Chapter 7 Chapter 06: The Climate Wars: A Big Lie
Is the Copenhagen climate conference a fairytale?
The increase in temperature leads to an increase in carbon dioxide, and the cause and effect have been reversed.
A group of fourth-rate scientists is deceiving the whole world.
I'm here to talk to you about a shocking conspiracy.You've all seen the movie 2012, it's scary, right?You see, the earth has encountered such a catastrophe, we need to rely on China to build a few Noah's Arks, and then save the whole world, but such a thing will never happen.The movie itself is a fiction. Sometimes I wonder if a movie can be fictional. Is it possible that greenhouse gas emissions and the Copenhagen Conference are also fictional?
Although I often mock myself to entertain readers, I still have to say that I am a scholar with a very good foundation in mathematics, otherwise it would be impossible to get a PhD in finance from the world's top Wharton Business School in two and a half years. There is no need to be too modest, otherwise it is hypocrisy.I think the most important academic attitude I learned at Wharton is scientific skepticism.What is scientific skepticism?Let me take greenhouse gas emissions as an example.
Because of Andersen, Copenhagen, the capital of Denmark, is also known as the capital of fairy tales. From December 7 to 18, 2009, heads of state or government of more than 85 countries and environment ministers of 192 countries attended the World Climate Conference held here.Coincidentally, just before the start of the Copenhagen conference, the American disaster movie "2012" was released globally.The doomsday scenario depicted in the movie is chilling, and more and more people believe that human beings' unrestrained demands on the environment will bring serious and disastrous consequences to the earth.Therefore, the Copenhagen Conference is regarded by many people as the "Noah's Ark" of human self-salvation.As a Hollywood commercial entertainment film, "2012" is a fictional product of the imagination. Then, is the global warming theory supporting the Copenhagen Conference just a fairy tale?
I believe that I should be the first person in China to question greenhouse gas emissions, very simply, I don't believe it at all.Why not?Because, first, all the arguments come from a university in the UK that I have never heard of, called the University of East Anglia.I am a professor myself. I am so familiar with universities all over the world. My professor friends are all over the world. None of us have heard of this university.This university has done so many researches on climate. They say that human beings drive cars, fill up gasoline, sing karaoke together, even hold a concert, and take an airplane, which will produce carbon dioxide and change the climate. So from today onwards, don’t You can't drive, you can't sing, you can't go to nightclubs, you can't even fly, or the climate will get warmer.Is it really that scary?A group of fourth- and fifth-rate scholars at the University of East Anglia made this conclusion, and the whole world believed it, but why didn't I believe it?Because I was thinking, the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.03%, which is such a small proportion.And we drive a car, fill up gasoline, take a plane, go to a nightclub, whatever, the carbon dioxide released is such a small proportion of carbon dioxide, which can change the climate, we human beings really It's so great, we really can conquer nature. Volcanic eruptions produce far more carbon dioxide than factories, cars, plants, and humans combined. An even bigger source of carbon dioxide is dead plants, such as fallen leaves in autumn, but also animals, bacteria, and the ocean.Let's take animals and bacteria as an example, they produce 150 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year.And we humans only produced a tiny 6.5 billion tons, which is simply disproportionate.What do you think, do you kill all the germs?Do you exterminate all animals?They are the real culprits of carbon dioxide production.What's more, the carbon dioxide emitted by human beings driving cars, filling up gasoline, singing karaoke together, or even holding a concert and flying an airplane is even more pitiful, about 300 to 500 million tons.The fourth- and fifth-rate scientists at the University of East Anglia say that three to five billion tons of carbon dioxide can change the climate. It's so ridiculous, I don't believe it at all.Readers who read my book today will surely be shocked. Therefore, I firmly believe that the whole issue of climate warming may be a huge hoax. I keep promoting my views. In fact, many people ask me, Professor Lang, why don’t you express these views internationally?I said I simply didn't have the time, and I had no interest in publishing internationally.However, after our conclusions are announced, they will definitely attract the attention of the whole world.Because after analyzing all the data, our research team came to the conclusion that everything you have always believed in turned out to be a huge hoax, it's that simple. On January 3, 2010, Beijing, which had just kicked off the new year, ushered in the heaviest snowfall in 59 years.Primary and secondary schools in Beijing were closed for one day.After the heavy snowfall, the lowest temperature in the Beijing area monitored by the Beijing Southern Suburb Observatory dropped to minus 16.7 degrees Celsius, the lowest value in nearly 40 years.At this moment, the entire northern hemisphere is suffering from strong cold currents and record heavy snowfall. From Northeast Asia to Russia, from Western Europe to the North American continent, there are varying degrees of heavy snowfall and large cooling.There are indications that the winter from 2009 to 2010 will be the coldest in nearly 30 years.The extreme cold is starting to make people wonder, is the world really warming?How did the so-called global warming claim come about?
Former US Vice President Al Gore once made an exciting film called "The Unwilling Truth". Have you seen the most amazing picture in it?A polar bear, standing on a piece of ice that is about to melt, looking helplessly at the far east, seems to be accusing the world that we Chinese have emitted too much carbon dioxide, which has caused climate warming, and it is almost drowning.Therefore, the U.S. government has listed polar bears as endangered animals.I want to tell readers, I’m really sorry, I still don’t believe it, so we started to search for evidence, and found out that Governor Palin of Alaska, the former vice presidential candidate of the Republican Party, recently wrote an article, this article wrote Very interesting.She is suing the federal government for listing polar bears as endangered because, she says, the number of polar bears in Alaska has more than doubled recently. The film Gore took is obviously not in line with the facts, so how did he come to such an astonishing conclusion?In fact, his argument is based on important and authoritative - including Arctic paleoclimatologist Professor Clark - "ice core experiment".What is an ice core?Scientists take an iron pipe and drill the pipe down to a depth of several hundred meters on the bottom of the Antarctic, and then dig up the soil. The soil inside the iron pipe is the soil of these millions of years.Then, scientists extracted all the carbon dioxide and air temperature in the soil of different ages and measured them. There are a total of 240,000 years of data, and the following picture is made.According to this picture, Gore came to his conclusion. Since the history of human beings with real temperature records is very short, it is difficult to reflect the long history of Earth's climate by relying on such records.Therefore, scholars who study the history of the earth's climate will put forward academic opinions through literature analysis, plant growth rings, and stratigraphic remains.For example, Chinese scholars have pointed out through research on "Historical Records" and other documents that the northern boundary of subtropical plants was pushed further north than it is now, so the climate in the Han Dynasty in China should be warmer than it is now.Since the Antarctic ice sheet is a recorder of the Earth's evolution history and contains information on paleoclimate and paleoenvironment, the study of Antarctic ice cores has become the most authoritative way of global climate research.The question is, after the real ice core data is extracted and charted, will it definitely get a real interpretation?
Figure 6-1 Distribution curves of temperature and CO2 from 240,000 years to the present
So please pay attention.The upper left line in Figure 6-1 represents air temperature, while carbon dioxide (CO2) is the lower line.You suddenly discovered that Gore was right, because when you have not received strict statistical training, when you look at this graph, your first reaction is that the trend of these two lines is the same.You can see that when carbon dioxide rises, the temperature also rises, and when carbon dioxide drops, the temperature also drops.Therefore, for more than 200,000 years, what really drives the temperature is carbon dioxide.Gore cheated the Nobel Peace Prize with this picture and his film.Makes sense, doesn't it?But let's use Gore's data to refute Gore.I pointed out the problem in very simple words.In order to help readers understand, we specially drew a column in the middle of Figure 6-1. Readers, please note that the temperature on the left side of the column reached its highest point at this moment, and then began to drop.On the right side of the column, after 800 years, carbon dioxide (CO2) reached its highest point and then began to decline.In other words, temperature is the driving force, not carbon dioxide.It turns out that the temperature rises first, which drives the carbon dioxide to rise, and the carbon dioxide does not start to decline until 800 years after the temperature drops, that is to say, the temperature reaches the peak first, and the carbon dioxide reaches the peak after 800 years.So it is the temperature that drives the rise in carbon dioxide, not the carbon dioxide that drives the rise in temperature.
Since carbon dioxide is soluble, the Earth's oceans are the largest absorbers of carbon dioxide.Half of the carbon dioxide produced by human activities is absorbed by the ocean, so the ocean is called the earth's carbon dioxide storage.According to the principle of physics, the lower the temperature, the higher the solubility of carbon dioxide in water, and the higher the temperature, the lower the solubility of carbon dioxide in water.So when sea water warms, carbon dioxide escapes from the water into the air.This is like beer, cola when the temperature rises, the gas will run out of it.So, apart from the ocean theory, what else can prove that the earth today is not under the serious threat of warming?
What does this sentence mean?In fact, the largest source of carbon dioxide is the ocean.I quoted a professor named Carl from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He said: "After carbon dioxide leaves the atmosphere, it will enter the ocean; it can also leave the ocean and enter the atmosphere." He said that if the ocean is heated, Carbon dioxide will come out, and if you cool the ocean, carbon dioxide will go into the sea.And it takes 800 years for the process from warming the weather to warming the ocean, why?Because the ocean is a very large pot of water, and it would take you 800 years to heat up such a large pot of water.Therefore, when the climate warms, the gradual heating will cause the ocean to become hotter after 800 years. After the ocean becomes warmer, a large amount of carbon dioxide will be released. This is not the conclusion drawn by Gore at all, and it is just the opposite.So it's not carbon dioxide that drives temperature at all, it's temperature that drives carbon dioxide, and the source of all that is the ocean. Let me show readers another very interesting picture.Figure 6-2 is a map of temperature for the entire 1000 years from 1000 AD to today.The 400 years from the 15th century to the 18th century, and even to the 19th century, was called the Little Ice Age because the climate was very cold at that time.By the middle of the 17th century, the lowest point was reached, and that was when it was coldest.When Europe entered the Little Ice Age, how cold was it?We can find from the many books left by the old priest of Thames and the paintings at that time that the winter in the Little Ice Age was very difficult, and the Thames River actually froze. People could skate on the Thames River and even sell goods.The Thames is now ice-free. Therefore, the rise in world temperature today began at this time.From the lowest point, it has been rising until now.But if we compare today's temperature with that of the Middle Ages, you find that the temperature in the Middle Ages was much, much higher than we are now.From the 11th century until the 14th century, the temperature reached its peak.During this period of about three or four hundred years, the temperature was very high. The high temperature climate in the Middle Ages caused great changes in people's lifestyles.In Europe, it was a golden age for church real estate developers.Do you know when people start building churches?It was when the country was so rich and there was nothing else to do that people built temples and churches.If the life is very difficult, with snow and ice every day, people are not in the mood at all, and when it is not easy to find a full meal, they are not in the mood to worship God or build churches.Therefore churches are usually built in times of affluence.
Figure 6-2 Temperature changes from 1000 AD to the present
Originally, the north of England did not produce grapes at all because it was too cold.But as described by an English poet Chaucer at that time, in the warm period at that time, the vineyards in the north of England were also very prosperous.It was a good and rich time, because the whole world was warm.
After looking at Figure 6-2, I suddenly thought of a very interesting thing, that is how the polar bear's life is going.Our data shows that polar bears existed at that time. When the climate warms, what are these polar bear buddies doing?The polar bears were having a good time there.Whether the Arctic ice and snow have melted, frankly speaking, we don't know.However, if the current low temperature can cause the Arctic ice and snow to melt, the high temperature at that time may melt the Arctic ice and snow, but I have no data. Regardless, the polar bear survived.We found that in many places, polar bears do not live on ice. Take the northern part of Canada as an example, polar bears often go to small towns to rummage through garbage to eat. It finds that living with people is quite good.And people are also very interesting. When you see a polar bear coming, you shoot. You don’t hit the polar bear, you just shoot. Polar bears are afraid of the sound. When you shoot, the polar bear shakes its big butt and raises its head high. , ran away, and then it came back next week.Tomorrow, you can clean up your garbage and put it outside. The polar bears will leave after eating. Humans and polar bears get along very well.Therefore, if the Arctic ice and snow really melt, according to the rules of the old polar bear, it should run to Alaska, Canada, or Siberia to live with humans. This is the situation in the Middle Ages.This explains why Alaska Governor Palin said that the number of polar bears has doubled recently because the climate has no effect on it.Polar bears have adapted to the natural phenomenon of temperature fluctuations for thousands of years.
In fact, I have raised my doubts about climate warming in Guangdong Satellite TV's "Financial Langyan" program. I never dreamed that my doubts were actually right. On November 17, 2009, Russian hackers invaded the archives of the Climate Research Center of the University of East Anglia. According to them, they found thousands of emails and more than 3,000 files related to climate change, all of which were stolen and downloaded. and post it on the website. Ten days later, on November 27, the University of East Anglia officially issued a statement saying that they confirmed that the school's server had been hacked, and admitted that their database had been stolen, and thousands of emails and more than 3,000 documents related to climate change had been stolen. load.From these widely circulated files on the Internet, people found that under the topic of climate warming, all the e-mails exchanged revealed some very shocking phenomena.That is, scientists have tampered with these raw data and destroyed those data that are not conducive to climate warming, because scientists themselves have doubts about whether the climate is warming.The existing data used to prove climate warming were almost completely revised by scholars at the University of East Anglia.
During the Copenhagen conference, the organizers specially made an ice sculpture of a polar bear in the city center. According to the plan, this ice sculpture will slowly melt during the Copenhagen climate conference. The organizers hope to remind the public to pay attention to climate change.During the session, however, the polar bear ice sculpture didn't really take center stage.On the contrary, on the eve of the meeting, after the email exchanges between several top scientists were exposed, a "climate-gate" incident that may become the "biggest scandal in modern science" became a hot topic on the opening day of the Copenhagen meeting.So, what is "Climategate" all about?
From these stolen materials, we found that the IPCC (IPCC, also known as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment Report published by the University of East Anglia in 2007, they consciously did not use the 1976 to 2005 Atmospheric temperature measurements from 1961 to 1990 were used as the baseline for the 30-year climate trend.what is the reason?Because of the data during this period, it can be more perfectly proved that the climate is warming.That is to say they are manipulating the data. Professor Jones, director of CRU at the University of East Anglia, in an email to several other climatologists, talked about how to use a trick to conceal the fact that the temperature is falling.In fact, the temperature has dropped in recent years. Readers should feel that the spring of 2010 was very cold. Looking at the weather in the north in 2010, when did you feel the temperature rise?On the contrary, I feel that the temperature has dropped even more, it is more like the Arctic, and it has entered an ice age.Jones also advised his colleagues to delete emails related to the Fourth Assessment Report.In another leaked email, Jones admitted privately, "...the temperature has been pretty steady for the past 10 years, and the fact is that we simply can't say we're missing warming data, there's no other way we can..." Another email from an American climatologist mentioned that scientists simply cannot explain that climate warming has slowed down in recent years, that is, the climate has been stable in recent years.Another core expert from the University of East Anglia said in his e-mail that he would contact Blake, the chemical reporter of the British BBC radio station, and ask him, "...why is another media reporter allowed to publish vague climate warming Skepticism..." Another email showed scientists at the University of East Anglia insulting skeptics, threatening to punch them in the teeth.Readers, take a look, this is the academic level of the University of East Anglia, which fully fulfilled my doubts about this fourth- and fifth-rate university at the time.Dear readers, if your children want to study in the UK in the future, I suggest you go to Oxford, Cambridge, or Manchester, but never to the University of East Anglia. This is the level of their professors. , It is this group of scumbags who concocted shocking lies about climate warming. On December 19, 2009, after 13 days of marathon difficult negotiations, the United Nations Climate Change Conference concluded after reaching the non-legally binding "Copenhagen Agreement".During the two weeks of thrilling climate diplomacy, China has won high praise from most countries for its serious and responsible attitude and resolute actions to safeguard the interests of developing countries and the right track of the conference. However, just after the end of the climate conference, some Western countries have thrown out the saying that "China hijacks Copenhagen".In this regard, Lang Xianping believes that the so-called global warming caused by human carbon dioxide emissions is itself a lie, and that the Copenhagen conference also buried ulterior secrets behind the defense of the human homeland of the earth. So, what is the real cause of global climate change? ?Who is trying to hijack Copenhagen?
Do readers want to know the real cause of climate warming?After so many months of investigation, I would like to tell readers what is the main driving factor.First of all, I will show you the following picture, which is the global temperature map for the last 120 years.From Figure 6-3, it can be clearly seen that the temperature began to rise from 1880, began to decline steadily by 1940, dropped to 1975, and then rose again.Do you know what these Western countries said at the Copenhagen Conference in Denmark?They said that it is because your power plants emit too much carbon dioxide, drive too much, and fly too much, so the carbon dioxide is produced, so the temperature rises.Let me ask these Western politicians again, do you think cars were used more before World War II, or after World War II?That is, when did our industrialization really advance by leaps and bounds?Was it in 1880?Or after 1940?Modern industrialization took off basically after World War II.Then let me ask you, why did the temperature drop from 1940 to 1975 after the Second World War?And instead of dropping for one or two years, it has dropped for 35 consecutive years?
Figure 6-3 Global temperature map in the last 120 years
After 1975, the temperature began to rise, but the increase in temperature at this time was far less than the increase in temperature between the 11th and 14th centuries.
So the question is – why are temperatures rising?According to my data, it is normal for the temperature to rise and fall, and there is really no need to make a fuss.Have readers ever seen a movie called "Ten Thousand Years Before History"?Readers are invited to take a look at Figure 6-4. This is the temperature data for the past 10,000 years. It is normal for the temperature to go up and down.Compared with the current temperature on the far right of Figure 6-4, when the earth was hottest, it was several degrees Celsius hotter than it is now, and when the earth was coldest, it was much colder than it is now.The temperature has been fluctuating greatly in this way.Let me ask readers, did you own cars or airplanes 10,000 years ago?You don't have any at all, but why is the temperature at this time much higher than it is now?
Therefore, during such a long cycle of the entire earth, it is very normal for the temperature to fluctuate.And according to the current data reports, the temperature has been very stable in the past ten years, and I even worry that the temperature will drop a bit and become colder.So what exactly are the drivers?Please think about it, what factors caused this drive?In fact, let's not talk about too complicated theories. You can imagine what factors drive the temperature.Let me ask readers, why is it warmer during the day?There is sun.Why is it colder at night?no sun.It's that simple, you can figure it out with your ass, do you still need climate scientists to tell us?At noon in summer, why don't you go out and play?Because it's too hot, why is it too hot?Is it because you drive a lot?Or is it because we humans have too many power plants?Do you watch too much TV?Is it because of these man-made reasons, or because of the sun?Of course, it's because of the sun!You see, even us 8-year-old girls know it, but scientists at the University of East Anglia don't.Based on this, in fact, I have already told you the answer, that is - it is the sun that really drives the temperature.
Figure 6-4 Changes in temperature over the past 10,000 years
In 1893, the British astronomer Edward?Mr. Mond found that during the Little Ice Age, the sun had no sunspots.What are sunspots?When you look at the sun, there will be many black spots on it, called sunspots.If there are more sunspots, it means that the solar activity is more intense and the sun is hotter.If there are fewer sunspots, or if there are no sunspots, it means that the solar activity is weakened, so the earth's climate is colder.Therefore, sunspots are the standard used in European history to measure whether the weather is warm or cold.When there are more sunspots, the sun is active, so the weather is hot; when there are fewer sunspots, the sun is not active, so the weather is colder. It's as simple as that. This is called the "sunspot theory".
For the climate research report used in the Copenhagen meeting, some Chinese scientists also put forward their own different views.Zhao Zongci, a researcher at the National Climate Center of the China Meteorological Administration, analyzed that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, overemphasized human factors in its four assessment reports. In fact, research on climate needs to consider many natural factors.Zhao Zongci believes that human factors will only increase China's average temperature by 0.5 degrees Celsius, but natural factors will cause China's average temperature to drop by 0.8 degrees Celsius between 2020 and 2030, which means that China's climate will become colder and colder.More scientists believe that the factors affecting the earth's climate are more complex, and it is too early to say that the earth is getting warmer or colder.So, what kind of natural factors constitute the main cause of the earth's climate change, and why is it so difficult to predict whether the climate will be warm or cold?
In 1991, scientists from the Danish Meteorological Society recorded sunspots in the 20th century.They found this conclusion.Remember the graph of global temperatures over 120 years?Looking at this picture alone, at this stage before 1940, the solar activity increased rapidly, and the number of sunspots increased significantly. By 1940, the number of sunspots began to decrease, so the temperature dropped. After the 1970s, the number of sunspots increased again, and the sun began to Active, so the temperature rises.Therefore, according to a 1991 paper by scientists from the Danish Meteorological Society, the real factor driving temperature changes is entirely sunspots. It should be said that from the signing of the "Kyoto Protocol" to the convening of the Copenhagen Conference, human beings consciously took coping with climate change and preventing possible extreme climate disasters as a common global strategy, which is a major progress in the development of human history.It will be an inevitable trend for human beings to live in the future to take relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, pay attention to environmental protection, save energy, change production methods and lifestyles, and seek the harmonious development of human beings and nature.So, is climate warming a central issue in such a process?
But I think what I explained may not be very clear, so I want to show readers two other pictures.In the first graph, the line with relatively large fluctuations is the temperature in the Arctic Circle from 1880 to the present, while the line with relatively small fluctuations is carbon dioxide emissions (Figure 6-5).In the second picture, we copied the same temperature in the Arctic Circle to Figure 6-6, and the other line is the activity of sunspots.Readers can see from the comparison of these two figures that, as shown in Figure 6-6, sunspots explain climate change more than carbon dioxide.So during this period, has there been an increase in carbon dioxide?Of course there is.But what about the increase?Such a small increase has no effect.Because CO2 is an effect, not a cause.What is an effect rather than a cause?It is because more carbon dioxide is released from the sea after the temperature rises. Then, in order to further strengthen my point of view, I have turned the 120-year global temperature map into a 400-year map. Look at it, the two lines of temperature and sunspots in the past 400 years, the changes in sunspots can be fully explained Changes in temperature, see Figure 6-7.
Figure 6-5 Changes in CO2 and temperature from 1880 to 2000
Figure 6-6 Changes in CO2 and sunspot activities from 1880 to 2000
Figure 6-7 Temperature and sunspot activity from 1550 to 2000
Whether carbon dioxide causes global warming has been a matter of debate throughout the scientific community.Whether at home or abroad, there are many people who are skeptical about global warming.For example, Ge Jianxiong, a well-known Chinese scholar and professor of the Historical Geography Research Center of Fudan University, said on various occasions a few years ago that it is too early to draw conclusions about global warming. We cannot be carefree about the earth's climate problem, but we don't have to worry too much .
It is not surprising that there are controversies in scientific research. What is strange is that before the Copenhagen conference, all kinds of voices of doubt seem to have evaporated, and only the voices of some scientists advocating climate warming were conveyed. Why? ?
Look at the meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, several Pacific island countries came to the venue and cried. In fact, I suspect that they took money to cry, just like many of our beggars ask for money. Organizations are manipulating.Those people said, you see, after the warming of our earth, the glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic have melted, and the sea level has risen, so our country is about to disappear.It doesn't matter if it disappears, it doesn't matter if it is such a small country.They also advertise that their government has to work from desks under the sea due to rising sea levels due to climate change.In fact, the islands where these small island countries are located are small islands for sightseeing.For example, the Maldives, etc., their land is less than one meter from the sea level, let alone the warming of the climate, just a big wave can wipe out the Maldives.And how many people are there?Only two hundred thousand people.Well, they came on set and put on a really funny show, and then got everyone sympathetic. Actually, why did these meteorologists concoct such a ridiculous story?The real reason is research funding. The Wall Street Journal reported after the fake emails of the University of East Anglia were disclosed on November 17, 2009, that these meteorologists used some false data to create a false image of climate warming, causing us to panic, and then Cheat more research funding from the government or other institutions.Politicians in the governments of various countries are usually scientifically illiterate, otherwise they would not be officials. I am not talking about China, I am talking about Europe and the United States, so they are easy to be fooled.In fact, global warming is not that serious, and to a large extent, it is artificially exaggerated and distorted.Der Spiegel in Germany is a very authoritative weekly magazine. They said that the data just released by Hadley Climate Change Research Center, the top climate research institution in the UK, shows that the global temperature has remained stable and has not risen in the past ten years.In fact, I also said something that I thought was very sarcastic. I thought it was very funny. The Germans were cursing people. They finally concluded, "Let rumors like melting icebergs and flooding Hamburg in Germany go to hell." Well, in addition to defrauding funds, they have created a terrifying atmosphere in European and American countries.They say that if you doubt the long and dry story of global warming, you suddenly look like a Holocaust denier.For example, Germany massacred Jews in World War II, or the Nanjing Massacre created by Japanese fascists, if you deny it, then you are committing a heinous crime.So today, European and American countries have created such a terrifying atmosphere.If you doubt global warming, it is equivalent to denying the facts of the Nanjing Massacre and the fact that Nazi Germany exterminated six million Jews, so you dare not deny global warming.Let's take a look at Professor Wilson from Harvard University, because the research done by these first-class scholars is the most rigorous, not the research done by professors from the University of East Anglia.Wilson said he also felt helpless, claiming to have had too many setbacks.For example, the IPCC, that is, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has always only used its research results that are beneficial to climate warming, while ignoring all unfavorable research results. This is what the United Nations does.Obama's current scientific adviser, John Holdren, also directly dismissed Wilson's scientific research results, and indiscriminately adopted other people's research with obvious flaws, such as the research of the University of East Anglia.The scientific research of these world-class universities is basically thrown into the trash, but the research of the fourth- and fifth-tier universities is adopted. This is unscientific and unreasonable in itself. Now there is a frightening fact that millions of jobs, especially in Europe and America, are dependent on global warming industries.If the world is warming, you don't use oil, you don't use thermal power, what do you use?Use solar power to generate electricity, use wind power to generate electricity, and this kind of solar power generation and wind power generation will feed millions of people, tens of millions of people in the future, and even this ridiculous industry will feed the entire country.Europe is the best in this respect. You said that apart from using climate warming as a fool, what competitiveness does Europe have?Yes or no?However, a world-class scholar made a very interesting remark. He said, yes, Europe wants to use solar power and wind power to generate electricity, but we have never seen solar panels that can provide steel industry with Electricity, and I have never seen solar panels that can provide electricity to railways.It is possible for a solar panel to provide electricity for a TV, but do you think it is possible to develop it to provide electricity for trains and steel industry?I think this sentence has already explained the problem very well, that is, it is impossible. So, I thought of a topic, what do you want to do?What is the real purpose of your European and American countries concocting this climate threat theory? Whether global warming is not just a climate issue, but also a big issue involving politics and economy.In fact, under the blow of the severe financial crisis, Obama, who just took office, put new energy technology in the most important position in his economic revitalization plan.而欧洲许多国家，在几年之前就已经明确提出了“减少碳排放、减缓地球变暖”的口号，并制定“碳排放”指标，谋求其政治和经济的领先优势。提出“保卫地球”，使得欧美国家占据了人类道德的制高点，那么，在“低碳”与“新能源”等口号掩盖下，这些国家又在进行着怎样的经济运作呢？
而且让我感到异常奇怪的，就是美国的华尔街特别地激动，他们激动什么呢？你华尔街跟气候有什么关系？于是我只能想到，这肯定有一个巨大的商机。因为你晓不晓得欧美各国最近搞出个碳交易市场。举例而言，生产1吨的钢，就会释放出1.8吨的二氧化碳；生产1吨的水泥，就会释放出1吨的二氧化碳；生产一件衣服，就会制造出5公斤的二氧化碳，你任何活动都会制造出碳。而我们制造出二氧化碳，那就是不道德，就是混蛋，所以我们就要赎罪，那么怎么赎罪呢？你就要到美国或者欧洲的碳交易中心，把你排放的碳折算成现金给他们来赎罪。下一个问题就是，那么又是谁在控制这些交易的交易所呢？猜一猜，当然是华尔街嘛，这不和股票交易是一个样子吗？我要做股票交易，透过华尔街的中介机构，每交易一笔，给他们1‰的手续费，或者1%的手续费，原来这些哥们儿靠这个方法赚钱。因此，欧美国家打着气候变暖的旗号，其实真正的目的就是来骗钱的。 此外，最低效而且高价的能源是由谁发展的？比如说风力发电、太阳能发电？基本是由欧洲做主导，现在美国也想做主导了，因为太有利可图了。原来是由于他们发展出来的这些低效高价的新能源的费用是火力发电的三倍，因此难有市场。而且以法国为首的核能发电，我看也是卖不出去吧，而且核能发电多危险，万一爆炸了怎么办？那么专门造核电厂的法国未来该怎么办呢？于是乎干脆大家勾结在一起，炮制一个二氧化碳跟气候的关联，让这些可怜的发展中国家，包括非洲、东南亚，当然还有我们中国以后都不要再用传统方式发电了，以后不要再制造二氧化碳了。而且感觉上他们就是想说，就是你们13亿中国人释放出了太多二氧化碳，每个人呼吸一次，还得了啊，而且你们放的屁，也会制造二氧化碳，因此地球气候变暖主要就是你们中国这个人口大国干的事，而最后却让我们美国人、欧洲人享受到了气候变暖的恐怖。所以以后中国人放屁，就要去交钱，打个嗝儿呢，也要交钱，开个车呢，也要交钱。这就是欧美人所炮制的一个可笑的游戏。 那么中国威胁论一下就成了欧美各国关注的重点，虽然我从来不认为中国会对世界构成威胁，但是中国威胁论对他们来讲，一直是一个心头大患。中国持续发展对他们是极其不利的。中国的持续发展，使用了大量的铁矿石制造钢材，中国的制造工业，包括钢铁业、化工业，都要用大量的电，这些东西加在一起造就了中国国力增强的同时，又都会产生大量的二氧化碳。如何打压像中国这一类的国家呢？那就是以后不能再用火力发电来炼钢了，以后你们中国人坐火车也不能够坐那种什么什么火车或者飞机了，那玩意儿制造出太多二氧化碳，所以你们都不要发展了，最好像以前一样，干脆骑单车算了。你们如果不听话的话，那下次你们中国国航的飞机飞到欧洲来，我们就要征收碳排放钱，因为飞机会排出二氧化碳，因此要收费。还有，你们中国出口到我们欧美的衣服都要收钱，因为制造一件衣服排放5公斤碳，我们就收5公斤碳的钱。中国以后对欧美的出口，全部要收碳关税。那么你还想出口吗？想出口的话，就不能不增加成本，对不对？那最好不要缴纳碳关税，对不对？好，那你只好减排碳，这个减排碳的设备向谁买呢？向欧美买。你们有没有觉得郎教授把话都讲清楚了，这一切就是我讲的惊天大阴谋。欧美各国炮制了一个可笑的二氧化碳导致气候变暖的假像。而这个可笑的学说，是哈佛大学、麻省理工这种顶级名校不屑于干的，因为大家都有学术的尊严，于是只有找那种四五流的学者，我听都没听过的什么东英吉利大学的学者，只有他们才会像俄罗斯黑客揭露的那样敢于违规造假，造假的最后结果，就是炮制出一个可怕的现实，那就是你不能够否认地球在变暖，否则，你就罪大恶极，然后让以我们中国为首的发展中国家的经济发展陷于停顿。最后，你想发展吗？就要发展低效高价的风力发电、太阳能发电。那么向谁买设备呢？向欧美买。然后，你想出口是吗？可以，减排碳才能出口，否则征收你碳关税，怎么减排碳，向他们购买设备，因此大量美元就开始回流欧美，促进欧美未来的经济发展。 最后一句话，很恐怖的一句话，就是这个“异教徒”的故事，一个荷兰科学家和两个美国科学家因为怀疑气候变暖而被炒鱿鱼。欧美是以宗教为主的国家，他们自认为是正统的基督教，你只要敢反对气候变暖，你就被打成异教徒。在欧美各国，你如果是异教徒的话，你就要被处死，甚至被钉在十字架上烧死。现在他们用同样的思维，把反对气候变暖的人全部打为异教徒，这就是为什么很多人抱怨荷兰科学家跟美国科学家因为怀疑气候变暖而丢掉了工作。因为这些仗义执言的所谓异教徒坏了欧美的惊天大阴谋，那还得了啊，肯定要整治你的。 控制由人类活动造成的温室气体排放量是世界经济发展的重大挑战之一。在工业革命之前，二氧化碳在大气中的浓度仅为280PPMV（指同温同压下其体积所占空气体积的比例为百万分之一），目前的二氧化碳浓度为430PPMV。根据国际能源机构的预测，能源消粍量的增长将造成二氧化碳排放量在2030年前以每年1.6%的速度递增。 从长期来看，气温的上升是不可避免的。在干旱和半干旱地区（中东、北非、非洲中部、南非、中国西北以及中亚），气温上升和降水减少将严重影响河流、植被和土壤，并加快干旱和荒漠化过程。农业和水资源的影响将在短期内就有所体现。在温带地区（如西欧、美国东部）和热带地区，气温和降水将同时提高，并由此造成洪涝灾害频率上升，热浪也将加剧。热带地区还将遭遇更多的飓风威胁。 The melting of polar glaciers is a clear reflection of climate warming.According to a report released in 2004, the polar climate will rise twice as fast as other regions in the coming decades.Since 1978, the area of the Earth's ocean ice has been shrinking at a rate of 8% per decade.Some people also believe that it is not ruled out that the polar ice cap may disappear completely in the second half of the 21st century.北极以及其他冰川地区（尤其是格陵兰岛）的气候变暖将带来极为严重的后果，如生物种类的显著改变、海平面上升以及大西洋地区气候的巨大变化。The desalination of seawater in the North Atlantic due to melting glaciers will slow down the exchange of cold and warm currents and reduce the impact of the Gulf Stream.According to recent studies, the impact of the Gulf Stream has decreased by 30 percent since the mid-20th century. 如果说气候变暖将从长期影响环境的话，那么工业化、农业过度开发、城市化和人口增长则会在中短期产生作用。环境恶化对发展中国家的负面影响将更为严重。总之，穷人将是环境恶化的最大受害者，无论是在城市还是在乡村。 本文摘选自［法］妮科尔·涅索托（Nicole Gensolto）、［意］吉奥瓦尼·格雷维（Giovanni Grevi）的《2025年世界将发生什么……》
I believe that I should be the first person in China to question greenhouse gas emissions, very simply, I don't believe it at all.Why not?Because, first, all the arguments come from a university in the UK that I have never heard of, called the University of East Anglia.I am a professor myself. I am so familiar with universities all over the world. My professor friends are all over the world. None of us have heard of this university.This university has done so many researches on climate. They say that human beings drive cars, fill up gasoline, sing karaoke together, even hold a concert, and take an airplane, which will produce carbon dioxide and change the climate. So from today onwards, don’t You can't drive, you can't sing, you can't go to nightclubs, you can't even fly, or the climate will get warmer.Is it really that scary?A group of fourth- and fifth-rate scholars at the University of East Anglia made this conclusion, and the whole world believed it, but why didn't I believe it?Because I was thinking, the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is only 0.03%, which is such a small proportion.And we drive a car, fill up gasoline, take a plane, go to a nightclub, whatever, the carbon dioxide released is such a small proportion of carbon dioxide, which can change the climate, we human beings really It's so great, we really can conquer nature. Volcanic eruptions produce far more carbon dioxide than factories, cars, plants, and humans combined. An even bigger source of carbon dioxide is dead plants, such as fallen leaves in autumn, but also animals, bacteria, and the ocean.Let's take animals and bacteria as an example, they produce 150 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year.And we humans only produced a tiny 6.5 billion tons, which is simply disproportionate.What do you think, do you kill all the germs?Do you exterminate all animals?They are the real culprits of carbon dioxide production.What's more, the carbon dioxide emitted by human beings driving cars, filling up gasoline, singing karaoke together, or even holding a concert and flying an airplane is even more pitiful, about 300 to 500 million tons.The fourth- and fifth-rate scientists at the University of East Anglia say that three to five billion tons of carbon dioxide can change the climate. It's so ridiculous, I don't believe it at all.Readers who read my book today will surely be shocked. Therefore, I firmly believe that the whole issue of climate warming may be a huge hoax. I keep promoting my views. In fact, many people ask me, Professor Lang, why don’t you express these views internationally?I said I simply didn't have the time, and I had no interest in publishing internationally.However, after our conclusions are announced, they will definitely attract the attention of the whole world.Because after analyzing all the data, our research team came to the conclusion that everything you have always believed in turned out to be a huge hoax, it's that simple. On January 3, 2010, Beijing, which had just kicked off the new year, ushered in the heaviest snowfall in 59 years.Primary and secondary schools in Beijing were closed for one day.After the heavy snowfall, the lowest temperature in the Beijing area monitored by the Beijing Southern Suburb Observatory dropped to minus 16.7 degrees Celsius, the lowest value in nearly 40 years.At this moment, the entire northern hemisphere is suffering from strong cold currents and record heavy snowfall. From Northeast Asia to Russia, from Western Europe to the North American continent, there are varying degrees of heavy snowfall and large cooling.There are indications that the winter from 2009 to 2010 will be the coldest in nearly 30 years.The extreme cold is starting to make people wonder, is the world really warming?How did the so-called global warming claim come about?
Former US Vice President Al Gore once made an exciting film called "The Unwilling Truth". Have you seen the most amazing picture in it?A polar bear, standing on a piece of ice that is about to melt, looking helplessly at the far east, seems to be accusing the world that we Chinese have emitted too much carbon dioxide, which has caused climate warming, and it is almost drowning.Therefore, the U.S. government has listed polar bears as endangered animals.I want to tell readers, I’m really sorry, I still don’t believe it, so we started to search for evidence, and found out that Governor Palin of Alaska, the former vice presidential candidate of the Republican Party, recently wrote an article, this article wrote Very interesting.She is suing the federal government for listing polar bears as endangered because, she says, the number of polar bears in Alaska has more than doubled recently. The film Gore took is obviously not in line with the facts, so how did he come to such an astonishing conclusion?In fact, his argument is based on important and authoritative - including Arctic paleoclimatologist Professor Clark - "ice core experiment".What is an ice core?Scientists take an iron pipe and drill the pipe down to a depth of several hundred meters on the bottom of the Antarctic, and then dig up the soil. The soil inside the iron pipe is the soil of these millions of years.Then, scientists extracted all the carbon dioxide and air temperature in the soil of different ages and measured them. There are a total of 240,000 years of data, and the following picture is made.According to this picture, Gore came to his conclusion. Since the history of human beings with real temperature records is very short, it is difficult to reflect the long history of Earth's climate by relying on such records.Therefore, scholars who study the history of the earth's climate will put forward academic opinions through literature analysis, plant growth rings, and stratigraphic remains.For example, Chinese scholars have pointed out through research on "Historical Records" and other documents that the northern boundary of subtropical plants was pushed further north than it is now, so the climate in the Han Dynasty in China should be warmer than it is now.Since the Antarctic ice sheet is a recorder of the Earth's evolution history and contains information on paleoclimate and paleoenvironment, the study of Antarctic ice cores has become the most authoritative way of global climate research.The question is, after the real ice core data is extracted and charted, will it definitely get a real interpretation?
Figure 6-1 Distribution curves of temperature and CO2 from 240,000 years to the present
What does this sentence mean?In fact, the largest source of carbon dioxide is the ocean.I quoted a professor named Carl from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He said: "After carbon dioxide leaves the atmosphere, it will enter the ocean; it can also leave the ocean and enter the atmosphere." He said that if the ocean is heated, Carbon dioxide will come out, and if you cool the ocean, carbon dioxide will go into the sea.And it takes 800 years for the process from warming the weather to warming the ocean, why?Because the ocean is a very large pot of water, and it would take you 800 years to heat up such a large pot of water.Therefore, when the climate warms, the gradual heating will cause the ocean to become hotter after 800 years. After the ocean becomes warmer, a large amount of carbon dioxide will be released. This is not the conclusion drawn by Gore at all, and it is just the opposite.So it's not carbon dioxide that drives temperature at all, it's temperature that drives carbon dioxide, and the source of all that is the ocean. Let me show readers another very interesting picture.Figure 6-2 is a map of temperature for the entire 1000 years from 1000 AD to today.The 400 years from the 15th century to the 18th century, and even to the 19th century, was called the Little Ice Age because the climate was very cold at that time.By the middle of the 17th century, the lowest point was reached, and that was when it was coldest.When Europe entered the Little Ice Age, how cold was it?We can find from the many books left by the old priest of Thames and the paintings at that time that the winter in the Little Ice Age was very difficult, and the Thames River actually froze. People could skate on the Thames River and even sell goods.The Thames is now ice-free. Therefore, the rise in world temperature today began at this time.From the lowest point, it has been rising until now.But if we compare today's temperature with that of the Middle Ages, you find that the temperature in the Middle Ages was much, much higher than we are now.From the 11th century until the 14th century, the temperature reached its peak.During this period of about three or four hundred years, the temperature was very high. The high temperature climate in the Middle Ages caused great changes in people's lifestyles.In Europe, it was a golden age for church real estate developers.Do you know when people start building churches?It was when the country was so rich and there was nothing else to do that people built temples and churches.If the life is very difficult, with snow and ice every day, people are not in the mood at all, and when it is not easy to find a full meal, they are not in the mood to worship God or build churches.Therefore churches are usually built in times of affluence.
Figure 6-2 Temperature changes from 1000 AD to the present
From these stolen materials, we found that the IPCC (IPCC, also known as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment Report published by the University of East Anglia in 2007, they consciously did not use the 1976 to 2005 Atmospheric temperature measurements from 1961 to 1990 were used as the baseline for the 30-year climate trend.what is the reason?Because of the data during this period, it can be more perfectly proved that the climate is warming.That is to say they are manipulating the data. Professor Jones, director of CRU at the University of East Anglia, in an email to several other climatologists, talked about how to use a trick to conceal the fact that the temperature is falling.In fact, the temperature has dropped in recent years. Readers should feel that the spring of 2010 was very cold. Looking at the weather in the north in 2010, when did you feel the temperature rise?On the contrary, I feel that the temperature has dropped even more, it is more like the Arctic, and it has entered an ice age.Jones also advised his colleagues to delete emails related to the Fourth Assessment Report.In another leaked email, Jones admitted privately, "...the temperature has been pretty steady for the past 10 years, and the fact is that we simply can't say we're missing warming data, there's no other way we can..." Another email from an American climatologist mentioned that scientists simply cannot explain that climate warming has slowed down in recent years, that is, the climate has been stable in recent years.Another core expert from the University of East Anglia said in his e-mail that he would contact Blake, the chemical reporter of the British BBC radio station, and ask him, "...why is another media reporter allowed to publish vague climate warming Skepticism..." Another email showed scientists at the University of East Anglia insulting skeptics, threatening to punch them in the teeth.Readers, take a look, this is the academic level of the University of East Anglia, which fully fulfilled my doubts about this fourth- and fifth-rate university at the time.Dear readers, if your children want to study in the UK in the future, I suggest you go to Oxford, Cambridge, or Manchester, but never to the University of East Anglia. This is the level of their professors. , It is this group of scumbags who concocted shocking lies about climate warming. On December 19, 2009, after 13 days of marathon difficult negotiations, the United Nations Climate Change Conference concluded after reaching the non-legally binding "Copenhagen Agreement".During the two weeks of thrilling climate diplomacy, China has won high praise from most countries for its serious and responsible attitude and resolute actions to safeguard the interests of developing countries and the right track of the conference. However, just after the end of the climate conference, some Western countries have thrown out the saying that "China hijacks Copenhagen".In this regard, Lang Xianping believes that the so-called global warming caused by human carbon dioxide emissions is itself a lie, and that the Copenhagen conference also buried ulterior secrets behind the defense of the human homeland of the earth. So, what is the real cause of global climate change? ?Who is trying to hijack Copenhagen?
Do readers want to know the real cause of climate warming?After so many months of investigation, I would like to tell readers what is the main driving factor.First of all, I will show you the following picture, which is the global temperature map for the last 120 years.From Figure 6-3, it can be clearly seen that the temperature began to rise from 1880, began to decline steadily by 1940, dropped to 1975, and then rose again.Do you know what these Western countries said at the Copenhagen Conference in Denmark?They said that it is because your power plants emit too much carbon dioxide, drive too much, and fly too much, so the carbon dioxide is produced, so the temperature rises.Let me ask these Western politicians again, do you think cars were used more before World War II, or after World War II?That is, when did our industrialization really advance by leaps and bounds?Was it in 1880?Or after 1940?Modern industrialization took off basically after World War II.Then let me ask you, why did the temperature drop from 1940 to 1975 after the Second World War?And instead of dropping for one or two years, it has dropped for 35 consecutive years?
Figure 6-3 Global temperature map in the last 120 years
Figure 6-4 Changes in temperature over the past 10,000 years
In 1991, scientists from the Danish Meteorological Society recorded sunspots in the 20th century.They found this conclusion.Remember the graph of global temperatures over 120 years?Looking at this picture alone, at this stage before 1940, the solar activity increased rapidly, and the number of sunspots increased significantly. By 1940, the number of sunspots began to decrease, so the temperature dropped. After the 1970s, the number of sunspots increased again, and the sun began to Active, so the temperature rises.Therefore, according to a 1991 paper by scientists from the Danish Meteorological Society, the real factor driving temperature changes is entirely sunspots. It should be said that from the signing of the "Kyoto Protocol" to the convening of the Copenhagen Conference, human beings consciously took coping with climate change and preventing possible extreme climate disasters as a common global strategy, which is a major progress in the development of human history.It will be an inevitable trend for human beings to live in the future to take relevant measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, pay attention to environmental protection, save energy, change production methods and lifestyles, and seek the harmonious development of human beings and nature.So, is climate warming a central issue in such a process?
But I think what I explained may not be very clear, so I want to show readers two other pictures.In the first graph, the line with relatively large fluctuations is the temperature in the Arctic Circle from 1880 to the present, while the line with relatively small fluctuations is carbon dioxide emissions (Figure 6-5).In the second picture, we copied the same temperature in the Arctic Circle to Figure 6-6, and the other line is the activity of sunspots.Readers can see from the comparison of these two figures that, as shown in Figure 6-6, sunspots explain climate change more than carbon dioxide.So during this period, has there been an increase in carbon dioxide?Of course there is.But what about the increase?Such a small increase has no effect.Because CO2 is an effect, not a cause.What is an effect rather than a cause?It is because more carbon dioxide is released from the sea after the temperature rises. Then, in order to further strengthen my point of view, I have turned the 120-year global temperature map into a 400-year map. Look at it, the two lines of temperature and sunspots in the past 400 years, the changes in sunspots can be fully explained Changes in temperature, see Figure 6-7.
Figure 6-5 Changes in CO2 and temperature from 1880 to 2000
Figure 6-6 Changes in CO2 and sunspot activities from 1880 to 2000
Figure 6-7 Temperature and sunspot activity from 1550 to 2000
Look at the meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, several Pacific island countries came to the venue and cried. In fact, I suspect that they took money to cry, just like many of our beggars ask for money. Organizations are manipulating.Those people said, you see, after the warming of our earth, the glaciers in the Arctic and Antarctic have melted, and the sea level has risen, so our country is about to disappear.It doesn't matter if it disappears, it doesn't matter if it is such a small country.They also advertise that their government has to work from desks under the sea due to rising sea levels due to climate change.In fact, the islands where these small island countries are located are small islands for sightseeing.For example, the Maldives, etc., their land is less than one meter from the sea level, let alone the warming of the climate, just a big wave can wipe out the Maldives.And how many people are there?Only two hundred thousand people.Well, they came on set and put on a really funny show, and then got everyone sympathetic. Actually, why did these meteorologists concoct such a ridiculous story?The real reason is research funding. The Wall Street Journal reported after the fake emails of the University of East Anglia were disclosed on November 17, 2009, that these meteorologists used some false data to create a false image of climate warming, causing us to panic, and then Cheat more research funding from the government or other institutions.Politicians in the governments of various countries are usually scientifically illiterate, otherwise they would not be officials. I am not talking about China, I am talking about Europe and the United States, so they are easy to be fooled.In fact, global warming is not that serious, and to a large extent, it is artificially exaggerated and distorted.Der Spiegel in Germany is a very authoritative weekly magazine. They said that the data just released by Hadley Climate Change Research Center, the top climate research institution in the UK, shows that the global temperature has remained stable and has not risen in the past ten years.In fact, I also said something that I thought was very sarcastic. I thought it was very funny. The Germans were cursing people. They finally concluded, "Let rumors like melting icebergs and flooding Hamburg in Germany go to hell." Well, in addition to defrauding funds, they have created a terrifying atmosphere in European and American countries.They say that if you doubt the long and dry story of global warming, you suddenly look like a Holocaust denier.For example, Germany massacred Jews in World War II, or the Nanjing Massacre created by Japanese fascists, if you deny it, then you are committing a heinous crime.So today, European and American countries have created such a terrifying atmosphere.If you doubt global warming, it is equivalent to denying the facts of the Nanjing Massacre and the fact that Nazi Germany exterminated six million Jews, so you dare not deny global warming.Let's take a look at Professor Wilson from Harvard University, because the research done by these first-class scholars is the most rigorous, not the research done by professors from the University of East Anglia.Wilson said he also felt helpless, claiming to have had too many setbacks.For example, the IPCC, that is, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has always only used its research results that are beneficial to climate warming, while ignoring all unfavorable research results. This is what the United Nations does.Obama's current scientific adviser, John Holdren, also directly dismissed Wilson's scientific research results, and indiscriminately adopted other people's research with obvious flaws, such as the research of the University of East Anglia.The scientific research of these world-class universities is basically thrown into the trash, but the research of the fourth- and fifth-tier universities is adopted. This is unscientific and unreasonable in itself. Now there is a frightening fact that millions of jobs, especially in Europe and America, are dependent on global warming industries.If the world is warming, you don't use oil, you don't use thermal power, what do you use?Use solar power to generate electricity, use wind power to generate electricity, and this kind of solar power generation and wind power generation will feed millions of people, tens of millions of people in the future, and even this ridiculous industry will feed the entire country.Europe is the best in this respect. You said that apart from using climate warming as a fool, what competitiveness does Europe have?Yes or no?However, a world-class scholar made a very interesting remark. He said, yes, Europe wants to use solar power and wind power to generate electricity, but we have never seen solar panels that can provide steel industry with Electricity, and I have never seen solar panels that can provide electricity to railways.It is possible for a solar panel to provide electricity for a TV, but do you think it is possible to develop it to provide electricity for trains and steel industry?I think this sentence has already explained the problem very well, that is, it is impossible. So, I thought of a topic, what do you want to do?What is the real purpose of your European and American countries concocting this climate threat theory? Whether global warming is not just a climate issue, but also a big issue involving politics and economy.In fact, under the blow of the severe financial crisis, Obama, who just took office, put new energy technology in the most important position in his economic revitalization plan.而欧洲许多国家，在几年之前就已经明确提出了“减少碳排放、减缓地球变暖”的口号，并制定“碳排放”指标，谋求其政治和经济的领先优势。提出“保卫地球”，使得欧美国家占据了人类道德的制高点，那么，在“低碳”与“新能源”等口号掩盖下，这些国家又在进行着怎样的经济运作呢？
而且让我感到异常奇怪的，就是美国的华尔街特别地激动，他们激动什么呢？你华尔街跟气候有什么关系？于是我只能想到，这肯定有一个巨大的商机。因为你晓不晓得欧美各国最近搞出个碳交易市场。举例而言，生产1吨的钢，就会释放出1.8吨的二氧化碳；生产1吨的水泥，就会释放出1吨的二氧化碳；生产一件衣服，就会制造出5公斤的二氧化碳，你任何活动都会制造出碳。而我们制造出二氧化碳，那就是不道德，就是混蛋，所以我们就要赎罪，那么怎么赎罪呢？你就要到美国或者欧洲的碳交易中心，把你排放的碳折算成现金给他们来赎罪。下一个问题就是，那么又是谁在控制这些交易的交易所呢？猜一猜，当然是华尔街嘛，这不和股票交易是一个样子吗？我要做股票交易，透过华尔街的中介机构，每交易一笔，给他们1‰的手续费，或者1%的手续费，原来这些哥们儿靠这个方法赚钱。因此，欧美国家打着气候变暖的旗号，其实真正的目的就是来骗钱的。 此外，最低效而且高价的能源是由谁发展的？比如说风力发电、太阳能发电？基本是由欧洲做主导，现在美国也想做主导了，因为太有利可图了。原来是由于他们发展出来的这些低效高价的新能源的费用是火力发电的三倍，因此难有市场。而且以法国为首的核能发电，我看也是卖不出去吧，而且核能发电多危险，万一爆炸了怎么办？那么专门造核电厂的法国未来该怎么办呢？于是乎干脆大家勾结在一起，炮制一个二氧化碳跟气候的关联，让这些可怜的发展中国家，包括非洲、东南亚，当然还有我们中国以后都不要再用传统方式发电了，以后不要再制造二氧化碳了。而且感觉上他们就是想说，就是你们13亿中国人释放出了太多二氧化碳，每个人呼吸一次，还得了啊，而且你们放的屁，也会制造二氧化碳，因此地球气候变暖主要就是你们中国这个人口大国干的事，而最后却让我们美国人、欧洲人享受到了气候变暖的恐怖。所以以后中国人放屁，就要去交钱，打个嗝儿呢，也要交钱，开个车呢，也要交钱。这就是欧美人所炮制的一个可笑的游戏。 那么中国威胁论一下就成了欧美各国关注的重点，虽然我从来不认为中国会对世界构成威胁，但是中国威胁论对他们来讲，一直是一个心头大患。中国持续发展对他们是极其不利的。中国的持续发展，使用了大量的铁矿石制造钢材，中国的制造工业，包括钢铁业、化工业，都要用大量的电，这些东西加在一起造就了中国国力增强的同时，又都会产生大量的二氧化碳。如何打压像中国这一类的国家呢？那就是以后不能再用火力发电来炼钢了，以后你们中国人坐火车也不能够坐那种什么什么火车或者飞机了，那玩意儿制造出太多二氧化碳，所以你们都不要发展了，最好像以前一样，干脆骑单车算了。你们如果不听话的话，那下次你们中国国航的飞机飞到欧洲来，我们就要征收碳排放钱，因为飞机会排出二氧化碳，因此要收费。还有，你们中国出口到我们欧美的衣服都要收钱，因为制造一件衣服排放5公斤碳，我们就收5公斤碳的钱。中国以后对欧美的出口，全部要收碳关税。那么你还想出口吗？想出口的话，就不能不增加成本，对不对？那最好不要缴纳碳关税，对不对？好，那你只好减排碳，这个减排碳的设备向谁买呢？向欧美买。你们有没有觉得郎教授把话都讲清楚了，这一切就是我讲的惊天大阴谋。欧美各国炮制了一个可笑的二氧化碳导致气候变暖的假像。而这个可笑的学说，是哈佛大学、麻省理工这种顶级名校不屑于干的，因为大家都有学术的尊严，于是只有找那种四五流的学者，我听都没听过的什么东英吉利大学的学者，只有他们才会像俄罗斯黑客揭露的那样敢于违规造假，造假的最后结果，就是炮制出一个可怕的现实，那就是你不能够否认地球在变暖，否则，你就罪大恶极，然后让以我们中国为首的发展中国家的经济发展陷于停顿。最后，你想发展吗？就要发展低效高价的风力发电、太阳能发电。那么向谁买设备呢？向欧美买。然后，你想出口是吗？可以，减排碳才能出口，否则征收你碳关税，怎么减排碳，向他们购买设备，因此大量美元就开始回流欧美，促进欧美未来的经济发展。 最后一句话，很恐怖的一句话，就是这个“异教徒”的故事，一个荷兰科学家和两个美国科学家因为怀疑气候变暖而被炒鱿鱼。欧美是以宗教为主的国家，他们自认为是正统的基督教，你只要敢反对气候变暖，你就被打成异教徒。在欧美各国，你如果是异教徒的话，你就要被处死，甚至被钉在十字架上烧死。现在他们用同样的思维，把反对气候变暖的人全部打为异教徒，这就是为什么很多人抱怨荷兰科学家跟美国科学家因为怀疑气候变暖而丢掉了工作。因为这些仗义执言的所谓异教徒坏了欧美的惊天大阴谋，那还得了啊，肯定要整治你的。 控制由人类活动造成的温室气体排放量是世界经济发展的重大挑战之一。在工业革命之前，二氧化碳在大气中的浓度仅为280PPMV（指同温同压下其体积所占空气体积的比例为百万分之一），目前的二氧化碳浓度为430PPMV。根据国际能源机构的预测，能源消粍量的增长将造成二氧化碳排放量在2030年前以每年1.6%的速度递增。 从长期来看，气温的上升是不可避免的。在干旱和半干旱地区（中东、北非、非洲中部、南非、中国西北以及中亚），气温上升和降水减少将严重影响河流、植被和土壤，并加快干旱和荒漠化过程。农业和水资源的影响将在短期内就有所体现。在温带地区（如西欧、美国东部）和热带地区，气温和降水将同时提高，并由此造成洪涝灾害频率上升，热浪也将加剧。热带地区还将遭遇更多的飓风威胁。 The melting of polar glaciers is a clear reflection of climate warming.According to a report released in 2004, the polar climate will rise twice as fast as other regions in the coming decades.Since 1978, the area of the Earth's ocean ice has been shrinking at a rate of 8% per decade.Some people also believe that it is not ruled out that the polar ice cap may disappear completely in the second half of the 21st century.北极以及其他冰川地区（尤其是格陵兰岛）的气候变暖将带来极为严重的后果，如生物种类的显著改变、海平面上升以及大西洋地区气候的巨大变化。The desalination of seawater in the North Atlantic due to melting glaciers will slow down the exchange of cold and warm currents and reduce the impact of the Gulf Stream.According to recent studies, the impact of the Gulf Stream has decreased by 30 percent since the mid-20th century. 如果说气候变暖将从长期影响环境的话，那么工业化、农业过度开发、城市化和人口增长则会在中短期产生作用。环境恶化对发展中国家的负面影响将更为严重。总之，穷人将是环境恶化的最大受害者，无论是在城市还是在乡村。 本文摘选自［法］妮科尔·涅索托（Nicole Gensolto）、［意］吉奥瓦尼·格雷维（Giovanni Grevi）的《2025年世界将发生什么……》