Chapter 39 difference between people

In ancient theology, on the topic of "faith" and "knowledge"—more precisely, the topic of instinct and rationality—there has been such thinking: When evaluating things, is instinct better than reason? play a greater role.Because reason evaluates and acts according to reason—that is, "why"—that is, purpose and utility, this is already an old moral topic, and the instigator was Plato himself; It splits.Although Socrates first joined the rational side with his excellent dialectician's aesthetics, all he did was to ridicule the incompetence of those superior Athenians-he regarded instinctive people as superior people, But never fully explained their actions, did they?At the same time, he secretly mocked himself, finding himself equally incompetent and confused in his more refined conscience and self-examination.But he was able to exhort himself, thus breaking free from the shackles of instinct!One must assist instinct and reason in their entitlement; following instinct, reason should be given sufficient reason to counsel instinct—such was the original deceit of the great and inscrutable mocker; Gain the satisfaction of self-deception.Essentially, in moral judgments he sees the irrational.In these things Plato is more innocent and less cunning than the commoners of ancient Rome, and he only wants to go all out—only a philosopher has so far expended such great energy—to prove himself.In essence, rationality and instinct lead to the same goal by different routes, and they both point to good and to "God".All the theologians and philosophers after Plato seem to be like this - in all moral things so far, instinct - or what the Christians call "faith", or what I call "herds" — all won.Perhaps one has to exclude Descartes, the father of irrationality (and, as such, the father of revolution) who recognized the authority of reason, but who was superficial—reason was nothing more than a tool .

The difference between people is not only reflected in their different cargo labels, but also in their pursuit of different cargo values, and the judgment of value is not the same as the recognition of recognized cargo grades.Things that are considered to be actually owned or possessed reflect more of this distinction.For example, women, for those who are temperate, domination of the body and sexual enjoyment is the sign of satisfactory possession and possession; but for those who desire possession with jealousy and greed, his standard is a "Question mark" - this is just the appearance of this kind of possession, he is more eager for in-depth experiments.Its purpose is to find out: whether a woman is not committed to him, but for him, willing to show what she has or seems to like to have-only in this way can it be regarded as "possessed".Even so, the suspicion and possessiveness of the third party have not yet reached the limit. He asked himself: If a woman really gave up everything for herself, is it just a woman's illusion of herself.For he wants first of all to be thoroughly understood in order to be fully loved; he is so sure of his own ideas that he experiences the lover with all his being in his own possessive way.If she stopped cheating on him, she would still love him for his irascibility and hidden dissatisfaction as much as he loved him for his gallantry, forbearance, and spirituality.The man wanted to take possession of a people.In his view, even the higher art of Cagliostro and Catilina was justified so long as it served this purpose.This man says to himself because of the nobler possessiveness: "Where there is intentional possession, one should not lie."—In imagining that he will put a mask on the national heart by himself, he is impatient, and finally caught Demon: "So before I let others know me, I must first know myself!" Among the good-hearted people, people are aware of that clumsy trick, and they are almost on guard against it. man of.For example, the person is "worthy" of help if necessary to carry out the ruse.And they will all be grateful for the help—they get what is needed by inventing it, as one who acquires a fortune—becomes consummated benefactors by asking for it.To meet them at charity, and to entertain them with hospitality, is bound to arouse envy.Parents have no qualms about shaping their children to be like themselves—this is their "education."In fact, no mother will believe that she has amassed a fortune from her children; no father will admit that he has forced his children to submit to his thoughts and judgments.In ancient times, of course, the father held the life and death power of the newborn baby (like the ancient Germans) and acted according to his own preferences.Like these fathers, we can still see the so-called masters, priests, princes, and anyone who is powerful, enjoying in any newly born people an indisputable opportunity for new types of possession.Why is this……