Chapter 30 Chapter 28 Chen Shui-bian's political views are lies

Li Ao On November 15, 1994, Lin Meilun, an outstanding city councilor of the New Party, held a "'President's' domineering" press conference to denounce Lee Teng-hui's occupation of the people's roads.According to the "United Daily News" report on November 16, an official from the Public Works Bureau of the Taipei City Government said: "The two alleys, Five Alleys and Five Alleys and Eight Alleys, in the Second Section of Chongqing South Road next to the 'President's' official residence, are both urban plans of eight meters long. Roads, but the city government has not yet expropriated them, but according to the urban planning law and other regulations, existing roads cannot be closed and should be restored to their original state, otherwise the right of the public to pass will be hindered.” “According to the urban planning law, within the urban planning area, To set up various buildings, you must apply for permission, otherwise it will be regarded as an illegal building and will be demolished forcibly, and according to the land law, the existing roads cannot be closed privately, otherwise the easement of public traffic will be hindered, if this happens, you must Return to the original state." On the same day, the "Liberty Times" reported: "Media reporters all went to the scene to check, and they saw that the roadway was indeed blocked."

The alleyways of Taipei citizens were occupied by Lee Teng-hui.The lower closure is true. The next day, November 16, New Party City Councilor Lin Meilun submitted a "reporting letter" to Taipei Mayor Huang Dazhou, which contained four points: 1. In the middle of 1991, in order to expand the land area of ​​the official residence, the official residence of "President Li" Denghui illegally surrounded the five alleys of the second section of Chongqing South Road in this city, and the five alleys and eight alleys of the same road section. A total of three alleys were blocked (see Figure p192), for their private use, seriously infringing on citizens' right of way.

2. According to the existing roads that are used for public facilities, they are only used by the public "in accordance with the law". If ordinary people forcibly occupy the stalls or use them as private parking spaces, the procuratorial and police agencies will always use iron fists to steal them with the "criminal law". The crime has won the applause of the general public. People from "President Li" Denghui's official residence flouted the law and discipline, and openly surrounded and occupied the existing roads for private use. The prosecution and police units turned a blind eye and condoned the law.

3. The three lanes mentioned above are land for public facilities set up in accordance with the urban plan. Before their use is changed according to law, no matter for any reason, there should be no act of stealing for private use. It is bound to disappear, and the law will also become a ruling tool for a few privileged classes to oppress the common people. 4. In order to maintain law and order and protect the people's right of passage, the city government is requested to act decisively and demolish it within three days. At the same time, punish the dereliction of duty officials of the city government who have indulged them for many years, so as to respect the officials.

To popularize this fact, Lin Meilun issued a press release on the third day (November 17), which said: ... In response to Cao Yongxin, the leader of the labor support team of the Beishi Labor Support Office, Lin Meilun strongly criticized the comments made after the on-site inspection. Afterwards, all the surrounding roadways were marked with yellow lines. Even though it was legal to park vehicles from 11:00 pm to 7:00 am, they were forcibly stopped by people in the official residence, and even the vehicles were vandalized, causing inconvenience to the nearby office workers and residents, and infringing The rights and interests of the people are very obvious. It should be noted that since 1988, the official residence of the "President" has been established on Chongqing South Road for three years, and has not affected the lives of nearby residents. After moving in, it brought great inconvenience to the nearby people. Therefore, it was not "alleys crossing the presidential mansion park", but the mansion illegally surrounded the alleys and became a private park. Before 1991, the safety of the mansion and the convenience of residents were not a problem. After the guard battalion moved in, the official residence suddenly became unsafe. They surrounded the alleyways on the grounds of 'presidential safety' and marked the nearby alleyways with yellow lines. They also exceeded the law to control the parking of yellow-line vehicles 24 hours a day. Is the 'President' safe? Or is it the security of the guards and soldiers? The city government believes that the two ends are surrounded by movable iron gates, which is only a small piece of road land and has no impact on traffic. It is really a cover-up mentality. The government should immediately enforce the law and dismantle it. Illegal law is illegal, not to mention enclosing 283 ping of urban planning road land and 205 ping of existing roads, and enclosing nearly 500 ping of land. Xiaokui, with its rhetoric and law enforcement mentality, will be spurned by the people."

On the fourth day (November 18), Lin Meilun went to the Overwatch Council and issued the following press release at the same time: ...Lawyer Lin Meilun went to the Supervisory Yuan at 10:00 this morning to illegally block the laneway for the "President" as the residence and parking lot for the official residence.Lin Meilun pointed out: "The three alleyways of the second section of Chongqing South Road in Zhongzheng District, including the fifth alley and the fifth alley and eight alleys of the same section, have been the daily passages of Taipei citizens for decades. You know that they were surrounded by the 'president' in 1991. It is used for parking vehicles and building buildings in the "President's" official residence." Lawyer Lin Meilun pointed out that Lane 5, Section 2, Chongqing South Road is No. 47 and No. 58, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City. The planning and planning are reserved for public facilities (land for roads). The five lanes and eight alleys in the same road section are No. 51, the fourth subsection of the Nanhai Section. "According to the Urban Planning Law, Road Traffic Management Punishment Regulations, and Construction Law, it is not allowed to be arbitrarily besieged for private use.If ordinary people forcibly occupy the laneway or park on the side of the road, the procuratorial and police agencies usually use iron fists to transfer the crime of embezzlement under the "Criminal Law" to investigation. In order to establish the character of Baitai and set an example for the people, Baitai, which is supervised by public officials, should be thoroughly verified, and all officials who violate the law and dereliction of duty including the "president" should be corrected.

On the fifth day (November 19), Lin Meilun detailed the details in a press release: …… Lin Meilun arrived at the "President's" official residence at 10:00 this morning, and was reported by Lin Meilun for illegal and domineering alleys.Regarding the remarks of the "Presidential Palace" spokesperson, Lin Meilun denounced his perfunctory mentality. Lin Meilun pointed out: "The five lanes and seven lanes of the second section of Chongqing South Road have been used for decades. The five lanes are one-way streets from west to east, and the seven lanes are" The one-way street from east to west was surrounded by guards before 1991, which did not affect the free passage and parking convenience of the public. However, after the guard camp of the official residence settled in, the five alleys were closed and the seven alleys were changed to "From west to east" one-way street. At the same time, the surrounding alleys and Hukou Street are all redrawn with yellow lines, and even prevent the temporary parking of "cars do not turn off, people do not leave the car". The implementation of the law is obviously excessive, and it violates the basic rights of citizens. Furthermore, during the on-site survey, the enclosed areas at the head and tail of the five alleys were blocked by iron gates and cement board walls, the height of which was nearly 200 meters. Asked to open the iron gate, although none of the surveyors carried any dangerous items and were willing to accept the inspection, the iron gate still refused to open. The city police department repeatedly emphasized: "The official residence did not close the lanes, and the public was not allowed to pass through at all, but the public When passing by, they must be inspected, and only those who are safe and sound can pass. ’ is a complete self-deception.The Taipei City Police Department urgently passed the "Road Traffic Management Punishment Regulations" yesterday (18th) to approve the establishment of roadblocks at the "President's" official residence.Its efficiency is ridiculously fast, and the cement boards on both sides illegally installed at the head and tail of the five alleys are completely fixed, and the iron gates have never been opened for ordinary good people. Is this a roadblock?It is simply a 'complete occupation' of the entire laneway.How is it just 'control traffic'?No. 51 is an alleyway that has been established for many years. In the past, there were food stalls and shady trees for nearby residents to rest. If the official residence needs to be changed, it should be handled according to the "Taipei City Existing Alleyway Abolition or Diversion Application Procedure", regardless The substantive conditions of abandoned alleys, as far as legal procedures are concerned, at least should be in accordance with Article 8 of the Measures, before the "Taipei City Existing Alleyway Abolition or Diversion Review Committee" is deliberated, it should be listed on the municipal government bulletin board, Zhongzheng District Office, Long The Fuli office and the four entrances and exits of the five alleys and eight alleys will put the application on public exhibition for 30 days, and the date and location of the public exhibition will be announced in the newspaper.Let me ask: ① Who are the members of the review committee? ②When was the deliberation committee held?How about its minutes? ③Why didn't the public know about the announcement? ④ When will the announcement be made? ⑤ Please publish the content of the newspaper.The official residence should have the responsibility to provide proof! "

"This incident shows the fact that the 'President's' official residence violated the law. Even if the 'President' is completely remedied afterwards, it will not affect the fact that the 'President' took the lead in breaking the law. What's more, the subsequent remedy is full of loopholes. For personal convenience, the right of passage of the people is sacrificed, causing The great inconvenience of the people and the lawlessness have cast the shadow of "national humiliation" on the process of implementing the rule of law in Taiwan. All the people share their grief and indignation. In order to heal the wound and relieve the pain, I call on "President Lee Teng-hui" to be brave enough to apologize to the people for his illegal facts, and immediately Stop auxiliary elections to avoid bringing 'national humiliation' to the candidates for provincial mayor. At the same time, take the blame and resign to be vigilant against public officials who break the law. It is also to teach the people to respect the law and to promote the rule of law by making some contributions."

On the sixth day (November 20), Lin Meilun issued another press release to testify: ...... The part of No. 51, the official residence was approved by the Municipal Bureau of Public Works on June 3, 1982, Jianzi No. 331, which is fundamentally inconsistent with the law. It is based on the application of "abolition or diversion of existing roadways in Taipei City" Article 10 of the “Application Measures” stipulates that the applicable conditions of the first to third paragraphs are inconsistent with the application conditions for official residences: ①In the first paragraph, “the planned roads in the surrounding area have been opened or completed by themselves” is a necessary condition, and the traffic The decades-old Five Alleys were closed as early as 1991. ②In the second paragraph, "the laneway is only for the original residents of the base to pass through" is a necessary condition, and the laneway is a place for nearby office workers and residents to eat food stalls, rest and park. ③In the third paragraph, "one-way export" is a necessary condition, but eight alleys are two-way export.It can be seen that the application of the law by the Municipal Public Works Bureau is obviously improper, and whether its approval is cheap for senior officials should be investigated.As for the part of the Five Alleys, Lin Meilun pointed out: the current situation in the official residence is shown in the photos. The old wall on the south side of the Five Alleys has been demolished by the Joint Command Department of the official residence. The old mansion is interlinked, and it merged the lanes into the park for integrated use. There is no doubt that the mansion lied that it was only setting up roadblocks to temporarily control traffic. In the past three years, I tried many times to pass without success. It is not only "control", but also "No" access: If "three years" is only a temporary control, what is long-term?If this explanation makes sense, what is the standard of our daily life?If the fact that the official residence is sealed off is considered a "roadblock", is it considered a roadblock when ordinary citizens occupy the unit with the movable iron frame of "Do not stop"?What exactly is a roadblock?Is there a uniform standard for the city police department?

The “Application Measures for the Abolition or Alteration of Existing Alleyways in Taipei City” mentioned by Lin Meilun above was issued by “Decree No. The original text of Article 10 is as follows: Article 9 After the application for the abolition or diversion of an existing roadway has been reviewed and approved by the Taipei City Roadway Abolition or Diversion Review Committee, it shall be announced on the bulletin board of the government, the district office and the ri office where the application is located, and the implementation date shall be announced. And the location is published in the newspaper.

Article 10 If the existing roadway in the construction base falls under one of the following conditions, when applying for a construction license, submit the relevant certificates and books and drawings and submit an application to the Construction Management Office of the Public Works Bureau for abolition or diversion, and the Construction Management Office shall report After approval by the Bureau of Public Works and the implementation of the construction license case, it is not subject to the restrictions of Articles 5 to 9: When it is proposed to abolish the average width of the existing roadway that is less than the minimum width of the surrounding planned roads, and the surrounding planned roads have been opened or completed by themselves, all the land within the same street or the land along both sides of the existing roadway are planned for overall users , or obtain the consent of the completed base along both sides of the existing roadway and plan the overall user. The existing roadway is located in the applied building base and is only for the original residents in the base to pass through. The existing lanes with one-way exits in the same street are abolished section by section from the bottom... In contrast, it is clear at a glance that the method approved by the Taipei City Government is a deliberate distortion of these two laws.On the seventh day (November 21), Lin Meilun issued a press release to declare his determination to pursue criminal prosecution: I held a press conference on November 15th for this incident, reported it to the city government on the 16th, filed a complaint with the Overwatch Council on the 18th, and conducted an on-site investigation with major media on the 19th. It cannot be erased. Later, the "National Security Bureau" made a supplementary application to set up a "temporary roadblock" to control traffic. Although it was approved by the Municipal Police Department, it did not affect the illegal facts before November 18, 1994. The consummated offender of the crime of embezzlement referred to in Paragraph 2 of Article 320.In order to safeguard the dignity of the law, I will prepare a written statement and report to the Taiwan Taipei District Court Prosecutor's Office at 10:30 am tomorrow morning to investigate Jiang Guanfeng, director of the Third Bureau of the "Presidential Palace", and the person in charge of the joint command center inside the mansion. For the legal responsibility of "President Lee Teng-hui", who is subject to Article 52 of the "Constitution" and Article 100 of the "Criminal Law", except for crimes of internal strife and foreign aggression, he is not subject to criminal prosecution. After the term of the "President" expires, according to the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 80 of the "Criminal Law", before the expiration of the criminal prosecution period (November 17, 1994), a supplementary report should be made to implement the determination of law enforcement. Do not indulge in vain. On the ninth day (November 23), Lin Meilun sent another letter to the Taipei City Government, the Taipei City Government Public Works Bureau, and the Taipei City Government Police Department, stating: Because Lane 5, Section 2, South Chongqing Road was blocked by the official residence, your organization has conducted an investigation again on the 19th of this month. Due to many questions that have not been resolved, we would like to ask your organization to set up temporary roadblocks in accordance with the approved official residence for the following issues. Efficiency, recovery within two days, with Zhao Gongxin. 1. According to the photos taken at the scene, the "five alleys" have been closed for many years and are only used to park vehicles in the official residence, which has nothing to do with the safety of the "head of state". Chen asked your organization to plan the parking spaces in the "five alleys" for ordinary people to use , can also increase financial resources for the market treasury? 2. The two-meter-high fixed cement board, iron gate, and iron pillar are miscellaneous buildings according to Article 4 of the "Construction Law". According to the approved roadblock efficiency, your unit shall dismantle it within two days according to the first paragraph of Article 86 of the "Construction Law", and impose a fine of less than 50% of the construction cost. 3. What is the legal definition or general interpretation of "roadblock"?Is there any limit to its height and width?Are fixed barriers barricades? 4. The inside of the alley cannot be seen from the outside. The width of the 8.8m alley is completely blocked, and there is no gap for crossing. Ordinary people are unable to climb over it, and the situation has not been opened for the public for many years. Is it a temporary roadblock?Or closed for a long time? 5. Your organization approved the official residence to "set up temporary roadblocks to control traffic". On the 19th of this month, people and many friends, under the attention of major media, are willing to undergo security inspections. How to deal with it? 6. Your unit uses the safety of the "head of state" as an excuse, but the result is only harm to the revenue of the city treasury, the rights and interests of citizens, and the dignity of the law. Would your unit consider revoking its permission to "set up temporary roadblocks and control traffic"? Seventh Lane and Hukou Street, Section 2, Chongqing South Road, have no impact on the safety of the "head of state". Please redesignate the parking space for nearby people to park, so as not to become the exclusive parking for people in official residences that are inconvenient for your organization to ban as in the current situation. position, and give some convenience to the citizens. On the tenth day (November 24th), Lin Meilun issued "The 'President's Mansion Violates Five Major Acts'" and revealed the violations from the point of view of the law: In the middle of 1991, the "President" official residence acquired two lands, No. 47 and No. 58, Section 2, Section 2, Chongqing South Road, Taipei City (that is, land Nos. 47 and 58, Section 4, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City), with a total area of ​​280. Sanping) is closed with 2-meter-high fixed cement board walls, iron gates and iron pillars, enclosing the head and tail of the alley, making the original 8-meter-8-meter-wide one-way laneway from west to east a parking lot exclusively for people in official residences , which clearly violates the Big Five Act: 1. Violation of Article 43 of the "Urban Planning Law": "The land used for public facilities... shall be used to enhance the convenience of citizens' activities and ensure a good urban living environment." Constructing buildings on the land used for public facilities shall be in accordance with the seventh law of the same law. Article 19: "Buildings constructed within the urban planning area...the local local government...may order it to be demolished immediately...".Article 80: "Those who do not comply with the provisions of the preceding article...in addition to being subject to administrative enforcement according to law, shall also be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than six months, short-term detention or a fine of not more than 3,000 yuan." 2. In violation of Article 82 of the "Land Law", any land allocated for road use shall not be used for other purposes. 3. Violation of the "Building Law", according to its Article 4: "The building referred to in this Law refers to a structure or miscellaneous work fixed on the land or under the ground with a roof, beams, or walls for personal or public use. thing".It can be seen that the fixed cement board walls and iron gates of the official residence fixed on the land are "miscellaneous work items" of the building. Article 28 of the same law: "Construction licenses are divided into the following four types... 2. Miscellaneous licenses: miscellaneous work For the construction of buildings, miscellaneous licenses shall be applied for..." Article 25: "Buildings shall not be constructed without application..." Examination and approval and issuance of a license..." Article 86: "Violation of Article 25 Article 1. Those who build without authorization shall be fined not more than 50% of the construction cost of the building.” 4. Violation of Item 2 of Article 320 of the "Criminal Law": "Whoever steals other people's real estate with the intention of gaining illegal interests for himself or a third party shall be a felon of the crime of embezzlement and shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years." , criminal detention, or a fine of not more than five hundred yuan." 5. Violation of Article 10 of the "Regulations on Road Traffic Management Penalties": "Those who obstruct roads and violate road traffic management, and who should bear criminal responsibility according to law, in addition to being punished according to the provisions of these regulations, shall be transferred to the procuratorate of the local court in charge."Article 82 Subparagraphs 1 and 7, those who pile up, place or throw objects that can hinder traffic on the road, and those who set up or change road traffic signs, marking lines, signs or similar signs without authorization, may be fined The perpetrator or his employer shall be fined not less than 400 yuan but not more than 800 yuan.  On November 15, 1994, when Lin Meilun held the "President's Overbearing" press conference, it coincided with the Taipei mayoral election. Such a major and hot news naturally attracted the attention of the mayoral candidate Chen Shui-bian. And aggressively cut into flower arrangements, as one can imagine.Sure enough, Chen Shui-bian took action when Lin Meilun presented his case to the Overwatch Council on November 18. On that day, Lianhe Evening News published his political views as follows: The Kuomintang regime is a combination of long-term interests and privileges. Lee Teng-hui's official residence occupies the laneway. As long as he is elected mayor, everything will be handled "in accordance with the law" and returned to the public for use. The next day (November 19), the "Liberty Times" published his political views as follows: In response to Lee Teng-hui's "President" occupying the laneway, DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Chen Shui-bian said yesterday that the Kuomintang regime has long been combined with privileges. As long as he is elected mayor, everything will be dealt with "in accordance with the law" and the land will be returned to the people for use. Under such categorical and steadfast political guarantees, the citizens of Taipei believed in Chen Shui-bian and voted for him to be elected. As a result, nothing happened until Lin Meilun made a statement to the Overwatch Council, and the Overwatch Council referred Mayor Chen Shui-bian to us. to get the truth and conclusions.I am announcing three relevant documents below: 1. Lin Meilun's "Correction Letter" Correction letter Cause of the case: For the blatant violation of the law by "President Li" Denghui and the people in the official residence, the three lanes were forcibly blocked as residences and parking places for the staff of the official residence, which humiliated all "people of the country". Illegal things should be corrected, legislation should be used to discipline, and officials should be suppressed. illustrate: 1. Five alleys in the second section of Chongqing South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, and five alleys and eight alleys in the same section. There are three laneways in total. They are existing roads and are daily detours for Taipei citizens. They were forcibly blocked in the middle of 1991 Alleys and alleys are used for parking vehicles and building buildings in the "President" official residence. 2. According to the existing roads, the land is used for public facilities and is only used by the public according to the law. If ordinary people forcibly occupy the stalls or use them as private parking spaces, the procuratorial and police agencies will always use iron fists to use the "criminal law" to steal the crime. The rope won the applause of the general public, and the "president" and people in the official residence flouted the law and discipline, openly surrounded and occupied the existing roads for private use, which is really a "national humiliation" of the "Republic of China". 3. The above-mentioned three lanes are land for public facilities set up in accordance with the urban plan. Before their use is changed according to law, no matter for any reason, there should be no act of stealing for private use. If there is nothing left, the law will also become a ruling tool for a few privileged classes to oppress the common people.Based on this, the Special Chen Qingjun Institute has thoroughly verified and corrected all officials who violated the law and dereliction of duty, and those involved in criminal responsibility, and pursued their criminal responsibility, so as to establish Baitai's character and set an example for the people. 4. Attached hereto: (1) List of land used by Lee Teng-hui's "President" official residence. (2) The fact that Lee Teng-hui's "President" official residence is illegal and domineering. (3) The topographic map of the official residence. (4) A copy of the cadastral map of the illegal and overbearing part of the official residence. (5) Transcript of land registration at No. 47, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City. (6) Transcript of land registration at No. 58, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City. (7) Land use zoning and land use certificate for public facilities at Land No. 47, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City. (8) Land use zoning and land use certificate for public facilities at No. 58, Section 4, Nanhai Section, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City. Sincerely, Director of the Overwatch Council Chen Members of the Supervisory Yuan Chen lover Lin Meilun Eighty-three eleven nineteen 2. Letter from the Supervisory Yuan to Lin Meilun Date "Republic of China" February 21, 1984 Font size (84) Yuantai Yiyizi No. 3196 Recipient Ms. Meilun Lin, Councilor of Taipei City Council Ms. Mei Lun, Member of the Taipei City Council Copy of the first group of our hospital The main purpose of this case is to be submitted to the court by the Taipei City Government. A photocopy of the reply letter is hereby attached, and please check it again. illustrate: Handle according to the review opinions of the inspectors of this office. Dean Chen Lu'an 3. Chen Shui-bian's return to the Supervisory Office 1. Handle according to No. 99  No. 1 letter of No. 83.12. 2. In this case, roadblocks were set up in Lane 5, Section 2, South Chongqing Road, because the lane is next to the official residence of the "President".In order to maintain the safety of the "Head of State", the "National Security Bureau" used this lane to run through the official residence and its ancillary facilities, which greatly affected the safety of the "Head of State". Letter No. 74 to the government to apply for setting up temporary roadblocks to control traffic (see Appendix 1 for details).After the on-site investigation by the relevant units of this government, it is considered that the roadblock is indeed an expedient measure necessary for the safety considerations of the "head of state", and it is adjacent to Qi Lane, Section 2, South Chongqing Road and Hukou Street. It is in accordance with the urban road regulations Article 28 stipulates: "When necessary, the competent authority of urban roads may restrict the use of roads." Reply on 83.11.19 with (83) Fugongyangzi No. 83rd76491 Agreed to record for future reference (see Appendix 2 for details). 3. This case was reviewed by the Third Bureau of the "Presidential Palace" on 83.11.21 with Hua Zong San (Guan) Zi No. 1196 Letter (see Annex 3 for details) in accordance with Article 2 of the Organic Law of the "National Security Bureau" And the content of Article 11: The secret service center cooperates with relevant agencies (...the police department...) to take charge of the safety maintenance of the "president" and his family members, and apply for the establishment of temporary roadblocks to manage passage, and when the reason for the restriction disappears, the list will be lifted immediately Tube. 4. With regard to the case of Mr. Lin Meilun and others’ statement B, Chaben’s government agreed to set it up based on the application of the “National Security Bureau” and other relevant units. , there is nothing wrong with it, please look into it clearly. Mayor Chen Shuibian In Chen Shui-bian's reply above, we can clearly see that Chen Shui-bian has made it clear that "according to the urban road regulations and the safety considerations of maintaining the 'President' and his family, there is nothing wrong with agreeing to install it"!He has long forgotten his promise to the people during the campaign, and shamelessly only sees "the security considerations of the 'President' and his family", and has no eyes for the citizens of Taipei.  On October 3, 1997, the "Lianhe Evening News" published the news of "Abandoned Alleys Don't Return Roads, Members Criticize A-Bian". The article said: [Reporter Dai Anwei/Taipei Report] The Taipei Metropolitan Committee reviewed and approved the proposal in the morning to convert the laneway next to the "president's" mansion into a residential area. City Councilor Lin Meilun was very angry when he learned about it in the morning, and strongly criticized the city government as a soft-footed shrimp. Lin Meilun said that the "presidential" official residence has occupied the alley next to the official residence for many years, but the Taipei City Government has never dared to deal with it.During the 1994 mayoral election in Taipei, Chen Shui-bian promised that he would "pay back to the people" after he was elected mayor. However, it has been more than two years since Chen Shui-bian became mayor. It is too weak to change the way of urban planning and change the abandoned lanes next to the "presidential" mansion into residential land. She said, why did the city government sweep the prostitution to the bakery, and when the public appealed and won the case, the city government could issue an administrative order not to allow the bakery to restore water and electricity? When it comes to illegally built households, you can say that it is improving the urban environment, and completely disregarding the life and death of the old veterans, but for the sake of "'presidential' completeness", ignore the lanes occupied by the "President" official residence, refuse to demolish them, and return Taking the initiative to make a proposal and agreeing to change the location of Waste Alley, this really cannot convince the public. Lin Meilun said that from this incident, it can be seen that the city government did not dare to beat the tiger, let the tiger occupy the road illegally, and did not dare to deal with the soft-legged shrimp.She believes that if the city government does not dare to fight tigers, it is tantamount to bullying the people. She will not let it go, and must hold the city government accountable. Although this caused public outrage, Chen Shui-bian didn't care if he became the mayor anyway. He broke his promise and became fat all the way. February 29, 2004