plans is the person who executes it, and then the responsibility can be investigated and the crime can be punished.The U.S. system can’t do that. Congress will plan it, but the government will implement it. The two are not connected, and each has its own blame.In the past, the Monroe Doctrine was sticking to the Monroe Doctrine, and there was little conflict with the big powers, so it was safe; but today it is not suitable for the current situation, which is also advocated by Rutherford's pro-nationalism.However, under the American legal system, I believe it is difficult for this doctrine to be realized in reality.The European republic is different.The British proverb says: "The power of the Congress, except for changing men and women, can do nothing." The power of the Congress is as important as that;Therefore, the Congress is always the supporter of the government, and the power of the Congress is also the power of the government.However, the power of the government can do nothing except make men and women change their bodies.The so-called strong government is nothing more than that.But easy to do but not autocratic?Therefore, those who have a majority in the Congress cannot be in power, and the Congress is actually elected by the people, and those who have a majority must follow the wishes of the people.This system is also absolutely impossible in an absolute monarchy; that is, it has not been implemented in a constitutional country with great powers such as Germany and Japan; it is absolutely impossible to implement it in the democratic republics of America; the only person who can implement it is an empty monarch. Only the republic.Those who talk about the political system push this to be extreme. But is it possible for China to do this too?Said: Woohoo!The great misfortune of our China is that for three hundred years, a foreigner was appointed as the monarch, and he abused the government for a long time.For more than ten years, I have tried my best day and night to fight against the evil politics, and the royal family is really rooted in the evil politics.So the royal family regretted me greatly, so those who slaughtered, humiliated and embarrassed people did everything they could.Although, my struggle is still dedicated to the government, and I do not want to target the royal family. Some people in the country may fear me, flatter them, ridicule them, or insult them, but I will not change my attitude.Gaiwu used to be convinced that the democratic republic of the United States and France is definitely not suitable for China. If you want to achieve national security, you should follow the example of the British monarchy.The reason why I have been cautious in speaking in the past ten years is because of this.I do what I believe, so I know that I am guilty, and I am not counted.Although, I made a mistake.Today's royal family is drinking poison to pray for a quick death, and they are willing to kill themselves, which makes China more difficult.Let him have the slightest spirit of compromise over the past few years, and be able to treat our people with sincerity, so that the so-called (nineteen articles of faith) can publish one or two of them a year or a few months ago, and our people will wear this for a long time. Ornaments are regarded as the ears of foreigners in countries such as Greece and Nawei, and I know that my people should disdain to compare them.And it's better to stay on until the hearts of the people are gone and the whole country is an enemy, and then forced to make an alliance in order to steal a life, and it's too late.The construction and organization of the husband country must be based on the will of the people.What the people hate, even if it is with the world, how can it live in one dynasty.Woohoo, our people are familiar with the false monarchy republic, which is the best experience of all nations, but there is almost no way to apply it today, who is to blame?It's really a long breath! In no other way, follow the example of Belgium, Naville and other countries that welcome foreigners as monarchs, take an oath of naturalization and then ascend the throne, but if the current royal family can change to Chinese surnames, may our citizens have a vacant seat?In the past, there were those who practiced it, and Emperor Kaowen of the Northern Wei Dynasty changed Tuoba to the Yuan family.What's more, the constitution stipulates that the appointment of a queen must be a celebrity of the Han nationality, so after the digital transmission, the bloodline will not change.I think that if you use this method, it will be more reasonable to use the blood of tens of thousands of people to fight for the puppet of this land.However, since people's resentment is so serious, I dare not say whether it is feasible or not. The so-called "Nineteen Articles of Constitutional Creed" has been promulgated today. If it can be implemented forever, the foundation of the virtual monarchy will be established, and our people will not have to compete for this empty position.However, after the matter is settled, is the old government willing to back down for a long time, and not seek to restore its power?This is beyond doubt.I secretly think that if the old dynasty has to be replaced as a last resort to implement the false monarchy republic, moving the capital is actually one of the most important conditions.If there is a southward migration, the establishment of civil rights can be expected.Moreover, the capital has long been the most evil area, and if it is not abandoned, political reforms will eventually be effective.But can this be done?Even if it can be done, can our people be complacent?I dare not speak. However, apart from the current imperial rule, is there still a way to practice the republic of the false monarch?Said: "Maybe there is one."In our nation, there are people who are the descendants of Confucius who are descendants of Shenggong, and the extension of the world is beyond comparison. If there is no choice but to smoke the alchemy point to seek the king, the duke will be added to the second level, that is, the emperor.This regards Greece, Nawei, etc. as welcoming foreign princes, and the matter is especially smooth.Since the husband thinks that decorations are tantamount to worshiping idols, who can't kill this person?This may or may not be one of them!Although, there are still three doubts: First, if it is not for the abdication of the royal family, it will be difficult for allies to recognize it, and the abdication may not be easy.The North and the South have been stalemate for a long time, can the order of the country be preserved?Once the order is broken, can interference be avoided? Second, Confucius is a religious leader, and now he supports his heir as the head of a country. Can the suspicion of mixing politics and religion be avoided?Is it possible not to enlighten the doubts of other believers? Third, Mongolia, Hui, and Tibet were attached to each other. Previously, because they obeyed the prestige of this dynasty, today they are still tamed by the famous princes of this dynasty. The imperial line has changed, can it still be maintained?If it can't, is China in danger? All three of these are extremely difficult problems to solve.The first and third items are the same problem whether you want to reform democracy or wear Yansheng; the second item is that Yansheng is the only one.The same is Dai Xujun, but Yan Shenggong is not as good as the current royal family.Therefore, it is said: since the royal family cannot wear it now, the hope of our country's republican system of false monarchs will be exhausted. The impossibility of the democratic republic of the husband is the same as that, and the impossibility of the republic of the false monarch is also the same, so my good law for the construction of new China is exhausted.Husband and our people can't give up and not build because of their poverty.The thinking of my thinking has exhausted my talents, but it has not been broken yet.I can only give the best of what I have seen, presenting the benefits and diseases before the people, and asking the people of the whole country to think carefully and choose carefully.The husband decides the major issues of a country's construction, but only the people of the whole country can have this power, and it is by no means a single person can do it.If it is said that a person should express his opinion for the reference of the people of the whole country, then I will offer it even more if I think about it.