Chapter 7 Chapter 05 His Concealment—Six "elders" donated 40 million property to A-Bian's children every year

Li Qingyuan After Chen Shui-bian's property surge was revealed, A-Bian's team was in a panic and uttered many contradictory lies to hide their ugliness. The six "elders" donate each year.Whether it is true or false is not only known by the heavens, the earth, and the A-bian team.Smart citizens will recognize the truth in their hearts. Former Taipei City Council Chairman Chen Jianzhi said: "Chen Shui-bian is a person who won't blush when he tells a lie!" From the rhetoric of A-Bian's team in response to the outside world's doubts about Chen Shui-bian's wealth, it can be confirmed that what Chen Jianzhi said is true.

When the author exposed Chen Shui-bian's only underage son, Chen Chih-chung, as having the ability to buy 145,000 shares of Nanya Science and Technology shares in 1997, A-Bian answered a question from Councilor Fei Hung-tai at the Taipei City Council and pointed out: "The stock of Nanya Technology , my wife bought a hundred at that time, and later forty-five were part of the capital increase.” Regarding Chen Zhizhong's source of income from stocks, Chen Shui-bian said: "At that time, my wife sold the house (according to a house on Hangzhou South Road), bought stocks, and gave them to him as a gift."

Chen Shui-bian's statement is obviously lying, because Ah-bian's house on Hangzhou South Road in Taipei City was "sold" in May 1997 to his 21-year-old daughter Chen Xingyu in the transfer records.Chen Xingyu was studying and had no financial means to buy a house. How could Ah Bian use his daughter's money to buy stocks and give them to his then nineteen-year-old son? At the same time, in an interview with the media, an official from the Taipei City Government of A-Bian’s team also confirmed with A-Bian: “Chen Shui-bian sold a house on Hangzhou South Road in 1997 and earned more than 7 million yuan.” Said: "With this amount of money plus the 4.7 million yuan reduction in Chen Shui-bian's savings in 1997, there is no problem with the increase or decrease of property." It is obvious that this official is weaving a lie for A-Bian. It just shows that the origin of Chen Shui-bian's property is unknown.

In fact, during Chen Shui-bian's four-year tenure as mayor, he never sold any real estate to outsiders. However, some people say that Wu Shuzhen is a "stock market expert" and has made considerable profits from the securities market. After hearing this, Wu Shuzhen frequently complained when she was interviewed by a reporter from "China Times". She said that she invested in the stock market back then because she was a legislator and received Former legislator Xu Rongshu "entered under the influence of Xu Rongshu", "as a result, he was locked up as soon as he entered."She has been trapped in the stock market for many years. Fortunately, she didn’t buy much at that time. In 1996 and 1997, she followed the trend of investing in electronic stocks, but she didn’t know how to get off the car. Many stocks were high-end. I didn't get out, and in 1998, I was locked up a lot.

Wu Shuzhen also emphasized that due to her health condition, she has no energy to make short-term investments in the stock market. "Most of my stock purchases are for long-term holding, not speculation. The outside world praises me too much. Who says I make a lot of money by trading stocks, just replenish me." !" According to Wu Shuzhen, it shows that in 1997, Chen Shui-bian's property, excluding the increase in real estate and including the missing deposit of more than 4 million yuan, had an abnormally sharp increase of 12 million to 19 million Yuan, not the money earned from stocks.

It can be seen that Chen Shui-bian's increased property was neither income from selling houses nor stocks. Therefore, Chen Shui-bian was not only suspected of failing to pay gift taxes in the process of handling the real estate on Hangzhou South Road, but also publicly lied to the society; Unclear source of property. Therefore, judging from the "buying and selling" process of this house on Hangzhou South Road, Chen Shui-bian was suspected of embezzling at least "more than 7 million yuan" of his own lies in 1997. However, regarding the source of the "more than 7 million yuan", Lin Jinchang, director of the city government's information department of A-Bian's team, gave a new statement when he was interviewed by the media on July 2, 1998: "This is in the In 1996 and 1997, Chen Xingyu received four gifts of one million yuan from relatives such as his grandfather, mother and uncle. According to the tax law, gifts below one million yuan are exempt from gift tax Yes, so, a total of 8 million yuan in two years. In 1997, Wu Shuzhen sold the house under her name to her daughter Chen Xingyu for 7.5 million yuan. Proof, how can there be illegal issues?"

Lin Jinchang's statement is reasonable, but what is incomprehensible is that even if Chen Shui-bian's father-in-law and mother are rich, they will not be so "orderly" for two consecutive years, each giving one million yuan to Chen Shui-bian's daughter Chen Xingyu .In particular, two years ago, when Chen Xingyu had the most savings, it was only more than 70,000 yuan. Obviously, Chen Shuibian's father-in-law and mother would not be so "generous" to their granddaughter. Moreover, Chen Shui-bian's father-in-law and mother have several sons and grandchildren who are closer to him. Wouldn't sending so much money to his granddaughter cause family disputes?What's more, in 1997, he "gifted" a house worth 20 million yuan to Ah Bian's only son.In fact, when A-Bian's only son received a house as a gift, Chen Shui-bian still owned five real estate properties. Why did he need a gift from his father-in-law and mother?These phenomena are completely contrary to ethics. Either Chen Shui-bian is an unfilial person who can't live in his own house, and he has the heart to ask for the old man's house as a son-in-law; , as a tax avoidance head for money laundering.

In addition, Wu Jingmao, one of A-Bian's uncle-in-law, needed Chen Shui-bian to "arrange" him to work as a confidential secretary at the Environmental Protection Bureau, and was once questioned by the parliament about "not avoiding relatives through internal referrals."Just imagine, Wu Jingmao's annual salary income is less than one million yuan, how can he give A Bian's daughter one million yuan every year for two consecutive years?Could it be said that Wu Jingmao himself has no children or wife to donate to A-Bian's daughter? In fact, anyone who is familiar with the tax law knows that there is a way to "let children have money to buy a house from their parents". The father first donates the funds under his name to one million yuan each for his mother, grandfather, grandmother, aunt, and uncle. Each person has a tax allowance of one million yuan, and these relatives donate one million yuan each to their children. As a result, the children who have no financial means have huge sums of money to buy stocks and real estate in a short period of time.

Obviously, according to this model, the so-called "eight million yuan" is nothing more than Ah Bian using his own money to use the "four heads" to obtain a gift tax-free amount of one million yuan per person per year for two consecutive years , and then use the 8 million yuan to pay 7.5 million yuan, value-added tax, deed tax and other house payments for her daughter, and jointly, this house can also be used by "buying and selling" transfer methods to avoid it again. Big "gift tax" on homes. If this is the case, why did Ah Bian get eight million yuan?Another suspicious question mark.

Such a process is reasonable to doubt. A-bian said to himself: "The new city government prides itself on being clean, efficient, and convenient for the people, and he will set an example."Then, A-Bian must confess the source of his property and the process of handling it, otherwise he will fail the first hurdle of "integrity". What is also questionable is that when A-Bian's only son was given a house on Minsheng East Road in 1995, when he bought it in the name of his mother-in-law Wu Wangxia, Wu Shuzhen once pointed out in an interview with the media that because her mother lived in the north, the existing The house is not enough to live in, and it happens that the house next door is going to be sold. They have already bought it and plan to open up two rooms to increase the indoor area.

It can be seen that as early as March 1995, when A-Bian "bought" this house in the name of his mother-in-law, this house was not actually owned by his mother-in-law, but was already A-Bian's home. Who paid for this house?That's the point of the question.Two years later, the ownership of this house was "gifted" to A-Bian's only son for observation. The mystery is not only known by God, Earth, and A-Bian's family. Regarding the source of the Nanya Science and Technology stock of Ah Bian’s only son, Ah Bian said that Wu Shuzhen bought 100,000 shares as a gift at 31.25 yuan per share. According to the tax law, gifts of more than 800,000 yuan are not subject to gift tax. Later, Nanya Technology increased its capital, and Chen Zhizhong subscribed for 45,000 shares at 22 yuan per share. The problem is that in 1997, when Wu Shuzhen bought it, the trading price of Nanya Technology's stock was as low as 31 yuan per share and as high as 63 yuan per share; while in 1996, the market price was even higher, at about 60 yuan per share. Between ten yuan and eight thousand yuan.So, why is Wu Shuzhen so accurate that she can buy at the lowest bargaining price? Moreover, people inside Nanya Technology testified in an interview with the media that because Wu Shuzhen and the director of Nanya Technology were classmates, they bought it at 20 yuan per share. Who the hell is lying?If it was bought at 20 yuan, it would involve serious insider trading, because A Bian's family is not an employee of Nanya Technology, so it is impossible to buy the employee price of 20 yuan per share. In addition, should Wu Shuzhen buy the 100,000 shares of Nanya Technology first, or directly under the name of "Chen Zhizhong"?This affects the way gift taxes are levied.If it was first bought under Wu Shuzhen's name and then gifted to Chen Zhizhong, then A-Bian's argument is in line with the law.However, if it is purchased directly under the name of Chen Zhizhong, the tax must be levied on the actual purchase price of 3.12 million yuan. This kind of thing is not that A-Bian has said that everyone has to believe him, but he has to produce the sales receipts of Nanya Technology at that time to prove his statement.Otherwise, it is still difficult to escape the suspicion of serious gift tax evasion. But even if it was bought under the name of Wu Shuzhen first, then she bought it with 3.125 million yuan, but "gifted" her only son with more than 800,000 yuan. The problem of underpayment of transaction tax. At the same time, Chen Zhizhong bought 45,000 shares of stock for 22 yuan, at a cost of 990,000 yuan. Chen Zhizhong's deposit before buying stocks, which appeared in the Bulletin of the Supervisory Yuan, was 520,000 yuan, and the remaining 400,000 yuan. Where did the seventy thousand yuan come from? According to the officials of the city government, the 470,000 yuan was Chen Zhizhong’s income from interest, rewards and pocket money. The problem is that in just half a year at most, Chen Zhizhong’s income can exceed what most adults earn after working hard for a year. The result is too unnatural, right? And who gave the 470,000 yuan as a gift?If it was Wu Shuzhen, the money that Wu Shuzhen donated to Chen Zhizhong in 1997 would have exceeded one million yuan, and he should have reported the gift tax.Ah Bian can't say it was a gift from his father-in-law and mother again, can he? Interestingly, according to what A-Bian’s team said, in 1997, A-Bian’s father-in-law and mother each donated one million yuan to A-Bian’s daughter, Chen Xingyu; Two houses will be donated in a "joint" way, obviously for the tax exemption of one million yuan each. However, according to the tax law, the annual gift allowance for each person is only one million yuan. How could Ah Bian's father-in-law and mother enjoy the two million yuan tax allowance each?Apparently, A-Bian was lying, and the lies he told couldn't be fulfilled by himself, and they even tied each other! On July 17, 1998, after the author reported the lies of A-Bian's team to the Supervisory Yuan, Lin Jinchang, the director of the city government's news department, changed his words in an interview with the media and said that the last time the information provided by the secretary was wrong, so he said Wrong, it was not Chen Shui-bian's father-in-law and mother who donated money to Chen Xingyu, but Chen Shui-bian's mother, aunt, uncle and aunt each donated one million yuan to Chen Xingyu for two consecutive years. Ah Bian actually asked the poor mother for two million dollars. If you believe him, Ah Bian is not filial; if you don't believe him, Ah Bian is lying. In general, Ah Bian's property has increased abnormally in the five years since he served as mayor for four years and the year after he left office, reaching at least hundreds of millions of yuan.No one knows how big the iceberg is under the iceberg, but only by constantly monitoring the rulers can power prevent the rulers from being corrupted!Lin Jinchang's statement is inconsistent.Does the rich A-Bian still have the heart to "extort" so much money from his father-in-law, mother-in-law, mother, aunt, uncle, aunt and brother-in-law? (See "Lianhe Evening News" on July 17, 1998) A Bian's property, Li Qingyuan, questioned again Reporter Song Ziqiang/Report from Taipei Li Qingyuan, the new party's "National Representative" who insisted on the property issue of Taipei Mayor Chen Shui-bian, said in the morning that Chen Shui-bian's property increased abnormally by more than 45 million yuan last year, among which Chen Shui-bian sold his daughter Chen Xingyu's house on Hangzhou South Road. It is claimed that Chen Xingyu's source of income for buying a house came from gifts totaling 800,000 yuan in 1996 and 1997 from Chen Shuibian's father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law.Li Qingyuan questioned that when Chen Shuibian's father-in-law and mother-in-law donated the house on Minsheng East Road to Chen Zhizhong, Chen Shuibian's only son, in 1997, they had already used the gift tax exemption quota of one million yuan a year. How could they enjoy another one million yuan in the same year? He will ask the Overwatch Council to investigate whether this part is illegal. Reporter Qiu Shuyi/Report from Taipei Lin Jinchang, director of the Information Department of the Taipei City Government, said that in 1997 Chen Zhizhong was given the house by his grandfather and grandmother, that is, Wu Shuzhen's parents; Aunt, don't repeat it at all, and every tax has a tax-free gift certificate, so there is no problem Li Qingyuan said. Lin Jinchang emphasized that when the house needs to be transferred, the relevant house purchase procedures must comply with the regulations before it can be handled.He said that the last statement was wrong because the information provided by the secretary was wrong.